Researchers at the University of Tokyo have announced the discovery of gamma rays produced by the annihilation of dark matter particles. If confirmed, this will be the first time that humanity has “seen” this mysterious substance.

The hidden mass of the Universe

Back in the early 1930s, astronomer Fritz Zwicky discovered an anomaly in the motion of galaxies, which could be explained by the fact that their actual mass was much greater than the mass of the observable matter. This led him to conclude that there must be some invisible structure—dark matter—holding the galaxies together.

Almost a century after Zwicky’s discovery, dark matter remains largely a mystery. Until now, scientists have only been able to observe it indirectly, by studying its effects on observable matter. For example, through its ability to generate enough gravity to hold galaxies together. The reason why dark matter cannot be observed directly is that the particles it consists of do not interact with electromagnetic radiation and do not emit it. In other words, dark matter does not absorb, reflect, or emit light.

Annihilation of dark matter

There are many hypotheses explaining the nature of dark matter. According to one of the most popular theories, it consists of so-called WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles), which are heavier than protons but interact very little with other matter. Despite the lack of interaction, when two such particles collide, they annihilate each other and release other particles, including gamma-ray photons.

For many years, scientists have been trying to find these specific gamma rays, focusing on areas where dark matter is believed to be most concentrated. According to Professor Tomonori Totani of the Department of Astronomy at the University of Tokyo, he has finally succeeded in solving this problem. After analyzing the latest data from the Fermi space telescope, he has found gamma rays whose characteristics match those predicted.

“We detected gamma rays with a photon energy of 20 gigaelectronvolts (or 20 billion electronvolts, which is an extremely high energy) propagating in a halo-like structure toward the center of the Milky Way galaxy. The gamma-ray component corresponds exactly to the shape expected from a dark matter halo,” said Totani.

The observed energy spectrum, or gamma-ray intensity range, corresponds to the radiation predicted as a result of the annihilation of hypothetical WIMPs, whose mass is approximately 500 times greater than that of a proton. The annihilation rate, estimated from the measured gamma-ray intensity, is also within the range of theoretical predictions.

“If this is true, then, as far as I know, this will be the first time that humanity has ‘seen’ dark matter. And it turns out that dark matter is a new particle not included in the current standard model of particle physics. This represents a significant breakthrough in astronomy and physics.”

Although Totani is confident that his gamma-ray measurements detect dark matter particles, his results must be verified by independent analysis by other researchers. Even with this confirmation, scientists will need additional evidence that this radiation is indeed the result of dark matter annihilation and not coming from some other astronomical phenomenon.

Additional evidence of collisions in other locations with high concentrations of dark matter would support these initial findings. For example, the detection of gamma rays of the same energy from dwarf galaxies in the Milky Way halo would confirm the results of the study.

• According to UTokyo

• Posted in News, Science

RELATED VIDEOS

 { https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

26-11-2025 om 16:43 geschreven door peter  

Overview

On November 21, 2025, a noteworthy documentary titled “The Age of Disclosure” was premiered on Capitol Hill, bringing significant attention to a series of recently declassified Pentagon recordings related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), commonly known as UFOs. Produced by Vulture, the online entertainment arm of New York Magazine, this 84-minute film aims to shed light on official government data that has largely been kept concealed from the public. The documentary combines authentic footage, firsthand witness testimonies, and archival materials to argue that the U.S. government is gradually becoming more transparent regarding its knowledge of unexplained aerial sightings. The organizers framed this screening as a “call for greater transparency,” emphasizing the importance of allowing citizens and policymakers alike access to credible evidence of UAP encounters.

The goal is to foster a shift in public perception and to motivate lawmakers to push for systematic reporting and scientific investigation of these phenomena. This event marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing push for openness and accountability related to UFO mysteries, highlighting how the government’s stance is evolving from secrecy to limited disclosure. As the documentary gains attention, it stokes a broader debate about national security, scientific curiosity, and governmental transparency surrounding aerial phenomena that defy current technological understanding.

Dan Farah. Photograph: Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Documentary Content

"The Age of Disclosure" intricately weaves three core elements to build its narrative. First, it showcases a series of declassified videos released by the Department of Defense between 2020 and 2024. These include high-profile clips like the “Gimbal” and “GoFast” videos, which depict unidentified objects performing extraordinary maneuvers that challenge known principles of aerospace physics. Second, the film features interviews with credible witnesses such as military pilots, radar operators, and intelligence analysts, all sharing personal accounts of observing unexplained objects during combat and reconnaissance missions.

Their detailed descriptions lend credibility to the argument that these sightings are real and not fabricated or misreported. Third, aerospace technology scholars contribute contextual analysis, emphasizing that the observed phenomena surpass current human engineering capabilities, thus raising questions about their origin—whether advanced foreign technology or something entirely different. Director Megan Alvarez explained that the documentary’s goal isn’t to prove extraterrestrial life but to stress that government-verified footage exists and warrants serious public discussion. By showcasing this compelling evidence, the film seeks to shift the narrative from skepticism to curiosity and acknowledgment of unexplainable phenomena that demand further scientific exploration.

Pentagon Releases and Official Context

The documentary’s core materials are rooted in the Pentagon’s ongoing transparency efforts, which have gradually declassified and released UAP-related footage since 2020. The initial releases of three Navy-recorded videos marked a turning point, confirming the existence of unexplained aerial objects captured by military sensors and pilots. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) followed up in 2022 with a preliminary assessment acknowledging that that most sightings remain unexplained, emphasizing the need for continued data collection and analysis. This document suggested that some phenomena could pose national security risks, thereby elevating their significance in government priorities. More recently, in August 2025, the Department of Defense released a set of high-resolution infrared recordings obtained through the Advanced Aerial Reconnaissance System (AARS).

These videos display objects that execute maneuvers at speeds and accelerations well beyond known human engineering capabilities, strengthening the case for serious scientific inquiry. While these releases are partial—often heavily redacted—they symbolize an increasing willingness within the government to acknowledge and share evidence. These steps have been praised by some members of Congress for providing potential avenues for research, though critics argue that the redactions hinder full understanding and transparency. Overall, these official disclosures reflect an incremental but pivotal move toward open discussion of UAP phenomena at the highest levels of government.

Political Reaction

The premier of “The Age of Disclosure” on Capitol Hill triggered diverse political responses. Republican Representative James Whitfield of Ohio expressed optimistic support, calling the documentary “a catalyst for accountability” and urging the House Armed Services Committee to convene hearings to scrutinize the ODNI’s findings more thoroughly. His stance underscores a proactive approach to addressing national security implications of UAP reports. On the other side, Democratic Senator Lisa Cheng from California cautioned against jumping to conclusions based solely on visual evidence. She emphasized the importance of proper context and scientific validation, advocating for a bipartisan task force to evaluate the data more comprehensively before any policy shifts occur.

Several of the highly placed officials who appear in the film.

Farah Films/photo by Vincent Wrenn

The event attracted a wide array of attendees, including lawmakers from both parties, defense officials, and scientific experts, reflecting a bipartisan curiosity and concern regarding UAP issues. The timing coincided with debate over the FY2026 defense appropriations bill, in which funding for an expanded UAP research office is expected to be a significant point of discussion. This bipartisan interest indicates a growing recognition of the importance of systematically investigating unidentified aerial phenomena, potentially leading to formal governmental oversight and more sustained inquiry.

Implications for Transparency

While “The Age of Disclosure” does not uncover new classified information, its compilation of existing declassified material and expert testimonials highlights an important shift in U.S. government transparency regarding UAPs. Analysts from the Congressional Research Service note that sustained public pressure and political interest could lead to the establishment of a permanent oversight body—similar to those overseeing emerging technologies like hypersonic weapons—that ensures consistent, transparent monitoring of unexplained phenomena. The film’s emphasis on visual evidence aims to bridge the often vast gap between highly classified briefings and the democratic accountability that citizens and their representatives require.

Advocates hope that increased public access to credible footage and expert analysis will push policymakers to allocate more resources and support for systematic scientific investigation of UAPs. However, questions remain about the scope of future disclosures and whether top officials will fully embrace transparency or continue to withhold sensitive information. Nevertheless, this moment signifies a cultural and political shift—an acknowledgment that mysteries lingering in the sky warrant open discussion, scientific rigor, and potentially, policy action to address the implications of these unexplained phenomena for both national security and human understanding.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ PETER2011 }

25-11-2025 om 23:56 geschreven door peter  

What About All Those USO Sightings since August in the Media? The REAL Story!

By Bob Spearing, MUFON Director of International Development

On November 2, 2025, Fox News reported that since August, a UAP reporting agency called Enigma Labs has documented 9,000 reports of objects within 10 miles of the American coastlines. The article mentioned that the states with the highest amount of these craft or anomalies near the coast were California & Florida, with 389 and 306, respectively.

Google AI generated that, “A UFO reporting app called Enigma has logged over 9,000 USO sightings since August 2025 within 10 miles of U.S. shoreline or other major bodies of water.” and “This data has raised concerns for national security analysts.” Google AI used a publication called Matine Technology News as its source.

In the Fox article, Retired Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet stated that, "The fact that unidentified objects with unexplainable characteristics are entering US waterspace and the [Department of War] is not raising a giant red flag is a sign that the government is not sharing all it knows about all-domain anomalous phenomena.”

Kent Heckenlively, a UFO book author, was also interviewed by Fox and said, "​​What is really interesting to me is the reports that we receive about [United States] underwater vessels detecting craft moving at exceptionally high speeds underwater."

This image is from a longer video in MUFON Case # 137607 out of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. It has made the news rounds frequently this month. But what is actually being seen here? Is it a genuine series of 2 USOs, or is it scuba divers with underwater lighting? The jury is still out, but the media pounces on this as legitimate proof of USOs. It is confirmatory of NOTHING! The source of the lights remains unidentified, but claiming this photo shows “legitimate alien or other paranormal activity under our waterways” would be inconsistent with MUFON’s high investigative values.

The Mutual UFO Network would like to ask some questions here because we do not necessarily believe the entire story is being laid out by Enigma, Gallaudet and Heckenlively.

First, Google AI suggests FALSELY that anything within 10 miles of a coast is a USO. Enigma implies that. That acronym USO stands for Unidentified Submersible Object. A UFO/UAP cannot be considered a USO simply because it is within 10 miles of a coastline. This is deceiving. If this is Enigma’s methodology for what constitutes a USO, it is flawed.

Second, the Fox article, at one point, states that only 150 objects in Enigma’s database were seen going into or out of water. This is a big drop for 9,000 reports down to 150 that actually are seen in, below or above a body of water. What gives? What is truth, then? Are classifications bendable when necessary for a news release?

The newest classification for an object capable of being in air, land or underwater is called a trans-

medium vehicle as they can operate in 3 different environments. Our media today is trying to portray this as a new phenomenon. Actually, it has been going on for thousands of years.

Third, the idea that suddenly there are these incredibly fast-moving underwater objects is also a new phenomenon, is inaccurate. MUFON’s 145,000-case database has reports of fast-moving submersibles circling our warships as far back as WWII. MUFON’s own Chief Photo Analyst, Marc D’Antonio, hitched a ride back in 2017 on an unnamed USN submarine, and, being in the right place at the right time, caught an interaction between the sub’s commander and his radar operator using the term “fast mover” concerning a very fast-moving object in proximity to the sub. Right now, the Chinese are developing this underwater technology, where soon their subs may transit the Pacific from Shanghai to San Francisco in hours instead of days. Aliens? Or Chinese tech, maybe?

BUT HERE IS THE MAJOR POINT!

There is a lot of disinformation on the UFO Street right now on several items, such as Hellfire

Missiles taking out UFOs off the coast of Yemen, which was most likely a CCP spy balloon. The 3i/Atlas affair is almost to the point of hysteria for no good reason. It’s almost seeming like an experiment to gauge population gullibility. Just look at the 3i/Atlas cesspool on Facebook.

There is a difference between Enigma and MUFON. A big difference! MUFON investigates! Enigma

doesn’t. Just because there are 9,000 Enigma reports of “purported USO objects” within 10 miles of coastline and 150 directly in or over bodies of water, doesn’t necessarily mean these statistics are in any way reliable. How many of these 9,000 objects have been investigated by Enigma, Fox, or anyone else, for that matter? BINGO! Where are the investigation reports forthcoming from Enigma and Fox? Don’t hold your breath.

MUFON, The MUTUAL UFO Network, has 4,000 members currently, and of that number, 700 are trained, certified Field Investigators, most with previous forensic backgrounds. We investigate all 145,000 cases in our database. Enigma does not investigate anything as far as we can tell. And here is the point….MUFON and other UFO Agencies, over the decades, have seen a pretty steady statistic about UFO reports.

Basically, 90% of those reports, if investigated, ultimately end up as being in the “IDENTIFIED” category. So, Enigma’s 9,000 reports since August of arbitrarily classified USOs, most likely are identifiable if they were actually investigated. Roughly 900 may be hard to figure out. Their 30,000 reports they have accrued since 2022 may turn out to be, if they were actually investigated, 3,000 that may need further consideration. What we believe is happening is sensationalism of the phenomenon. Clickbait even for media exposure. Yellow Journalism in the finest 19th-century fashion! It used to sell newspapers, right?

Who suffers because of this? The person who wants to believe. That’s who! Cruel! They are being fed a steady stream of FEAR by our media and people who are sensationalizing every report as if FACT.

Shame on them! It’s grotesque!

If you see something or if you feel you have been abducted, you can report it to MUFON at mufon.com. Click on the red report buttons in the upper right corner of our website. We will investigate. More importantly, we have an Experiencer Resource Team to help abductees cope with their experience.

MUFON is a 501c3 non-profit organization. We have been doing the Air Force’s business since 1969, when Blue Book ended. We are a free, open, grassroots team of UFO Investigators staffed by dedicated volunteers only! We are not funded by billionaires.

{ mufon.com }

25-11-2025 om 23:24 geschreven door peter  

Beneath the idyllic resort towns of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula, daring explorers have uncovered a hidden world of grand chambers and twisting tunnels.

The Ox Bel Ha, Mayan for 'Three Paths of Water', is a sprawling water 'web' that makes up the world's longest underwater cave system.

In this vast network, researchers have found giant sink holes, huge crystal chambers known as ice palaces, and 38 unique species of cave–dwelling animals.

Cave divers have mapped out 325.6 miles (524 kilometres) of subterranean tunnels, but believe there could be even more yet to explore.

Since 2018 alone, divers have squeezed their way through 108 more miles (175 kilometres) of unexplored cave.

Research group, El Centro Investigador del Sistema Acuífero de Quintana Roo (CINDAQ), believes it may find more than 373 miles (600 kilometres) of cave before its investigations are done.

The Ox Bel Ha is the second–longest explored cave in the world, and is only beaten by Kentucky's Mammoth Caves, which run for at least 426 miles (686 km).

The big difference is that every metre of Mexico's cavernous network is submerged in a mixture of salt and freshwater.

The Ox Bel Ha is the world's largest cave network, extending at least 325 miles beneath Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula 

Scientists believe that the incredible complexity of Ox Bel Ha is due to the unusual way in which it formed.

Millions of years ago, rainwater and dissolved carbon dioxide filtered through a thick layer of limestone on the Yucatan Peninsula.

As this acidic solution filtered through the rock, it reacted with the limestone and carved out vast channels and tunnels.

Then, approximately 18,000 years ago, severe climate changes caused ocean levels to rise and flood the caves – sealing the underground landscape exactly as it is found today.

Rather uniquely, this is also one of the few underwater caves in Mexico which connect directly to the sea.

This means that there is a layer of faster–flowing fresh water sitting on top of a nearly static saltwater layer.

This creates what scientists call a 'halocline', a layer where salt and fresh water mix, which makes exploration even trickier.

Exploration only began on the Ox Bel Ha cave network in 1996, when explorers found an entrance inside one of the area's natural sink holes, known as cenotes.

The leading research group, El Centro Investigador del Sistema Acuífero de Quintana Roo (CINDAQ), believes they may find more than 373 miles (600 kilometres) of cave before their investigations are done

Exploration is continuously uncovering new chambers and tunnels as explorers find more connections between different sections of the cave

The only cave system longer than Ox Bel Ha is Mammoth Cave in Kentucky (pictured), which extends for at least 426 miles (686 km)

Exploring a dry cave network, such as Mammoth Cave, is already dangerous and difficult.

Cavers must force themselves into narrow passages known as constrictions in the hope that they will open up enough to turn around further on.

Becoming trapped or lost can easily result in the caver's death if they are not able to call for help.

Underwater, these difficulties are all massively increased by the fact that explorers must also manage their limited oxygen supply.

Cave divers must balance the amount of gas they bring with them against the fact that they may need to pull that equipment through some tight squeezes.

This makes long dives extending deep underground extremely challenging, and something that can only be attempted by the most skilled divers.

However, over the last 30 years, explorers have gradually managed to piece together a map of the Ox Bel Ha.

As the divers explore, they trail a line of cable behind them that allows them to find their way back, and also to assess how long the cave network is.

Ox Bel Ha is home to huge sink holes, 38 species of unique cave–dwelling animals, and a series of crystal–coated chambers known as an 'ice palace' (pictured) 

Since 2018 alone, divers have squeezed their way through 108 more miles (175 kilometres) of unexplored cave

And, as divers have repeatedly resurveyed old sections of cable, they are still finding entirely new sections of tunnel to explore.

For example, in 2022, a group of divers were following an old cable about two miles deep into the cave when they discovered that it had been overlooked by earlier dives.

The divers told In Depth Magazine at the time: 'To our surprise it looked like we were the first ones there.'

By undertaking mammoth six–to eight–hour dives, the explorers pushed up to 6,370 metres into the cave and uncovered 6.2 miles (10.1 kilometres) of new passageways.

Read More

• Are YOU brave enough to go inside Nutty Putty cave? Recreation lets you experience what it was like 

However, the efforts to map the extent of Ox Bel Ha have not been without fatalities.

In April 2022, an experienced Russian diver who had been mapping the cave for six months set out on a dive from sinkhole Cenote Odyssey and never returned.

Investigators found the diver floating face down within arm's reach of a spare gas tank, with his own tank drained empty.

It is believed that the diver became trapped in a cloud of silt while exploring a new crack, panicked, and used up the remainder of their air supplies faster than they had been prepared for.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

25-11-2025 om 23:03 geschreven door peter  

The U.S. government is compelled to investigate reports of UFOs to identify any issues regarding threats to national security. 

(iStock)

"This disturbing incident perfectly illustrates why the UAP issue has gone from fringe to mainstream," Pope said. "Whatever people’s beliefs, this is a serious safety-of-flight matter that demands urgent attention and action."

Pope stressed that simply labeling such encounters "drones" can obscure what might be much more complex.

"‘Drone’ has become a convenient shorthand for anything unexplained that people see in the skies," he said. "So, we really don’t know what we’re dealing with here."

• REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK: MILITARY WHISTLEBLOWERS TESTIFY TO CONGRESS ABOUT UNEXPLAINED UFO ENCOUNTERS

25-11-2025 om 21:28 geschreven door peter  

Mystery over strange crash near Area 51 deepens as FBI opens investigation

• MORE: World's most secretive jet spotted over Area 51

By CHRIS MELORE, US ASSISTANT SCIENCE EDITOR

The US Air Force has sparked a mystery near the top-secret base Area 51 after admitting the FBI was investigating a recent crash near the facility. 

In a statement on October 4, officials at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada said that an aircraft 'was involved in an incident,' crashing in the desert just miles from the restricted zone around Area 51 on September 23.

The infamous base has been tied to extraterrestrial lore for decades, with UFO researchers and conspiracy theorists claiming that secret government projects have been conducted at Area 51 since the 1950s.

While the Air Force said that the craft was assigned to the base as part of the 432nd Wing, some on social media pointed out that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a temporary flight restriction around the area for an entire week.

The reason for the shutdown was simply noted as 'national security' with no other explanation given by the FAA.

The location of the flight restriction placed the crash roughly 12 miles east of the security boundary around Area 51, and about 24 miles from the base itself.

However, the Air Force has revealed that even more strange activity took place after military personnel cleaned up the site, leaving nothing for the public to find.

Officials at Creech said investigators found an 'inert training bomb body' and a piece of an unidentified aircraft at the same crash site on October 3, prompting the military to get the FBI involved.

Area 51, an area of more than 2.9 million acres, is located at the Nevada Test and Training Range

A temporary flight restriction was issued by the FAA shortly after the US Air Force announced the crash of a military aircraft near Area 51

According to the Air Force statement, officials believe someone intentionally altered the scene of the secretive crash after the military left the desert.

An inert training bomb body is a practice explosive that's not rigged to explode.

Meanwhile, the Air Force said the aircraft piece was likely a panel from a plane, but admitted that it came from an 'unknown origin.'

Joerg Arnu, a long-time Area 51 researcher and host of the website Dreamland Resort, visited the site of the crash on September 27, finding nothing but a completely cleared area and several tire tracks, likely from military vehicles that combed the desert for wreckage.

'They really tore up the ground so it's impossible to find the impact mark,' Arnu said in a video taken from the alleged crash.

The researchers noted that there was no debris left in the area, but something could still be there underground, adding that desert rains often wash hidden objects back up to the surface.

The Air Force noted that 'no further details are available at this time,' but did say that there were no injuries or fatalities during the unexplained incident.

Creech Air Force Base is less than 60 miles from the alleged crash site and is home to the 432nd Wing, which operates MQ-9 Reaper armed drones, RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drones, and other craft used for intelligence, surveillance, and combat missions.

Area 51 researcher Joerg Arnu captured video of the supposed crash site after the military had finished recovering the object

The crash reportedly took place just 12 miles from the security area surrounding Area 51, a base tied to UFO encounters for decades

According to online defense news site The War Zone, Reapers are the main type of aircraft housed at the base, used for spying, watching targets, and even firing missiles from far away.

They've been in use for two decades, and it's not uncommon for them to crash under certain circumstances, including user error and mechanical failures with the uncrewed, remote-controlled drones.

Conspiracy theorists online pointed out that it would be incredibly unusual for the federal officials to keep a Reaper drone crash so secret.

They noted the fact that federal investigators showed up so quickly, searched for planted fake evidence, and kept the incident completely under wraps for over two weeks were signs that the aircraft was no ordinary drone.

Recently, the US Air Force's top-secret RAT55 jet was also spotted soaring over Area 51, confirming rumors that the enigmatic radar plane operated from the clandestine Groom Lake facility.

Area 51 has also been involved in the development and testing of other revolutionary and experimental aircraft over the years, including the F-117 Nighthawk, America's first stealth bomber.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

25-11-2025 om 21:00 geschreven door peter  

The US military and other nations around the world allegedly used nuclear weapons to shoot down UFOs and harvest their technology from the crashed remains. 

The shocking claims were made by filmmaker and director Dan Farah, who spent four years secretly interviewing high-level members of the US government and military regarding the existence of extraterrestrials. 

While speaking on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Friday, Farah said he had learned from unnamed sources responsible for the retrieval of these UFOs that nuclear testing carried out in the 1950s was often done to secretly disable alien craft.

'One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing, nuclear weapon testing, has a ripple effect that can down these things,' Farah explained. 

He added that the US military started setting off high altitude nuclear tests to essentially 'shoot fish in a barrel,' a practice that the Russians quickly followed to disable UFOs for their own experiments.

'Which is crazy on multiple levels. A, you could accidentally provoke a nuclear conflict with another party that doesn't know what you're doing. B, you're picking a fight with a more intelligent, superior species,' Farah warned.

The revelations come from his documentary, called The Age of Disclosure, released this month, that allegedly detailed the 80-year global cover-up of alien life and the technology humans have created using pieces of UFOs.

Despite the claims from a plethora of high-ranking government officials, the US government has said proof of alien life has never been found, and the military has added there's 'no verifiable evidence' they've ever recovered an alien spacecraft.

Nuclear testing in the Nevada desert in 1957. Filmmaker Dan Farah said these tests were secretly aimed at disabling UFOs

Dan Farah (Pictured) appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast to promote his new documentary 'The Age of Disclosure'

Farah said the nuclear explosions were deliberately carried out by elements of the US military intelligence community and their peers in foreign military intelligence communities, including the Soviet Union, to capture advanced technology.

However, the film's director and those who were interviewed for the documentary did not provide any physical evidence of extraterrestrial life or a government cover-up to back up their testimonies.

The US Department of Energy (DOE) said in an official report that America carried out 1,054 nuclear bomb tests between 1945 and 1992. Those included several high-altitude detonations, meaning they exploded over 31 miles above Earth.

The potentially catastrophic atomic detonations, many of which took place in the Nevada desert nearly 80 years ago, came after the US military spotted these strange craft appearing over nuclear weapons sites and bomber bases.

'Our defense capabilities and our nuclear progress essentially are being monitored,' Farah told Rogan during the podcast.

In addition to high-altitude atomic tests, the US and other nations detonated hundreds of nuclear weapons underwater during the Cold War, and Farah said this was directly linked to even more sightings of UFOs entering and exiting Earth's oceans.

According to the 2015 report from DOE, at least five of these atomic tests took place in the Pacific Ocean between 1946 and 1962.

'It's like throwing dynamite into the river. Fishing with dynamite. Oh my God, that's so crazy,' Rogan declared. 

An atomic bomb explosion above Bikini Atoll in 1946. Nuclear detonations taking place in the ocean were allegedly done to target UFOs seen entering Earth's oceans

Government whistleblowers and members of Congress alleged that information about the recovery of alien spacecraft has been (Stock Image) 

Both Farah and Rogan referenced recent claims made by Tennessee congressman Tim Burchett, who said US Navy personnel were aware of 'five or six' underwater UFO bases right off the US coast.

Burchett, a member of the House Oversight Committee overseeing UFO reports, has not produced any verifiable physical evidence, such as artifacts or clear footage of these underwater craft, to confirm the existence of alien bases.

Farah said that several US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, revealed the world was now locked in a Cold War to reengineer the alien technology recovered from these ships.

During his interviews, government officials admitted this new, secret Cold War would be far more consequential than the original nuclear arms race.

Members of Congress and the White House revealed in the documentary that the US, Russia, and China were all racing to be the first to fully weaponize non-human tech.

The director of 'The Age of Disclosure' added that certain UFO sightings in space and over sensitive areas are believed to be reverse-engineered human craft that have already been constructed and are still in the testing phase. 

Joe Rogan (Pictured) was visibly stunned after Farah said the US military had alleedly used nuclear weapons to attack UFOs in the 1950s

According to Farah, Rubio was especially worried that China would beat the US in the race to unlock the secrets of alien technology recovered from all around the world.

'He literally says in the film, is If we don't get our act together and take this more seriously as a country, we're going to wake up one day, we're going to find out the hard way that China got there,' Farah recounted from his interview with Rubio.

'We won't know when or how, but to quote him, we will be screwed... His chin buckled when he said it. He was dead serious, and he was super concerned and you could feel it.'

Farah revealed that he had spoken to members of the Trump Administration, and the president has already ordered to current DNI Tulsi Gabbard to investigate the claims presented in the new documentary and find out what's being kept secret from him and former presidents.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

25-11-2025 om 20:49 geschreven door peter  

Disney has brought one of its most legendary characters to life – and he's seriously worth melting for. 

Measuring just three feet (one metre) tall, Olaf the robot can walk and talk just like the delightful eternally optimistic snowman from the Frozen movies. 

The high-tech device can move around through a combination of remote operation and AI that's programmed to adapt to surroundings. 

Video shows him curiously shuffling around Disneyland Paris just like he does in the films – and visitors will soon be able to meet him.

Kyle Laughlin, product and technology leader at Disney, called it 'one of the most expressive and true-to-life characters built'. 

'From the way he moves to the way he looks, every gesture and detail is crafted to reflect the Olaf audiences have seen in the film,' he said. 

On Instagram, Frozen fans were sent into delirium, calling the creation 'incredible', 'perfect' and 'so good it's making my tummy hurt'. 

Another fan said: 'It's like he jumped right off the screen into real life.' 

Some people are worth melting for: The walking, talking bot, unveiled at Disneyland Paris on Monday, has movements just like in the film, as well as detachable arms and nose 

In a nod to one of his most famous lines, another person said: 'I need a warm hug please Olaf.'

Olaf was built by Disney Imagineering, the multi-billion-dollar company's research and development arm based in Glendale, California. 

To make the snowman's movements as authentic as possible, engineers relied on a type of AI called reinforcement learning.

This is where a robot learns to make intelligent decisions through trial and error by interacting with its environment. 

But the technology allows Olaf the robot to practice thousands of motions inside a computer simulation until his real-life movements look natural. 

'It takes humans years to perfect our motor skills for walking, and it takes additional years of practice to perform acrobatic motions that only a few of us can master,' Laughlin said. 

'Deep reinforcement learning is a technology that helps robots acquire such skills in a shorter amount of time. 

'To make this technology scale well, we need fast and parallel simulation.' 

Olaf talking about the new World of Frozen, inside the Disney Adventure World (former Walt Disney Studios) in Disneyland Paris, in Marne-la-Vallee, east of Paris on November 24, 2025

A hidden operator remotely controls the robot using joysticks, but it is AI programmed to adapt to surroundings 

To make Olaf as authentic as possible, the team used a branch of artificial intelligence called reinforcement learning

Despite this feat, Olaf is still ultimately operated by a Disney staff member holding a remote control, Tech Radar reports. 

Other nice touches are Olaf's exterior 'snow' made from light-catching iridescent fibres, which is a striking contrast to the hard shells of other robotic characters. 

And just like in the film, his twig arms and carrot nose are removable and pop right back on. 

Most importantly, Olaf can fully articulate his mouth and engage in Frozen-related conversations with park guests, Disney claims. 

As yet, it's unclear how sophisticated these conversations will be or if they'll be powered by a generative chatbot akin to ChatGPT. 

Olaf is similar to the Star Wars BDX Droids, the free roaming robotic characters that victors can see at Disney attractions. 

'However, BDX Droids in the films are literally robotic characters,' Laughlin said. 

'Olaf is an animated character that is far more challenging to bring to life in the physical world.'  

Olaf at the new World of Frozen, inside the Disney Adventure World (former Walt Disney Studios) in Disneyland Paris, in Marne-la-Vallee, east of Paris on November 24, 2025. The Disney Adventure World will open on March 29, 2026

Read More

• Chefs, your jobs are safe for now! Humanoid robot tries to cook a stir-fry - with disastrous results 

Early next year, Olaf the robot will start shuffling around at World of Frozen, a new immersive world at Disneyland in Hong Kong and Paris. 

The creation has been detailed further in a new episode of Disney's YouTube series We Call It Imagineering. 

While undoubtedly impressive, Olaf's chunky legs make keeping his balance an easier task compared to some of the long-legged humanoids in development. 

Earlier this month, a Russian robot called AIDOL wobbled and face-planted during an on-stage unveiling event, leaving attendees stunned. 

Another recent clip shows a Unitree G1 robot chef attempting to cook a stir-fry – but ending up flinging the food on the floor and slipping over the mess. 

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

25-11-2025 om 20:26 geschreven door peter  

Professor Says Mysterious Interstellar Object May Be Releasing Sentinels Around Jupiter

By Victor Tangermann

NASA / Futurism

Interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is expected to make its closest pass of the Earth just under a month from now, coming within around 170 million miles of us.

Three months later, it’s expected to get even closer to Jupiter as it continues on its highly eccentric path through the solar system.

And as Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb — who has long championed the theory that 3I/ATLAS could be an alien spacecraft, to the increasing dismay of the mainstream research community — points out on his blog, recent “non-gravitational acceleration” seems to have nudged it toward a fascinating region of Jupiter’s orbit.

Specifically, it’s going to zip right past Jupiter’s Hill radius, the boundary inside which the gas giant can keep an object in its own orbit without it being stolen by the Sun.

In the Earth’s vicinity, Lagrange points L1 and L2 are close to the boundary of our planet’s Hill radius, a perfect place of equilibrium for satellites and other human-made objects, such as the James Webb Space Telescope, to orbit the Sun while using minimal amounts of fuel.

Loeb suggests that if it is indeed an alien spacecraft, 3I/ATLAS could be passing through Jupiter’s Hill radius to “seed” the planet with “technological devices” — a hypothesis, you have to admit, that sounds strikingly similar to the plot of Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 film “2001: A Space Odyssey.”

“If we find technological satellites of Jupiter that we did not send, it would imply that Jupiter is of interest to an extraterrestrial civilization,” Loeb wrote.

But not everybody’s on board, including NASA. In light of considerable evidence that the mysterious visitor is a comet made of ice and dust, NASA associate administrator Amit Kshatriya preemptively shut down Loeb’s theorizing during a recent announcement, angering him in the process.

During its closest approach to the Sun last month, 3I/ATLAS got a push in the form of “non-gravitational acceleration.” While a more conventional explanation would suggest the Sun’s radiation heated the object up, causing it to lose more mass and thereby accelerate, Loeb suggested at the time that it could “be the technological signature of an internal engine.”

Intriguingly, that extra push will allow it to get within around 53 million miles of Jupiter on March 16, which also happens to be within just 160,000 miles of the planet’s Hill radius.

“In other words, the non-gravitational acceleration introduced a small course correction of exactly the magnitude needed to bring the minimum distance of 3I/ATLAS from Jupiter to the value of Jupiter’s Hill radius,” Loeb wrote. “3I/ATLAS would have missed the edge of the Hill sphere otherwise.”

Therefore, Loeb suggested that 3I/ATLAS’ “level of non-gravitational acceleration was finely tuned” with the help of thrusters to meet the “radius of Jupiter’s gravitational influence.”

The astronomer reiterated that NASA’s Juno spacecraft, which has been orbiting Jupiter since 2016, should have a closer look at 3I/ATLAS in the spring.

Loeb also argued that scientists should remain humble and not jump to conclusions by arguing that the only possibility is that 3I/ATLAS is a natural comet. For one, if we were to find “technological satellites” in the orbit of our solar system’s largest planet — and not around Earth — it could serve as a “blow to our ego, akin to attending a party where nobody is interested in dancing with us.”

“Perhaps this is because the human species arrived late to the party — only a few million years ago, whereas Jupiter — the biggest planet in the Solar system, was visible to the senders of 3I/ATLAS when the mission was launched billions of years ago,” he concluded.

More on 3I/ATLAS: 

• Scientist Identifies Something Strange About New Image of Mysterious Interstellar Visitor

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://futurism.com/category/space }

25-11-2025 om 18:58 geschreven door peter  

The findings, published in Nature Geoscience, were the result of work led by Yoshinori Miyazaki, a geodynamicist at Rutgers University, working along with a team of collaborators.

Anomalies at the Boundary

1,800 miles beneath the Earth’s surface, massive structures exist that have long been recognized by geologists. These unusual formations exist at the point where Earth’s Mantle and its outer core converge, and are composed of massive accumulations of extremely hot, dense rock that are comparable in size to Earth’s present-day continents.

The structures come in two types, which are known as large low-shear-velocity provinces and ultra-low-velocity zones. The former are structures that are found deep beneath the Pacific Ocean and the African continent, and are comprised of large, dense accumulations of very hot rock. Their counterpart—ultra-low-velocity zones, by contrast, are large molten areas which resemble “puddles” of lava situated around the Earth’s core.

Each of these structures appears to possess odd structural traits based on their composition, which includes the fact that they both can slow the progress of seismic waves passing through inner-Earth regions.

However, the presence of these features is far from being coincidental, according to Miyazaki.

“These are not random oddities,” the researcher said in a recent statement, instead likening the unusual structures to the “fingerprints of Earth’s earliest history.”

Understanding why these inner-Earth features exist, Miyazaki says, could ultimately help geologists unravel the mystery of not just how the early planet formed but also what processes may have contributed to it becoming habitable over time.

Exploring an Ancient Ocean of Magma

Miyazaki is uniquely positioned to unravel such questions. As an assistant professor in Rutgers’ Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences in the university’s School of Arts and Sciences, Miyazaki is a theoretical planetary scientist whose work focuses on unraveling the origin and early evolution of planets like Earth by using mathematical models.

If we travel billions of years back in time, our planet was once encased in an ocean of hot molten lava. Gradually over time, it began to cool and take shape into the modern surface and subsurface regions, which researchers expected to resemble a layered shell marked by several distinctive chemical layers.

That wasn’t the case, however. Rather than distinctive layers, scientists were surprised to discover the presence of anomalous large-low shear velocity provinces and ultra-low velocity zones, which, instead of ordered layers, take shape as uneven “blobs” at the lower levels of the planet’s mantle.

That discovery, while seemingly contradictory, was the launchpad for Miyazaki and his collaborators’ research.

“If we start from the magma ocean and do the calculations, we don’t get what we see in Earth’s mantle today,” Miyazaki said.

“Something was missing.”

Missing Pieces of an Ancient Earth Mystery

In searching for the answers to this geological mystery, Miyazaki and his colleagues concluded that the resolution might be hidden in plain sight: that the Earth’s core was itself the seemingly missing component.

Over the course of billions of years, elements that include magnesium and silicon would gradually make their way from the core into the Earth’s mantle, which over time prevented the strong layering of chemicals scientists originally expected.

This not only explains the absence of distinctive layers within the Earth but also the unusual structures at the boundary between the core and the mantle, which are effectively solid portions that were left behind from the lower portions of the original magma ocean, which over time became contaminated through interactions with material from the Earth’s core.

Going beyond simply resolving the mystery of the anomalous structures themselves, Miyazaki says that the discovery could also point to new clues about how the Earth evolved as it cooled, which could lend itself to understanding how life began to emerge.

Additionally, the results offer clues about the reasons for fundamental differences between the atmospheres of Earth and neighboring planets like Venus and Mars.

“Venus’ atmosphere is 100 times thicker than Earth’s and is mostly carbon dioxide, and Mars has a very thin atmosphere,” Miyazaki said. “We don’t fully understand why that is.”

“But what happens inside a planet, that is, how it cools, how its layers evolve, could be a big part of the answer,” he adds.

A Multi-Field Approach

Additionally, by combining data from areas that include mineralogy, geophysics, seismology, and other disciplines, the team’s results offer a pathway toward obtaining a far deeper understanding of processes that contributed to how the Earth formed over time.

Jie Deng, one of the study’s collaborators from Princeton University and a co-author of the new study, called the team’s work a “great example of how combining planetary science, geodynamics, and mineral physics can help us solve some of Earth’s oldest mysteries.”

“The idea that the deep mantle could still carry the chemical memory of early core–mantle interactions opens up new ways to understand Earth’s unique evolution,” Deng added.

Fundamentally, the emerging story of planetary evolution that the team’s work is revealing offers researchers like Deng and Miyazaki much greater insights into the mysteries of the ancient Earth.

“This study gives us a little more certainty about how Earth evolved, and why it’s so special,” Miyazaki said.

The team’s new paper, “Deep mantle heterogeneities formed through a basal magma ocean contaminated by core exsolution,” appeared in Nature Geoscience.

• Micah Hanks is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of The Debrief. A longtime reporter on science, defense, and technology with a focus on space and astronomy, he can be reached at micah@thedebrief.org. Follow him on X @MicahHanks, and at micahhanks.com.

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/space/ pà

25-11-2025 om 18:44 geschreven door peter  

Scientists issue ominous warning over mind-altering 'brain weapons' that can control your perception, memory and behaviour

• READ MORE: Analysis of 45 notorious murderers uncovers 4 common traits

By WILIAM HUNTER, SENIOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY REPORTER

Mind control weapons may sound like something from a dystopian science fiction film, but experts now say they are becoming a reality. 

Scientists have issued an ominous warning over mind-altering 'brain weapons' that can target your perception, memory, and even behaviour.

In a newly published book, Dr Michael Crowley and Professor Malcolm Dando, of Bradford University, argue that recent scientific advances should be a 'wake-up call'.

Professor Dando says: 'The same knowledge that helps us treat neurological disorders could be used to disrupt cognition, induce compliance, or even in the future turn people into unwitting agents.'

Nations including the US, China, Russia, and the UK have been researching so-called central nervous system (CNS)-acting weapons since the 1950s.

Now, Dr Crowley and Professor Dando argue that modern neuroscience has become so advanced that truly terrifying mind weapons could be created.

Professor Dando says: 'We are entering an era where the brain itself could become a battlefield.

'The tools to manipulate the central nervous system – to sedate, confuse, or even coerce – are becoming more precise, more accessible, and more attractive to states.'

Scientists have issued an ominous warning that developments in neuroscience could see powerful 'brain weapons' become a reality (stock image) 

Just like the fictional drug 'Soma' from the science-fiction classic 'Brave New World' (pictured), scientists warn that new chemicals could be used as a powerful form of mind control 

Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, most of the world's major powers 'actively sought' to develop their own mind-controlling weapons.

Their goal was to create devices that could incapacitate large numbers of people through unconsciousness, hallucination, disorientation, or sedation.

Most famously, the American military developed the compound 'BZ', which produces a powerful sense of delirium, hallucinations, and cognitive dysfunction.

The US manufactured approximately 60,000 kilograms of the potent drug and used it to create a 340-kilogram (750 lbs) cluster bomb.

Although the bomb was intended to be used in Vietnam, and BZ was tested intensively on US soldiers, there's no evidence that the weapon was ever used.

Meanwhile, the Chinese military has developed a 'narcosis-gun' designed to shoot syringes of incapacitating chemicals.  

However, Dr Crowley and Professor Dando point out, the only time that a CNS-targeting weapon has ever been used in combat was by Russian security forces during the 2002 Moscow theatre siege.

After armed Chechen militants took 900 civilians hostage, security forces used a fentanyl-derived 'incapacitating chemical agent' to disable the attackers.

 

Since the 1950s, major world powers have been attempting to create chemical weapons that target the brain. These include the US military's BZ bomb filled with hallucination-inducing gas (right) and the Chinese 'Narcosis-gun' (right)

The only time that so-called central nervous system (CNS)-targeting weapons have been used was by the Russian security services during the 2002 Moscow theatre siege (pictured). A gas containing fentanyl derivatives was used to knock out the gunmen inside 

While the chemical weapon did break the siege, the gas killed 120 of the 900 hostages and an undetermined number more to face long-term health issues and premature death.

However, since then, the mind-warping potential of these weapons has extended far beyond simply knocking out attackers or triggering hallucinations.

The same scientific research that is helping to treat neurological disorders can also be used to build weapons which target specific brain functions.

'That's the dual-use dilemma we face,' says Professor Dando.

For example, scientists are investigating parts of the brain's 'survival circuits', which are the neural pathways that control fear, sleep, aggression, and decision making.

Understanding how these circuits work is critical for treating neurological conditions, but also opens the door to weaponising these regions of the brain.

In fact, Dr Crowley and Professor Dando are so concerned about this possibility that they are travelling to the Hague for a key meeting of states to argue the case for urgent action.

The issue, the researchers warn, is that CNS-targeting weapons currently sit within a 'loophole' in the rules governing the use of chemical weapons.

While the gas did break the siege, it also killed 120 of the 900 hostages in the theatre and left an unknown number with life-long illnesses. Pictured: Vladimir Putin visits survivors of the theatre siege 

This comes amid growing concern that future armies could be made up of cyborgs with neurological enhancements allowing them to see, hear and fight better than current soldiers

Read More

• The most detailed map of the brain ever seen: Stunning simulation details 10 MILLION neurons 

The Chemical Weapons Convention prohibits the use of harmful chemicals in war, but there is a grey area allowing the use of some chemicals in certain circumstances, such as law enforcement.

That leaves a potential legal justification for the development and use of powerful mind-control weapons within the current scope of the law.

Professor Dando says: 'There are dangerous regulatory gaps within and between these treaties. Unless they are closed, we fear certain States may be emboldened to exploit them in dedicated CNS and broader incapacitating agent weapons programmes.

'We must act now to protect the integrity of science and the sanctity of the human mind.'

WHAT ARE PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPONS AND HOW MIGHT THEY WORK?

Rumours of governments experimenting with pyscho-electronic weapons have long abounded among conspiracy theorists.

Also known as pscyhotronic or mind-control weapons, it is claimed they use electromagnetic forces to achieve a variety of results.

This includes mind-reading and mind control, as well as torture and harassment.

The basis for these claims does have some origin in fact.

In 1953, the then director of Central Intelligence officially approved project MKUltra. 

It was intended to help the US government keep up with experiments they believed the Soviets were conducting during the Cold War.

They hoped to achieve this aim through 'the use of biological and chemical materials in altering human behavior,' CIA director Stansfield Turner testified in 1977.

Footage has since emerged of experiments conducted into the potential of weaponising LSD as a method of controlling or subduing enemy forces.

Since that time, conspiracy theorists have expanded their claims about the kinds of techniques agencies like the CIA or others may have experimented with.

Some individuals say they have been targeted with pscyhotronic weapons, leading to a variety of unpleasant side effects.

That includes transmitting thoughts and sounds into people's minds, although most medical professionals agree this is likely the result of psychiatric disorders.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

24-11-2025 om 22:46 geschreven door peter  

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

24-11-2025 om 22:27 geschreven door peter  

Once again, the International Space Station’s live stream has raised more questions than answers. Just days ago, viewers watched the ISS feed suddenly glitch out, right after a strange, dark object drifted past the station. 

Moments before the cut, the ISS radio chatter sounded completely normal. Then something slid across the right side of the frame… and NASA instantly switched to their generic “technical difficulties” screen. Coincidence? Or another quiet cover-up? 

NASA tried to downplay the incident, claiming the object passed through a known “black spot” on the camera, a sensor artifact where things temporarily vanish. But the timing couldn’t have been more suspicious: the object slipped into that exact blind zone, reappeared briefly, and then the entire feed went down. 

One of the loudest critics of NASA’s broadcasts is researcher Justin Robert, who argues that much of the ISS footage is staged using studio tricks, wires, harnesses, green screens, and VR compositing. 

According to Justin, NASA’s own videos show: 

1. Astronauts glitching or fading like green-screen artifacts.

2. Objects being “grabbed” that aren’t actually there. 

3. Crew tugging at what looks like invisible wires.

4. Astronauts getting tangled in harness rigs. 

5. Even moments where people appear to pop into the shot. 

His central question is simple: If astronauts are orbiting Earth, why do NASA’s feeds resemble Hollywood post-production? Some researchers go further, arguing the ISS “live stream” isn’t even from orbit, claiming it could be filmed from a high-altitude aircraft with a fisheye lens to fake Earth’s curvature, with a curated, pre-processed feed presented as “live.” 

But why would NASA lie? 

Justin and a growing number of researchers trace the secrecy back to the 1950s. In 1956, Admiral Byrd completed his final Antarctic expedition and allegedly described a lush, temperate landmass the size of the United States hidden beyond the ice. 

Then, almost too conveniently, two major events followed: NASA was founded in 1958 and the Antarctic Treaty was signed the same year, locking the continent off from all independent exploration. 

Some theories argue NASA became involved in this region because of Byrd’s discoveries and the classified exploration that followed. 

These theories suggest: Unknown land, resources, or even civilizations may exist beyond Antarctica and  extraterrestrials might not come from deep space, they could be emerging from hidden regions on Earth, or even from beneath the oceans.  

Another major red flag: NASA openly admits that many iconic “Earth from space” images, such as the famous blue marble iPhone wallpaper, are Photoshop composites, not single photographs. 

Commonly cited issues include: 

1. Identical cloud patterns in images supposedly taken years apart.

2. Inconsistent continent shapes, colors, and scales. 

3. NASA graphic artists explaining how they constructed Earth images from data. 

4. And despite decades of satellites… still no true single shot full Earth photo. 

Even Russia has publicly questioned NASA’s authenticity, claiming their forensic analysis of U.S. moon landing photos showed them to be “99% fake.” 

The big question NASA never answers: 

1. Where are the trillions of dollars going? 

2. NASA receives massive budgets, yet: No major breakthroughs in decades. 

3. Still no return to the Moon despite superior technology. 

4. Endless glitches, blurry footage, and suspicious ISS livestream behavior. 

5. Zero transparency.

And every time something strange pops up on camera, like this week’s mysterious object, the feed gets cut instantly. 

 

At this point, it’s no wonder millions believe NASA’s real mission isn’t exploration… but distraction.

  

{ http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/ }

24-11-2025 om 18:38 geschreven door peter  

The clustering algorithm detected an area of increased density in the Kuiper belt. Scientists do not know why there are more objects concentrated in this area than elsewhere. In addition, the objects here have orbits closer to a circle.

New regions of the Kuiper belt

A large region of our solar system called the Kuiper belt extends from Neptune’s orbit to approximately 50 astronomical units. This region consists mainly of icy objects and small rocky bodies such as Pluto. Scientists believe that Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) are remnants left over from the formation of the solar system.

Now, a new paper describes a recently discovered region that appears to be completely different from other parts of the Kuiper belt, but some uncertainty remains.

Core of the Kuiper Belt

Back in 2011, a group of astronomers noticed a denser region of objects located in the Kuiper belt at a distance of about 44 AU. The group named this region the “core” and found that the objects in it have a low inclination to the ecliptic and eccentricity compared to other KPOs.

In other words, their orbits were more circular and lay closer to the plane of the Solar System rather than at an angle. The core itself lies within another distinct population of KPO, called the “dynamically cold” population, in which all objects tend to have lower eccentricities and inclinations.

Since the initial observation of the nucleus was visual in nature, it may not have captured some fine details. Some researchers have wondered whether a more in-depth study of the data on these objects might reveal new features in the nucleus or other parts of the Kuiper belt.

Clustering algorithm and new questions

To find individual structures in the Kuiper belt, the authors of a new preprint article decided to test a clustering algorithm called Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN). This algorithm has already been used for other astronomical datasets, but not for the Kuiper belt. First, the team calculated the barycentric free orbital elements, such as the semi-major axis, eccentricity, and inclination, for 1,650 classical KPOs and applied DBSCAN to them to search for other clusters of similar objects.

Their algorithm detected not only the core, but also another separate structure next to it, approximately 43 AU away, which they simply call the inner core. The inner core stands out as potentially separate because its eccentricity distribution is narrower than that of the core, indicating a separate population. They claim that the inner core contains 7-10% of classical KPOs.

However, the team notes that the distinction between the core and the inner core depends on the clustering parameters. This leaves some doubt as to whether the inner core is truly separate.

Theories about the structure of the Kuiper belt

At present, the existence of the inner belt as a separate structure remains unclear. However, new data from the Vera Rubin Observatory will soon be published, which should shed more light on this issue. These and other studies may clarify the nature of these structures and provide more information about their origin.

However, for the authors of the study, the inner belt remains important. Scientists note that there are two alternative explanations, between which it is impossible to choose: either the core is much larger than previously thought, or there is an additional separate structure in the cold classical Kuiper belt. In any case, the inner core, as described here, is an additional component.

• Provided by phys.org

• Posted in News, Science

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

24-11-2025 om 18:27 geschreven door peter  

Radar satellites operating in Mars’ orbit regularly detect strange bright reflections under the planet’s ice caps. These are usually interpreted as pools of meltwater, but scientists have recently begun to question this interpretation.

MARSIS radar discovery

Ancient Mars boasted abundant water, but the cold and dry conditions of today make liquid water on the Red Planet seem far less probable. However, the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding (MARSIS) detected strong radar reflections from a 20-kilometer-wide area over the base of Mars’s southern polar ice cap, hinting at the possibility of liquid water below the icy surface. Such a finding would have major implications for the planet’s possible habitability.

But sustaining liquid water underneath the ice might not be feasible without very salty brines or localized volcanic heat. Scientists have deliberated about other possible “dry” explanations for the bright reflections detected by MARSIS, such as layers of carbon dioxide and water ices or salty ice and clay causing elevated radar reflectivity.

Penetrating signals of the SHARAD device

Aboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, the Shallow Radar (SHARAD) uses higher frequencies than MARSIS. Until recently, though, SHARAD’s signals could not reach deep enough into Mars to bounce off the base layer of the ice where the potential water lies – meaning its results couldn’t be compared with those from MARSIS.

However, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter team recently tested a new maneuver that rolls the spacecraft on its flight axis by 120° – whereas it previously could roll only up to 28°. The new maneuver, termed a “very large roll,” or VLR, can increase SHARAD’s signal strength and penetration depth, allowing researchers to examine the base of the ice in the enigmatic high-reflectivity zone.

Most likely not liquid water

Gareth Morgan and colleagues, for their article published in Geophysical Research Letters, examined 91 SHARAD observations that crossed the high-reflectivity zone. Only when using the VLR maneuver was a SHARAD basal echo detected at the site. In contrast to the MARSIS detection, the SHARAD detection was very weak, meaning it is unlikely that liquid water is present in the high-reflectivity zone.

The researchers suggest that the faint detection returned by SHARAD under this portion of the ice cap is likely due to a localized region of smooth ground beneath the ice. They add that further research is needed to reconcile the differences between the MARSIS and SHARAD findings.

• Provided by: phys.org

• Posted in News, ScienceTagged
  

{ https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

24-11-2025 om 18:12 geschreven door peter  

What would happen if you walked into a black hole? Scientist reveals the gruesome effects on the human body

• READ MORE: Scientists capture an image of two black holes circling each other

By WILIAM HUNTER, SENIOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY REPORTER

Although falling into a massive black hole would certainly be deadly, it isn't really something most people need to worry about.

However, scientists say that there could be smaller hidden black holes lurking in our solar system that could pass right through you at any time.

These so-called 'primordial' black holes have masses ranging from 100,000 times smaller than a paper clip to 100,000 times greater than the sun.

But what would happen if you walked into one of these miniature monsters?

According to Professor Robert Scherrer, a physicist from Vanderbilt University, the results would be gruesome.

The gravitational forces of a primordial black hole would be so strong that they would tear the cells of your brain apart from the inside out.

Professor Scherrer says: 'A sufficiently large primordial black hole, about the size of an asteroid or larger, would cause serious injury or death if it passed through you.

'It would behave like a gunshot.'

A scientist has revealed what would happen if you walked into a black hole, and his calculations show the gruesome effects it would have on your body 

A primordial black hole is a type of black hole that formed in the very first moments of the Universe as vast clouds of matter collapsed directly into singularities.

Although they are currently only theoretical, these black holes might have been drifting around the universe and slowly shrinking for the last 13.8 billion years.

Today, scientists think that any remaining primordial black holes probably have roughly the same mass as an asteroid, crushed into a point the size of an atom.

Despite being incredibly small, Professor Scherrer's calculations suggest that being hit by one of these strange objects could very well be deadly.

When the black hole collides with a body, it will start to transfer huge amounts of energy in two forms: a supersonic shock and tidal forces.

A supersonic shock occurs when something moves faster than the speed of sound and produces a blast of energy radiating out in a cone.

In the case of a black hole, these shockwaves would spread out from its path as it passed through the body's tissue.

Professor Scherrer compares the force of this impact to being hit by a large-calibre bullet, which dumps energy into the body as it passes through.

Entering a massive black hole would be deadly, but a researcher has now calculated that a tiny 'primordial' black hole could also produce a strong enough force to tear the cells of your brain apart from the inside (stock image)

If the black hole has a big enough mass, that energy would be enough to cause death by rupturing the internal organs and triggering massive bleeding.

The other way in which a black hole might kill you is through the creation of tidal forces.

Tidal forces occur when gravity pulls more strongly on one part of an object than another, tearing it apart.

This is the same process that causes planets to crumble into pieces when they fall too close to their host stars.

Since a primordial black hole is so small, the area affected by its gravitational pull is quite limited.

However, if it passed through the brain, these tidal forces could be strong enough to kill.

Professor Scherrer predicts that a primordial black hole could produce a tidal force of 10 to 100 Newtons across the entire brain.

In his paper, published in the International Journal of Modern Physics D, he explains that this 'would be sufficient to pull apart human brain cells'.

Scientists believe that the universe might be filled with tiny primordial black holes (artist's impression) left over from the very earliest moments of the Big Bang. If one of these hit you, it would be like being struck by a high-calibre bullet 

Although this sounds gruesome, Professor Scherrer's calculations suggest that it is the shockwave which is most likely to kill you.

A black hole with a mass of roughly 140 billion tonnes would deliver a shock equivalent to the muzzle energy of a 0.22 calibre rifle, which could be fatal.

For the tidal forces to be deadly, the black hole would need to be several orders of magnitude larger, with a mass of roughly seven trillion tonnes.

That is comfortably within the mass that scientists expect from primordial black holes, but Professor Scherrer maintains there is no real reason to worry.

He says: 'A smaller primordial black hole could pass through you, and you wouldn't even notice it.

'However, the density of these black holes is so low that such an encounter is essentially never going to happen.'

In reality, the fact that no one has ever been killed by a black hole could be an important piece of scientific evidence.

Some scientists think that primordial black holes might make up a chunk of the Universe's dark matter.

However, since primordial black holes are so small and rare, the chances of actually being hit by one are almost negligible 

This is the unobservable extra mass that makes up most of the known universe and helps galaxies stay together. 

However, since we can't see these primordial black holes, it's almost impossible to know how much dark matter they make up.

Professor Scherrer's calculations show that even the smallest, asteroid-sized primordial black holes would cause serious injury or death if they hit someone.

So, the fact that this has never happened means primordial black holes can't be that common - putting a limit on how much dark matter they represent if they exist at all.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

24-11-2025 om 17:51 geschreven door peter  

Skeptical of UAPs and aliens? This new documentary is trying to change your mind

What does the U.S. government know about “unidentified aerial phenomena” (UAPs), aliens and an alleged global alien technology arms race?

A brand-new documentary claims to have an answer: more than it’s telling the public.

On Tuesday, filmmaker Dan Farah and a group of the film’s subjects screened “The Age of Disclosure” at New York City’s Intrepid Museum aboard the decommissioned USS Intrepid aircraft carrier.

The documentary is described by its filmmakers as a look at “an 80-year global cover-up of non-human intelligent life and a secret war among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of non-human origin.” It features interviews with more than 30 “U.S. government, military and intelligence community insiders.”

“This is one of the most important documentaries ever made,” Jay Stratton, a former director of the covert Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, said at the screening, where a number of stars, including “Karate Kid” and “Cobra Kai” star Ralph Macchio and actor Adrian Martinez, were in attendance.

“It will make a huge impact on humanity,” added Stratton, who is featured in the film.

The film, which first premiered at the SXSW Film Festival in March, makes its case through a combination of video evidence taken from various military cameras and firsthand accounts from members of the intelligence community who detail declassified events they claim to have witnessed during their time in military service while either on the ground or flying aircraft.

“These are otherworldly things that are performing maneuvers that haven’t been seen,” U.S. Rep. André Carson, D-Ind., says in the documentary.

Large shapes the size of football fields floating in midair above U.S. nuclear missile sites and aircraft able to travel over 30,000 mph are just a few of the UAPs — a term that the government now favors over the older term “UFOs” — described in their accounts.

While the UAPs they describe often differed in size, shape and movement, they all had one thing in common: The U.S. government had no explanation for what they were or where they were from — or at least not publicly.

The film also alleges the existence of an ongoing arms race between the U.S., Russia and China, set off by the discovery of supposed crashed UAPs, with each nation hoping to be the first to crack into alien technology to reverse-engineer it for human use.

In the documentary, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says there is a bipartisan effort to push for the declassification of government intelligence related to UAPs.

“It’s just not an issue, at least as of yet, in this country, that lends itself to some sort of partisan or ideological divide,” he says in the film.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., have also called for learning more about the government’s investigation into UAPs.

Earlier this year, Burchett introduced the UAP Transparency Act, which aims to require “the President to direct each federal agency to declassify all agency records related to UAP and make such records available on a public website of the agency.”

“We’ve been fighting this battle, some of y’all, for 30 years, and maybe longer,” Burchett said during a House Oversight Committee hearing in September. “The government has something, and they need to turn it over to us.”

At the screening, where some attendees wore alien-themed outfits, Stratton stressed the importance of the documentary’s serious tone, noting the decades of skepticism and public stigma faced by people who speak out about their experiences with UAPs.

Retired Navy Cmdr. David Fravor, whose military aircraft captured video, featured in the film, of his own purported UAP encounter, told the crowd that it takes “a lot of guts” for people to come forward on the record about their experiences.

“Some people claim it would cost them their lives if they spoke out about these things,” Rubio says in the film.

Due to these safety concerns, Burchett said he also introduced the UAP Whistleblower Protection Act “to provide whistleblower protections to Federal personnel for disclosing the use of Federal taxpayer funds to evaluate or research unidentified anomalous phenomenon material.”

Farah, who spent three years making “The Age of Disclosure,” said he hopes the film leads to a national conversation that “puts pressure on the executive branch to reveal the truth” about UAPs and aliens.

“Reach out to your elected representatives,” Stratton also said.

On Friday, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences named “The Age of Disclosure” among the 201 documentaries eligible for Oscar consideration.

It’s now available to rent or buy on Amazon’s Prime Video and is showing in select theaters.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.nbcnews.com/ }

23-11-2025 om 23:51 geschreven door peter  

[VIDEO] NASA Cuts ISS Livestream After Mysterious UFO Flyby – Latest in a Series of Unexplained Sightings

On November 18th, at around 11:04 a.m. U.S. Central Time, NASA’s official International Space Station (ISS) livestream suddenly went offline – right after viewers spotted what appeared to be a bright unidentified flying object gliding past Earth’s horizon.

The short clip, now widely shared online, shows a glowing object moving steadily across the frame, far below the station’s orbit. Just moments later, the ISS feed abruptly cuts to a “technical difficulties” screen, a move that has fueled speculation among UFO enthusiasts and space watchers alike.

While some believe the object could be a reflection, a piece of orbital debris, or even a classified satellite, others are convinced it represents one of the most compelling recent UFO sightings caught by NASA cameras.

This isn’t the first time the ISS livestream has been interrupted after something unusual appeared in view. Over the years, several alleged UFO sightings have been documented by sharp-eyed viewers monitoring the station’s continuous broadcast of Earth from space.

Whether this is a simple technical glitch or another piece of evidence that something mysterious is sharing our skies, one thing is certain: interest in UFO sightings continues to grow, especially when they come from official space sources.

Watch the full video here:

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

23-11-2025 om 23:33 geschreven door peter  

Age of Disclosure and truth about UFOs? Watch trailer here

He personally seems to believe that UAP represent aliens from another world, stating:

… At a base level, the public deserves to know the truth about fundamental facts, like we’re not alone in the universe.

Brian Fedderson, a former director of aviation security at the National Security Council, says:

This [UAP] technology does stuff that we can’t do.

Lots of people who watch the film will have their belief confirmed that the U.S. government is hiding the existence of UFOs. The writers at IMDb, for example, said:

Featuring 34 U.S. government insiders, this explosive documentary reveals an 80-year global coverup of non-human intelligent life and a secret war among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of non-human origin.

But remember … although reveals is a strong word, it’s not the same word as proves.

• See a video interview of six participants

Skepticism about Age of Disclosure

Writers at Wikipedia refer to the premise of the movie as a conspiracy theory. We at EarthSky probably wouldn’t go that far; we think of it more as “confused, but possible.” The movie’s Wikipedia page says on November 23, 2025:

The Age of Disclosure is a 2025 American documentary film by Dan Farah which proposes the conspiracy theory that information regarding the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence has been subject to a decades-long government coverup, and advocates for its declassification and disclosure. The film received mixed reviews from critics and its premise has been rejected by scientists.

• Visit the Age of Disclosure website
• Read an article from The Guardian about Age of Disclosure
• See Age of Disclosure on Prime Video

Scientists react

According to Wikipedia, some scientists reject the premise of the film.

Joshua Semeter, a professor of electrical engineering at Boston University who served on a NASA panel charged with studying classified evidence for the existence of UFOs, stated that:

I have seen no evidence that the government has been hiding anything … testimonies are simply not enough. They need to be backed up with evidence.

Charley Lineweaver, an astronomer and planetologist at Australian National University, said,

The whole film is full of these guys who are not scientists, talking about an issue that I think is very scientific, very very interesting, but it’s just baloney. And I said, gaww …, give me a scientist, please.

However, Avi Loeb of Harvard was more positive, stating:

There are definitely a lot of interesting claims from military personnel, from intelligence agencies. These are serious people, people that are responsible for national security, and they are not easily swayed to claim things that are incorrect or not real, and they say that there are objects we don’t understand … I don’t respond to stories that people tell me, but these stories are very intriguing and if the government does have access to such information, I think they should share it with scientists like myself because my day job is what lies outside the solar system.

Avi Loeb also reacted to the film in a video.

23-11-2025 om 23:25 geschreven door peter  

Los AngelesEen nieuwe documentaire, The Age of Disclosure, brengt een reeks opmerkelijke getuigenissen samen van voormalige hoge Amerikaanse functionarissen en politici. Regisseur Dan Farah werkte drie jaar lang in het geheim aan de productie, waarbij hij enkel mensen interviewde die volgens hem directe kennis hebben van geheime programma’s rond UAP’s (unidentified anomalous phenomena). Het resultaat is een film die stelt dat de Amerikaanse overheid al decennia cruciale informatie over buitenaards leven en technologie achterhoudt.

Critici zijn verdeeld over de vraag of dit iets nieuws biedt – hoewel het zeker boeiend is

(Foto: Farah Films)

Farah, bekend als producent van onder meer Ready Player One, vertelt dat zijn fascinatie voor buitenaards leven begon in zijn jeugd, gevoed door films als E.T. en series als The X-Files. Voor zijn documentaire koos hij bewust voor een onafhankelijke aanpak, zonder grote studio’s of streamingdiensten, om te vermijden dat het project zou worden afgezwakt of sensationeel gemaakt. Hij hield de namen van deelnemers geheim tot de film voltooid was, zodat zij zich veilig genoeg voelden om hun verhaal te doen.

Ook Marco Rubio, de huidige minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, nam deel. 

© epa

De eerste grote doorbraak kwam toen Jay Stratton, een defensiefunctionaris die jarenlang onderzoek deed naar UAP’s, besloot zijn stilte te doorbreken. Hij verklaarde dat hij met eigen ogen niet-menselijke voertuigen en wezens had gezien. Kort daarna volgden andere prominente stemmen, waaronder Luis Elizondo, voormalig Pentagon-official en leider van het Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Ook Marco Rubio, de huidige minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, en Jim Clapper, voormalig directeur van nationale inlichtingen onder Barack Obama, namen deel. Hun deelname gaf de documentaire een aanzienlijke geloofwaardigheid.

Geopolitiek als drijfveer

In totaal leverden 34 personen hun getuigenis, variërend van leden van het Congres tot experts in nationale veiligheid. Zij stellen dat er een systematische desinformatiecampagne bestaat om het publiek te misleiden en dat de VS al decennia bezig is met het analyseren en mogelijk reverse-engineeren van buitenaardse technologie.

In een interview met The Guardian vertelde Farah dat de geopolitieke wapenwedloop om UAP-technolgie te reverse-engineeren één van de belangrijkste redenen achter de vermeende doofpotaffaire. “Je kunt het niet aan je vrienden vertellen zonder het aan je vijanden te vertellen”, klinkt het tijdens het interview. Hij zegt dat deze wedloop escaleerde toen de VS ontdekte dat andere landen, zoals Rusland, UAP-technologie in beslag namen. “Nu zijn we op een punt gekomen waarop de mensen die ons land besturen niet op de hoogte zijn van de feiten. Die mensen zouden op de hoogte moeten zijn van belangrijke informatie zoals deze, die voor ons van groot belang is. En op basisniveau verdient het publiek het om de waarheid te weten over fundamentele feiten, zoals dat we niet alleen zijn in het universum.”

De film opent met een montage van voormalige militairen en inlichtingenfunctionarissen die hun indrukwekkende cv’s opsommen, waarna zij zonder omwegen verklaren dat de mensheid niet alleen is. Sommigen wijzen op de mogelijke voordelen van het begrijpen van UAP-technologie, zoals nieuwe vormen van schone energie. Rubio benadrukt dat het gebrek aan transparantie gevaarlijk kan zijn, omdat vijandige staten mogelijk sneller vooruitgang boeken door de technologie te bestuderen.

“Deze (UAP, nvdr.) technologie doet dingen die wij niet kunnen”, zegt een voormalig directeur luchtvaartbeveiliging bij de Nationale Veiligheidsraad ook in de documentaire. De voormalige hoofdwetenschapper van de Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) beweert ook in de film dat degenen die ervoor moeten zorgen dat er geen informatie over UAP’s uitlekt, “alle middelen zullen gebruiken om mensen ervan te overtuigen dat ze zich niet moeten melden”. Een voormalig defensieambtenaar merkte dan weer op dat als we de technologie die we observeren kunnen begrijpen, dit de deur opent naar tal van “potentieel gunstige effecten, waaronder schone energie”.

Farah ziet zijn documentaire als een poging om het stigma rond UFO’s en UAP’s te doorbreken. Hij stelt dat de sterkste bewijzen niet in beelden of video’s liggen, maar in de bereidheid van geloofwaardige mensen om hun reputatie op het spel te zetten. “Voor veel te lang is het publiek misleid en in het duister gehouden,” zegt hij. “Het is slechts een kwestie van tijd voordat een Amerikaanse president openlijk erkent dat we niet de enige intelligente levensvorm in het universum zijn.”

Het Tijdperk van Openbaring Met Dank aan Het Tijdperk van Openbaring

Getuigenissen als bewijs

In The Age of Disclosure is het duidelijk dat er weinig ruimte is voor tegenstand of scepsis, vooral omdat er in de film geen enkele tegenstander te zien is die als tegenhanger kan dienen voor de vele vastberaden geïnterviewden. En Farah ziet zelf ook geen noodzaak om die stemmen de rode draad van de documentaire te laten vertroebelen. “Ik denk dat wanneer mensen deze film bekijken, ze zullen beseffen dat het stigma rond dit onderwerp volkomen onlogisch en onzinnig is en niet goed is voor de mensheid. We hebben de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap nodig, niet alleen in de Verenigde Staten, maar in elk land, om te accepteren dat dit een reële situatie is. Dat dit een geldig onderzoeksgebied is en dat ze hun denkkracht moeten inzetten om hier meer over te leren en een antwoord te vinden op veel van de grote vragen die nog openstaan”, vertelt Farah nog aan The Guardian.

Getuigenissen zijn uiteindelijk waar de film om draait en het is het enige ‘bewijs’ dat Farah kan bieden. Maar voor hem is dit net overtuigender: Farah gelooft dat het sterkste bewijs bestaat uit “geloofwaardige mensen die hun naam en reputatie op het spel zetten om je te vertellen wat ze weten, met groot risico. Wat video’s en foto’s betreft, merkt de regisseur op dat deze weinig zouden bijdragen aan het ontkrachten van beweringen dat het allemaal een hoax is. “Je zou een foto of een video van het meest buitengewone ding op de cover van een grote nieuwsuitgave of op grote tv-zenders kunnen plaatsen en de helft van de mensheid zou je vertellen dat ze denken dat het AI is of dat het visuele effecten zijn.”

Andere ufo-documentaires die je nu kunt bekijken

Showtime's docuserie "UFO."

Verzorgd door Paramount+

Terwijl je wacht op updates over The Age of Disclosure, zijn hier enkele boeiende UFO-documentaires en docuseries om te bekijken.

• The Phenomenon (2020): Van dezelfde regisseur als The Age of Disclosure, bevat The Phenomenon interviews met regeringsfunctionarissen en NASA-astronauten, samen met archiefbeelden, om geloofwaardig bewijs en inzichten in UFO-verschijnselen te presenteren. Bekijk op Prime Video.
• Investigation Alien (2024): Deze Netflix-docuserie volgt verslaggever George Knapp terwijl hij onderzoek doet naar UFO-waarnemingen en buitenaardse ontmoetingen over de hele wereld. Kijk op Netflix.
• Moment of Contact (2022): Deze documentaire onderzoekt een incident uit 1996 in Varginha, Brazilië, waar inwoners meldden een UFO-neerstorting te hebben gezien en mysterieuze wezens te hebben ontmoet. Bekijk op Apple TV+.
• UFOs: Investigating the Unknown (2023): De vijfdelige serie van National Geographic onderzoekt het geheime Pentagon-programma over Ongeïdentificeerde Luchtfenomenen (UAP's). Bekijk op Hulu.
• UFO (2021): Uitgevoerd door J.J. Abrams, onderzoekt Showtime’s docuserie UFO de fascinatie van mensen voor UFO’s en hoe de overheid, particuliere bedrijven en het leger de waarheid mogelijk verborgen hebben. De serie werd gemaakt nadat het nieuws naar buiten kwam dat het Pentagon al jaren UFO’s volgde. Kijk op Paramount+.

GERELATEERDE VIDEO'S

{ PETER2011 }

23-11-2025 om 22:29 geschreven door peter