Panicking Over AI? What Chinese, British, and American History Can Teach Us (Part 2)

China’s final dynasty experienced severe difficulties based on its internal contradictions, and was unable to absorb the introduction of important new technologies without disruption. The historical experiences of Britain and the United States also have lessons to teach us about the impact of significant new technologies, and about how those impacts can be managed—or mismanaged—to promote the greater good, or to harm it.

The Last Dynasty

China’s final imperial dynasty, the Qing, collapsed under the weight of multiple uprisings both from within and without. Despite achieving impressive economic growth during the 18th century – fuelled by agricultural innovation, a population boom, and the roaring global trade in tea and porcelain – levels of inequality exploded, in part due to widespread corruption.

The infamous government official Heshen, widely regarded as the most corrupt figure in the Qing dynasty, amassed a personal fortune reckoned to exceed the empire’s entire annual revenue (one estimate suggests he amassed 1.1 billion taels of silver, equivalent to around US$270 billion (£200bn), during his lucrative career).

Imperial institutions failed to restrain the inequality and moral decay that the Qing’s growth had initially masked. The mechanisms that once spurred prosperity – technological advances, centralised bureaucracy and Confucian moral authority – eventually ossified, serving entrenched power rather than adaptive reform.

• How Technology is Changing the Face of Archaeology
• Forging a Nation: The Iron Age Tribes of Britain

When shocks like natural disasters and foreign invasions struck, the system could no longer respond. The collapse of the empire became inevitable – and this time there was no groundbreaking technology to enable a new dynasty to take the Qing’s place. Nor were there fresh social ideals or revitalised institutions capable of rebooting the imperial model. As foreign powers surged ahead with their own technological breakthroughs, China’s imperial system collapsed under its own weight. The age of emperors was over.

A grandfather and grandson beg for food amid the collapse of China’s Qing dynasty in the late 19th century. 

(UtCon Collection/Alamy Stock Photo).

The world had turned. As China embarked on two centuries of technological and economic stagnation – and political humiliation at the hands of Great Britain and Japan – other nations, led first by Britain and then the US, would step up to build global empires on the back of new technological leaps.

In these modern empires, we see the same four key influences on their cycles of growth and inequality – technology, institutions, politics and social norms – but playing out at an ever-faster rate. As the saying goes: history does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes.

Rule Britannia

If imperial China’s inequality saga was written in rice and rebellions, Britain’s industrial revolution featured steam and strikes. In Lancashire’s “satanic mills”, steam engines and mechanised looms created industrialists so rich that their fortunes dwarfed small nations.

In 1835, social observer Andrew Ure enthused: “Machinery is the grand agent of civilisation.” Yet for many decades, the steam engines, spinning jennies and railways disproportionately enriched the new industrial class, just as in the Han dynasty of China 2,000 years earlier. The workers? They inhaled soot, lived in slums – and staged Europe’s first symbolic protest when the Luddites began smashing their looms in 1811.

A spinning jenny.

(Elcapito22/CC BY-SA 3.0).

During the 19th century, Britain’s richest 1% hoarded as much as 70% of the nation’s wealth, while labourers toiled 16-hour days in mills. In cities like Manchester, child workers earned pennies while industrialists built palaces.

But as inequality peaked in Britain, the backlash brewed. Trade unions formed (and became legal in 1824) to demand fair wages. Reforms such as the Factory Acts (1833–1878) banned child labour and capped working hours.

Although government forces intervened to suppress the uprisings, unrest such as the 1830 Swing Riots and 1842 General Strike exposed deep social and economic inequalities. By 1900, child labour was banned and pensions had been introduced. The 1900 Labour Representation Committee (later the Labour Party) vowed to “promote legislation in the direct interests of labour” – a striking echo of how China’s imperial exams had attempted to open paths to power.

Slowly, the working class saw some improvement: real wages for Britain’s poorest workers gradually increased over the latter half of the 19th century, as mass production lowered the cost of goods and expanding factory employment provided a more stable livelihood than subsistence farming.

And then, two world wars flattened Britain’s elite – the Blitz didn’t discriminate between rich and poor neighbourhoods. When peace finally returned, the Beveridge Report gave rise to the welfare state: the NHS, social housing, and pensions.

Income inequality plummeted as a result. The top 1%’s share fell from 70% to 15% by 1979. While China’s inequality fell via dynastic collapse, Britain’s decline resulted from war-driven destruction, progressive taxation, and expansive social reforms.

Wealth share of top 1% in the UK, inequality before 1895 is not well documented; dotted curve is conjectured based on Kuznets curve. Sources: Alvaredo et al (2018), World Inequality Database. 

(Peng Zhou/CC BY-SA).

However, from the 1980s onwards, inequality in Britain has begun to rise again. This new cycle of inequality has coincided with another technological revolution: the emergence of personal computers and information technology — innovations that fundamentally transformed how wealth was created and distributed.

The era was accelerated by deregulation, deindustrialisation and privatisation — policies associated with former prime minister Margaret Thatcher, that favoured capital over labour. Trade unions were weakened, income taxes on the highest earners were slashed, and financial markets were unleashed. Today, the richest 1% of UK adults own more 20% of the country’s total wealth.

The UK now appears to be in the worst of both worlds – wrestling with low growth and rising inequality. Yet renewal is still within reach. The current UK government’s pledge to streamline regulation and harness AI could spark fresh growth – provided it is coupled with serious investment in skills, modern infrastructure, and inclusive institutions geared to benefit all workers.

At the same time, history reminds us that technology is a lever, not a panacea. Sustained prosperity comes only when institutional reform and social attitudes evolve in step with innovation.

The American Century

While China’s growth-and-inequality cycles unfolded over millennia and Britain’s over centuries, America’s story is a fast-forward drama of cycles lasting mere decades. In the early 20th century, several waves of new technology widened the gap between rich and poor dramatically.

By 1929, as the world teetered on the edge of the Great Depression, John D. Rockefeller had amassed such a vast fortune – valued at roughly 1.5% of America’s entire GDP – that newspapers hailed him the world’s first billionaire. His wealth stemmed largely from pioneering petroleum and petrochemical ventures including Standard Oil, which dominated oil refining in an age when cars and mechanised transport were exploding in popularity.

• American People Suffering Historical Amnesia With Many Citizens Knowing “Virtually Nothing” About Their History
• America: A Nation Defined by its Mythology (Part 1)

Yet this period of unprecedented riches for a handful of magnates coincided with severe imbalances in the broader US economy. The “roaring Twenties” had boosted consumerism and stock speculation, but wage growth for many workers lagged behind skyrocketing corporate profits. By 1929, the top 1% of Americans owned more than a third of the nation’s income, creating a precariously narrow base of prosperity.

When the US stock market crashed in October 1929, it laid bare how vulnerable the system was to the fortunes of a tiny elite. Millions of everyday Americans – living without adequate savings or safeguards – faced immediate hardship, ushering in the Great Depression. Breadlines snaked through city streets, and banks collapsed under waves of withdrawals they could not meet.

Unemployed men queued outside a Great Depression soup kitchen in Chicago, 1931.

 (National Archives at College Park/Public Domain). 

In response, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal reshaped American institutions. It introduced unemployment insurance, minimum wages, and public works programmes to support struggling workers, while progressive taxation – with top rates exceeding 90% during the second world war. Roosevelt declared: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much – it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”

In a different way to the UK, the second world war proved a great leveller for the US – generating millions of jobs and drawing women and minorities into industries they’d long been excluded from. After 1945, the GI Bill expanded education and home ownership for veterans, helping to build a robust middle class. Although access remained unequal, especially along racial lines, the era marked a shift toward the norm that prosperity should be shared.

Meanwhile, grassroots movements led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr. reshaped social norms about justice. In his lesser-quoted speeches, King warned that “a dream deferred is a dream denied” and launched the Poor People’s Campaign, which demanded jobs, healthcare and housing for all Americans. This narrowing of income distribution during the post-war era was dubbed the “Great Compression” – but it did not last.

As oil crises of the 1970s marked the end of the preceding cycle of inequality, another cycle began with the full-scale emergence of the third industrial revolution, powered by computers, digital networks and information technology.

The first personal computer, made by IBM. 

(Photographing Travis/CC BY-SA 2.0). 

As digitalisation transformed business models and labour markets, wealth flowed to those who owned the algorithms, patents and platforms – not those operating the machines. Hi-tech entrepreneurs and Wall Street financiers became the new oligarchs. Stock options replaced salaries as the true measure of success, and companies increasingly rewarded capital over labour.

By the 2000s, the wealth share of the richest 1% climbed to 30% in the US. The gap between the elite minority and working majority widened with every company stock market launch, hedge fund bonus and quarterly report tailored to shareholder returns.

But this wasn’t just a market phenomenon – it was institutionally engineered. The 1980s ushered in the age of (Ronald) Reaganomics, driven by the conviction that “government is not the solution to our problem; government  is the problem”. Following this neoliberalist philosophy, taxes on high incomes were slashed, capital gains were shielded, and labour unions were weakened.

Deregulation gave Wall Street free rein to innovate and speculate, while public investment in housing, healthcare and education was curtailed. The consequences came to a head in 2008 when the US housing market collapsed and the financial system imploded.

The Global Financial Crisis that followed exposed the fragility of a deregulated economy built on credit bubbles and concentrated risk. Millions of people lost their homes and jobs, while banks were rescued with public money. It marked an economic rupture and a moral reckoning – proof that decades of pro-market policies had produced a system that privatised gain and socialised loss.

Inequality, long growing in the background, now became a glaring, undeniable fault line in American life – and it has remained that way ever since.

Wealth share and income share of top 1% in the US: World Inequality Database; income share: Picketty & Saez (2003). Dotted curves are conjectured based on Kuznets curve. 

(Peng Zhou/CC BY-SA).

So is the US proof that the Kuznets model of inequality is indeed wrong? While the chart above shows inequality has flattened in the US since the 2008 financial crisis, there is little evidence of it actually declining. And in the short term, while Donald Trump’s tariffs are unlikely to do much for growth in the US, his low-tax policies won’t do anything to raise working-class incomes either.

The story of “the American century” is a dizzying sequence of technological revolutions – from transport and manufacturing to the internet and now AI – crashing one atop the other before institutions, politics or social norms could catch up. In my view, the result is not a broken cycle but an interrupted one. Like a wheel that never completes its turn, inequality rises, reform stutters – and a new wave of disruption begins.

Our Unequal AI Future?

Like any technological explosion, AI’s potential is dual-edged. Like the Tang dynasty’s bureaucrats hoarding grain, today’s tech giants monopolise data, algorithms and computing power. Management consultant firm McKinsey has predicted that algorithms could automate 30% of jobs by 2030, from lorry drivers to radiologists.

Yet AI also democratises: ChatGPT tutors students in Africa while open-source models such as DeepSeek empower worldwide startups to challenge Silicon Valley’s oligarchy.

The rise of AI isn’t just a technological revolution – it’s a political battleground. History’s empires collapsed when elites hoarded power; today’s fight over AI mirrors the same stakes. Will it become a tool for collective uplift like Britain’s post-war welfare state? Or a weapon of control akin to Han China’s grain-hoarding bureaucrats?

The answer hinges on who wins these political battles. In 19th-century Britain, factory owners bribed MPs to block child labour laws. Today, Big Tech spends billions lobbying to neuter AI regulation.

Meanwhile, grassroots movements like the Algorithmic Justice League demand bans on facial recognition in policing, echoing the Luddites who smashed looms not out of technophobia but to protest exploitation. The question is not if AI will be regulated but who will write the rules: corporate lobbyists or citizen coalitions.

The real threat has never been the technology itself, but the concentration of its spoils. When elites hoard tech-driven wealth, social fault-lines crack wide open – as happened more than 2,000 years ago when the Red Eyebrows marched against Han China’s agricultural monopolies.

To be human is to grow – and to innovate. Technological progress raises inequality faster than incomes, but the response depends on how people band together. Initiatives like “Responsible AI” and “Data for All” reframe digital ethics as a civil right, much like Occupy Wall Street exposed wealth gaps. Even memes – like TikTok skits mocking ChatGPT’s biases – shape public sentiment.

There is no simple path between growth and inequality. But history shows our AI future isn’t preordained in code: it’s written, as always, by us.

• Top image: Photo of an early IBM 7030 computer, in the 1960s, on display at National Cryptologic Museum.
• Source: ArnoldReinhold/Public Domain.
• This article was originally published under the title ‘What 2,000 years of Chinese history reveals about today’s AI-driven technology panic – and the future of inequality’ by Peng Zhou on The Conversation, and has been republished under a Creative Commons License.

{ https://www.ancient-origins.net/science-space }

27-04-2025 om 01:03 geschreven door peter  

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

27-04-2025 om 00:14 geschreven door peter  

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

26-04-2025 om 23:49 geschreven door peter  

Two UFOs Over Arlington, Illinois On April 22, 2025, NUFORC, UAP Drone Sighting News.

Date of sighting: April 22, 2025

Location of sighting: Arlington, Illinois, USA

Source: from NUFORC website

 

A new report just came into NUFORC, a glowing object was seen with another smaller one seeming coming out of it. This larger craft has only a huge flashing light, so powerful we cannot see the shape of the craft, but I put it through a few filters until I found a yellow one that shows its true shape. This is 100% an alien craft. Very rare close up catch.

Scott C. Waring - Utah, USA

 

Eyewitness states: 

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

26-04-2025 om 23:18 geschreven door peter  

Structure With Three Spheres On Planet Mercury, April 25, 2025, UFO UAP Sighting News.

 

Date of discovery: April 25, 2025

Location of discovery: Planet Mercury

Source photo: 

• https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA02962

While searching over some NASA photos, I found on on Mercury that really caught my eye. There is a structure with three huge spheres on its top and a center tower that goes down to the ground. The object is big, I mean a mile high and a mile wide, but it's blocked by a black wall structure that goes 360 degrees around it to prevent it from being seen from far away. However the NASA satellite caught it. Proof of life? Mercury has more life on it than any planet in our solar system, including Earth. 

Scott C. Waring - Utah

 

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

26-04-2025 om 23:09 geschreven door peter  

Brent Swancer

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

26-04-2025 om 23:00 geschreven door peter  

Titan as seen by James Webb.

Image Credit: SCIENCE: NASA, ESA, CSA, Webb Titan GTO Team IMAGE PROCESSING: Alyssa Pagan (STScI).

1. Europa

Europa’s smooth, icy surface is crisscrossed with brownish lines — likely fractures in its outer shell. Below that ice lies a global ocean that may contain twice as much water as Earth. Scientists believe the ocean is kept warm by tidal forces created by Jupiter’s gravity, which flex the moon’s interior and generate heat.

What makes Europa so fascinating?

• Evidence of a subsurface saltwater ocean

• Active geological resurfacing, possibly from erupting water

• Oxygen and other materials on the surface that may mix with the ocean below

NASA’s Europa Clipper mission will fly by the moon dozens of times to investigate whether it could support life.

2. Enceladus

Enceladus is smaller than Europa but just as mysterious. In 2005, NASA’s Cassini spacecr

aft captured stunning images of plumes of water vapor erupting from its south pole — shooting ice particles and organic molecules into space.

Key discoveries:

• Cryovolcanic geysers that erupt through surface cracks

• Organic compounds, silica particles, and salt — all signs of an underground ocean

• Detection of phosphates, essential for life as we know it

The presence of heat, water, and organic material make Enceladus one of the most exciting candidates for extraterrestrial life in the solar system.

Phobos and Deimos: Mars’s Mysterious Moons

Talking about mysterious moons, Mars has two tiny ones, Phobos and Deimos, and both present puzzles that still don’t have clear answers.

Phobos, the larger of the two, is slowly spiraling toward Mars and may eventually crash into the planet or break apart and form a ring. It’s oddly shaped, heavily cratered, and appears to be made of carbon-rich rock, not unlike certain asteroids.

Theories about its origin include:

• A captured asteroid from the outer solar system

• A re-accreted fragment from a massive impact on Mars

Deimos is even smaller and more distant, with a smoother appearance. Both moons challenge traditional models of how natural satellites form, and Japan’s upcoming Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission hopes to return samples from Phobos to help solve the mystery.

Triton and Titan: Outliers with Odd Behavior

Two other moons, mysterious moons — Triton (Neptune’s largest moon) and Titan (Saturn’s largest) — are full of strange surprises.

1. Triton

Triton is the only large moon in the solar system that orbits in the opposite direction of its planet’s rotation. This retrograde motion suggests it was once a captured object, possibly a dwarf planet from the Kuiper Belt.

It’s geologically active, with ice volcanoes, nitrogen geysers, and a frozen crust. Triton may also harbor a subsurface ocean.

NASA is currently studying potential flyby missions to Triton under its Trident concept, which would aim to investigate its active surface and interior.

2. Titan

Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, is the only moon with a dense atmosphere and features rivers, lakes, and seas — of liquid methane and ethane.

Despite the frigid temperatures, Titan’s chemistry is considered a potential analog for early Earth. NASA’s upcoming Dragonfly mission will send a rotorcraft to fly across Titan’s surface and explore its complex organic chemistry in the 2030s.

These moons aren’t just rocks in orbit — they are worlds in their own right, with active geology, unique atmospheres, and potential habitats for life. What makes them mysterious moons isn’t just their strange behaviors, but how little we still know about them.

In the coming decades, space agencies will focus on missions to these moons to answer questions that could reshape our understanding of planetary formation — and perhaps even the origin of life.

Each of these mysterious moons represents a new frontier in the search for answers about the solar system’s past — and our place in it.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://curiosmos.com/category/curious-lists/ }

25-04-2025 om 23:58 geschreven door peter  

An illustration of exoplanes.

Curiosmos.

But if the filter lies ahead — say, in the form of self-destruction through war, climate collapse, or runaway artificial intelligence — then humanity might be racing toward a wall that most civilizations never survive.

So why haven’t we found alien life? Another popular idea is the simulation hypothesis, which argues that we might not be living in the base reality at all. If an advanced civilization could simulate consciousness, they might create entire digital worlds — including ours. In that case, we wouldn’t find alien life simply because the simulation wasn’t designed to include it.

This theory has gained traction in philosophical circles and among some physicists, but it opens up more questions than answers. Who created the simulation? Could we break out of it? And what would finding extraterrestrial life mean in such a scenario?

The Dark Forest Hypothesis: Everyone Is Hiding

In a universe where unknown threats could lurk in any corner, broadcasting your location might be a fatal mistake. That’s the premise behind the dark forest hypothesis, a chilling idea popularized by author Liu Cixin. According to this view, every civilization is both hunter and prey, hiding in silence to avoid being noticed — or eliminated.

If true, then maybe other civilizations are out there but choose to stay quiet. They might have observed us already and decided it’s safer not to interact.

Could We Be Looking the Wrong Way?

It’s also possible that alien life simply doesn’t resemble what we expect. Life could be based on elements or chemistry unfamiliar to us. We might be scanning the wrong frequencies, or even missing signs that are right under our noses. Some researchers have suggested that alien probes could be lurking in our own solar system — hidden in places we haven’t fully explored, like the Moon’s far side or inside near-Earth asteroids.

Are We Too Early — Or Too Late?

Timing could be everything. The universe is nearly 14 billion years old. Human beings have only been around for a tiny fraction of that. Civilizations could have risen and fallen before Earth even formed. Or we might be early bloomers, among the first to reach this level of development.

Either way, our timing might explain the silence. We may be shouting into a void that hasn’t had time to echo back — or where the echoes have long faded.

As our tools improve — with missions to distant moons like Europa and Titan, and powerful telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope — we may finally catch a glimpse of something that answers this age-old question. But for now, the mystery remains unsolved. And maybe that’s the point. Perhaps the search itself is what defines us. What do you think is the most likely explanation? Are we truly alone, or just not looking in the right way?

RELATED  VIDEOS

{ https://curiosmos.com/ }

25-04-2025 om 23:07 geschreven door peter  

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

25-04-2025 om 22:44 geschreven door peter  

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

25-04-2025 om 22:33 geschreven door peter  

Glowing Craft Over Roswell, New Mexico April 12, 2025, UFO UAP Sighting News.

Date of sighting: April 12, 2025

Location of sighting: Roswell, New Mexico, USA

Source: Email report at scwaring @ yahoo.com 

 

Wow something over Roswell caught the attention of some people last week. The object was glowing and moving fast, but then suddenly ejected itself from the glowing sphere and a long craft exits outward but continues to travel the same direction. Now this almost looks like a rocket launch, but there are no launches near Roswell, also aliens themselves may have thought about hiding from humans by disguising their ships to mimic rocket launches. It's not redicuoulous, it's actually ingenious of them. You see, UFOs have been known to change shape, sometimes from a disk into a plane and have even been seen creating a cloud around itself to disappear. Aliens pride themselves on being smarter than humans, but the truth is...they are not. They only have greater tech advantages. This is a UFO disguising itself as a rocket where no rocket launches exist. Aliens logic is flawed. 

Scott C. Waring - Utah

 

 

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

25-04-2025 om 21:49 geschreven door peter  

Amazing Glowing Objects Over Phoenix, Arizona April 22, 2025, UFO UAP Sighting News.

Date of sighting: April 22, 2025

Location of sighting: Phoenix, Arizona USA

Source: Email to scwaring @ yahoo.com

 

This just in. Some UFO lights were seen over Phoenix a few days ago and wow, one of them is so big! I was just in the CIA files yesterday and they noted UFO often having up to four different flashing colors, so bright that the hull of the craft could not be seen by the jet pilots intercepting them. This video shows similar UFOs and one of them is massive is size and looks to me to be 100 meters across. This is 100% proof that the aliens that caused the Phoenix lights...never left, they live there in an underground base about 5 miles below the surface. 

 

Now I made a short clip of a close up and another similar but in a different color which I did in order to help the viewers truly see the shape of the alien craft.

Scott C. Waring - Utah...email me your reports. 

 

Eyewitness states: 

We saw blinking lights circling each other, and they started forming a triangle; and then stopped mid-air! I ran in to get my phone to record it, and one had moved away. You can still see two blinking dots… when one, out of nowhere, gets SUPER bright! No idea why?

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

25-04-2025 om 21:35 geschreven door peter  

An illustration of exoplanes.

Curiosmos.

But if the filter lies ahead — say, in the form of self-destruction through war, climate collapse, or runaway artificial intelligence — then humanity might be racing toward a wall that most civilizations never survive.

Simulation Hypothesis: Are We Living in a Construct?

So why haven’t we found alien life? Another popular idea is the simulation hypothesis, which argues that we might not be living in the base reality at all. If an advanced civilization could simulate consciousness, they might create entire digital worlds — including ours. In that case, we wouldn’t find alien life simply because the simulation wasn’t designed to include it.

This theory has gained traction in philosophical circles and among some physicists, but it opens up more questions than answers. Who created the simulation? Could we break out of it? And what would finding extraterrestrial life mean in such a scenario?

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://curiosmos.com/category/cosmic-phenomena/ }

24-04-2025 om 23:43 geschreven door peter  

This week brings the Hubble Space Telescope's 35th birthday — but instead of getting presents, the Hubble team is giving out presents in the form of four views of the cosmos, ranging from a glimpse of Mars to a glittering picture of a far-out galaxy.

It’s the latest observance of a tradition that goes back decades, in which NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute release pictures to celebrate the anniversary of Hubble’s launch into Earth orbit aboard the space shuttle Discovery on April 24, 1990.

“Hubble opened a new window to the universe when it launched 35 years ago,” Shawn Domagal-Goldman, acting director of the Astrophysics Division at NASA Headquarters, said today in an image advisory marking the occasion.

“The fact that it is still operating today is a testament to the value of our flagship observatories, and provides critical lessons for the Habitable Worlds Observatory, which we plan to be serviceable in the spirit of Hubble.”

Hubble didn’t get off to a smooth start. After the 24,000-pound observatory was deployed, scientists discovered that its nearly 8-foot-wide mirror had a manufacturing flaw. In 1993, during the first of five servicing missions, astronauts installed hardware that greatly improved the sharpness of Hubble’s images.

Since then, Hubble’s observations have revolutionized astronomy, contributing to discoveries related to exoplanets, black holes, the nature of the early universe, the existence of dark energy and the accelerating expansion of the cosmos. NASA says Hubble has made nearly 1.7 million observations so far, focusing on about 55,000 astronomical targets and resulting in more than 22,000 research papers.

All those discoveries, and all those images, endeared Hubble to the general public. The loss of the shuttle Columbia and its crew in 2003 led NASA to suspend plans for much-needed repairs, but because of the resulting outcry over the telescope’s potential demise, the space agency agreed to a final servicing mission that took place in 2009.

At the time, NASA expected the telescope to provide dazzling views for an additional five or 10 years. Once again, Hubble exceeded expectations, racking up 16 years of operation without on-orbit repairs.

The images released today illustrate the breadth of Hubble’s range:

• Pictures of Mars were captured between last Dec. 28 and 30, near the time when Mars came closest to Earth in its orbit. The images show the planet’s bright orange Tharsis plateau and its dormant volcanoes, the north polar ice cap and wispy water-ice clouds.

• Another Hubble image from last December focuses on a small portion of the Rosette Nebula, a huge star-forming region 5,200 light-years from Earth. Dark clouds of gas, laced with dust, are silhouetted across the image. The Hubble team also released a wider-scale image of the nebula to add cosmic context.

• In January, Hubble snapped a picture of the planetary nebula NGC 2899, seemingly fluttering like a cosmic moth 4,500 light-years from Earth. The colorful clouds of dust and gas have been shaped by the radiation and stellar winds blasting out from the star at the image’s center.

• Hubble produced a new view of the spiral galaxy NGC 5335 in March. The picture reveals a bar-shaped structure that slices across the galaxy and channels gas inward toward the center, fueling the production of new stars. Patchy streamers of star formation swirl around the edges of the galaxy.

Mars near opposition. Image: NASA, ESA, STScI; Image Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)

Planetary nebula NGC 2899.

Image: NASA, ESA,  STScI; Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)

Spiral galaxy NGC 5335.

Image: NASA, ESA, STScI; Image Processing: Alyssa Pagan (STScI)

Clouds in the Rosette Nebula.

Image: NASA, ESA, STScI; Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)

In recent years, Hubble has been experiencing periodic hiccups, and it's only a matter of time before a glitch puts it out of commission permanently. Meanwhile, the spotlight has been shifting to NASA's James Webb Space Telescope, which was launched in 2021 and has seven times as much light-gathering capability as Hubble does.

Unlike Hubble, JWST sees the universe primarily in infrared light. It doesn't have Hubble's capability to make observations in a wide spectrum ranging from infrared to ultraviolet. And because JWST is positioned at a gravitational balance point a million miles from Earth, it can't be serviced in space, as Hubble was.

In contrast, the Habitable Worlds Observatory would study the universe in visible and ultraviolet light, producing images that would be significantly sharper than Hubble's views. A major goal of that future mission would be to identify potentially habitable Earthlike planets orbiting distant stars. The HWO would also be designed with robotic servicing in mind.

NASA's current plans call for launching the Habitable Worlds Observatory by as early as the 2040s, but those plans — and more immediate plans to launch the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope next year — have been thrown into doubt by a proposal from the Trump administration to make deep cuts in NASA's science budget.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

24-04-2025 om 22:49 geschreven door peter  

Ten Types of UFOs Seen In China From 1965-1980, In CIA File, With Detailed Description Of Appearance! UFO UAP Drone Sighting News.

CIA file: 

• https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0005516652

Ever wanted to have better descriptions of the UFOs? Well this CIA file has them and they seem to be similar to some to the things we have seen over the last few months around the world, and they include UFOs partly making clouds to hide in, editing different color lights that will blow your mind...too many naive people think such colors of lights flashing are always planes...but no...this CIA document counters that with so much truth its a little hard to swallow, but wow, I just love it! So here are those ten UFO sightings summarized with the details of the shape, color, etc of the craft. 

Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily

🛸 UFO Report Summary – China (1965–1980)

📍 Scope

• Covers ~100 eyewitness reports from 15 provinces and cities in China.

• Data collected between 1976–1980, with some historic cases back to 1965.

---

📅 Key Sightings and Dates

1. 13 Nov 1978 – Wuhan, Hubei Province

   • Orange-red glowing object, size of full moon.

   • Slowly drifting west-northwest with cloud around its top.

   • Silent, visually intense, observed for ~10 minutes.

2. 9 Sept 1976 – Yichun, Jiangxi Province

   • Disk-shaped, like two cymbals joined.

   • Rotating, emitted silver vapor, ~2000m altitude.

   • Seen flying E to NW over 5 minutes.

3. 9 Sept 1979 – Jianli County, Hubei Province

   • Round object, red/yellow light, blue outer ring.

   • Emitted an awl-shaped tail, rapidly flying NE to SW.

   • Suddenly changed direction mid-air.

4. 9 Sept 1979 – Changde County, Hunan Province

   • Oval object, intense orange-red head, gas-emitting tail.

   • Silent, flew from north to SW, observed by a crowd during an outdoor movie.

5. Summer 1965 – Beijing

   • Two glowing points (one green oval) “chased” each other in the sky, collided, and vanished.

6. Late Jan 1979 – Fujian Province

   • Low-altitude object hovered over road with a blinding light.

   • Scared several local women.

7. Feb 1979 – Shanxi Province

   • Extremely bright object darted over an airfield, "lit up half the sky."

8. 1 July (Year unspecified) – Beijing

   • 10m-wide dark gray sphere with 5m-long vertical tail.

   • Flew silently southeast to northeast.

9. 23 Oct 1978 – Gansu Province

   • Huge object (~1000m long), spanned half the sky.

   • Seen by airbase personnel, had bright lights at head and tail.

10. 26 July 1977 – Chengdu, Sichuan Province

    • Spiral nebula-type UFO with glowing core and radiating arms.

    • Observed across a 180 km stretch.

---

🛸 UFO Shapes Identified

1. Disks / Globes / Ovals

   • 80% of reports.

   • Often silver by day, orange-red at night.

   • Sometimes emitted smoke or light beams.

2. Cylindrical or Long Craft

   • Rare.

   • Extremely large, sometimes over 1,000 meters in length.

3. Spiral Nebula Objects

   • Bright core with spinning arms of light.

   • Massive in appearance.

---

✨ Patterns and Observations

• UFO activity peaked around major international incidents (e.g., 1976 Tehran encounter).

• Multiple objects changed direction mid-flight, flew silently, or emitted beams.

• Sightings often involved groups of witnesses, including scientists, technicians, and military staff.

• No photos, physical evidence, or encounters with beings reported.

---

👽 Conclusion

Chinese analysts concluded that:

• Many cases are credible and unexplained by current science.

• Some may be natural or man-made, but others suggest unknown technologies or phenomena.

• They stress the need for open-minded scientific investigation without dismissing extraterrestrial possibilities.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

24-04-2025 om 21:35 geschreven door peter  

1976 Tehran Diamond UFO Dropped Probe, Landing Site And Probe Found! Based On CIA Documents and Google Maps, UAP Drone Sighting News.

After analyzing CIA declassified documents and following a 150° magnetic bearing from Tehran’s Mehrabad Air Base — I found it. The exact landing site of the UFO involved in the 1976 Tehran incident.

Location: 34°27'4.62"N, 51°20'33.65"E
Size of Object: 29 meters across
Surface: Dry lake bed in the middle of nowhere, perfectly flat — except for one massive, dark, oval-shaped anomaly.

CIA Documents:

•  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Tehran_UFO_incident

CIA Site: 

 

The object is partially embedded, casting shadows, and appears metallic or possibly scorched. There's no road to it, no buildings, no signs of construction. It’s the only thing in the entire basin.

This perfectly matches what the Iranian F-4 pilots reported: an object that glowed, knocked out their weapons and comms, then landed gently without an explosion. Days later, a U.S. debrief confirmed this—back when we were still pretending UFOs were just "weather balloons."

Now we’ve got the coordinates. We've got visual proof. And we’ve got a crater in the middle of Iran that doesn’t belong to anything man-made or natural.

This was not a crash. This was a controlled landing. And whatever came down in 1976... it wanted to be found, but it's been sitting there for 49 years in the desert partly buried in the dry lake bed floor! The object which looks visible and is the size of a wingspan of a Boeing 737 could contain all answers to all the questions in the universe.

Scott C. Waring, UFO Sightings Daily

                    📌 Location:

1. • 1. Meteorite?

        • But there’s no recorded impact of that size in the area.

        • Lack of explosion or ejecta rules that out.

     2. Man-made?

        • Unlikely. Nothing in Iran's known infrastructure justifies placing a 29-meter object in the center of a dried lake.

     3. UFO Landing Site?

        • Fits the Tehran incident description exactly:

          • Landed softly

          • Emitted light over 2–3 km

          • Caused UHF, radar, weapons, and inertial navigation failure

          • Interacted with nearby home electronics/beeper

          • Pilot visually confirmed the landing

            • Coordinates: 34°27'4.62"N, 51°20'33.65"E

            • A remote dry lake bed east of Qom, perfectly aligned with the 150° magnetic bearing from Mehrabad Air Base

            • Inside the Tehran FIR (Flight Information Region), the same airspace the F-4 pilots patrolled

            ---

            🪨 The Object:

            • Roughly 29.3 meters across (that’s nearly the wingspan of a Boeing 737)

            • Isolated, no other objects nearby

            • Appears metallic or composite, with light reflection on part of the surface

            • Possibly half-buried or partially melted into the surface

            • Surrounded by a slight depression or impact ring, resembling what you'd expect from a controlled landing or soft crash

            ---

            🔬 Possible Explanations:

            1. Meteorite?

               • But there’s no recorded impact of that size in the area.

               • Lack of explosion or ejecta rules that out.

            2. Man-made?

               • Unlikely. Nothing in Iran's known infrastructure justifies placing a 29-meter object in the center of a dried lake.

            3. UFO Landing Site?

               • Fits the Tehran incident description exactly:

                 • Landed softly

                 • Emitted light over 2–3 km

                 • Caused UHF, radar, weapons, and inertial navigation failure

                 • Interacted with nearby home electronics/beeper

                 • Pilot visually confirmed the landing

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

24-04-2025 om 20:57 geschreven door peter  

CIA File Says NASA Apollo Missions Spied On Countries! UFO UAP Sighting News.

CIA documents say NASA Apollo Missions Spied On China and Russia, UFO UAP Sighting News. 🚀🚀🚀 I would bet money SpaceX is spying too. 🤣 I found these documents and made this video, please hit like and share...link here, 4 page doc.

 

CIA Source: 

• https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp75b00514r000200190003-2

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

24-04-2025 om 20:32 geschreven door peter  

Vreemde en bizarre feiten over het zonnestelsel

©Shutterstock

De veranderende vorm van de binnenkern van de aarde

In februari 2025 publiceerde een groep geofysici een onderzoek dat suggereert dat er veranderingen gaande zijn in de binnenkern van de aarde. In 2023 kwamen we er al achter dat de draairichting van de binnenkern van onze planeet rond 2009 veranderd of zelfs omgekeerd kan zijn. Het nieuwe onderzoek suggereert echter dat niet alleen de rotatie van de aardkern aan verandering onderhevig is. De vorm van de binnenste laag van de aarde staat misschien ook niet vast.

©Shutterstock

Recent onderzoek
Begin februari 2025 publiceerden onderzoekers een studie in het tijdschrift Nature die suggereert dat de vorm van de mysterieuze binnenkern van de aarde mogelijk aan het veranderen is.

©Shutterstock

Eerder onderzoek
Wetenschappers ontdekten al in 2023 dat ongeveer 15 jaar daarvoor de rotatie van de binnenkern van de aarde zo sterk vertraagde dat deze mogelijk is gepauzeerd of zelfs omgekeerd.

©Shutterstock

Kennis uitbreiden
De meest recente studie bouwt voort op dat onderzoek en suggereert dat als het gaat om de binnenkern van de aarde, niet alleen de draairichting kan veranderen, maar ook de vorm.

©Shutterstock

Geen directe waarnemingen
Gezien de extreme omstandigheden in het centrum van de aarde is het natuurlijk niet mogelijk om deze veranderingen direct te observeren en te volgen.

©Shutterstock

Hoe de waarnemingen worden gedaan
Wetenschappers gebruiken daarom aardbevingsgolven om aannames te doen over wat er in het binnenste van de aarde gebeurt.

©Shutterstock

De verschillende lagen van onze planeet
Van alle aardlagen weten wetenschappers het minst over de binnenste kern. Het is zelfs de meest afgelegen laag en daarom het moeilijkst te observeren.

©Shutterstock

Massieve bol van metaal
Wat we wel weten is dat de binnenkern van de aarde een massieve bol van metaal is en dat deze een straal heeft van ongeveer 1.221 kilometer.

©Shutterstock

Temperaturen
Temperaturen in de binnenkern kunnen oplopen tot 5.400°C en de druk kan oplopen tot 365 gigapascal (GPa).

©Shutterstock

Gigapascal?
Ter vergelijking: dat is ongeveer drie miljoen keer zo hoog als de gemiddelde atmosferische druk op het land.

©Shutterstock

Veranderende staat
Lange tijd geloofden wetenschappers dat de binnenste kern in een permanente staat verkeerde. Maar deze overtuiging komt nu door dit onderzoek op losse schroeven te staan.

©Shutterstock

Kijken naar seismische golven
Zoals eerder vermeld, gebruiken onderzoekers de seismische golven d

©Shutterstock

De Zuidelijke Sandwicheilanden
Meestal gebruiken ze golven van aardbevingen die plaatsvinden op de Zuidelijke Sandwicheilanden bij Antarctica en door de planeet naar Alaska reizen.

©Shutterstock

Van Antarctica tot Alaska
De golven reizen door de aarde zoals sonargolven door water en sommige golven passeren de kern van de aarde op hun reis naar Alaska.

©Shutterstock

Veranderingen detecteren
Om veranderingen in het binnenste van de aarde betrouwbaar te kunnen detecteren, vergelijken wetenschappers aardbevingen van vergelijkbare grootte die op dezelfde plaats maar op verschillende tijdstippen plaatsvinden.

©Shutterstock

Doubletten
Als de trajecten van deze tweelingbevingen - ook wel doubletten genoemd - identiek zijn, zouden ze dezelfde golfvormen moeten genereren.

©Shutterstock

Belangrijke opmerking
Bij het bekijken van tientallen jaren aan gegevens hebben wetenschappers echter opgemerkt dat sommige doubletten in de Zuidelijke Sandwicheilanden andere golfvormen genereren in Alaska.

©Shutterstock

De resultaten interpreteren
Dit suggereert dat er iets aan de binnenkern van de aarde is veranderd in de periode vóór de eerste en tweede beving van het doublet.

©Shutterstock

Rotatieverandering
De eerste verandering die geofysici rapporteerden, had te maken met de richting van de rotatie van de binnenkern van de aarde.

©Shutterstock

Bestaande kennis
Wetenschappers weten al enige tijd dat de binnenkern van de aarde onafhankelijk van en sneller dan de rest van de planeet ronddraait.

©Shutterstock

Openbaringen van 2023
In 2023 rapporteerden wetenschappers echter dat het draaien van de binnenkern zo sterk was vertraagd dat het leek alsof het volledig stopte of zelfs omkeerde.

©Shutterstock

De gegevens opnieuw bekijken
Toen, in 2024, leidden een nadere beschouwing van de gegevens ertoe dat onderzoekers de vermoede omkering bevestigden.

©Shutterstock

Ongeveer 200 paar bevingen
Voor het onderzoek dat in februari 2025 werd gepubliceerd, keken onderzoekers naar gegevens van ongeveer 200 paar aardbevingen die plaatsvonden tussen 1991 en 2024.

©Shutterstock

Subtiele verschillen waargenomen
Ze namen subtiele verschillen waar in 10 doubletten en concludeerden dat de eenvoudigste verklaring een vervorming van de ondiepe binnenkern zou zijn.

©Shutterstock

Hoe de veranderingen kunnen plaatsvinden
Wat betreft de manier waarop de binnenkern verandert, zijn er twee mogelijkheden. De eerste is dat de hele binnenkern wordt vervormd.

©Shutterstock

Nuttige metafoor
Stel je een voetbal voor die een nieuwe vorm krijgt zodat de twee uiteinden nu in twee nieuwe richtingen wijzen.

©Shutterstock

Kleine vlekken
De andere mogelijkheid is dat kleine stukjes van de binnenkern van de aarde opzwellen en samentrekken. Als dit het geval is, zou de metaforische rugbybal dezelfde algemene vorm hebben, maar hij zou ook verschillende kleine deuken en bulten hebben.

©Shutterstock

Derde mogelijkheid
Het is ook heel goed mogelijk dat beide veranderingen tegelijkertijd plaatsvinden.

©Shutterstock

Aansturen van de veranderingen
Als het gaat om de oorzaak van deze veranderingen, denken wetenschappers dat het de zwaartekracht van de mantel kan zijn of materiaal dat in de buitenste kern stroomt.

©Shutterstock

{ https://nortonsafe.search.ask.com/web?q=Stars+Insider }

24-04-2025 om 18:08 geschreven door peter  

24-04-2025 om 16:55 geschreven door peter  

A photograph showing the ruins at Baalbek.

What we’ve found at sites like Göbekli Tepe, Karahantepe, Nabta Playa, Gunung Padang, and the deepest layers of Baalbek doesn’t align with the timeline printed in textbooks. If the dates are correct—and mounting evidence suggests they are—then our timeline of civilization is off by thousands of years. Despite this overwhelming evidence, history is not being corrected or updated. We continue to tach the same outdated information in school. Despite physical evidence that suggests that history as we know it is far more complex than what we believed only a couple o decades ago. In this article, I will take you across some of my favorite ancient sites and explain why they don’t match history as we are being told.

Göbekli Tepe Was Buried on Purpose—But Why?

Tthis is, I think, one of my favorite ancient sites and literally one of the oldest strcutres on Earth, and I have written about it on various oacacions where I have outlined why this site is such a history breaker. Tucked beneath a dusty hill in southeastern Turkey, Göbekli Tepe stunned the archaeological world when it was first excavated in the 1990s. Carbon dating placed the site at least 11,500 years old, making it not only older than the pyramids, but older than agriculture, pottery, or any form of writing.

Carved T-shaped megaliths, each weighing up to 20 tons, stand in circular formations. They’re decorated with reliefs of wild animals, abstract symbols, and possibly mythological beings. The stonework is not rough or experimental—it’s precise. Intentional. Studies have demonstrated that he builders of this ancient site used advanced geometrical reasoning. And then there’s the strangest part: the entire complex was deliberately buried in antiquity. Someone not only built it—they entombed it. No one knows why.

What purpose did it serve? A temple? A place of ritual gathering? A sky-watching observatory? Nothing about Göbekli Tepe fits the narrative of primitive nomads just learning how to sow seeds. Tis site breaks history because sites like it should not have been possible according to mainstream experts. Yet there it is. Göbekli Tepe is truly a history changer and not many people know about it.

Karahantepe Adds Depth—Literally and Figuratively one of the Oldest Strcutures on Earth

And a short distance away from Göbekli Tepe we have another shocker.

Just 35 kilometers from Göbekli Tepe lies Karahantepe, a site of the same age that may be even more complex. Unlike Göbekli’s open-air circles, Karahantepe includes deep, carved chambers—entire rooms built into the bedrock. More than 250 stone pillars have been uncovered so far, along with stylized human heads and abstract sculptures embedded in the walls. Who could have built these gigantic strcutres over 11,000 years ago? Where they really hunter-gatherers as mainstream experts suggest, or is there something more complex about these ancient people?

The complexity and site of this site was not a one-off anomaly. I believe that whoever built Göbekli Tepe was part of a broader cultural world—possibly a network of sacred or ceremonial sites. Karahantepe expands the story, suggesting the region was teeming with early symbolic architecture. And yet, just like Göbekli, it appears and disappears with no clear lineage, no gradual development, and no evolutionary trail. It’s as if it came from nowhere.

Nabta Playa May Have Tracked the Stars Before Egypt Had a Name

We cannot go through an article mentioning the oldest structures on Earth without mentioning this incredible acient site. In the Nubian Desert of southern Egypt, Nabta Playa looks at first like a scatter of rocks in the sand. But its alignment tells another story. Dating back 7,000 to 9,000 years, the stones were arranged to mark the rising of Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky—an event that would later become central to Egyptian calendar systems.

Long before pharaohs, this site may have served as both a ceremonial ground and a celestial clock. Buried cattle remains suggest ritual sacrifice, possibly tied to early pastoralist religion. This hints at a connection between astronomy, myth, and seasonal survival long before formal religion or kingdoms took shape. Though smaller in scale than Göbekli or Karahantepe, Nabta Playa reveals something similar: a deep concern with time, sky, and cosmic order. All from people we call “prehistoric.”

Gunung Padang Could Be the Oldest of Them All

Indonesia’s Gunung Padang might be the most controversial site on this list—but it could also be the most astonishing. On the surface, it looks like a stepped hill made of volcanic stone. But excavations in the last decade have revealed terraces, chambers, and layers of construction that extend 20 meters deep. Some geologists argue the deepest layers could date to as early as 20,000 BCE—a time when the Earth was still in the grip of the last Ice Age.

If proven true, it would be the oldest known human-built structure on Earth by a wide margin. But mainstream archaeologists remain skeptical. The core question is whether the deeper layers are artificial or natural. The debate is ongoing. Regardless of the final verdict, the site challenges our assumptions. At the very least, it shows human activity at the site far earlier than previously believed. At most, it suggests a lost chapter of human development buried—literally—beneath layers of time and earth.

Baalbek’s Megastones Hint at a Forgotten Foundation

Another one of my favorite sites.

High in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon, the ruins of Baalbek are often credited to the Romans, who built temples to Jupiter and Bacchus atop its massive stone platform. But beneath those classical columns lies a deeper mystery—one that predates Roman engineering by millennia. At the heart of the platform are the Trilithon stones: three limestone blocks each weighing over 800 tons. Nearby, an unfinished stone known as the Stone of the Pregnant Woman weighs more than 1,000 tons. Even with today’s technology, moving and placing these megaliths would be a challenge.

No one knows how they were transported, lifted, or aligned with such precision—and the builders left no inscriptions, no clear cultural fingerprints. Some researchers argue the deepest layers of Baalbek’s foundation could stretch back to the pre-pottery Neolithic, possibly linked to the same horizon as Göbekli Tepe and Karahantepe. If that’s true, then Roman temples were built atop something far older—a platform whose origins remain undocumented. Baalbek’s base may not yet be as precisely dated as the others on this list, but it raises the same unsettling question: Who built the foundation—and when?

Why Were They Building at All?

This is the question that lingers. Why were people with no cities, no writing, no metallurgy, and supposedly no organizational complexity carving massive stones and aligning them to the stars? Some researchers believe these were spiritual centers. Others think they were calendars—designed to track the solstices, lunar cycles, or stellar movements crucial to seasonal survival. Still others suggest they were gathering places where ideas, stories, and collective memory were shared in symbolic form.

But here’s the problem: none of this fits with how we define “prehistory.” We were taught that humans built monuments after developing agriculture and complex societies. These sites flip that script. Maybe, just maybe, the desire to build came first—and everything else followed.

If even one of these sites is as old as the evidence suggests, then the timeline of human history needs serious revision. The builders were capable of organizing labor, understanding celestial cycles, and shaping stone on a massive scale. These weren’t scattered efforts. They show patterns — of intent, of knowledge, and of memory we no longer share. There’s still too much we don’t know. But it’s clear we’ve been starting the story too late.

{ https://curiosmos.com/category/ancient-civilizations/ }

24-04-2025 om 00:00 geschreven door peter