Harvard Scientists Say There May Be an Unknown, Technologically Advanced Civilization Hiding on Earth

By Victor Tangermann

Image: Getty / Futurism

What if — stick with us here — an unknown technological civilization is hiding right here on Earth, sheltering in bases deep underground and possibly even emerging with UFOs or disguised as everyday humans?

In a new paper that’s bound to raise eyebrows in the scientific community, a team of researchers from Harvard and Montana Technological University speculates that sightings of “Unidentified Anomalous Phemonemona” (UAP) —  bureaucracy-speak for UFOs, basically — “may reflect activities of intelligent beings concealed in stealth here on Earth (e.g., underground), and/or its near environs (e.g., the Moon), and/or even ‘walking among us’ (e.g., passing as humans).”

Yes, that’s a direct quote from the paper. Needless to say, the researchers admit, this idea of hidden “crypoterrestrials” is a highly exotic hypothesis that’s “likely to be regarded skeptically by most scientists.” Nonetheless, they argue, the theory “deserves genuine consideration in a spirit of epistemic humility and openness.”

The interest in unexplained sightings of UFOs by military personnel has grown considerably over the past decade or so. This attention grew to a peak last summer, when former Air Force intelligence officer and whistleblower David Grusch testified in front of Congress, claiming that the US had already recovered alien spacecraft as part of a decades-long UFO retrieval program.

Even NASA has opened its doors for researchers to explore mysterious, high-speed objects that have been spotted by military pilots over the years.

But several Pentagon reports later, we have yet to find any evidence of extraterrestrial life.

That hasn’t dissuaded these Harvard researchers, though. In the paper, they suggest a range of possibilities, each more outlandish than the next.

First is that a “remnant form” of an ancient, highly advanced human civilization is still hanging around, observing us. Second is that an intelligent species evolved independently of humans in the distant past, possibly from “intelligent dinosaurs,” and is now hiding their presence from us. Third is that these hidden occupants of Earth traveled here from another planet or time period. And fourth — please keep a straight face, everybody — is that these unknown inhabitants of Earth are “less technological than magical,” which the researchers liken to “earthbound angels.”

UFO sightings of “craft and other phenomena (e.g., ‘orbs’) appearing to enter/exit potential underground access points, like volcanoes,” they write, could be evidence that these cryptoterrestrials may not be drawn to these spots, but actually reside in underground or underwater bases.

The paper quotes former House Representative Mike Gallagher, who suggested last year that one explanation for the UFO sightings might be “an ancient civilization that’s just been hiding here, for all this time, and is suddenly showing itself right now,” following Grusch’s testimony.

The researchers didn’t stop there, even suggesting that these cryptoterrestrials may take on different, non-human primate or even reptile forms.

Beyond residing deep underground, they even speculate that this mysterious species could even be concealing themselves on the Moon or have mastered the art of blending in as human beings, a folk theory that has inspired countless works of science fiction.

Another explanation, as put forward by controversial Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb, suggests that other ancient civilizations may have lived on “planets like Mars or Earth” but a “billion years apart and hence were not aware of each other.”

Of course, these are all “far-fetched” hypotheses, as the scientists admit, and deserve to be regarded with plenty of skepticism.

“We entertain them here because some aspects of UAP are strange enough that they seem to call for unconventional explanations,” the paper reads.

“It may be exceedingly improbable, but hopefully this paper has shown it should nevertheless be kept on the table as we seek to understand the ongoing empirical mystery of UAP,” the researchers conclude.

More on UFOs: 

• New Law Would Force Government to Declassify Every UFO Document

Related videos

{ https://futurism.com/ }

27-11-2025 om 16:40 geschreven door peter  

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

27-11-2025 om 16:24 geschreven door peter  

The Kuiper Belt is a vast ring of icy bodies beyond Neptune, home to Pluto and countless smaller objects. Astronomers have long known that this belt is not uniform, and that it contains subtle clumps and gaps, like the rings of Saturn seen from far away. One of these clumps is called the “kernel,” a tight crowd of small, cold, almost circular orbits centered around 44 times Earth’s distance from the Sun (44 astronomical units, or AU).

In the new study, the astronomy team from Princeton report evidence for a second, similar crowd just inside that one, at about 43 AU, which they dub the “inner kernel.” The objects in this inner kernel move on nearly circular paths, with low tilts relative to the Solar System’s main plane. According to the researchers, these traits mark these curious bodies as members of the “cold classical” Kuiper Belt, a population thought to have stayed relatively undisturbed since the early days of the Solar System.

Across a catalog of 1,650 tracked Kuiper Belt Objects, the inner kernel appears as a real concentration of orbits: it spans about 42.4–43.6 AU in distance, and its members have especially low “free” eccentricities (a measure of how stretched their orbits are once after you strip away planetary gravity effects). The team estimates that objects in this inner kernel may make up around 7–10 percent of all so‑called classical Kuiper Belt objects, and roughly 14–21 percent of the coldest, most undisturbed ones.

So a big question now remains. Is the “kernel” and the “inner kernel” one large structure out there in the dark expanse of space, or are they separate?

The orbits of these objects are very stable. Their closest approaches to the Sun stay well above a theoretical “stability boundary” near 37 AU, and even in the most extreme case their paths don’t dip inside about 40 AU. That suggests they have not been violently scattered inward by Neptune, but instead survived more or less where they formed, or were gently moved there.

Compared with the outer kernel at 44 AU, the inner kernel looks “colder” in one key respect: its free eccentricities are smaller on average, meaning the orbits are more nearly circular when planetary influences are factored out. That difference could make the inner kernel a better example of how much shaking and shuffling the Kuiper Belt has experienced. If giant planets like Neptune migrated outward in jumps, as some models suggest, each jump could have left behind gravitational gaps in the belt’s structure. The presence of two closely spaced, cold clumps might be telling the story of how smooth or violent that process really was.

The main part of the Kuiper Belt begins at Neptune’s orbit

(Image: NASA).

There is also a strange piece of orbital context. The structure’s orbit has a particular resonance with Neptune. In simple terms, between the two clumps of Kuiper Belt objects, there is a special region where Neptune’s gravity keeps time with them in a steady rhythm called the 7:4 resonance. While Neptune goes around the Sun seven times, the objects in the belt goes around four times. In places like this, those repeated tugs can either sweep objects away or herd them together, a bit like a parent pushing a child on a swing in just the right rhythm, so the lack of objects between the two clumps might be caused by this resonance, although the researchers are not yet sure that this is really the reason.​​

This was an interesting find, according to the researchers, as it points to a possible cause of the “inner kernel” structure. 

Beyond the discovery of this new structure inside the belt, the study is notable because the researchers turned to tools more familiar from data science than from traditional astronomy.

First, they re‑described each orbit in a way that tries to peel away the steady, predictable nudges from the giant planets. The raw orbital elements of a Kuiper Belt object, its eccentricity (how elongated the orbit is) and inclination (how tilted it is), are a mix of a “forced” part set by the collective gravity of the planets and a “free” part that reflects the object’s own history. Using established mathematical techniques from celestial mechanics, the team calculated these free components for each of the 1,650 objects in a recent catalog of classical Kuiper Belt objects.

They then fed each object’s distance from the Sun, free eccentricity, and free inclination  into a clustering algorithm called DBSCAN (Density‑Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise). DBSCAN looks for dense swarms of points in a cloud of data, marking them as clusters, while treating isolated points as noise.

Because DBSCAN’s behavior depends on how you tune its settings, the team adopted a conservative strategy. They only trusted results from runs where the algorithm clearly picked out a “kernel‑like” feature matching the known 44 AU kernel, and then asked whether, under those same settings, another cluster appeared.

In every such case, the inner kernel popped out at about 43 AU. Changing the parameters slightly sometimes caused the algorithm to merge the inner and outer kernels into one broader cluster, underlining the ambiguity of whether these are two distinct structures or two peaks in a single large one.

“There are two alternative explanations that we cannot distinguish between: either the kernel is significantly larger than previously thought, or there is an additional distinct structure in the cold classical Kuiper belt,” the authors explained. “In either case, the inner kernel, as described here, is the additional component.”

For now, the authors are cautious. The inner kernel clearly shows up in the data as they have processed it, but it is not yet clear whether it is a truly separate structure or simply the inner edge of a larger, more complex kernel. It’s especially cold orbits, however, hint that it might carry a slightly different history, and that makes it valuable for testing models of how Neptune moved and how the outer Solar System settled into its current shape.

The real test will come with more data. The Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), due to begin full operations later this decade, is expected to discover and track thousands more Kuiper Belt objects. With that flood of new orbits, astronomers will be able to see whether the inner kernel sharpens into a well‑defined band or blurs into a broader structure.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/space/ }

27-11-2025 om 15:57 geschreven door peter  

The Speed of Light

Based on present-day physics, scientists know the speed of light is the greatest speed at which anything in our universe can travel. That astronomical rate is clocked at 186,000 miles per second. Due to the immense distances separating points in outer space, scientists have adopted the distance light travels in one year, 5.88 trillion miles, as a universal measurement scale.

Proxima Centauri is the star nearest to our own, even though that cosmic neighbor is 4.2 light-years away from Earth. Over four years of light-speed travel would be required to cross such a distance.

For shorter distances in space, scientists rely on astronomical units, which are equal to the distance between Earth and the Sun. Although humanity has yet to conquer light-speed travel, Voyager 1 still manages to zip along at the relatively quick 11 miles per second. This adds up to 3.5 AU each year as the craft continues its journey.

Communications Challenges

Somewhere in the middle of these two ends of the cosmic measuring scale is the less commonly used figure known as the “light day,” denoting the distance light travels in a single Earth day.

That distance has begun to add up and impact the effectiveness of communications with Voyager, which are maintained through NASA’s Deep Space Network. Mission engineers spent weeks last November dealing with just one episode of technical difficulties due to communications lag. At billions of miles from Earth, the commands and responses took 23 hours to travel in each direction from Voyager 1 to Earth.

During that event, silicon dioxide from a rubber diaphragm had accumulated in a fuel tank, cutting off a crucial fuel thruster tube. Thrust was drastically lowered, as the liquid hydrazine fuel was impeded from flowing freely. It took 40 small thrusts from the obstructed system to even push Voyager into proper alignment for effective communication with Earth.

In the end, the mission engineers elected to return to a set of thrusters that had themselves been turned off years earlier due to malfunctions, although of a less severe sort than those plaguing the system last year. At one point during the operation, power was so low that the mission team had to take the calculated risk of turning off Voyager 1’s heater in deep space to power the systems required to bring the old thrusters back online.

The Future of Voyager 1

Despite the challenges of communicating over such a massive distance, NASA plans to maintain contact with Voyager 1 as it crosses the monumental 16.1 billion-mile threshold to reach one full light-day from Earth.

The celebration may be bittersweet, though. Three radioisotope thermoelectric generators power the craft, which are expected to run out of energy in the next decade. Many of Voyager 1’s systems are no longer functional, as those generators are even now providing much less power than the craft utilized at launch. Over the years, many concessions have been made, reverting to backup thrusters, disabling instruments, and cutting power to keep the mission continuing long past its expected lifespan.

As such, the one light day milestone may be the last outstanding achievement for humanity’s farthest step into the cosmos.

• Ryan Whalen covers science and technology for The Debrief. He holds an MA in History and a Master of Library and Information Science with a certificate in Data Science. He can be contacted at ryan@thedebrief.org, and follow him on Twitter @mdntwvlf.

RELATED VIDEOS

https://thedebrief.org/category/space/ }

27-11-2025 om 15:39 geschreven door peter  

The Origins of Disclosure: Crashes, Archives, and Secrets with Leslie Kean

Overview

Investigative journalist Leslie Kean sat down with host Peter Skafish on the Sol Forum to trace the “disclosure era” that has emerged around unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Kean argues that today’s surge of official acknowledgment rests on a decades‑long, largely hidden effort by government officials, journalists, and researchers. She points to a series of high‑profile incidents, persistent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) pushes, and internal memos that together form a “paper trail” of acknowledgment, even as many details remain classified or deliberately omitted.

Historic Crashes and Legal Battles

One of the earliest keystones in Kean’s narrative is the 1979 Kecksburg incident in Pennsylvania, where witnesses reported a fireball and a metallic object that allegedly crashed in a wooded area. Witnesses described seeing a fiery streak in the sky followed by the discovery of a mysterious metallic object. Local residents and witnesses indicated that the object resembled a spacecraft or a piece of advanced technology. Kean notes that a lawsuit filed against NASA in the early 1980s sought access to the agency’s investigative files, claiming that the government had retrieved the craft and concealed evidence. Although the suit was ultimately dismissed due to legal technicalities, the case revealed “multiple eyewitnesses, an unidentified object, and missing files” that continue to be cited by researchers as proof of a genuine crash retrieval. Kean emphasizes that the Kecksburg case set a precedent for later legal and investigative actions aimed at uncovering hidden material. It demonstrated the importance of grassroots advocacy and legal persistence in challenging government opacity regarding aerial phenomena.

Further back in history, the Roswell incident of 1947 remains a touchstone in UAP lore. Although officially dismissed as a weather balloon, whistleblowers and researchers have long argued otherwise. Kean describes how declassified documents, when scrutinized, hinted at a cover-up involving the recovery of unusual debris and possibly alien bodies. These revelations prompted ongoing efforts to push for transparency and led to a cultural and political climate increasingly receptive to investigating extraordinary claims. Decades later, the Roswell incident became a symbol of government secrecy and the need for scrutiny of official narratives.

Government Archives and FOIA

Efforts Kean highlights several internal government initiatives that have gradually opened the archives, serving as milestones in the ongoing disclosure process. In 2022, John Podesta’s FOIA push resulted in the release of a handful of declassified documents, including the Bolender memo, which acknowledges that the Department of Defense was still receiving civilian UFO reports in the 1990s. These documents, although limited in scope, provide glimpses into a long history of official interest and concern regarding aerial anomalies. Additionally, the efforts by Congressional figures like Harry Reid—former Senate Majority Leader—have been instrumental. Reid’s advocacy for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) and its successor AASWAP led to the eventual public release of video footage showing unidentified objects performing maneuvers beyond known human technology, as well as a limited inventory of recovered materials. Kean points out that these releases often contain “quiet references to ‘classic’ UFO cases”—a term used internally to denote incidents predating the modern UAP terminology—suggesting that the government has long been aware of a broader phenomenon. The process of declassification, she explains, is often incremental and partial, reflecting the sensitive nature of certain knowledge and a cautious approach to public disclosure.

Deep Secrecy and Recent Revelations

The conversation also turned to the depth of secrecy surrounding UAP investigations. Kean cites the Wilson memo, a classified internal document that outlines a covert program tasked with “monitoring and analyzing anomalous aerial events” while restricting dissemination to a narrow circle of authorized personnel. She explains that her decision to publish former intelligence officer David Grusch’s allegations was not taken lightly; the story was cross‑checked against findings from an Office of the Inspector General (IG) investigation and corroborated by multiple independent sources. Kean stresses that the U.S. approach has been characterized by “systemic denial,” contrasting sharply with the openness displayed by other nations such as Canada, the United Kingdom, and, as previously mentioned, Chile. These countries have adopted more transparent policies and actively invite the public and scientific community to participate in investigations and data collection efforts. Kean suggests that the American government’s secrecy is rooted in a combination of national security concerns, fear of public panic, and a desire to maintain technological superiority.

The Wilson memo and other classified documents reveal that U.S. agencies have been aware of phenomena that challenge conventional understanding for decades. However, efforts to study or disclose this information have often been thwarted by bureaucratic inertia and classified compartmentalization. This systemic secrecy complicates efforts by outside researchers and journalists, who must piece together fragmented evidence from leaks, witness testimonies, and declassified unintentionally revealing documents. Kean underscores that new declassification initiatives could potentially accelerate the timeline toward full transparency, but political and institutional barriers remain formidable.

International Contrast and Outlook

Kean underscores that not all governments follow the United States’ pattern of secrecy. Chile, for example, operates an official UAP office within its civil aviation authority, regularly publishing reports and inviting public participation. This approach reflects a more transparent, collaborative attitude and demonstrates that openness can coexist with national security protocols. Kean views Chile’s model as a template for future U.S. policies—highlighting the importance of establishing institutional frameworks where scientific, governmental, and civilian entities work together openly. She also mentions emerging transparency efforts in countries like France and the United Kingdom, which have initiated more open dialogue and data-sharing strategies.

This international contrast underscores a fundamental question: why is the U.S. lagging behind in transparency? Kean suggests that internal cultural factors, political pressures, and differing perceptions of national security influence policy decisions. She advocates for a shift towards greater openness, emphasizing that public trust and scientific progress depend on honest, comprehensive disclosure of UAP encounters.

Looking ahead, Kean asserts that the current “disclosure era” is the product of “quiet, sustained work” over decades—an accumulated effort involving whistleblowers, investigative journalism, FOIA activism, and evolving governmental attitudes. As new technologies such as advanced sensors, radar, and AI-driven analysis become more widespread, the potential for breakthroughs increases. Kean remains cautiously optimistic that a future where UAPs are openly studied, and their origins understood, is possible. However, she stresses that this future hinges on continued pressure from journalists, legislators, and the public to move from modest releases to full accountability. The ongoing push for transparency may ultimately lead to paradigm shifts in science, defense, and our understanding of our place in the cosmos.

In conclusion, Leslie Kean’s insights illustrate that the path to UAP disclosure has been long, arduous, and intertwined with national security considerations, institutional reluctance, and societal interest. While recent years have seen remarkable strides—including declassified videos and congressional hearings—the full story remains elusive. Kean’s work advocates for persistence and transparency, arguing that openness about aerial anomalies is essential for scientific integrity, public trust, and future technological and cultural evolution. The history, current developments, and international perspectives she presents collectively emphasize that disclosure is not a single moment but a sustained journey—one that continues to unfold with every new revelation, research effort, and public demand for truth.

{ https://usubjects.com/  }

26-11-2025 om 23:30 geschreven door peter  

Today's biggest science news: Doomed comet explodes | Comet 3I/ATLAS course alteration | Dark matter detected?

Wednesday, Nov. 26, 2025: Your daily feed of the biggest discoveries and breakthroughs making headlines.

Here's the biggest science news you need to know. 

• The 'other' comet ATLAS C/2025 K1 has exploded and is disintegrating in real time.
• Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS may have a course-altering encounter with Jupiter before it leaves our solar system.
• A new study claims to provide the first direct evidence of dark matter.

RIP 'other ATLAS': Watch the doomed comet explode into pieces in incredible new images

By Harry Baker  

Stunning new photos show the pieces of the "other ATLAS," C/2025 K1, breaking apart in space after the golden comet suddenly exploded earlier this month.

A new animation shows the gradual disintegration of comet C/2025 K1 (ATLAS), which began to break apart on Nov. 13. 

(Image credit: Michael Jäger)

In space, death can be a beautiful thing. That's certainly the case for the recently deceased "other" comet ATLAS, which is slowly breaking apart after meeting its explosive end earlier this month, stunning new images reveal.

C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) is a comet originating from the Oort Cloud beyond Neptune that was discovered in May by astronomers at the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS). It reached its closest point to the sun, or perihelion, on Oct. 8, coming within 31 million miles (50 million kilometers) of our home star. But the comet largely went under the radar until earlier this month, when it developed a rare golden glow in its coma and tail.

It has become known as the "other ATLAS," thanks to its shared surname with the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS, which has been dominating headlines since it was first spotted shooting through the solar system in July. The two comets have no relation, other than being detected by the same telescope network around the same time.

On Nov. 13, astronomers noticed that C/2025 K1 had broken apart into several pieces. Austrian astrophotographer Michael Jäger has been keeping a close eye on C/2025 K1 since it began to fall apart, and he has now shared a stunning timelapse animation that shows the fragments of the comet slowly separating from one another.

"Following brightness surges in early November, we have been able to observe this comet splitting into three brighter fragments for the past two weeks," Jäger told Spaceweather.com. "The animation shows it on November 12, 14, 18, 19, and 20th."

The comet was not expected to survive its perihelion — astronomers predicted that the close proximity of its journey around the sun would place a huge amount of gravitational strain on the object. After its solar flyby, initial observations suggested that it had emerged unscathed. However, following a sudden brightening event, the comet then broke apart into three distinct pieces.

More recent photos have shown that a smaller fourth fragment also splintered from the comet, according to Spaceweather.com. However, this part of the comet is not visible in the new animation.

C/2025 K1 was one of just a handful of comets that have ever been seen with a golden hue (see below), which is likely the result of a surprising lack of carbon-bearing molecules, such as dicarbon, carbon monoxide and cyanide in its nucleus. In fact, only two other known comets have ever had fewer of these molecules, astronomer David Schleicher of Arizona's Lowell Observatory recently reported.

Researchers had hoped to learn more about the comet and its surprising composition during its closest approach to Earth on Tuesday (Nov. 25). However, this now seems unlikely.

But the comet's fragments will still be visible in the constellation Leo to anyone with a decent telescope or a pair of stargazing binoculars.

Other ATLAS(s)

C/2025 K1 is not the first comet to bear the name ATLAS. In fact, dozens of other comets have been found by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System — a NASA-funded robotic survey, which has been scanning the night sky using telescopes in Hawaii, South Africa and Chile since 2015.

Over the last few years, several ATLAS comets have made the news, including C/2024 G3, which appeared in spectacular snaps by astronauts onboard the International Space Station (ISS) earlier this year, as well as a doomed sungrazer comet, the Halloween ATLAS comet and Comet Tsuchinshan-ATLAS, which all shone brightly in 2024.

But the most famous of the ATLASs is 3I/ATLAS, an alien comet that is traveling past us after being ejected from its own star system, potentially long before the solar system was born.

3I/ATLAS is currently on its way back out of the solar system, having reached its own perihelion on Oct. 29, and will reach its closest point to Earth on Dec. 19, when it will reach a minimum distance of 168 million miles (270 million km) from our planet. And despite what some people claim, the astronomical community is very much in agreement that it is not an alien spacecraft.

Only time will tell what wonders the future ATLAS comets will have in store for us.

3I/ATlAS shrugged

We’re still tracking comet 3I/ATLAS after last week’s headline-grabbing NASA stream revealing the agency’s images of the potentially 7-billion-year-old interstellar visitor.

Astronomers are racing to learn everything they can about the comet as it approaches its closest point to Earth on Dec 19., with some even having devised a new way to measure the size of the comet’s nuclei.

And another preprint paper suggests that the comet’s trajectory could be altered by gravitational interactions with the gas giant Jupiter as it zips out of our solar system, with an ideal potential observation window for the Juno spacecraft sometime in March 2026.

Dark matter revealed?

Good morning science fans, did you miss us? We’re back with big news, or for now just a very big claim, that an astrophysicist working with NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope may have found the very first direct evidence for the existence of dark matter.

Dark matter is one of the universe's most mysterious components. It makes up 27% of our universe, with ordinary matter only accounting for 5%, but because it does not interact with light, it can't be detected directly.

But characteristic flashes spotted in this new study could be a smoking gun pointing to dark matter being made up of weakly interacting massive particles, or wimps, which are 500 times heavier than protons.

Much more work is needed to rule out other explanations, so astronomers are responding to the claims with characteristic caution. But if they can finally unveil the mass-ter of disguise, it will offer a major boost for our best theory of the universe.

{ https://www.livescience.com/space }

26-11-2025 om 22:25 geschreven door peter  

Do UFOs Come from Parallel Dimensions? Scientific Theories

1. Overview

The phenomenon of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) has long fascinated humanity, inspiring countless stories, theories, and debates about their origin. Traditionally, UFO sightings have been attributed to extraterrestrial visitors from distant planets, stimulated by movies, literature, and anecdotal reports. However, in recent years, a new and intriguing hypothesis has gained traction within scientific and academic circles: that some UFOs may not originate from other planets but instead from alternative dimensions or parallel universes.

This perspective shifts the focus from extraterrestrial civilizations traveling through space via advanced propulsion to the idea that UFOs could be interdimensional craft—vehicles capable of traversing different realities. Such a notion is rooted in modern physics, particularly in quantum mechanics, string theory, and multiverse hypotheses. These frameworks propose that our universe may be just one of many, existing across multiple dimensions, with different physical laws, constants, and properties.

Proponents of the interdimensional hypothesis argue that the unusual flight characteristics reported in many UFO sightings—such as instantaneous acceleration, abrupt directional changes, and apparent defiance of gravity—might be explained if these objects are shifting between or residing in alternate realms where the laws of physics differ from our observable universe. If true, this would revolutionize our understanding of reality, technology, and even consciousness, bridging the gap between science fiction and empirical science.

In this article, we will explore the scientific foundations for these ideas, analyze the evidence and challenges involved, and consider the broader implications of the hypothesis that UFOs originate from parallel or higher dimensions.

2. Theoretical Foundations

The hypothesis that UFOs may originate from alternate dimensions rests on some of the most advanced and speculative theories in contemporary physics. These theories aim to unify understanding of the universe's fundamental structure, often proposing the existence of realms beyond human perception, governed by different physical laws or constants.

a. Parallel Universes and Multiverse Concepts

One of the central constructs supporting the idea of interdimensional travel is the multiverse—the concept that our universe is just one among an enormous, possibly infinite, number of universes. This idea emerges from interpretations of quantum mechanics, cosmology, and string theory.

The multiverse notion can be categorized into several types:

• Level I (Infinite Space): Our universe, which, due to the universe's vastness, contains regions with different initial conditions, but governed by the same physical laws.
• Level II (Bubble Universes): Arising from cosmic inflation, different "bubble" universes could have varied physical constants and properties.
• Level III (Many-Worlds): Derived from the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics, suggesting every quantum event creates branches or parallel worlds.
• Level IV (Mathematical Multiverse): Theorized by physicist Max Tegmark, proposing that all mathematical structures exist physically as universes with different laws of mathematics.

Within multiverse frameworks, parallel universes are envisioned as realms physically adjacent or overlapped with our own, yet separated by dimensions or boundaries imperceptible to us. Diverging from traditional science-fiction notions, these concepts are rooted in highly mathematical models that remain untestable with current technology, but offer consistent explanations within physics.

b. Extra Dimensions and String Theory

String theory posits that fundamental particles are not point-like but instead are small, vibrating strings. For the mathematics to work and be free of inconsistencies, string theory requires more than the three spatial dimensions we experience daily—specifically, it demands up to 10 or 11 total dimensions.

These additional dimensions are thought to be "compactified" or curled up at scales near the Planck length (~10^-35 meters), rendering them invisible and inaccessible to current experiments. Nonetheless, some models propose that higher or "large" extra dimensions could influence gravitational forces, potentially allowing shortcuts or portals between our observable universe and others.

The idea is that interdimensional travel might be akin to navigating through these extra dimensions, which could be larger or have different physical properties than the small curled-up ones posited by string theory. If such portals exist, an advanced civilization or technology might harness them for faster-than-light or non-spatial travel—possibly explaining some of the inexplicably rapid movements observed in UFO sightings.

c. Quantum Mechanics and Superposition

Quantum mechanics introduces the concept of particles existing in multiple states simultaneously—a superposition—and the influence of the observer on the state of particles. Some theorists interpret these phenomena as hints toward a layered reality, where multiple states or worlds coexist and interact at a fundamental level.

In particular, the Many-Worlds Interpretation suggests that all possible outcomes of quantum events occur in branching universes. While controversial, it lends conceptual support to the idea that realities can intersect or overlap, perhaps allowing phenomena or entities from one realm to manifest into another temporarily.

This raises intriguing questions about whether objects or entities could "leap" between states or realities via quantum effects, and whether UFOs could be manifestations of such inter-reality physics. Although speculative, this idea fuels the notion that what we see as UFOs might be the result of interdimensional crossings governed by quantum laws.

d. Summary Table of Dimensions

3. Expert Commentary

The scientific community remains cautious in adopting the interdimensional hypothesis, primarily due to the lack of direct empirical evidence. Nonetheless, some physicists advocate for exploring these ideas, especially in the context of unexplained phenomena.

Some have theorized that we made contact with a form of intelligent life but they aren't from outer space, they are ultraterrestrials from other dimensions. 

AMR Image/Getty Images

a. Michio Kaku and Higher-Dimensional Physics

One of the most prominent voices supporting interdimensional travel is theoretical physicist Michio Kaku. Known for popularizing advanced concepts like string theory and multiverse cosmology, Kaku has publicly entertained the possibility that civilizations with sufficiently advanced technology could exploit higher dimensions for travel.

In a 2024 interview, Kaku stated: "If a civilization could master the mathematics of string theory, it might be able to slip into a neighboring brane and re-enter our space, appearing to us as a sudden flash or a craft that seems to ignore our laws of inertia." Here, "brane" refers to a multidimensional membrane within string theory where our universe resides. The idea is that if an object could access a neighboring brane—another dimension with different physical properties—it could traverse regions of space and time in ways impossible for our current technology.

He emphasizes that such interdimensional crossings would not necessarily require faster-than-light travel but would involve shifting into a higher or different dimension where the constraints of our physical constants, like the speed of light, may not apply. The craft would effectively "hop" between universes or dimensions, bypassing the physical limits that trap objects within our universe.

While speculative, Kaku’s assertions are grounded in the mathematics of string theory and higher-dimensional physics, providing a scientific veneer to an otherwise sci-fi concept. His arguments are bolstered by the fact that the equations describing particle behavior at the quantum level—such as quantum tunneling and entanglement—suggest that non-classical interactions across dimensions are at least theoretically conceivable.

b. Other Scientific Perspectives and Skepticism

While notable physicists entertain these ideas, the overall scientific consensus remains cautious. Many experts argue that current models lack empirical support, and with no tangible method to test or falsify the multiverse or interdimensional hypotheses, they remain speculative.

Critics point out that without experimental verification, these theories risk remaining philosophical musings rather than scientific facts. The challenge lies in developing technology capable of detecting or interacting with higher dimensions or parallel universes, a feat that may be centuries beyond current capabilities.

Nonetheless, some researchers advocate for indirect testing methods—such as high-energy physics experiments, gravitational wave detection, or observations of cosmic phenomena—that might hint at extra dimensions or multiverse effects. For example, anomalies in gravitational wave signals or deviations in fundamental constants could suggest phenomena beyond our current understanding, potentially linked to higher-dimensional physics.

4. Evaluating the Evidence

The hypothesis that some UFOs are interdimensional craft hinges on the interpretation of anomalous flight characteristics that defy known physics.

Artist's view of an aerial encounter with an unidentified flying object. 

(Image credit: MUFON)

a. UFO Sightings and Flight Characteristics

Numerous reports cite UFOs with extraordinary capabilities:

- Instantaneous acceleration: Objects appearing to jump from a standstill to high speeds in a fraction of a second.

- Sharp angular turns: Making sudden, impossible maneuvers without apparent inertia or aerodynamic effects.

- Silent hovering and sudden disappearance: Remaining stationary or vanishing abruptly, often without noise.

- Lack of detectable propulsion: No visible exhaust or electromagnetic signatures.

These observations challenge our understanding of physics, especially the constraints imposed by energy requirements, inertia, and aerodynamics. Such flight profiles could, in principle, be explained by transformations through higher dimensions, where the constraints of our physical laws do not apply, allowing craft to "transcend" our spatial-temporal framework.

b. Empirical Data and Limitations

Despite anecdotal accounts and some corroborated sightings, systematic scientific analysis reveals significant limitations:

- The 2023 UFO report by the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence documented 144 incidents featuring "unexplained flight dynamics," yet it refrained from offering conclusive explanations.

- Many reports are subject to observer bias, atmospheric illusions, or instrumentation errors. For example, atmospheric phenomena like ball lightning, mirages, or drone interference can mimic extraordinary motion.

- High-quality, multi-sensor data—combining radar, infrared, and visual recordings—are scarce, making it difficult to conclusively analyze these phenomena.

Tic-Tac-shaped objects were recently reported zipping through the sky by jet-fighter pilots and radar operators. The Pentagon's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) was created to research and investigate Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), including numerous videos of reported encounters, three of which were released to the public in 2017. 

(Image credit: U.S. Department of Defense/To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science)

c. Challenges in Confirming Interdimensional Origin

The primary challenge is scientific: without testable hypotheses or measurable interactions with these allegedly interdimensional crafts, the theory remains speculative. To establish credibility, researchers need:

- High-resolution data from multiple sensors.

- Observable interactions with the environment or instruments that cannot be explained by known physics.

- Reproducible experiments or controlled studies.

Until such data are available, the interdimensional hypothesis functions more as an intriguing framework than an empirically proven theory.

Reported UFOs take on all shapes and sizes.  

(Image credit: U.K. National Archives sightings chart, circa 1969)

5. Implications and Future Directions

The notion that UFOs could originate from parallel dimensions, if validated, would have profound implications across several scientific disciplines and societal domains.

a. Impact on Physics and Cosmology

Empirical evidence of interdimensional craft would directly support multiverse and higher-dimensional theories, transforming our understanding of reality. It would:

- Validate models of string theory and brane-world scenarios.

- Provide clues about the fabric of spacetime and the nature of all existence.

- Enable scientists to explore new physics, potentially leading to revolutionary technological advances.

Such discoveries could also offer insights into the origins of the universe, the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and the fundamental limits of physical laws.

Close encounters with our future selves?

 (Image credit: thortful.com)

b. Technological and Societal Impact

Harnessing interdimensional travel could revolutionize transportation and energy:

- Travel across vast distances in space or time, reducing or eliminating the need for conventional propulsion.

- The possibility of accessing alternate realities might spark radical shifts in technology, medicine, and understanding of consciousness.

Society’s perception of reality, humanity’s place in the cosmos, and religious or philosophical views could also be profoundly affected. The confirmation of interdimensional visitors would challenge notions of objectivity, perception, and the uniqueness of human existence.

c. Scientific and Research Directions

Current efforts focus on:

- Developing more sensitive instruments for detecting anomalies in gravitational, electromagnetic, and quantum signals.

- Conducting multi-disciplinary research combining physics, neuroscience, and data science to explore consciousness and perception in relation to unexplained phenomena.

- Launching dedicated exoplanet and cosmic surveys to identify potential signatures of higher-dimensional effects.

Funding agencies like the National Science Foundation and private organizations recognize the importance of exploring "exotic physics" and allocate modest grants for relevant projects, aiming to develop testable models or find indirect evidence.

d. Ethical and Philosophical Considerations

The possibility of encountering other dimensions or realities raises vital questions:

- How should research be conducted ethically, especially if interdimensional beings possess consciousness?

- What are the implications for human identity if others exist beyond our perception?

- How do we communicate or interact cautiously with phenomena that may be beyond our understanding?

The scientific pursuit of interdimensional hypotheses demands rigorous standards, transparency, and interdisciplinary collaboration, balancing curiosity with caution.

6. Conclusion

The hypothesis that UFOs originate from parallel or higher dimensions integrates the frontier concepts of modern physics with the enduring mystery of unidentified aerial phenomena. While firmly rooted in speculative models like string theory, quantum mechanics, and multiverse cosmologies, it remains unproven and highly debated. Nonetheless, the intriguing flight characteristics of some UFO sightings and the mathematical consistency of these theories continue to inspire scientific inquiry.

Future technological advancements, meticulous data collection, and experimental innovation could bring us closer to understanding whether these phenomena are manifestations of unseen realms or simply artifacts of misinterpretation. Regardless of the outcome, exploring the possibility of interdimensional origins not only pushes the boundaries of physics but also challenges our notions of reality, perception, and humanity’s place in the universe.

In summary: The idea that UFOs come from alternate dimensions remains an exciting, scientifically plausible avenue of investigation—one that bridges our current knowledge with the unknown. If confirmed, it would fundamentally alter our understanding of the cosmos and open new horizons for discovery, technology, and philosophy.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ PETER2011 }

26-11-2025 om 21:07 geschreven door peter  

This Man Behind the Documentary “The Age of Disclosure” Claims Donald Trump Might Be the One to Confirm the Existence of Aliens

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

26-11-2025 om 18:42 geschreven door peter  

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

26-11-2025 om 18:23 geschreven door peter  

Now, an international consortium wants to try and take the discussion even further by making UAP a topic of global discourse. 

Dubbed “Project Titan,” if all goes according to plan, the European enclave of San Marino could become the “Geneva” of UFOs and host nation for a United Nations-backed World Conference dedicated to the study of unidentified aerial phenomena. 

“In its contemporary form, the UAP/UFO phenomenon manifests itself for at least 70 years with pretty much the same characteristics all over the world and continues to remain a mystery,” Project Titan manager, Paolo Guizzardi, told The Debrief. “If we really want to advance in the knowledge of the phenomena, an open and collaborative international cooperation is indispensable.”

The driving force behind Project Titan is two different international organizations, the Italian-based Centro Ufologico Nazionale (CUN) and the recently formed International Coalition for Extraterrestrial Research (ICER). 

Last week, representatives from CUN and ICER gave a presentation to officials from the Republic of San Marino, formally requesting as a U.N. member state, San Marino to present the Office of the U.N. Secretary-General with a proposal for the creation of a permanent structure within the United Nations tasked with the organization of a periodic World Conference on UAP. 

In presentation documents provided to The Debrief, organizers highlighted four primary reasons it is significantly necessary to have a United Nations-backed initiative on unidentified aerial phenomena. 

1. Need for research: although more than seventy years have passed since the first UAP sighting of the contemporary era, the phenomenon persists, and its origins and nature remain shrouded in mystery.
2. The scale of the phenomenon: the manifestations of the UAP phenomenon are borderless, and there is a need to move beyond the phase of nationally based studies to a truly global dimension if such research is to be successful. 
3. Very high potential at the scientific level.
4. Very high potential for technological spin-off.

Likewise, San Marino officials were provided with a rundown of UAP activity by the U.S. government, which has steadily increased since December 2017, when the New York Times revealed elements within the Department of Defense had been secretly studying UAP for nearly a decade. 

In fact, as organizers were in San Marino staking their case, The Debrief broke the news that the House Armed Services Committee had submitted legislation to create a permanent UAP Office within the Pentagon. If passed, the UAP Office would replace the DoD’s current temporary UAP Task Force. 

Proposers also noted that other nations, such as France and Chile, have been investigating UFO sightings for decades through officially backed government bodies. 

Leading the current U.N. initiative, Paolo Guizzardi tells The Debrief that creating a formal way for the international community to take stock of recent UAP research is necessary if there is any hope of ever answering the UFO question. 

“The Conference will create a favorable environment for the collegial discussion of items that until now have remained confined within national boundaries, for the sharing and spreading of knowledge until now restricted to national apparatus, and for the presentation and discussion of new ideas in the field,” Guizzardi explained. 

From left: Col. Gordon Cooper, Jacques Vallee, Claude Poher, J. Allen Hynek, Grenada Prime Minister Sir Eric Gairy, Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim, Morton Gleisner, Lee Spiegel, Leonard Stringfield, and David Saunders.

(Image Source: Lee Speigel/ Huffington Post)

Project Titan would not be the first time the subject of UFOs has officially come up at the United Nations. 

In the spring of 1978, Prime Minister of the newly independent nation of Grenada, Eric Gairy, proposed creating a U.N.-backed global task force to study the nature and origin of UFOs. 

Gairy and a panel of experts – including astronaut Col. Gordon Cooper, computer scientist Jacques Vallee, astronomer/astrophysicist Claude Poher, astronomer J. Allen Hynek, University of Colorado psychologist David Saunders and researchers Lee Spiegel and Leonard Stringfield -even met personally with U.N. Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim in July of 1978 to discuss the idea. 

The same panel would later formally submit the proposal before the entire United Nations on November 28, 1978. 

Contrary to popular belief, the idea of starting a global UFO investigative group was actually well received by the U.N. General Assembly. So well, in fact, thanks to leaked cables published by Wikileaks, we now know that following the presentation, the U.N. encouraged member states to “take appropriate steps to coordinate on a national level scientific research and investigation into extraterrestrial life, including unidentified flying objects, and to inform the Secretary-General of the observations, research, and evaluation of such activities.” 

Discussion on creating an international UFO investigative group was slated to continue when the U.N. General Assembly reconvened in 1979. However, in March 1979, Gairy was ousted from power in a military coup by the communist New Jewel Movement leader, Maurice Bishop. Ironically, Gairy was at the U.N. when his government was overthrown. 

Ultimately, the reason the 1978 proposal for a United Nations UFO committee never came to fruition wasn’t that the U.N. failed to take the topic seriously. Instead, no other member nation decided to push the initiative forward following Gairy’s ousting from power and subsequent exile to the United States. 

Guizzardi and Project Titan supporters see San Marino as a perfect fit to pick up the torch where Grenada left off 43 years ago by leading the charge to make UAP a topic of international discourse. 

“The Republic of San Marino is indeed the most natural choice for this, given that the Republic is not at all unfamiliar with the UAP issue, as for thirty editions it has been hosting the World Symposium on UFOs and related phenomena, organized by the Centro Ufologico Nazionale of Italy,” said Guizzardi. “Its proposal to the U.N. would therefore represent a natural extension of this activity.” 

The stigma surrounding the topic of UFOs or UAP has lessened in recent years, thanks mainly to testimony by credible eye-witnesses like former U.S. Navy F/A-18 fighter pilot Ryan Graves and actions taken by the DoD and politicians. 

However, thanks to extraordinary claims that lack concrete evidence or sensationalized affirmations by carnival barkers, public ridicule and caricatures of little green men still often plague efforts to establish any credible examinations of UAP. 

That said, aside from one’s preexisting beliefs on the topic, there is precedent suggesting there is merit to Project Titan’s proposal of an international World Conference on UAP. In particular, the potential for scientific and technological breakthroughs. 

In a previous interview, Dr. William Culbreth, an engineering professor at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, discussed how his unwitting involvement in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency’s (DIA) UFO-centric carve-outs led to tangible scientific advances. 

Unaware of the program’s UFO focus when he was asked to author two papers on tracking hypersonic vehicles and “aneutronic fusion propulsion” for the DIA’s 2009 Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP), Dr. Culbreth said the work ultimately led to him examining new forms of nuclear propulsion technology. 

“We’re looking into these propulsion technologies today, and this area alone led to several of my students pursuing PhDs who I don’t think otherwise would have,” said Dr. Culbreth. 

Guaita Tower in San Marino

(Image Source: Wikicommons)

With Project Titan organizers having presented their case, San Marino officials will now internally discuss whether to go forward with a proposal to the United Nations. 

• Follow and connect with author Tim McMillan on Twitter: @LtTimMcMillan or encrypted email: LtTimMcMillan@protonmail.com

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/science/ }

26-11-2025 om 18:06 geschreven door peter  

Dark matter is seen for the first time: Eerie image shows first direct evidence of the elusive substance that makes up 25% of the universe

• READ MORE: Scientist explains what happens if you walked into a black hole 

By WILIAM HUNTER, SENIOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY REPORTER

Scientists have captured the first–ever direct evidence for dark matter, the elusive substance that makes up more than a quarter of the universe.

Using NASA's Fermi telescope, researchers have detected powerful gamma–ray radiation emerging from a 'halo–like' structure surrounding the Milky Way.

Its frequency and intensity suggest that this could be dark matter.  

According to the study's author, Professor Tomonori Totani of the University of Tokyo, this eerie image is the first time that humanity has been able to 'see' the mysterious substance. 

For almost two decades, scientists have known that there is a glow of gamma–ray radiation coming from the heart of the Milky Way called the galactic centre (GC) excess.

However, the so–called 'halo signature' surrounding our galaxy is something that no scientist has ever seen before.

Speaking to Daily Mail, Professor Totani explained: 'While the GC excess is concentrated at the very centre of the Galaxy, my halo signal is thinly spread across the halo region.

'I believe it strongly suggests radiation from dark matter.'

Scientists have captured the first–ever direct evidence for dark matter, the elusive substance that makes up more than a quarter of the universe 

The invisible influence of dark matter helps explain everything from the rotation of galaxies to the expansion of the universe.

But, despite its enormous importance to modern physics, scientists have only been able to observe dark matter indirectly by measuring its gravitational effects.

Now, Professor Totani believes he has finally found a way to change this.

Many scientists believe that dark matter is made up of something called weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

WIMPS are much larger than normal particles like protons, but don't interact with conventional matter – making them almost impossible to detect.

However, when two WIMPs collide, they are annihilated and release a burst of photons in the form of gamma–ray radiation.

Using 15 years of data from NASA's Fermi Gamma–ray Space Telescope, Professor Totani looked at a region of the galaxy where dark matter was thought to collect.

There, he found that gamma rays with an 'extremely large amount of energy' extend in a large halo–like structure, emerging from the galactic centre.

Scientists have known for almost two decades that there is a glow of gamma radiation emerging from the centre of the galaxy. Now, a scientist has found an even more powerful signal that could be caused by dark matter 

Even after blocking out the glow of the galactic centre, data from NASA's Fermi telescope shows a 'halo–like' region of powerful gamma ray radiation that could be caused by colliding particles of dark matter 

What is dark matter?

Dark matter outweighs visible matter roughly six to one, making up about 27 per cent of the universe. 

Unlike normal matter, dark matter does not interact with the electromagnetic force. 

This means it does not absorb, reflect or emit light, making it extremely hard to spot.

In fact, researchers have been able to infer the existence of dark matter only from the gravitational effect it seems to have on visible matter. 

Source: CERN 

This energy was emerging from the exact place where previous studies had predicted dark matter would be most concentrated.

Even more excitingly, this energy level is exactly what some scientists had predicted colliding particles of dark matter should produce.

This could very well be the first time that scientists have found a way of looking at dark matter itself.

Professor Totani told Daily Mail: 'Since we are directly observing the gamma rays emitted by dark matter, I personally believe it can be considered "direct observation".'

Importantly, the halo signature is completely distinct from previous observations of the GC excess.

Not only is the halo signature more spread out, but it is also 10 times more powerful than the gamma radiation found in the GC excess.

This is critical because there are no known types of stars or black holes which produce this type of energy.

Dr Moorts Muru, a dark matter expert from the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics who was not involved in the study, told Daily Mail: 'None of the known stellar objects radiates energy at such high levels, and thus, Totani leans strongly towards the dark matter hypothesis.'

The energy produced by this halo signal is 10 times more powerful than the gamma–ray radiation coming from the galactic centre, and matches the signal researchers expected to find from dark matter (illustrated). The red and blue lines show the predicted signal from dark matter, while the circles show the data points collected by Fermi

While Dr Muru says this is not 'definitive proof', he adds that it is a 'significant boost to understanding dark matter'.

However, not everyone is convinced.

Professor Joe Silk, a dark matter researcher from Johns Hopkins University who was not involved in the study, told Daily Mail he thinks the claim of dark matter detection is 'premature'.

Firstly, Professor Totani's predictions for how much energy a WIMP should produce are much higher than some scientists' calculations.

'Of course, our predictions could be wrong, but if he is correct, we should have seen a gamma ray signal from nearby dwarf galaxies that are dark matter–dominated,' says Professor Silk.

Additionally, Professor Silk argues that these strong gamma rays could be the product of a huge explosion that emanated from the galaxy's central black hole about 10 billion years ago.

This explosion created the massive structures known as the 'Fermi bubbles' that extend on either side of the galaxy, but could have also started a powerful chain reaction.

Professor Silk says: 'What he did not consider is the fact that such an explosion that caused the Fermi bubbles is associated with violent shock fronts with turbulent magnetic fields that are known to be giant particle accelerators.

Not everyone is convinced by these findings, as some scientists suggest the gamma ray radiation could be emerging from 'energetic particles' trapped in the 'Fermi bubble' (highlighted) that emerges above and below the galactic plane 

Read More

• The Milky Way as you've NEVER seen it: Scientists reveal largest low-frequency radio colour image 

'So they could have injected many energetic particles whose subsequent diffusion and interaction with the ambient gas would have generated an additional gamma ray glow. In which case, we have no evidence for dark matter.'

In his paper, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Professor Totani acknowledges that more observations will be needed to prove this really is dark matter.

If other regions that should have lots of dark matter, like nearby dwarf galaxies, have similar gamma–ray signatures, it would be strong evidence for his claim.

However, the researcher remains confident that more data in the future will only provide more evidence that gamma–rays originate from dark matter.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

26-11-2025 om 17:39 geschreven door peter  

Internet Puzzled by “Jellyfish” UFO Video

By Victor Tangermann

Image: Jeremy Corbell via YouTube

Jellyfish and Chandelier

A video of what has since been dubbed a “jellyfish” UFO is making the rounds online.

The footage, shared by journalist Jeremy Corbell earlier this week, shows a mysterious object that appears to have dangling tendrils, and which appears to smoothly float over the roofs of a military base in Iraq. According to Corbell, the UFO footage dates back to October 2018.

According to Cincoski, the footage was taken from an aerostat, a big balloon observatory that was floating over the base to detect any incoming threats.

“Toward the end, it seemingly continued off into the distance,” he told NewsNation, but refuted Corbell’s claims that it ever dropped “into the lake or shoot into the sky.”

“It ended up being the ghost story of the base,” Cincoski added.

Critics, however, say both the “jellyfish” and “chandelier” had much simpler explanations than some outlandish alien theories would suggest.

“The ‘Chandelier’ UFO appears to be a diffraction artifact,” tweeted writer and noted UFO debunker Mick West. “Basically, a glare from a very bright/hot source, like a missile rocket/engine.”

And the jellyfish was likely “two different balloon-like entities” moving about 12 kilometers apart, West added, that appear to be moving at the same speed as the wind — a strong clue that instead of an alien visitor, it’s just a balloon.

More on UFOs: 

• Congress Receiving Mysterious Classified Briefing About UFOs

{ https://futurism.com/ }

26-11-2025 om 17:21 geschreven door peter  

The FBI Just Quietly Revealed That It Has a Real-Life UFO Office

By Noor Al-Sibai

Image: Fox / Liaison via Getty / Futurism

Amid the Pentagon’s years-long probes into the unexplained and unidentified, the FBI has been quietly running its own secret office investigating so-called “unidentified anomalous phenomena.”

Yes, let’s get this out of the way: that’s basically the plot of the 90s television show “The X-Files.” But buried in a new Politico story about concerns that UFO-hunting agents may soon be caught up in a purge is a jarring revelation: that such an office exists within the bureau —the “existence” of which had “not been disclosed publicly before,” per the outlet’s reporting.

{ https://futurism.com/ }

26-11-2025 om 17:05 geschreven door peter  

NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft, launched in 1977, continues to operate and set records. It is already the first man-made object to reach interstellar space and is currently the furthest spacecraft from Earth. But at the end of 2026, it will reach a new milestone: traveling one light-day away from our planet.

One light day is the distance that light or a radio signal travels in 24 hours. Voyager 1 is currently more than 25 billion km away, and a signal from Earth takes almost 23.5 hours to reach it. According to NASA calculations, in a year, on November 15, 2026, the spacecraft will reach a distance of 25.9 billion km. At that point, each transmission from our antennas will take exactly 24 hours to reach it.

Unique mission and challenges

Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 are the longest-running missions in NASA history. It is remarkable that their equipment has millions of times less memory and computing power than modern smartphones. However, outdated electronics do not prevent them from continuing to help science. It was Voyager 1 that took the iconic photo of Earth – “Pale Blue Dot” – showing our planet as a tiny speck in the vastness of space.

But at such great distances, communication with the spacecraft becomes increasingly difficult. It takes a whole day for a command from Earth to reach it, and another day for the response to return. Its nuclear power source will only last for a few more years. But even when the Voyagers fall silent, they will forever remain humanity’s first messengers in interstellar space.

Earlier, we reported on how NASA named this year the “death” of the Voyager probes.

• According to Interesting Engineering

• Posted in News, Tech

RELATED VIDEOS

 { https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

26-11-2025 om 16:54 geschreven door peter  

Researchers at the University of Tokyo have announced the discovery of gamma rays produced by the annihilation of dark matter particles. If confirmed, this will be the first time that humanity has “seen” this mysterious substance.

The hidden mass of the Universe

Back in the early 1930s, astronomer Fritz Zwicky discovered an anomaly in the motion of galaxies, which could be explained by the fact that their actual mass was much greater than the mass of the observable matter. This led him to conclude that there must be some invisible structure—dark matter—holding the galaxies together.

Almost a century after Zwicky’s discovery, dark matter remains largely a mystery. Until now, scientists have only been able to observe it indirectly, by studying its effects on observable matter. For example, through its ability to generate enough gravity to hold galaxies together. The reason why dark matter cannot be observed directly is that the particles it consists of do not interact with electromagnetic radiation and do not emit it. In other words, dark matter does not absorb, reflect, or emit light.

Annihilation of dark matter

There are many hypotheses explaining the nature of dark matter. According to one of the most popular theories, it consists of so-called WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles), which are heavier than protons but interact very little with other matter. Despite the lack of interaction, when two such particles collide, they annihilate each other and release other particles, including gamma-ray photons.

For many years, scientists have been trying to find these specific gamma rays, focusing on areas where dark matter is believed to be most concentrated. According to Professor Tomonori Totani of the Department of Astronomy at the University of Tokyo, he has finally succeeded in solving this problem. After analyzing the latest data from the Fermi space telescope, he has found gamma rays whose characteristics match those predicted.

“We detected gamma rays with a photon energy of 20 gigaelectronvolts (or 20 billion electronvolts, which is an extremely high energy) propagating in a halo-like structure toward the center of the Milky Way galaxy. The gamma-ray component corresponds exactly to the shape expected from a dark matter halo,” said Totani.

The observed energy spectrum, or gamma-ray intensity range, corresponds to the radiation predicted as a result of the annihilation of hypothetical WIMPs, whose mass is approximately 500 times greater than that of a proton. The annihilation rate, estimated from the measured gamma-ray intensity, is also within the range of theoretical predictions.

“If this is true, then, as far as I know, this will be the first time that humanity has ‘seen’ dark matter. And it turns out that dark matter is a new particle not included in the current standard model of particle physics. This represents a significant breakthrough in astronomy and physics.”

Although Totani is confident that his gamma-ray measurements detect dark matter particles, his results must be verified by independent analysis by other researchers. Even with this confirmation, scientists will need additional evidence that this radiation is indeed the result of dark matter annihilation and not coming from some other astronomical phenomenon.

Additional evidence of collisions in other locations with high concentrations of dark matter would support these initial findings. For example, the detection of gamma rays of the same energy from dwarf galaxies in the Milky Way halo would confirm the results of the study.

• According to UTokyo

• Posted in News, Science

RELATED VIDEOS

 { https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

26-11-2025 om 16:43 geschreven door peter  

Overview

On November 21, 2025, a noteworthy documentary titled “The Age of Disclosure” was premiered on Capitol Hill, bringing significant attention to a series of recently declassified Pentagon recordings related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), commonly known as UFOs. Produced by Vulture, the online entertainment arm of New York Magazine, this 84-minute film aims to shed light on official government data that has largely been kept concealed from the public. The documentary combines authentic footage, firsthand witness testimonies, and archival materials to argue that the U.S. government is gradually becoming more transparent regarding its knowledge of unexplained aerial sightings. The organizers framed this screening as a “call for greater transparency,” emphasizing the importance of allowing citizens and policymakers alike access to credible evidence of UAP encounters.

The goal is to foster a shift in public perception and to motivate lawmakers to push for systematic reporting and scientific investigation of these phenomena. This event marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing push for openness and accountability related to UFO mysteries, highlighting how the government’s stance is evolving from secrecy to limited disclosure. As the documentary gains attention, it stokes a broader debate about national security, scientific curiosity, and governmental transparency surrounding aerial phenomena that defy current technological understanding.

Dan Farah. Photograph: Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Documentary Content

"The Age of Disclosure" intricately weaves three core elements to build its narrative. First, it showcases a series of declassified videos released by the Department of Defense between 2020 and 2024. These include high-profile clips like the “Gimbal” and “GoFast” videos, which depict unidentified objects performing extraordinary maneuvers that challenge known principles of aerospace physics. Second, the film features interviews with credible witnesses such as military pilots, radar operators, and intelligence analysts, all sharing personal accounts of observing unexplained objects during combat and reconnaissance missions.

Their detailed descriptions lend credibility to the argument that these sightings are real and not fabricated or misreported. Third, aerospace technology scholars contribute contextual analysis, emphasizing that the observed phenomena surpass current human engineering capabilities, thus raising questions about their origin—whether advanced foreign technology or something entirely different. Director Megan Alvarez explained that the documentary’s goal isn’t to prove extraterrestrial life but to stress that government-verified footage exists and warrants serious public discussion. By showcasing this compelling evidence, the film seeks to shift the narrative from skepticism to curiosity and acknowledgment of unexplainable phenomena that demand further scientific exploration.

Pentagon Releases and Official Context

The documentary’s core materials are rooted in the Pentagon’s ongoing transparency efforts, which have gradually declassified and released UAP-related footage since 2020. The initial releases of three Navy-recorded videos marked a turning point, confirming the existence of unexplained aerial objects captured by military sensors and pilots. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) followed up in 2022 with a preliminary assessment acknowledging that that most sightings remain unexplained, emphasizing the need for continued data collection and analysis. This document suggested that some phenomena could pose national security risks, thereby elevating their significance in government priorities. More recently, in August 2025, the Department of Defense released a set of high-resolution infrared recordings obtained through the Advanced Aerial Reconnaissance System (AARS).

These videos display objects that execute maneuvers at speeds and accelerations well beyond known human engineering capabilities, strengthening the case for serious scientific inquiry. While these releases are partial—often heavily redacted—they symbolize an increasing willingness within the government to acknowledge and share evidence. These steps have been praised by some members of Congress for providing potential avenues for research, though critics argue that the redactions hinder full understanding and transparency. Overall, these official disclosures reflect an incremental but pivotal move toward open discussion of UAP phenomena at the highest levels of government.

Political Reaction

The premier of “The Age of Disclosure” on Capitol Hill triggered diverse political responses. Republican Representative James Whitfield of Ohio expressed optimistic support, calling the documentary “a catalyst for accountability” and urging the House Armed Services Committee to convene hearings to scrutinize the ODNI’s findings more thoroughly. His stance underscores a proactive approach to addressing national security implications of UAP reports. On the other side, Democratic Senator Lisa Cheng from California cautioned against jumping to conclusions based solely on visual evidence. She emphasized the importance of proper context and scientific validation, advocating for a bipartisan task force to evaluate the data more comprehensively before any policy shifts occur.

Several of the highly placed officials who appear in the film.

Farah Films/photo by Vincent Wrenn

The event attracted a wide array of attendees, including lawmakers from both parties, defense officials, and scientific experts, reflecting a bipartisan curiosity and concern regarding UAP issues. The timing coincided with debate over the FY2026 defense appropriations bill, in which funding for an expanded UAP research office is expected to be a significant point of discussion. This bipartisan interest indicates a growing recognition of the importance of systematically investigating unidentified aerial phenomena, potentially leading to formal governmental oversight and more sustained inquiry.

Implications for Transparency

While “The Age of Disclosure” does not uncover new classified information, its compilation of existing declassified material and expert testimonials highlights an important shift in U.S. government transparency regarding UAPs. Analysts from the Congressional Research Service note that sustained public pressure and political interest could lead to the establishment of a permanent oversight body—similar to those overseeing emerging technologies like hypersonic weapons—that ensures consistent, transparent monitoring of unexplained phenomena. The film’s emphasis on visual evidence aims to bridge the often vast gap between highly classified briefings and the democratic accountability that citizens and their representatives require.

Advocates hope that increased public access to credible footage and expert analysis will push policymakers to allocate more resources and support for systematic scientific investigation of UAPs. However, questions remain about the scope of future disclosures and whether top officials will fully embrace transparency or continue to withhold sensitive information. Nevertheless, this moment signifies a cultural and political shift—an acknowledgment that mysteries lingering in the sky warrant open discussion, scientific rigor, and potentially, policy action to address the implications of these unexplained phenomena for both national security and human understanding.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ PETER2011 }

25-11-2025 om 23:56 geschreven door peter  

What About All Those USO Sightings since August in the Media? The REAL Story!

By Bob Spearing, MUFON Director of International Development

On November 2, 2025, Fox News reported that since August, a UAP reporting agency called Enigma Labs has documented 9,000 reports of objects within 10 miles of the American coastlines. The article mentioned that the states with the highest amount of these craft or anomalies near the coast were California & Florida, with 389 and 306, respectively.

Google AI generated that, “A UFO reporting app called Enigma has logged over 9,000 USO sightings since August 2025 within 10 miles of U.S. shoreline or other major bodies of water.” and “This data has raised concerns for national security analysts.” Google AI used a publication called Matine Technology News as its source.

In the Fox article, Retired Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet stated that, "The fact that unidentified objects with unexplainable characteristics are entering US waterspace and the [Department of War] is not raising a giant red flag is a sign that the government is not sharing all it knows about all-domain anomalous phenomena.”

Kent Heckenlively, a UFO book author, was also interviewed by Fox and said, "​​What is really interesting to me is the reports that we receive about [United States] underwater vessels detecting craft moving at exceptionally high speeds underwater."

This image is from a longer video in MUFON Case # 137607 out of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. It has made the news rounds frequently this month. But what is actually being seen here? Is it a genuine series of 2 USOs, or is it scuba divers with underwater lighting? The jury is still out, but the media pounces on this as legitimate proof of USOs. It is confirmatory of NOTHING! The source of the lights remains unidentified, but claiming this photo shows “legitimate alien or other paranormal activity under our waterways” would be inconsistent with MUFON’s high investigative values.

The Mutual UFO Network would like to ask some questions here because we do not necessarily believe the entire story is being laid out by Enigma, Gallaudet and Heckenlively.

First, Google AI suggests FALSELY that anything within 10 miles of a coast is a USO. Enigma implies that. That acronym USO stands for Unidentified Submersible Object. A UFO/UAP cannot be considered a USO simply because it is within 10 miles of a coastline. This is deceiving. If this is Enigma’s methodology for what constitutes a USO, it is flawed.

Second, the Fox article, at one point, states that only 150 objects in Enigma’s database were seen going into or out of water. This is a big drop for 9,000 reports down to 150 that actually are seen in, below or above a body of water. What gives? What is truth, then? Are classifications bendable when necessary for a news release?

The newest classification for an object capable of being in air, land or underwater is called a trans-

medium vehicle as they can operate in 3 different environments. Our media today is trying to portray this as a new phenomenon. Actually, it has been going on for thousands of years.

Third, the idea that suddenly there are these incredibly fast-moving underwater objects is also a new phenomenon, is inaccurate. MUFON’s 145,000-case database has reports of fast-moving submersibles circling our warships as far back as WWII. MUFON’s own Chief Photo Analyst, Marc D’Antonio, hitched a ride back in 2017 on an unnamed USN submarine, and, being in the right place at the right time, caught an interaction between the sub’s commander and his radar operator using the term “fast mover” concerning a very fast-moving object in proximity to the sub. Right now, the Chinese are developing this underwater technology, where soon their subs may transit the Pacific from Shanghai to San Francisco in hours instead of days. Aliens? Or Chinese tech, maybe?

BUT HERE IS THE MAJOR POINT!

There is a lot of disinformation on the UFO Street right now on several items, such as Hellfire

Missiles taking out UFOs off the coast of Yemen, which was most likely a CCP spy balloon. The 3i/Atlas affair is almost to the point of hysteria for no good reason. It’s almost seeming like an experiment to gauge population gullibility. Just look at the 3i/Atlas cesspool on Facebook.

There is a difference between Enigma and MUFON. A big difference! MUFON investigates! Enigma

doesn’t. Just because there are 9,000 Enigma reports of “purported USO objects” within 10 miles of coastline and 150 directly in or over bodies of water, doesn’t necessarily mean these statistics are in any way reliable. How many of these 9,000 objects have been investigated by Enigma, Fox, or anyone else, for that matter? BINGO! Where are the investigation reports forthcoming from Enigma and Fox? Don’t hold your breath.

MUFON, The MUTUAL UFO Network, has 4,000 members currently, and of that number, 700 are trained, certified Field Investigators, most with previous forensic backgrounds. We investigate all 145,000 cases in our database. Enigma does not investigate anything as far as we can tell. And here is the point….MUFON and other UFO Agencies, over the decades, have seen a pretty steady statistic about UFO reports.

Basically, 90% of those reports, if investigated, ultimately end up as being in the “IDENTIFIED” category. So, Enigma’s 9,000 reports since August of arbitrarily classified USOs, most likely are identifiable if they were actually investigated. Roughly 900 may be hard to figure out. Their 30,000 reports they have accrued since 2022 may turn out to be, if they were actually investigated, 3,000 that may need further consideration. What we believe is happening is sensationalism of the phenomenon. Clickbait even for media exposure. Yellow Journalism in the finest 19th-century fashion! It used to sell newspapers, right?

Who suffers because of this? The person who wants to believe. That’s who! Cruel! They are being fed a steady stream of FEAR by our media and people who are sensationalizing every report as if FACT.

Shame on them! It’s grotesque!

If you see something or if you feel you have been abducted, you can report it to MUFON at mufon.com. Click on the red report buttons in the upper right corner of our website. We will investigate. More importantly, we have an Experiencer Resource Team to help abductees cope with their experience.

MUFON is a 501c3 non-profit organization. We have been doing the Air Force’s business since 1969, when Blue Book ended. We are a free, open, grassroots team of UFO Investigators staffed by dedicated volunteers only! We are not funded by billionaires.

{ mufon.com }

25-11-2025 om 23:24 geschreven door peter  

Beneath the idyllic resort towns of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula, daring explorers have uncovered a hidden world of grand chambers and twisting tunnels.

The Ox Bel Ha, Mayan for 'Three Paths of Water', is a sprawling water 'web' that makes up the world's longest underwater cave system.

In this vast network, researchers have found giant sink holes, huge crystal chambers known as ice palaces, and 38 unique species of cave–dwelling animals.

Cave divers have mapped out 325.6 miles (524 kilometres) of subterranean tunnels, but believe there could be even more yet to explore.

Since 2018 alone, divers have squeezed their way through 108 more miles (175 kilometres) of unexplored cave.

Research group, El Centro Investigador del Sistema Acuífero de Quintana Roo (CINDAQ), believes it may find more than 373 miles (600 kilometres) of cave before its investigations are done.

The Ox Bel Ha is the second–longest explored cave in the world, and is only beaten by Kentucky's Mammoth Caves, which run for at least 426 miles (686 km).

The big difference is that every metre of Mexico's cavernous network is submerged in a mixture of salt and freshwater.

The Ox Bel Ha is the world's largest cave network, extending at least 325 miles beneath Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula 

Scientists believe that the incredible complexity of Ox Bel Ha is due to the unusual way in which it formed.

Millions of years ago, rainwater and dissolved carbon dioxide filtered through a thick layer of limestone on the Yucatan Peninsula.

As this acidic solution filtered through the rock, it reacted with the limestone and carved out vast channels and tunnels.

Then, approximately 18,000 years ago, severe climate changes caused ocean levels to rise and flood the caves – sealing the underground landscape exactly as it is found today.

Rather uniquely, this is also one of the few underwater caves in Mexico which connect directly to the sea.

This means that there is a layer of faster–flowing fresh water sitting on top of a nearly static saltwater layer.

This creates what scientists call a 'halocline', a layer where salt and fresh water mix, which makes exploration even trickier.

Exploration only began on the Ox Bel Ha cave network in 1996, when explorers found an entrance inside one of the area's natural sink holes, known as cenotes.

The leading research group, El Centro Investigador del Sistema Acuífero de Quintana Roo (CINDAQ), believes they may find more than 373 miles (600 kilometres) of cave before their investigations are done

Exploration is continuously uncovering new chambers and tunnels as explorers find more connections between different sections of the cave

The only cave system longer than Ox Bel Ha is Mammoth Cave in Kentucky (pictured), which extends for at least 426 miles (686 km)

Exploring a dry cave network, such as Mammoth Cave, is already dangerous and difficult.

Cavers must force themselves into narrow passages known as constrictions in the hope that they will open up enough to turn around further on.

Becoming trapped or lost can easily result in the caver's death if they are not able to call for help.

Underwater, these difficulties are all massively increased by the fact that explorers must also manage their limited oxygen supply.

Cave divers must balance the amount of gas they bring with them against the fact that they may need to pull that equipment through some tight squeezes.

This makes long dives extending deep underground extremely challenging, and something that can only be attempted by the most skilled divers.

However, over the last 30 years, explorers have gradually managed to piece together a map of the Ox Bel Ha.

As the divers explore, they trail a line of cable behind them that allows them to find their way back, and also to assess how long the cave network is.

Ox Bel Ha is home to huge sink holes, 38 species of unique cave–dwelling animals, and a series of crystal–coated chambers known as an 'ice palace' (pictured) 

Since 2018 alone, divers have squeezed their way through 108 more miles (175 kilometres) of unexplored cave

And, as divers have repeatedly resurveyed old sections of cable, they are still finding entirely new sections of tunnel to explore.

For example, in 2022, a group of divers were following an old cable about two miles deep into the cave when they discovered that it had been overlooked by earlier dives.

The divers told In Depth Magazine at the time: 'To our surprise it looked like we were the first ones there.'

By undertaking mammoth six–to eight–hour dives, the explorers pushed up to 6,370 metres into the cave and uncovered 6.2 miles (10.1 kilometres) of new passageways.

Read More

• Are YOU brave enough to go inside Nutty Putty cave? Recreation lets you experience what it was like 

However, the efforts to map the extent of Ox Bel Ha have not been without fatalities.

In April 2022, an experienced Russian diver who had been mapping the cave for six months set out on a dive from sinkhole Cenote Odyssey and never returned.

Investigators found the diver floating face down within arm's reach of a spare gas tank, with his own tank drained empty.

It is believed that the diver became trapped in a cloud of silt while exploring a new crack, panicked, and used up the remainder of their air supplies faster than they had been prepared for.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

25-11-2025 om 23:03 geschreven door peter  

The U.S. government is compelled to investigate reports of UFOs to identify any issues regarding threats to national security. 

(iStock)

"This disturbing incident perfectly illustrates why the UAP issue has gone from fringe to mainstream," Pope said. "Whatever people’s beliefs, this is a serious safety-of-flight matter that demands urgent attention and action."

Pope stressed that simply labeling such encounters "drones" can obscure what might be much more complex.

"‘Drone’ has become a convenient shorthand for anything unexplained that people see in the skies," he said. "So, we really don’t know what we’re dealing with here."

• REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK: MILITARY WHISTLEBLOWERS TESTIFY TO CONGRESS ABOUT UNEXPLAINED UFO ENCOUNTERS

25-11-2025 om 21:28 geschreven door peter  

Mystery over strange crash near Area 51 deepens as FBI opens investigation

• MORE: World's most secretive jet spotted over Area 51

By CHRIS MELORE, US ASSISTANT SCIENCE EDITOR

The US Air Force has sparked a mystery near the top-secret base Area 51 after admitting the FBI was investigating a recent crash near the facility. 

In a statement on October 4, officials at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada said that an aircraft 'was involved in an incident,' crashing in the desert just miles from the restricted zone around Area 51 on September 23.

The infamous base has been tied to extraterrestrial lore for decades, with UFO researchers and conspiracy theorists claiming that secret government projects have been conducted at Area 51 since the 1950s.

While the Air Force said that the craft was assigned to the base as part of the 432nd Wing, some on social media pointed out that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a temporary flight restriction around the area for an entire week.

The reason for the shutdown was simply noted as 'national security' with no other explanation given by the FAA.

The location of the flight restriction placed the crash roughly 12 miles east of the security boundary around Area 51, and about 24 miles from the base itself.

However, the Air Force has revealed that even more strange activity took place after military personnel cleaned up the site, leaving nothing for the public to find.

Officials at Creech said investigators found an 'inert training bomb body' and a piece of an unidentified aircraft at the same crash site on October 3, prompting the military to get the FBI involved.

Area 51, an area of more than 2.9 million acres, is located at the Nevada Test and Training Range

A temporary flight restriction was issued by the FAA shortly after the US Air Force announced the crash of a military aircraft near Area 51

According to the Air Force statement, officials believe someone intentionally altered the scene of the secretive crash after the military left the desert.

An inert training bomb body is a practice explosive that's not rigged to explode.

Meanwhile, the Air Force said the aircraft piece was likely a panel from a plane, but admitted that it came from an 'unknown origin.'

Joerg Arnu, a long-time Area 51 researcher and host of the website Dreamland Resort, visited the site of the crash on September 27, finding nothing but a completely cleared area and several tire tracks, likely from military vehicles that combed the desert for wreckage.

'They really tore up the ground so it's impossible to find the impact mark,' Arnu said in a video taken from the alleged crash.

The researchers noted that there was no debris left in the area, but something could still be there underground, adding that desert rains often wash hidden objects back up to the surface.

The Air Force noted that 'no further details are available at this time,' but did say that there were no injuries or fatalities during the unexplained incident.

Creech Air Force Base is less than 60 miles from the alleged crash site and is home to the 432nd Wing, which operates MQ-9 Reaper armed drones, RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drones, and other craft used for intelligence, surveillance, and combat missions.

Area 51 researcher Joerg Arnu captured video of the supposed crash site after the military had finished recovering the object

The crash reportedly took place just 12 miles from the security area surrounding Area 51, a base tied to UFO encounters for decades

According to online defense news site The War Zone, Reapers are the main type of aircraft housed at the base, used for spying, watching targets, and even firing missiles from far away.

They've been in use for two decades, and it's not uncommon for them to crash under certain circumstances, including user error and mechanical failures with the uncrewed, remote-controlled drones.

Conspiracy theorists online pointed out that it would be incredibly unusual for the federal officials to keep a Reaper drone crash so secret.

They noted the fact that federal investigators showed up so quickly, searched for planted fake evidence, and kept the incident completely under wraps for over two weeks were signs that the aircraft was no ordinary drone.

Recently, the US Air Force's top-secret RAT55 jet was also spotted soaring over Area 51, confirming rumors that the enigmatic radar plane operated from the clandestine Groom Lake facility.

Area 51 has also been involved in the development and testing of other revolutionary and experimental aircraft over the years, including the F-117 Nighthawk, America's first stealth bomber.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

25-11-2025 om 21:00 geschreven door peter