The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie!
Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek!
België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek
In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch.
Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie
Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen!
Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit
Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie.
Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie
Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen.
Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen
Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek!
Blijf Op De Hoogte!
Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren!
Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
08-02-2025
This British Scientist Proposes Controversial Theory: We May Be Living 52 Million Lives in a Simulation
This British Scientist Proposes Controversial Theory: We May Be Living 52 Million Lives in a Simulation
Dr. Melvin Vopson suggests a controversial theory that we may be living 52 million lives in a simulation, as one real-world lifetime could feel like 4.2 billion years in simulated time.
Dr. Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, suggests that we might be living in a computer simulation, much like in The Matrix. He believes that certain signs in our daily lives hint that reality might not be what it seems. He explores the question: if we are in a simulated world, what is its purpose?
Dr Vopson makes scientific observations and measurements to support his theory. His theory is considered controversial which suggests that time can slow down in a simulation. Just like dreams feel long but last only a short time in real life, a whole lifetime in a simulated world could happen in just one real-world minute. This means a person could live many lifetimes by repeating these short simulations, potentially experiencing 52 million lifetimes in one human lifespan.
Dr. Melvin Vopson has previously published research suggesting that information has mass and that all elementary particles – the smallest known building blocks of the universe – store information about themselves, similar to the way humans have DNA.
In 2022, he discovered a new law of physics that could predict genetic mutations in organisms, including viruses, and help judge their potential consequences. It is based on the second law of thermodynamics, which establishes that entropy – a measure of disorder in an isolated system – can only increase or stay the same.
Dr. Melvin Vopson
Dr. Vopson had expected that the entropy in information systems would also increase over time, but on examining the evolution of these systems he realized it remains constant or decreases. That’s when he established the second law of information dynamics, or infodynamics, which could significantly impact genetics research and evolution theory.
Dr. Vopson presents three possible explanations. One idea is that we willingly entered this simulation before birth, choosing to live in an exciting, artificial world rather than a dull real one. In this view, life is like a highly advanced virtual reality game meant for entertainment.
Another possibility is that we are part of an experiment designed to solve real-world problems. This theory suggests that humans in the future create simulations like ours to test solutions for global crises such as climate change or war. If one of these simulations finds a solution, it could be applied in the real world.
The third idea is that time in the simulation moves much slower than in reality. A few minutes in the real world could last for centuries here, allowing us to live multiple lifetimes. Thus, by choosing to exist in the simulation, we might experience a form of immortality.
According to this idea, in the same way, that our dreams can feel days long but last only minutes in real life, an entire lifetime in a simulated universe could take just one minute in the real world. That means a person could become virtually immortal by stacking up these one-minute simulated lives across their entire human lifetime, leaving 52 million chained lifetimes behind. (Source)
Although Dr. Vopson admits these are just theories and not proven by science, some of his research suggests that the universe could be a giant computer. He is not alone in this belief—figures like Elon Musk have also speculated that reality might be a simulation.
In 2022, Dr. Vopson discovered a new law of physics that could predict genetic mutations in organisms, including viruses, and help judge their potential consequences.
It is based on the second law of thermodynamics, which establishes that entropy – a measure of disorder in an isolated system – can only increase or stay the same.
Dr. Vopson had expected that the entropy in information systems would also increase over time, but on examining the evolution of these systems he realized it remains constant or decreases. That’s when he established the second law of information dynamics, or infodynamics, which could significantly impact genetics research and evolution theory.
Dr Vopson said: “I knew then that this revelation had far-reaching implications across various scientific disciplines.
“What I wanted to do next is put the law to the test and see if it could further support the simulation hypothesis by moving it on from the philosophical realm to mainstream science.”
Information theory is the study of how information is measured, stored, and shared. It was first developed by a mathematician named Claude Shannon and is now used in many areas of science, including physics.
In 2022, Dr. Vopson and another physicist, Serban Lepadatu, introduced a new idea called the “second law of infodynamics.”
This idea is similar to a well-known rule in physics called the “second law of thermodynamics,” which says that disorder (called entropy) in the universe always increases or stays the same over time. In simple terms, things naturally become more chaotic.
However, Dr. Vopson found that in information systems—such as digital data or genetic code—the opposite happens. Instead of becoming more disordered, these systems become more organized over time.
He tested this idea on different systems and found that it supports the theory that our universe might be a simulation. This is because, unlike in nature where things become more chaotic, information systems tend to become more efficient and structured. The patterns we see in nature might be a way of organizing information, which fits with the idea of a simulated world.
Key findings include:
Biological Systems: The second law of infodynamics challenges the conventional understanding of genetic mutations, suggesting that they follow a pattern governed by information entropy. This discovery has profound implications for fields such as genetic research, evolutionary biology, genetic therapies, pharmacology, virology, and pandemic monitoring.
Atomic Physics: The paper explains the behavior of electrons in multi-electron atoms, providing insights into phenomena like Hund’s rule; which states that the term with maximum multiplicity lies lowest in energy. Electrons arrange themselves in a way that minimizes their information entropy, shedding light on atomic physics and the stability of chemicals.
Cosmology: The second law of infodynamics is shown to be a cosmological necessity, with thermodynamic considerations applied to an adiabatically expanding universe supporting its validity.
“The paper also provides an explanation for the prevalence of symmetry in the universe”, explained Dr. Vopson.
Dr. Vopson argues that this law plays a role in atomic physics (electron arrangement), cosmology, and biological systems. This last one is where Dr. Vopson makes a big claim: contrary to Charles Darwin’s idea that mutations occur randomly, mutations actually occur so that information entropy is minimized.
He analyzed the constantly mutating SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. COVID-19) virus, and his paper on that investigation—shows a “unique correlation between the information and the dynamics of the genetic mutations.”
“A super complex universe like ours, if it were a simulation, would require a built-in data optimization and compression in order to reduce the computational power and the data storage requirements to run the simulation,” Dr. Vopson wrote. (Source)
Dr. Vopson tested his new idea, called the “second law of infodynamics,” by studying digital information.
He wrote the word “INFORMATION” in binary (a computer code using 1s and 0s) onto a tiny magnetic surface. Over time, as the system went through many cycles at room temperature, the information started to fade. After 1,990 cycles, it disappeared completely. This matched his theory, which says that information naturally gets lost over time, becoming simpler.
Dr. Vopson was surprised and excited that his idea applied to many different systems. He believes the law could be universal. However, he made it clear that, while his study supports the idea that the universe might be a simulation, it doesn’t prove it for sure. He hopes his work will encourage more research and that other scientists will find new ways to test this idea.
He also suggested another experiment to check his theory. If scientists smash matter and antimatter (opposites of each other) together, they might see low-energy light particles appear. This would show that information is being erased, proving his law of infodynamics in action.
Information physics suggests that everything we see as physical might actually be made of bits of information.
This means our universe could be a simulation. The idea isn’t new—John Archibald Wheeler suggested in 1989 that the universe might emerge from information.
In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom argued that it’s likely we are living in such a simulation, as advanced civilizations might create simulations that are impossible to tell apart from reality.
Physicist Seth Lloyd from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US took the simulation hypothesis to the next level by suggesting that the entire universe could be a giant quantum computer. (Source)
Dr. Vopson noted that the simulation hypothesis has attracted the interest of many public figures, such as Elon Musk and Neil deGrasse Tyson, along with other people from all walks of life, showing that it has a broad appeal.
RELATED VIDEOS
The Simulation Theory
Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains the Simulation Hypothesis
Are We Living in A Simulation - Simulation Theory Explained- Are We Real - Is this World an illusion
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
07-02-2025
Terrifying robot dog can walk, climb, and even backflip on almost any terrain - but concerned viewers predict it will be 'hunting down every last human before long'
The idea of a robotic dog that can move on almost any terrain might sound like something from the latest episode of Black Mirror.
But as this terrifying footage shows, it has now become a reality.
The state-of-the-art robot dog is called Lynx, and is the brainchild of Chinese company, Deep Robotics.
Equipped with four wheels instead of paws, the bot can walk, climb, and even backflip on everything from rocks to snow.
Deep Robtics hopes that it could be used in search and rescue operations.
However, some sceptics have already raised concerns about the four-legged robot.
'I know these are gonna be hunting down every last human before long,' one user commented on the video.
However, they reluctantly added: 'But this is also just legitimately cool as hell.'
The state-of-the-art robot dog is called Lynx, and is the brainchild of Chinese company, Deep Robotics
Equipped with four wheels instead of paws, the bot can walk, climb, and even backflip on everything from rocks to snow
Lynx stands at just under one metre tall, and weighs 30kg - around the same size as a Labrador Retriever.
'DEEPRoboticsLynx all-terrain robot boasts a compact and agile design with exceptional adaptability to diverse terrains,' Deep Robotics explains on its website.
'By leveraging its distinctive wheel-leg motion, DEEPRoboticsLynx strikes an optimal balance between speed and agility, carrying forward DEEP Robotics' deep expertise in embodied intelligence and industry applications.'
According to the firm, the robot is able to climb platforms up to 80cm tall and navigate continuous steps reaching up to 22cm tall.
Meanwhile, when it's on the move, the bot can reach top speeds of five metres/second (11mph).
It also comes with an IP54 protection rating, meaning it is suitable for use in all weather conditions.
Equipped with a wide-angle camera, the bot could be used to access hard-to-reach areas during search and rescue missions.
Unsurprisingly, it comes with a fairly hefty price-tag.
According to the firm, the robot is able to climb platforms up to 80cm tall and navigate continuous steps reaching up to 22cm tall
Unsurprisingly, it comes with a fairly hefty price-tag. Lynx will set buyers back by $17,999 (£14,520.65)
Lynx will set buyers back by $17,999 (£14,520.65)!
The response to the bot has been overwhelmingly positive on social media.
Commenting on Deep Robotics' video showcasing the robot, one user wrote: 'That's crazy. This kind of robots with such agility were still a science fiction several years ago.'
Another added: 'this is the most hardcore flex I've ever seen in the history of robotics.'
And one joked: 'the first couple of jump clips had me wondering if those were real or cgi because of how well the lynx did it!'
However, others were slightly more sceptical of the robot.
'Cant wait for this thing to chase me down in the future,' one user wrote, while another said: 'This 100% was a black mirror episode.'
Boston Dynamics first showed off Spot, the most advanced robot dog ever created, in a video posted in November 2017.
The firm, best known for Atlas, its 5 foot 9 (1.7 metre) humanoid robot, has revealed a new 'lightweight' version of its robot Spot.
The robotic canine was shown trotting around a yard, with the promise that more information from the notoriously secretive firm is 'coming soon'.
Boston Dynamics tease upcoming video of new robot - Spot
'Spot is a small four-legged robot that comfortably fits in an office or home' the firm says on its website.
It weighs 25 kg (55 lb), or 30 kg (66 lb) when you include the robotic arm.
Spot is all-electric and can go for about 90 minutes on a charge, depending on what it is doing, the firm says, boasting 'Spot is the quietest robot we have built.'
Spot was first unveiled in 2016, and a previous version of the mini version of spot with a strange extendable neck has been shown off helping around the house.
In the firm's previous video, the robot is shown walking out of the firm's HQ and into what appears to be a home.
There, it helps load a dishwasher and carries a can to the trash.
It also at one point encounters a dropped banana skin and falls dramatically - but uses its extendable neck to push itself back up.
'Spot is one of the quietest robots we have ever built, the firm says, due to its electric motors.
'It has a variety of sensors, including depth cameras, a solid state gyro (IMU) and proprioception sensors in the limbs.
'These sensors help with navigation and mobile manipulation.
'Spot performs some tasks autonomously, but often uses a human for high-level guidance.'
RELATED VIDEOS
China reveals unstoppable all-terrain robo-dog on wheels
5 Best Robot Dogs You Can Buy In 2025
Amazing Robotic Dog tricks
Robot dog with gun brings Black Mirror into terrifying reality
Lifelike human motion could enable robots to complete far more tasks, as well as adapt to environments they've not been specifically designed for.
ExBody2: Advanced Expressive Humanoid Whole-Body Control
Humanoid robots could soon move in a far more realistic manner — and even dance just like us — thanks to a new software framework for tracking human motion.
Developed by researchers at UC San Diego, UC Berkeley, MIT, and Nvidia, "ExBody2" is a new technology that enables humanoid robots to perform realistic movements based on detailed scans and motion-tracked visualizations of humans.
The researchers hope that future humanoid robots could perform a much wider range of tasks by mimicking human movements more accurately. For example, the teaching method could help robots operate in roles requiring fine movements — such as retrieving items from shelves — or moving with care around humans or other machines.
(Image credit: Exbody 2)
ExBody2 works by taking simulated movements based on motion-capture scans of humans and translating them into usable motion data for the robot to replicate. The framework can replicate complex movements using the robot, which would let robots move less rigidly and adapt to different tasks without needing extensive retraining.
Discover the 8 Weirdest Robots in the World in 2025
This is all taught using reinforcement learning, a subset of machine learning in which the robot is fed large amounts of data to ensure it takes the optimal route in any given situation. Good outputs, simulated by researchers, are assigned positive or negative scores to "reward" the model for desirable outcomes, which here meant replicating motions precisely without compromising the bot's stability.
The framework can also take short motion clips, such as a few seconds of dancing, and synthesize new frames of movement for reference, to enable robots to complete longer-duration movements.
Dancing with robots
In a video posted to YouTube, a robot trained through ExBody2 dances, spars and exercises alongside a human subject. Additionally, the robot mimics a researcher's movement in real time, using additional code titled "HybrIK: Hybrid Analytical-Neural Inverse Kinematics for Body Mesh Recovery" developed by the Machine Vision and Intelligence Group at Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
At present, ExBody2's dataset is largely focused on upper-body movements. In a study, uploaded Dec. 17, 2024 to the preprint server ArXiv, the researchers behind the framework explained that this is due to concerns that introducing too much movement in the lower half of the robot will cause instability.
"Overly simplistic tasks could limit the training policy's ability to generalize to new situations, while overly complex tasks might exceed the robot's operational capabilities, leading to ineffective learning outcomes," they wrote. "Part of our dataset preparation, therefore, includes the exclusion or modification of entries that featured complex lower body movements beyond the robot's capabilities."
The researchers' dataset contains more than 2,800 movements, with 1,919 of these coming from the Archive of Motion Capture As Surface Shapes (AMASS) dataset. This is a large dataset of human motions, including more than 11,000 individual human movements and 40 hours of detailed motion data, intended for non-commercial deep learning — when a neural network is trained on vast amounts of data to identify or reproduce patterns.
Having proven ExBody2's effectiveness at replicating human-like movement in humanoid robots, the team will now turn to the problem of achieving these results without having to manually curate datasets to ensure only suitable information is available to the framework. The researchers suggest that, in the future, automated dataset collection will help smooth this process.
RELATED VIDEOS
Meet Ameca, the world's 'most advanced' humanoid robot
5 Most Realistic Humanoid Robots in The World
This Is The First LIQUID Robot, And It’s Unbelievable
The HELIOS system was tested aboard the USS Preble, with photos capturing its bright beam shooting an unmanned aerial vehicle out of the sky.
HELIOS, which stands for High Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance, was developed by Lockheed Martin in 2021 and delivered to the Navy a year later.
The system blasts more than 60 kilowatts of directed energy, enough to power up to 60 homes, at the speed of light and can hit targets up to five miles away.
The US Naval Institute said in a recent report: 'The drone threat has been around for years, but the Navy has yet to prioritize defending against these easily acquired weapons.'
The US Navy conducted the first tests of its drone-kill laser weapon. HELIOS can fire for as long as it has power, which it collects from the ship
'Expecting sailors who shoot shotguns, rifles, or machine guns twice a year on a range to be able to engage multiple small, fast-moving targets is unreasonable, 'the report added.
'Even if a few sailors were expert shooters capable of shooting down drones, it likely would take a few minutes from the first report of a potential drone to identify the drone, raise the alarm, and bring key weapons and associated ammunition to bear against the threat—time the ship might not have.'
But the Navy sees its new HELIOS as a way to fight back, showing off its capabilities on the open ocean.
The US Center for Countermeasures (CCM) released details on the testing, SWNS reported.
'CCM supported the Navy’s demonstration on USS Preble (DDG 88) to verify and validate the functionality, performance, and capability of the HEL with Integrated Optical Dazzler and Surveillance system against an unmanned aerial vehicle target, it shared in a report.
The weapon was integrated into the ship's combat system, enhancing its target detection and tracking capabilities.
HELIOS can fire for as long as it has power, which it collects from the ship.
The system blasts more than 60 kilowatts of directed energy, enough to power up to 60 homes, at the speed of light and can hit targets up to five miles away
The HELIOS system was tested aboard the USS Preble, with photos showing its bright beam shooting an unmanned aerial vehicle out of the sky
And because the ship's power source is constantly replenished, the laser has an unlimited supply of power.
The test comes as a Homeland Security Advisor and billionaire Marc Andreessen suggested AI-powered jets will be the main fighters in future wars.
Speaking on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast in November, Andreessen said jets that travel five times the speed of sound, Mach 5, are going to be more common 'within a few years.'
'Image a thousand of these things coming over the horizon right at you,' Andreessen said. 'It really changes the fundamental equation of war.'
He explain that instead of needing the most soldiers and material to win, people with the most technology and money will take over.
Andreessen also noted that there are 'a bunch of reasons' why he believes a future of AI-piloted fighter jets is all but inevitable.
'Part of it is simply the speed of processing,' Andreessen explained.
'But the other big thing is, if you don't have a human in the plane, you don't have [...] 'the Spam in the Can.''
'You don't have the human body in the plane to keep alive, which means you can be a lot faster,' the billionaire White House advisor continued, 'much higher G-forces.'
RELATED VIDEOS
US Navy testing its new laser weapon that never runs out of power
"Incredible Images: U.S. Navy Tests Powerful New Laser Weapon!"
US Navy Tests Tesla's Advanced Laser Weapon System
Lieven Scheire over Chinese AI die wereld verbaast: “Geheime projecten zou ik niet bespreken met DeepSeek”
InterviewDat wij, Vlamingen, ook ‘mee’ zijn met artificiële intelligentie danken we toch ook aan Lieven Scheire, succesvol theatermaker over AI en sinds kort eredoctor in wetenschapscommunicatie (UAntwerpen). Wat vindt hij van het Chinese DeepSeek, dat voor een ‘habbekrats’ een gratis ChatGPT bouwde? “Dit is bijzonder pijnlijk voor de VS.”
Steven Swinnen
Deepseek AI Assistant: ALWAYS ON Python AI Agent for Engineers that SHIP
DeepSeek facts vs hype, model distillation, and open source competition
Kan je aan ons, leken, nog even uitleggen hoe die Chinese start-up DeepSeek de AI-wereld op z’n kop zette?
Lieven Scheire: “Het lijkt erop dat DeepSeek een taalmodel in AI bouwde dat even krachtig is als dat van ChatGPT, maar voor een fractie van de kosten. Machinelearning laat een computerprogramma zichzelf aanpassen door miljoenen voorbeelden te verwerken, het “neurale netwerk” in die computer wordt dan stap voor stap verbeterd tot het werkt. Tot nu toe werd altijd gezegd dat je alleen zulke krachtige AI kunt ontwikkelen als je beschikt over de nieuwste, duurste computerchips. Maar DeepSeek beweert nu dat het ook met 6 miljoen dollar kan, terwijl anderen miljarden nodig hebben.”
Als je genoeg computerkracht hebt – en we spreken dan al over een kmo met een stevige server – kun je het model downloaden. Je kunt thuis met je eigen DeepSeek werken, zonder dat er verbinding met het internet of met China nodig is
Lieven Scheire
Meer dan 1.000 miljard aan beurswaarde ging bij AI-bedrijven in rook op.
“De concurrentiepositie van ChatGPT van OpenAI is plotseling onderuitgehaald. En het toekomstperspectief van chipfabrikant Nvidia komt onder druk. Als blijkt dat die krachtigste chips niet meer nodig zijn, verandert dat alles. Stel het je voor als een goudkoorts waarbij Nvidia bulldozers verkoopt waarmee je goud kan delven en in China graven ze met een simpele spade evenveel op. Geopolitiek gezien is het bijzonder pijnlijk voor de VS. Zij probeerden China te beperken: ‘Jullie krijgen onze geavanceerde chips niet.’ Maar nu zegt China: ‘Dankjewel voor die sancties, want we hebben ontdekt dat we die straffe chips helemaal niet nodig hebben.’ Dit is echt enorm. Ik belde al verschillende AI-wetenschappers, die wel wat gewend zijn en ook zij trekken grote ogen. Vanavond treed ik op in Roosendaal (Scheire toert momenteel met z’n theatershow ‘Artificiële Intelligentie’ door Nederland en het Verenigd Koninkrijk, red.) en ik moét hier gewoon iets over vertellen. Dit is te groot om te negeren.”
Lieven Scheire toert momenteel door Nederland en het Verenigd Koninkrijk met zijn theatershow over AI. Daarin krijgt DeepSeek ook meteen aandacht.
DeepSeek kan toch niets meer dan ChatGPT? Waarom is er dan, behalve dat het dus goedkoper kan, zoveel fuss?
“Belangrijk is dat het hele model van DeepSeek ‘open source’ is. Bij OpenAI houden ze wat ze ontwikkelen gesloten als een zwarte doos. Het is hun uitvinding en ze vragen geld aan gebruikers voor toegang. Maar DeepSeek maakt alles openbaar. Als je genoeg computerkracht hebt – en we spreken dan al over een kmo met een stevige server – kun je het model downloaden. Je kunt thuis met je eigen DeepSeek werken zonder dat er verbinding met het internet of met China nodig is. Dit zet bedrijven zoals Microsoft, die fors hebben geïnvesteerd in OpenAI, onder druk.’”
Net toen Trump aankondigde dat hij 500 miljard dollar zou investeren om de VS op de eerste plek te houden in AI, lanceerde China DeepSeek. Een toevallige timing? Misschien niet. Dit is een wake-upcall voor de VS
Lieven Scheire
DeepSeek claimt efficiënter te zijn, zowel in ontwikkelingskosten als in energieverbruik. Da’s toch vooral goed nieuws, want dan is er een duurzame toekomst voor dat energieverslindende AI?
“Voor energieverbruik zou dit goed nieuws kunnen zijn, maar dat is nog afwachten. AI is een consumentenproduct geworden. Zolang een tiental grote onderzoeksinstellingen veel energie gebruiken, valt dat nog mee. Maar als miljarden mensen dagelijks AI gebruiken, zit je met een ander probleem. DeepSeek zou dat proces efficiënter kunnen maken. Maar we blijven mensen: zodra iets goedkoper en sneller kan, willen we meer. Dat zagen we ook met computers. Het zou me niet verbazen als we die efficiëntiewinst in energieverbruik gebruiken voor nog ingewikkeldere modellen, in plaats van voor duurzaamheid.”
“Op dit moment zijn taalmodellen nog steeds dé revolutie binnen AI. Beeldherkenning en andere vormen van AI ontwikkelen zich ook, maar waar iedereen naar streeft, is de ontwikkeling van artificial general intelligence (AGI): een AI-systeem dat niet één specifieke taak uitvoert, maar alles kan. Volgens veel onderzoekers komt dat steeds dichterbij, terwijl anderen het nog als een luchtkasteel beschouwen. Toch lijkt één ding zeker: als er meer rekenkracht beschikbaar komt door efficiëntere methoden, zoals die van DeepSeek, zal dat vrijwel zeker gebruikt worden in de race naar AGI.”
Sommigen vergelijken deze AI-race tussen de VS en China met het ‘Spoetnik-moment’ van de Koude Oorlog. Zie jij die vergelijking?
“Ja, die vergelijking is goed gekozen. Spoetnik was voor de VS een koude douche: opeens had de grote vijand een satelliet die boven het hoofd van de Amerikanen hing. Nu hebben we iets vergelijkbaars. Net toen Trump aankondigde dat hij 500 miljard dollar zou investeren om de VS op de eerste plek te houden in AI, lanceerde China DeepSeek. Een toevallige timing? Misschien niet. Dit is een wake-upcall voor de VS. Ze gaan daar hun aanpak moeten herzien. Waar ze tot nu toe vertrouwden op dure hardware en brute rekenkracht, laat DeepSeek zien dat het ook anders kan: efficiënter en goedkoper. Dit zal niet alleen Amerikaanse bedrijven aan het denken zetten, maar ook Aziatische en Europese start-ups, die hun eigen plannen voor een ChatGPT-alternatief wellicht in de prullenbak gooien om te kijken hoe DeepSeek dit heeft gedaan. Wat ontwikkeling betreft, is dit fantastisch natuurlijk, maar laat ons hopen dat het geopolitiek niet nog meer opschudding veroorzaakt.”
Je waarschuwde al voor ‘de dag dat de leerling-tovenaar ermee aan de slag gaat’ en ook grote namen in de AI-wereld zeggen dat wie de race wint, technologie kan ontwikkelen die de mensheid niet meer onder controle krijgt. Komen we dichter bij dat moment?
“Da’s een lastige vraag. Zelfs de grootste specialisten hebben compleet tegengestelde meningen. Sommigen waarschuwen dat de ‘geest uit de fles’ is en dat dergelijke technologieën hun eigen gang kunnen gaan, zonder menselijke controle. Aan de andere kant zijn er collega-wetenschappers, die ook aan de wieg stonden van AI, die benadrukken dat we altijd de mogelijkheid hebben om de stekker eruit te trekken.”
DeepSeek komt uit China en dat roept vragen op over privacy en dataveiligheid. Hoe moeten we daarmee omgaan?
“Het lijkt me logisch dat ze data verzamelen en gebruikers profileren op basis van vragen die je stelt. Als je geheime projecten hebt, zou ik die niet met DeepSeek bespreken. Maar eerlijk gezegd weet ik niet of je dat bij ChatGPT wel veilig kunt doen.”
From Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics to bipedal machines you can buy today, here are 12 important milestones in the development of robots.
(Image credit: VCG / VCG via Getty Images)
Few technologies have captured the human imagination in quite the same way as robots. The idea of machines that can walk and talk like us has been a staple of science fiction for decades. The reality has been more prosaic — most real-world robots are disembodied arms relegated to dull and repetitive factory work. But recent breakthroughs in both artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic hardware mean that the smart, humanoids of our imaginations are getting ever closer to reality.
Here are 12 of the most important milestones that got us here.
1921 — Invention of the term "robot"
(Image credit: Heritage Art/Heritage Images via Getty Images)
Since antiquity, people had imagined the possibility of artificial humans — from the clay Golems of Jewish folklore to the mechanical servants of the Greek god Hephaestus. History is also littered with examples of complex automata designed to wow audiences with their life-like movements. But the word "robot" was first introduced by the Czech writer Karel Čapek in his 1921 play R.U.R., which stands for Rossumovi Univerzální Roboti (Rossum's Universal Robots). The term is derived from the Czech word "robota," which means forced labor, and the play features artificial workers made of synthetic organic matter that rise up against their human masters — a narrative that would be echoed in many later works.
1942 — Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics
(Image credit: Rita Barros/Getty Images)
Robots became a popular science fiction trope, with legendary author Isaac Asimov featuring them prominently in many of his stories. A major theme of his work was how these artificial humans would interact with human society. In his 1942 short story "Runaround" he introduced the Three Laws of Robotics, which were supposed to govern how all robots in his fictional universe operated. The first law prohibited the robots from harming humans, the second mandated robots to obey humans unless it violated the first law, and the third ordered the machines to protect themselves as long as that didn't conflict with the two other laws. While entirely fictional, Asimov's three laws were influential on the development of ethical frameworks for AI and robotics.
1961 — The first industrial robot
It didn't take long for ideas from science fiction to filter through to the real world. In the early 1950s, serial inventor George Devol began work on a robotic arm that could perform repetitive tasks in factories. He teamed up with entrepreneur Joseph Engelberger to form Unimation, the world's first robotics company, and in 1961 their Unimate robot went to work on the assembly line at a General Motors plant in New Jersey. The hydraulically-powered arm had five degrees of freedom (DoF) — a measure of dexterity that means its arm could move or rotate in five different directions. Programming the device required the user to physically move the arm to different positions to teach it the required sequence of actions, which was then recorded in a magnetic storage device known as a drum memory.
1966 — World's first intelligent mobile robot
(Image credit: Marshall Astor from San Pedro, United States, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons)
While significant progress had been made on the mechanical capabilities of robots by the mid-1960s, they were still essentially dumb machines that needed to be programmed by hand. In 1966, researchers at the Stanford Research Institute started work on a wheeled robot with cameras and touch sensors that could reason about its actions, make plans and navigate the real world. It could move between multiple rooms autonomously, avoiding obstacles, opening doors, flicking light switches and pushing boxes around. The robot, which the team named "Shakey," received significant media attention — in 1970 — Life magazine even referred to it as the first electronic person." A key advance behind the robot was its layered software architecture, which enabled it to reason through tasks, something replicated in many subsequent robots.
1969 — The Stanford Arm spawns a new industry
(Image credit: Gildardo Sánchez, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons)
While the Unimate was the first robotic arm to go into production, the Stanford Arm became the blueprint for the emerging industrial robotics industry. Designed in 1969 by Victor Scheinman, who was then a student in the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab, the six-DoF arm was electrically powered and controlled by a computer. Over the following years Scheinman built increasingly sophisticated versions of the arm at both Stanford and MIT, before eventually starting a company called Vicarm Inc. in 1974 to commercialize his work. He ended up selling his designs to Unimation in 1977, which released the Programmable Universal Machine for Assembly (PUMA) robot in 1978. The initial customer was General Motors, which used it to assemble automotive subcomponents.
1970 — First robotic rover sent to the Moon
(Image credit: NASA)
The birth of robotics overlapped with another major technological leap — the advent of the Space Age. Scientists recognized that machines that could be controlled remotely or even operate autonomously could be a powerful tool for exploring the solar system. In 1970, the Soviet Union landed Lunokhod 1, the world's first robotic rover, on the moon. Shaped like a bathtub and with eight independently powered wheels, the rover could be controlled remotely from Earth via antennas and a feed from four cameras. The solar-powered vehicle operated for almost a year, roughly three and half times longer than it was designed to last, and travelled 6.5 miles (10.5 kilometers). It also used extendable probes to carry out more than 500 tests on the mechanical properties of lunar soil.
1990 — Rodney Brooks rewrites AI for robotics
(Image credit: Panuwat Sikham via Getty Images)
By the 1980s, industrial robots that could carry out repetitive tasks in controlled environments had become commonplace, but efforts to create more flexible and autonomous machines were foundering. Australian roboticist Rodney Brooks had the intuition that this plateau was due to the top-down approach researchers were taking. This involved a focus on imbuing machines with abstract reasoning skills and developing complex systems of mathematical symbols to represent the world around them. Instead, he took inspiration from nature and focused on the feedback loops between sensing and action that enable sophisticated behavior in animals. He demonstrated that by taking this bottom-up approach, outlined in the 1990 paper Elephants Don't Play Chess, it was possible to combine multiple simple behavioral modules to solve challenges beyond the robots that existed at the time.
1996 — Honda unveils first humanoid walking robot
Despite considerable progress in robotics, most machines were a far cry from the mechanical people depicted in sci-fi. That changed in 1996 when Honda unveiled its P2 robot, which was the first humanoid robot capable of walking independently on two legs. The company had started working on the problem of bipedal locomotion in the late 1980s by studying, and trying to replicate, how humans walked. Research on P2 and its successors P3 and P4 eventually culminated in the development of the company's iconic ASIMO humanoid robot, which was unveiled for the first time in 2000 and set the standard for humanoid robotics going forward.
2000 — The da Vinci surgical robot cleared by the FDA
Intuitive Surgical da Vinci Sp Single Port Robotic Surgical System
While most commercial robotics companies focused on machines designed to replace brute labor in factories, Intuitive Surgical decided to focus on the delicate process of minimally invasive surgery. They built a four-armed robotic surgical system called da Vinci that could be controlled remotely by a surgeon. The arms were capable of holding surgical instruments like scalpels, graspers and scissors and enabled the surgeon to carry out ultra-precise movements. The device was cleared for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2000 and has been used in more than 14 million procedures.
2010 — Google unveils self driving car project
(Image credit: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
There had been scattered experiments in autonomous vehicles over the years, but the first company to devote serious resources to the idea was Google. The firm began developing self-driving cars in 2009 and drove more than 140,000 miles on public roads before announcing the project in October 2010. Earlier experiments were carried out in a modified Toyota Prius with a safety driver behind the wheel. But in 2015 the company carried out the first fully autonomous ride on a public road in a custom-built vehicle with steering wheel or pedals. After rebranding as Waymo, the company started its first public trials of a driverless taxi service in Phoenix, Arizona in 2017.
2012 — The DARPA robotics challenge is launched
(Image credit: Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
One of the major catalysts for recent breakthroughs in smart, humanoid robots was the DARPA Robotics Challenge. Launched by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in 2012, the competition challenged teams to develop semi-autonomous robots that could carry out complex tasks in simulated disaster zones. The bots were tasked with walking across rubble, climbing ladders, closing leaky valves and even driving a utility vehicle. The finals were held in 2015. While some teams competed with their own robots, six were provided with humanoid Atlas robots built by Boston Dynamics. The company continued to develop the robot after the competition was over, showing off increasingly advanced capabilities over the years such as running outdoors, jumping and tackling parkour courses.
2020 — The first bipedal robot goes on sale
Unitree Introducing | Unitree G1 Humanoid Agent | AI Avatar | Price from $16K
The startup Agility Robotics became the first company to release a commercial bipedal robot after selling two units of its Digit model to Ford. While not strictly a humanoid, thanks to its "backward" legs that work more like a bird's than a person's, the robot is roughly the size and shape of a small human and designed to help out in warehouses and other industrial settings. The release marked the beginning of a boom in commercial humanoid robotics, with companies like Tesla, Figure and 1X unveiling their own offerings shortly afterwards. And costs are falling rapidly — earlier this year Chinese company Unitree released its G1 humanoid robot, which costs just $16,000.
Decoding Asimov: The Three Laws of Robotics Explained
#2 Evolution of Robotics | Introduction to Robotics
Theoretical physics is a fascinating and (at times) amusing field. While most people would not claim to know much about this field of research, many of its more advanced concepts come up in popular culture all the time. In fact, words like “nuclear,” “quantum,” and “multiverse” are often key to the plot of our favorite TV shows and movies.
On the other hand, some of the more advanced concepts in theoretical physics (when described) sound more like philosophy and metaphysics than science. In fact, some theories even manage to blur the lines between science and religion and are generally met by either awe or dismissal (depending upon who’s listening).
Consider the idea of “extra dimensions,” which many people would assume refers to the existence of dimensions parallel to our own where things are slightly or vastly different — aka. “multiverse” theory. In truth, the theory of extra dimensions deals with the possible existence of extra dimensions beyond the ones we are immediately aware of.
While this kind of talk may sound like something farfetched or purely speculative, it is actually a vital part of our understanding of how our Universe works. If and when we determine how many dimensions our Universe has (and what each of them does), we will finally have a Theory of Everything (ToE) and know how it all fits together.
Dimensions 101
To break it down, the term “dimension” refers to any mathematical measurement. This can generally refer to a physical measurement (an object or space) or a temporal measurement (time). There are three dimensions that we experience daily, which define the length, width, and depth of all objects in our Universe (the x, y, and z-axis, respectively).
However, scientists maintain that to understand the laws of nature, one must include a “fourth dimension,” which is time. Without this coordinate, the position, velocity, and acceleration of objects in our Universe cannot be properly measured. It’s not enough to know where an object is in terms of three spatial coordinates. You also need to know when the object was where.
Beyond these four dimensions, theoretical physicists have ventured that there may be more at play. The number of dimensions varies, but the purpose behind extra dimensions is to find ways of unifying the known laws of the Universe, which theoretical physicists have been trying to do for about a century.
The reason has to do with two very interesting fields of study: Quantum Mechanics (QM) and General Relativity (GR). These fields emerged during the early 20th century and were almost concurrent with each other. Whereas QM has many forebears (Planck, Heisenberg, Schrodinger, et al.), GR owes its existence, at least initially, to Albert Einstein — though many of his ideas were refinements on earlier theories.
For the record, Einstein also contributed to the development of QM through his research on the behavior of light. In any case, whereas Quantum Mechanics (QM) describes how energy and matter behave at the atomic and subatomic levels, General Relativity (GR) describes how matter, energy, and spacetime behave on larger scales in the presence of gravity.
The funny thing is, our greatest scientific minds have been trying to figure out how these two fields fit together for almost a century. Both appear to work just fine on their own, but where they come together into a single coherent system, that remains largely a mystery.
Four fundamental forces
After thousands of years of research into nature and the laws that govern it, scientists have determined that four fundamental forces govern all matter-energy interactions. These forces, and the fundamental particles that make up all matter (quarks, leptons, gauge bosons, and scalar bosons), are part of The Standard Model of particle physics. These forces are:
Electromagnetism
Weak Nuclear Force
Strong Nuclear Force
Gravitation
The first three forces are all described by the field of Quantum Mechanics and are associated with specific subatomic particles. Electromagnetism is associated with electrons (a lepton), which are responsible for electricity, magnetism, and all forms of electromagnetic radiation. That includes visible light (color), heat, microwaves, radio waves, ultraviolet radiation, and gamma rays.
The weak nuclear force deals with interactions between subatomic particles responsible for the radioactive decay of atoms and is associated with particles smaller than a proton (bosons). At higher energies, this force merges with electromagnetism, which has given rise to the unified term “electroweak force.”
The strong nuclear force governs particles that are the size of protons and neutrons (hadrons) and is so-named because it is approximately 137 times as strong as electromagnetism, millions of times stronger than the weak nuclear force, and 1038 times as strong as gravitation. It causes quarks to come together to form larger protons and neutrons and binds them to create atomic nuclei.
Finally, there is gravitation, which is the weakest of the four forces and deals with interactions between massive objects (asteroids, planets, stars, galaxies, and the large-scale structure of the Universe.) Unlike the other three forces, there is no known subatomic particle that describes gravitation or gravitational interactions.
This is why scientists are forced to study physics in terms of QM or GR (depending on the scales involved), but generally not both combined. Because of this, scientists have been trying to come up with a theoretical framework for unifying gravity with the other forces. Attempts to do so generally fall under the heading of “quantum gravity” or a Theory of Everything (ToE).
String Theory in 11 Dimensions Simplified | Mr.GK
How many dimensions are there?
Attempts to create a unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism can be traced to German physicist Theodor Kaluza (1885–1954). In 1921, he published a paper where he presented an extended interpretation of Einstein’s Field Equations. This theory was built on the idea of a 5D Universe, which included a dimension beyond the common 4D of space and time.
In 1926, Swedish theoretical physicist Oskar Klein offered a quantum interpretation of Kaluza’s 5D theory. In Klein’s extension, the fifth dimension was curled up, microscopic, and could take the form of a circle that had a 10-30 cm radius. In the 1930s, work was undertaken on the Kaluza field theory by Einstein and his colleagues at Princeton. By the 1940s, the theory was formally completed and given the name Kaluza-Klein theory.
The work of Kaluza and Klein predicted the emergence of String Theory (ST), which was first proposed during the 1960s. By the 1990s, multiple interpretations emerged, including Superstring Theory, Loop-Quantum Gravity, M-theory, and Supergravity. Each of these theories entails the existence of “extra dimensions,” “hyperspace,” or something similar.
To summarize, ST states that the point-like particles of particle physics are actually one-dimensional objects called “strings.” Over distances larger than the string scale, they resemble ordinary particles, though their mass, charge, and other properties are determined by the string’s vibrational state. In one state, the string corresponds to the graviton, which is what causes gravitation.
Superstring theory, a variation on ST, requires the existence of 10 spacetime dimensions. These include the four dimensions immediately apparent to us (length, width, depth, time) and six more that are not.
These extra six dimensions are curled up into a compact space. On order the string scale (10-33 cm) we wouldn’t be able to detect the presence of these extra dimensions directly because they’re just too small.
According to the theory, the fifth and sixth dimensions deal with possible worlds that began with the same initial conditions.
The fifth dimension encompasses worlds with slightly different outcomes than ours, while the sixth is where a plane of possible worlds would be visible. The seventh dimension is where one could see possible worlds that started with different initial conditions and then branched out infinitely — hence why the term “infinity” is used to describe them.
The eighth dimension would similarly give us a plane of these “infinities,” while in the ninth dimension, all possible Universes and laws of physics could be seen. In the tenth dimension, anything and everything possible in terms of cosmic evolution are accessible. Beyond that, nothing can be seen by living creatures that are part of the spacetime continuum.
M-theory, which combines five distinct superstring theories, posits the existence of 11 dimensions — ten spatial and one time. This variation on superstring theory is considered attractive because of the phenomena it predicts. For one, M-theory predicts the existence of the graviton, which is consistent with string theory as a whole and offers an explanation for quantum gravity.
It also predicts a phenomenon similar to black hole evaporation, where black holes emit “Hawking radiation” and lose mass over time. Some variations of superstring theory also predict the existence of Einstein-Rosen bridges — aka. “wormholes.” Another approach, Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG), posits that gravity is completely different from the other fundamental forces and that space-time itself is made of quantized, discrete bits, in the form of tiny, one-dimensional loops.
Some versions of supergravity theory also promote an 11-D model of spacetime, with 4 common dimensions and 7 hyperspace dimensions. There’s also “brane theory,” which posits that the Universe is made up of multidimensional vibrating “membranes” that have mass and a charge and can propagate through spacetime.
To date, there is no experimental evidence for the existence of “extra dimensions,” “hyperspace,” or anything beyond the four dimensions we can perceive.
Why can’t we see them?
Alas, the question remains. If additional dimensions are required for the laws of physics to make sense, why can’t we confirm their existence? There are two possibilities: one, what we think we know about physics is wrong, or two, the dimensions of spacetime beyond the 4D we experience are so subtle or tiny that they are invisible to our current experiments.
On its face, the first possibility seems highly unlikely. After all, ongoing particle experiments — like those conducted with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) — have confirmed that the Standard Model of particle physics is correct. Similarly, General Relativity has been confirmed many times over since Einstein formally proposed it in 1915.
That leaves us with the second possibility: that extra dimensions cannot be measured or characterized using current methods and experiments. A well-studied possibility is that dimensions are “curled up” at tiny scales, which means their properties and influence on spacetime could only be measured at subatomic levels.
Another possibility is “compactification,” where certain dimensions are finite or temporal in nature. In short, this theory posits that curled-up dimensions become very small or close in on themselves to form circles. If this is true, then the six extra dimensions would likely take the form of a Calabi–Yau manifold (these are shapes that satisfy the requirement needed for the six “unseen” spatial dimensions of string theory).
For astrophysicists and theoretical physicists, compactification and the idea that extra dimensions are tiny explains why the Universe still exists billions of years after its emergence. If these dimensions were larger, they would accommodate enough matter to trigger gravitational collapses and the formation of black holes (which would consume the rest of the Universe).
The fact that the cosmos still exists after 13.8 billion years, and shows no sign of being torn apart, would suggest that this theory is sound. Alternatively, the laws of physics may operate differently in these extra dimensions. Either way, there’s still the unanswered question of how we might observe and study them.
How do we find them?
So if the Universe really does have extra dimensions that are imperceptible to us, how are we going to find evidence of their existence and determine their properties? One possibility is to look for them through particle physics experiments, like those conducted by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) — the operators of the LHC — and other particle accelerator labs.
At CERN, scientists boost particles to high energies before smashing them together and measuring the resulting cascade of subatomic particles. Detectors gather clues about the particles, such as their speed, mass, and charge, which can be used to work out their identity.
Theories involving extra dimensions predict that there must be heavier versions of standard particles recurring at higher and higher energies as they navigate smaller dimensions. These would have exactly the same properties as standard particles (and so be visible to detectors like those at CERN) but at a greater mass. If evidence of these were to be found, this might suggest the presence of extra dimensions.
Another way is to look back through time towards the period known as “Cosmic Dawn,” roughly 100 to 500 million years after the Big Bang, when the first stars and galaxies formed. Even if extra dimensions are imperceptible to detection today, they would have influenced the evolution of the Universe from the very beginning.
This coincides nicely with existing Dark Matter and Dark Energy surveys that are observing early comic history in the hopes of measuring their influence on cosmic evolution. Since some theorists venture that the existence of extra dimensions could help explain the “Dark Universe,” these observations could address several mysteries at once.
This dual approach is not unlike our current understanding of the Universe, which scientists can only understand in one of two ways — the largest (GR) and tiniest of scales (QM). By observing the Universe with a very wide and very tight-angle lense, we may be able to account for all the forces governing it.
Much like other ToE candidates, the belief that the universe is made up of ten dimensions or more is an attempt to take all the physical laws we understand and find out how they fit together. In that respect, it’s like assembling a puzzle, where each piece makes sense to us, but we are unaware of what the bigger picture looks like.
It’s not enough to put pieces together wherever they appear to match. We also need to have an overall idea of what the framework is, a mental picture of what it will look like when it is finished. This helps to guide our efforts so we can anticipate how it will all come together.
RELATED VIDEOS
The Multiverse Hypothesis Explained by Neil deGrasse Tyson
Let's explore the possibility of traveling to universes beyond our own — if they so exist, that is.
What would it take to access another universe?
(Image credit: Devrimb/Getty Images)
While parallel universes are a staple of science fiction, there are some real scientific theories to support them. But if parallel universes do exist, could we ever travel to them? It certainly wouldn't be easy, but let's explore this possibility.
Parallel universes crop up in two places in physical theories. One is in our conception of inflation, the theory of the extremely early universe. In those tumultuous times, many universes may have inflated all at once (and kept going) and branched out into a tremendous number of individual universes, each with their own kinds of physics and arrangements of matter. But traveling to the other universes wouldn't be easy, because they're far beyond our observable horizon and moving away faster than the speed of light. That would take a lot of frequent flyer miles.
The other potential multiverse is in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. This interpretation says that when some random quantum process occurs, one "universe" gets one of the possible results, while other universes get the others. Thus, the multiverse is constantly being filled with every possible quantum possibility.
How Many Dimensions Does The Universe Have?
But how would we get to one of those parallel universes?
The trick is to build a time machine. It doesn't matter how you do it; you just need to go back in time. Normally, going back in time introduces all sorts of nasty paradoxes, like the infamous grandfather paradox, or, less violently, inconsistent histories. Try going back in time and destroying your time machine. Now it doesn't exist, which means you can't go back in time to destroy it, which means it should exist.
Perhaps time travel into the past is forbidden for exactly these reasons, according to Stephen Hawking's chronology protection conjecture. Or perhaps time travel into the past is allowed, but with one strict rule: You can't change the past. This is known as Igor Novikov's self-consistency conjecture. But how could you go into the past without changing it?
Could we travel to parallel universes?
One possible answer is that when you travel into the past, you don't go into your own past. Instead, you slip into another history. If you go back in time and kill Hitler, you're not killing the Hitler of your past; you're killing somebody else's. And in that alternate universe, Hitler was always killed by a time-traveling assassin from another universe. When you return to the future, you come back home, with an unchanged past.
The many-worlds interpretation offers a natural platform for creating these alternate histories. If the universe is constantly splitting and branching anyway, then time travel simply moves you from one of those branches to another. Or, in another possibility, when you go back in time, you create a new branch that didn't exist before.
While this all sounds neat and tidy, it runs into the slight complication that nobody has ever gotten it to work. We don't know how this process actually unfolds or through what mechanism the alternate history emerges.
Attempts to navigate the issue by studying quantum mechanics have had mixed results. Left to their own devices, quantum fields tend to go haywire when time machines are involved. You can stabilize them — if you give up some of the core tenets of the theory, like the correspondence principle or unitarity, which say that quantum processes eventually lead to macroscopic behavior and that fundamental reactions are reversible. Nobody is really willing to give those up, since they seem central to the theory — so we're stuck on that front.
Besides, even classical, non-quantum systems run into issues. Let's say you have a switch that can turn your time machine on and off — say, by opening or closing a wormhole. We don't know how the alternate histories can accommodate changes in their space-time structures like that, regardless of whatever quantum processes are happening on a subatomic level.
However, if we could build a time machine, we could easily test whether alternate histories are created. All we'd have to do is change something in the past that you remember. If you're not allowed to do it (say, no matter how hard you try, you just can't kill Hitler), then you know there's only one timeline with a past that is locked in stone. But if you accomplish the mission, then you know that alternate histories are real and that the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics might be valid.
We don't know if any of this is possible. On the other hand, we can't exactly rule it out. Time travel into the past seems forbidden but for reasons we can't readily discern. Our past seems to be gone forever — but it's also possible that it's just one branch of many and that visiting alternate universes is as easy as … Well, it's not easy at all.
The first mouse with two biological fathers has survived until adulthood, a new study has revealed.
Researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences say they have succeeded in breeding mice using only genetic material from two males.
Through a technique called 'embryonic stem cell engineering’, scientists created eggs from the sperm of one father which could be fertilised by the other.
Mice bred using two sets of male genes either failed to grow at all or were born with severe developmental defects that prevented them from reaching adulthood.
However, by editing 20 different genes in the mice's stem cells, the researchers were able to prevent these issues.
Co-author of the study Dr Wei Li says: 'This work will help to address a number of limitations in stem cell and regenerative medicine research.'
While it is currently only possible in mice, this major breakthrough could pave the way for gay men to have children who are biologically related to both fathers.
Researchers have successfully bred a mouse (right) that has two male parents (one pictured left) and can survive to adulthood by editing their genes to overcome developmental challenges
In order to breed offspring which have two biological fathers, the researchers first needed to transform the male sex cells from one parent into female sex cells.
The scientists took sperm from a mouse and injected it into a type of cell called an oocyte - an immature egg cell that has had its genetic material removed in a process called enucleation.
The researchers then took one of these stem cells and a sperm cell from another male and injected both into another enucleated immature egg.
These male cells combined to create an embryonic stem cell containing the DNA of both parents, which was then used to create an embryo which could be implanted in a surrogate mother.
Once the embryo had developed, the mother gave birth to the offspring, which contained only genetic material from the two males.
Scientists have known for a long time that this is possible and have managed to create viable embryos using the technique.
However, no one has previously managed to create 'bi-paternal' mice that are actually capable of surviving to adulthood.
By changing genes which control how the parents' chromosomes combine, the bi-paternal mice lived much longer and could even survive weaning. Edited mice are shown by the dark blue line
How was the mouse created?
Scientists take sperm from a mouse and inject it into a cell called an oocyte - an immature egg cell that has had its genetic material removed in a process called enucleation.
This creates a stem cell - a type of cell with the potential to become any other type of cell in the body.
Researchers then take one of these stem cells and a sperm cell from another male and inject both into another enucleated immature egg.
These male cells combine to create an embryonic stem cell containing the DNA of both parents, which is then used to create an embryo which can be implanted into a surrogate mother.
Once the embryo develops, the mother gives birth to the offspring, which contains only genetic material from the two males.
During heterosexual reproduction, genetic material from a male carried by the sperm combines with genetic material from a female contained in the egg, or ovum.
When this happens, a group of genes called 'homologous chromosomes' from the mother come together with those from the father and combine in a process called 'crossing over'.
These abnormalities can cause developmental defects which prevent the offspring from living healthy lives.
Co-author Dr Qi Zhou says: 'The unique characteristics of imprinting genes have led scientists to believe that they are a fundamental barrier to unisexual reproduction in mammals.
'Even when constructing bi-maternal or bi-paternal embryos artificially, they fail to develop properly, and they stall at some point during development due to these genes.'
In this study, the researchers used a gene editing technology called CRISPR to make changes to mice's DNA in order to prevent imprinting abnormalities.
After creating stem cells from the first male's sperm, they inserted or removed sections of genetic code at 20 places in the mice's DNA that control imprinting.
Using a technique called CRISPR, the researchers modified 20 genes in one of the male mice. This prevented their offspring developing defects which led to earlier death (stock image)
When these genetically modified stem cells were combined with the sperm from another male, they were much more likely to develop properly.
These changes resulted in mice with two fathers who were able to live until adulthood for the first time ever.
Study co-author Dr Guan-Zheng Luo, of Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, says: 'These findings provide strong evidence that imprinting abnormalities are the main barrier to mammalian unisexual reproduction.
'This approach can significantly improve the developmental outcomes of embryonic stem cells and cloned animals, paving a promising path for the advancement of regenerative medicine.'
The authors do acknowledge some significant limitations to these findings.
Only 11.8 per cent of the viable embryos were capable of developing to birth and not every pup which was born lived to adulthood.
The mice that did live to adulthood showed altered growth, shortened lifespans, and were sterile.
In the future, the development of this technique could allow gay men to have children who are genetically related to both partners. However, gene editing techniques are currently not permitted for use on humans (stock image)
In theory, it could be possible to use a similar technique to create an embryo using stem cells derived from one human partner and sperm from the other.
Although the child would still need to be carried to term by a female surrogate, they would have genetic material only from both of their fathers.
Currently, the researchers are planning to try this approach in larger animals like monkeys - and warn that the technological hurdles will be significantly larger.
That means getting the technique to work in humans could require years of effort.
However, not everyone is convinced that scientists should try to pursue this technology in humans, even if it is possible.
Lukasz Konieczka, executive director of the LGBT+ charity Mosaic Trust, told MailOnline: ''I do understand that some might have a strong desire to have biological children as it offers some virtual immortality, as psychologists call it.
'I do not think it is necessary to spend time and resources on such technology as we still have children who are alive today, stuck in a care system due to neglectful or abusive biological parents.'
Since the technique requires editing the genome of the parent's stem cells, it is also prohibited in humans.
The International Society for Stem Cell Research's ethical guidelines for stem cell research do not allow heritable genome editing for reproductive purposes nor the use of human stem cell-derived gametes for reproduction because they are deemed as currently unsafe.
Since 1984, the European Union has provided funding for scientific research through a series of framework programs for research and technological development.
This include providing funding for research using embryonic stem cells as well as a human embryonic stem cell registery, which began operations in April 2007 in order to make more efficient use of pre-existing embryonic stem cell lines.
More recently, a legal battle over whether stem cell techniques can be patented may alter the research landscape, as the removal of the legal protections provided by the patent system might greatly dampen incentives for stem cell research in the EU
United Kingdom
In the UK, the law states that the use of embryos in stem cell research can only be carried out with authority from the Human Fertilisation and Embryo Authority (HFEA).
Licences are only granted if the HFEA is satisfied that any proposed use of embryos is absolutely necessary for the purposes of the research.
Research is allowed only in the following conditions:
To increase knowledge about the causes of congenital disease
To promote advances in the treatment of infertility7
To increase knowledge about the causes of miscarriages.
To develop more effective techniques of contraception.
To develop methods for detecting the presence of gene or chromosome abnormalities.
To increase knowledge about the development of embryos.
To increase knowledge about serious disease.
To enable any such knowledge to be applied in developing treatments for serious disease.
United States
State laws regarding embryonic stem cells vary widely, with some restricting their use and others permitting certain activities.
Approaches to stem cell research policy range from statutes in eight states—California, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York— which encourage embryonic stem cell research, to South Dakota's law, which strictly forbids research on embryos regardless of their source.
States that specifically permit embryonic stem cell research have established guidelines for scientists such as consent requirements and approval and review processes for projects.
In Massachusetts, for example, experiments can be performed on embryos that have not experienced more than 14 days of development.
RELATED VIDEO
A Mouse With Two Dads — and a New Frontier for Biology | Katsuhiko Hayashi | TED
DeepSeek-R1, a new reasoning model made by Chinese researchers, completes tasks with a comparable proficiency to OpenAI's o1 at a fraction of the cost.
The DeepSeek logo displayed on a smartphone screen.
(Image credit: VCG/VCG via Getty Images)
China has released a cheap, open-source rival to OpenAI's ChatGPT, and it has some scientists excited and Silicon Valley worried.
China’s AI Models Challenge OpenAI’s Lead – Deepseek, Marco-1, OpenMMLab Explained
DeepSeek, the Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) lab behind the innovation, unveiled its free large language model (LLM) DeepSeek-V3 in late December 2024 and claims it was trained in two months for just $5.58 million — a fraction of the time and cost required by its Silicon Valley competitors.
Following hot on its heels is an even newer model called DeepSeek-R1, released Monday (Jan. 20). In third-party benchmark tests, DeepSeek-V3 matched the capabilities of OpenAI's GPT-4o and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 3.5 while outperforming others, such as Meta's Llama 3.1 and Alibaba's Qwen2.5, in tasks that included problem-solving, coding and math.
Now, R1 has also surpassed ChatGPT's latest o1 model in many of the same tests. This impressive performance at a fraction of the cost of other models, its semi-open-source nature, and its training on significantly less graphics processing units (GPUs) has wowed AI experts and raised the specter of China's AI models surpassing their U.S. counterparts.
"We should take the developments out of China very, very seriously," Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft, a strategic partner of OpenAI, said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 22..
AI systems learn using training data taken from human input, which enables them to generate output based on the probabilities of different patterns cropping up in that training dataset.
For large language models, these data are text. For instance, OpenAI's GPT-3.5, which was released in 2023, was trained on roughly 570GB of text data from the repository Common Crawl — which amounts to roughly 300 billion words — taken from books, online articles, Wikipedia and other webpages.
Reasoning models, such as R1 and o1, are an upgraded version of standard LLMs that use a method called "chain of thought" to backtrack and reevaluate their logic, which enables them to tackle more complex tasks with greater accuracy.
This has made reasoning models popular among scientists and engineers who are looking to integrate AI into their work.
But unlike ChatGPT's o1, DeepSeek is an "open-weight" model that (although its training data remains proprietary) enables users to peer inside and modify its algorithm. Just as important is its reduced price for users — 27 times less than o1.
Besides its performance, the hype around DeepSeek comes from its cost efficiency; the model's shoestring budget is minuscule compared with the tens of millions to hundreds of millions that rival companies spend to train its competitors.
In addition, U.S. export controls, which limit Chinese companies' access to the best AI computing chips, forced R1's developers to build smarter, more energy-efficient algorithms to compensate for their lack of computing power. ChatGPT reportedly needed 10,000 Nvidia GPUs to process its training data, DeepSeek engineers say they achieved similar results with just over 2,000.
How much this will translate into useful scientific and technical applications, or whether DeepSeek has simply trained its model to ace benchmark tests, remains to be seen. Scientists and AI investors are watching closely.
DeepSeek R1 Revolutionizing AI with Superior Reasoning
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
22-01-2025
Nuclear fusion breakthrough: China's 'artificial sun' reactor sets a new world record by generating a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds - taking the world closer towards limitless clean energy
Nuclear fusion breakthrough: China's 'artificial sun' reactor sets a new world record by generating a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds - taking the world closer towards limitless clean energy
If we want to rely on nuclear fusion to power the world's homes, the first step is making reactors that can run as hot and as long as possible.
Now, China's 'artificial sun' reactor – officially called 'Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak' (EAST) – has set a new world record, bringing the goal of limitless clean energy ever closer.
The reactor, located in Hefei in Anhui province, generated a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds at 180million°F (100million°C) – seven times hotter than the sun's core.
It surpasses the previous world record of 403 seconds, also set by EAST in 2023.
EAST could be a precursor to the first ever fusion power plants that supply power directly to the grid and electricity to people's homes.
These power plants could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the power-generation sector by diverting away from the use of fossil fuels like coal and gas.
Fusion differs from fission (the technique currently used in nuclear power plants), because the former fuses two atomic nuclei instead of splitting one (fission).
Unlike fission, fusion carries no risk of catastrophic nuclear accidents – like that seen in Fukushima in Japan in 2011 – and produces far less radioactive waste than current power plants, its exponents say.
China's 'artificial sun' reactor - officially called 'Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak' (EAST) - has set a new world record, bringing the goal of limitless clean energy ever closer. The reactor, located in Hefei in Anhui province, generated a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds at 180million°F (100million°C) - seven times hotter than the sun's core
If nuclear fusion experiments can be harnessed on a much larger scale, reactors hotter than anything else in the solar system will provide limitless clean energy. Tokamak Energy is a private company based at the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy in Oxfordshire
China's 'artificial sun' is operated by the Institute of Plasma Physics (ASIPP) at Hefei Institutes of Physical Science on behalf of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
The new world record, achieved on Monday, marks a critical step toward a functional fusion reactor, according to ASIPP director Professor Song Yuntao.
'A fusion device must achieve stable operation at high efficiency for thousands of seconds to enable the self-sustaining circulation of plasma, which is essential for the continuous power generation of future fusion plants,' he said.
Global scientists have worked for more than 70 years on trying to achieve this feat, according to a release from State Council Information Office, central propaganda department of the ruling Chinese Communist Party.
Gong Xianzu, head of the division of EAST physics and experimental operations, said they have upgraded several EAST systems since the last round of experiments.
For example, the heating system, which previously operated at the equivalent of nearly 70,000 household microwave ovens, has now doubled its power output.
'The ultimate goal of an artificial sun is to create nuclear fusion like the sun, providing humanity with an endless, clean energy source,' the release says.
Fusion – generally considered the holy grail of energy – could also enable 'space exploration beyond the solar system', by providing rockets with more powerful propulsion systems.
China's self-designed 'artificial sun' - a device to harness the energy of fusion, has made an important advance by achieving a temperature of 180 million °F (100 million °C) in plasma
This photo shows the control center of the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) in Hefei, east China's Anhui Province, January 20, 2025
A staff member performs an upgrade to the experimental advanced superconducting tokamak (EAST) at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) on April 28, 2021
Nuclear fusion vs. nuclear fission
Nuclear fusion and nuclear fission are nuclear processes, in that they involve nuclear forces to change the nucleus of atoms.
Fusion joins two light elements (with a low atomic mass number), forming a heavier element. For fusion to occur, hydrogen atoms are placed under high heat and pressure until they fuse together.
Meanwhile, fission splits a heavy element (with a high atomic mass number) into fragments.
In both cases, energy is freed because the mass of the remaining nucleus is smaller than the mass of the reacting nuclei.
Both reactions release energy which, in a power plant, would be used to boil water to drive a steam generator, thus producing electricity.
Source: International Atomic Energy Agency
At the heart of EAST and other fusion reactors around the world is a tokamak, a doughnut-shaped device initially conceptualised in the 1950s by Soviet physicists.
Inside, under the influence of extreme heat and pressure, gaseous hydrogen fuel becomes a plasma – a hot, electrically charged gas.
Plasma is often referred to as the fourth state of matter after solid, liquid and gas, and comprises over 99 per cent of the visible universe, including most of our sun.
In the tokamak, the plasma is trapped and pressurised by magnetic fields until the energised plasma particles start to collide.
As the particles fuse into helium, they release enormous amounts of energy, mimicking the process that occurs naturally in the centre of stars like our sun.
The only by-products of fusion reactions are small amounts of helium, an inert gas which can be safely released without harming the environment.
As a result, fusion reactors have long been touted as the best clean energy source – although the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists claims they are 'far from perfect'.
As yet, the energy input required to produce the temperatures and pressures that enable significant fusion reactions in hydrogen isotopes don't justify the fusion energy that's actually being generated, the nonprofit organization points out.
At the heart of EAST and other fusion reactors around the world is the tokamak, a doughnut-shaped device initially conceptualised in the 1950s by Soviet physicists. Inside, under the influence of extreme heat and pressure, gaseous hydrogen fuel becomes a plasma – a hot, electrically charged gas
Gong Xianzu, head of division of the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) Physics and Experimental Operations, watches the experimental data on January 15, 2025 in Hefei, Anhui Province of China
Nuclear fusion is still in the research and development phase - while nuclear fission is already making electricity. Pictured, nuclear power plant in Wuhan, China
Fusion power works by colliding heavy hydrogen atoms to form helium - releasing vast amounts of energy in the process, as occurs naturally in the centre of stars
Why are there no nuclear fusion plants yet?
Unlike nuclear fission, the nuclear fusion reaction in a tokamak is an inherently safe reaction.
But fusion is a finely balanced reaction which is very sensitive to the conditions.
The reaction will die if the plasma is too cold or too hot, or if there is too much fuel or not enough, or too many contaminants, or if the magnetic fields are not set up just right to control the turbulence of the hot plasma.
This is why fusion is still in the research and development phase - and fission is already making electricity.
Source: EUROfusion
It's worth bearing in mind that EAST, as the name suggests, is China's 'experimental' reactor project – and may yet pave the way for the first nuclear fusion power plants.
Chinese experts say: 'The mission of the EAST project is to develop an advanced fully superconducting tokamak so as to establish solid scientific and technological bases for the future continuous operation of tokamak fusion devices.'
Of course there are already nuclear power plants around the world, but they use nuclear fission, which has the disadvantage of generating unstable nuclei, some of which are radioactive for millions of years.
Fusion, on the other hand, does not create any long-lived radioactive nuclear waste but instead helium, which is an inert gas.
Fusion fuel is made up of deuterium and tritium, which are isotopes of hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, giving scientists hopes of 'unlimited energy'.
The Chinese team plan to use the nuclear fusion reactor in collaboration with scientists in France working on the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER).
The Provence-based ITER project is expected to begin delivering power in 2035, and will become the world's biggest reactor once completed.
Meanwhile, the SPARC nuclear fusion reactor, a US project involving MIT, is currently in development in Devens, Massachusetts and scheduled to start operations in 2026.
Construction of ITER, the world's largest nuclear fusion project that will replicate the reactions that power the sun in pursuit of clean power
In 2024, Korea's artificial sun' (pictured) ran at 100 million°C (180 million°F) for 48 seconds - seven times hotter than the sun's core
South Korea also has its own 'artificial sun', the Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR), which has run at 180million°F (100million°C) for 48 seconds.
Japan's reactor, called JT-60SA and switched on in Naka north of Tokyo late 2023, is a six-storey-high machine measuring 50 feet high and 44 feet wide.
Built and operated jointly by Europe and Japan, JT-60SA will be the world's largest fusion reactor until the completion of ITER in France.
Other smaller reactors are being built and tested – including the ST40 in Oxfordshire, which is more squashed-up and compact compared with other 'doughnut-shaped' reactors.
The Joint European Torus (JET), also located in Oxfordshire, released a total of 69 megajoules of energy over five seconds before being decommissioned.
They could all be precursors to fusion power plants that supply power directly to the grid and electricity to people's homes.
Fusion is the process by which a gas is heated up and separated into its constituent ions and electrons.
It involves light elements, such as hydrogen, smashing together to form heavier elements, such as helium.
For fusion to occur, hydrogen atoms are placed under high heat and pressure until they fuse together.
The tokamak (artist's impression) is the most developed magnetic confinement system and is the basis for the design of many modern fusion reactors. The purple at the center of the diagram shows the plasma inside
When deuterium and tritium nuclei - which can be found in hydrogen - fuse, they form a helium nucleus, a neutron and a lot of energy.
This is done by heating the fuel to temperatures in excess of 150 million°C and forming a hot plasma, a gaseous soup of subatomic particles.
Strong magnetic fields are used to keep the plasma away from the reactor's walls, so that it doesn't cool down and lose its energy potential.
These fields are produced by superconducting coils surrounding the vessel and by an electrical current driven through the plasma.
For energy production, plasma has to be confined for a sufficiently long period for fusion to occur.
When ions get hot enough, they can overcome their mutual repulsion and collide, fusing together.
When this happens, they release around one million times more energy than a chemical reaction and three to four times more than a conventional nuclear fission reactor.
China is making a 'mini sun' as global fusion race heats up | World News | WION
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
16-01-2025
The looming quantum apocalypse: What you need to know!
The looming quantum apocalypse: What you need to know!
Quantum computing, a transformative field leveraging quantum mechanics, has the potential to solve complex problems far beyond the reach of classical computers. While it promises significant advancements, it also poses risks, such as breaking cryptographic codes, threatening global data security.
For example: At NASA's Quantum Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (QuAIL), experiments revealed unprecedented computational power and successfully solved the unsolvable problem. However, the quantum computer began generating independent and unconventional outputs, leading to speculation that it could think for itself or even connect with extraterrestrial intelligence. Concerned about the implications, NASA halted its quantum computing project in 2023, though some believe the research continued in secret.
Separately, researchers have hypothesized that advanced extraterrestrial civilizations might use black holes as quantum computers for computation and communication. highlighting the mysterious potential of these quantum systems to explore phenomena beyond Earthly understanding.
A fictional scenario (watch video below) illustrates the dangers of quantum technology spiraling out of control:
A mysterious data transfer lights up NSA monitors at 3 AM. Within hours, hospital records flash across Times Square billboards. Dating app messages spill onto every screen in the city.
Bank accounts vanish. Traffic lights freeze. Autonomous vehicles crash through shopping malls. Intelligence agencies scramble as decades of encrypted messages suddenly unlock. Someone or something has broken the unbreakable - the mathematical foundations that protect everything from banking passwords to nuclear launch codes.
The quantum apocalypse arrives years ahead of schedule. But as chaos spreads, patterns start to surface. The timing seems too perfect, the targets too precise.
Deep beneath the Pentagon, analysts notice something strange: some messages were decrypted months ago. The chaos isn't random - it's cover for something bigger.
2024 was de grote doorbraak van AI. In recordtempo veranderde kunstmatige intelligentie ons leven, én dat van de wetenschap. Van het ontcijferen van eeuwenoude papyrusrollen tot het begrijpen van walviscommunicatie, AI draait er zijn hand niet voor om.
We noemen een aantal belangrijke wetenschappelijke ontdekkingen die zonder kunstmatige intelligentie niet mogelijk waren geweest. Zo lukte het om de Papyri van Herculaneum te ontcijferen. Deze honderden eeuwenoude boekrollen zijn verkoold door de uitbarsting van de Vesuvius in het jaar 79 na Christus. De inhoud is daarom altijd een mysterie gebleven. Het openen van de broze documenten zou ze namelijk direct vernietigen. Maar dankzij hoge resolutie-röntgenfoto’s en de kracht van AI is een doorbraak bereikt: meer dan 2000 letters zijn ontcijferd zonder de boekrollen open te maken of aan te tasten. De teksten bieden een uniek inkijkje in het leven en de ideeën van het oude Rome en Griekenland. Wetenschappers schatten dat binnenkort zo’n 90 procent van vier rollen is ontcijferd. Dit is mogelijk omdat AI ijzersterk is in het herkennen van patronen, en in staat is om het contrast tussen de inkt en de koolstoflaag zichtbaar te maken.
Superkracht Volgens Brent Seales, computerwetenschapper aan de Universiteit van Kentucky, functioneert AI als een ‘soort superkracht’: het maakt onzichtbare details zichtbaar, legt hij uit aan de wetenschapsafdeling van CNN. De Vesuvius Challenge, een wedstrijd om de decodeersnelheid te verhogen, laat zien hoe AI complexe problemen oplost – met een werkwijze en snelheid die tot voor kort ondenkbaar was.
Walvisgeluiden decoderen Wetenschappers zetten AI ook in om dierlijke communicatie beter te begrijpen, zoals het mysterieuze ‘klikalfabet’ van potvissen. Onderzoekers analyseerden bijna 9000 klikreeksen – korte stoten van klikgeluiden, die ‘codas’ genoemd worden. Hiervoor luisterden ze het onderlinge gebabbel van ongeveer zestig potvissen in de Caraïbische Zee minutieus af. Ze ontdekten met behulp van AI subtiele patronen in tempo, ritme en toonhoogte, vergelijkbaar met menselijk gepraat.
Zo identificeerden zij achttien soorten ritmes en vijf verschillende tempo’s. Artificiële intelligentie maakt deze structuren zichtbaar, maar de betekenis van de klikgeluiden blijft nog steeds een raadsel. De volgende stap is om de klikgeluiden aan hun gedrag te koppelen en ook echt te kunnen communiceren met de walvissen. De verwachting is dat AI hierbij zal kunnen helpen.
Verborgen archeologische schatten Op het droge helpt AI archeologen bij het ontdekken van verborgen locaties, zoals de mysterieuze Nazca-lijnen in Peru. Deze gigantische symbolen zijn alleen vanuit de lucht zichtbaar en zijn de afgelopen honderd jaar meer en meer in kaart gebracht. Een team onder leiding van de Japanse professor Masato Sakai trainde een AI-model om 430 bekende symbolen te analyseren. Zo verdubbelde binnen enkele maanden het aantal gedocumenteerde geogliefen.
Toch is het systeem zeker niet perfect: het identificeerde tienduizenden potentiële locaties, waarvan slechts een klein percentage veelbelovend bleek. AI biedt echter enorme kansen voor de archeologie, vooral in afgelegen en ontoegankelijke gebieden. Het combineren van menselijke expertise met AI-modellen versnelt de ontdekkingen en leidt tot inzichten die zonder de hulp van AI niet mogelijk waren.
De bouwstenen van het leven ontrafelen AI leidt ook tot een revolutie in de biologie, vooral bij het onderzoeken van eiwitten – de moleculen die verantwoordelijk zijn voor bijna alle processen in het menselijk lichaam. Het begrijpen van de driedimensionale structuren van eiwitten was tot voor kort een tijdrovend proces. Met AlphaFold, een AI-tool ontwikkeld door Google DeepMind, kunnen wetenschappers nu de structuur van bijna alle 200 miljoen bekende eiwitten voorspellen. Dit bespaart enorm veel tijd en biedt nieuwe mogelijkheden in de geneeskunde en fundamentele biologie. AlphaFold wordt al door meer dan twee miljoen onderzoekers wereldwijd gebruikt. Hoewel de tool ook zijn beperkingen heeft, bijvoorbeeld bij het voorspellen van mutaties, wordt het beschouwd als een enorme doorbraak in de wetenschap.
Het onbenutte potentieel van AI AI is geen perfecte technologie: de zogenaamde black box waarin veel modellen opereren maakt sommige resultaten moeilijk reproduceerbaar. Toch is de impact van AI op wetenschappelijk onderzoek enorm. Het biedt ongekende mogelijkheden om complexe problemen op te lossen en verborgen patronen te ontdekken – of het nu gaat om eeuwenoude teksten, de taal van walvissen of de chemie van het leven. In 2024 is AI niet alleen een hulpmiddel gebleken, maar een belangrijke katalysator voor innovatie en het begrip van de wereld om ons heen.
A new video shows a human-shaped ‘robot’ escaping from a miniature jail by transforming itself into a liquid metal state and then slipping through the bars, evoking imagery from popular films like Terminator 2.
Eerily, just like the villain from the aforementioned movie, the robot used in the demonstration was also able to coalesce back into its original shape once it was free.
To accomplish a task right out of a science fiction movie, researchers from Carnegie Mellon University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong had to create an entirely new type of material that includes magnets and metal. Dubbed a “magnetoactive solid-liquid phase transitional machine,” the futuristic material was made by embedding magnetic particles into a base of gallium. The researchers chose gallium due to its low melting point of only 85.6 °F (or 29.8 °C).
You can see a video featuring this fascinating–and unusual–accomplishment below:
Magnetic Particles and Gallium are the secret ingredients in a Shape Shifting liquid metal robot
According to the researchers involved, the magnetic particles offer other benefits, too.
“The magnetic particles here have two roles,” explained senior author and mechanical engineer Carmel Majidi of Carnegie Mellon University. “One is that they make the material responsive to an alternating magnetic field, so you can, through induction, heat up the material and cause the phase change.”
Along with this unique heating ability that doesn’t require an outside heating source to change from a solid state to a liquid one, Majidi says the magnetic particles also give the robots the ability to move in response to the magnetic field. This is particularly significant since the primary function of any robot is the ability to move around and perform various functions.
“Giving robots the ability to switch between liquid and solid states endows them with more functionality,” says Chengfeng Pan, an engineer at The Chinese University of Hong Kong who led the study.
Liquid Metal Robot Passes a wide range of tests
To understand the limits of their new shape-shifting liquid metal robot, the researchers put it through a number of tests. This included using magnetic fields to make the robot jump over moats, climb walls, and even split itself into two smaller robots to move other objects around before coalescing back together.
“Now, we’re pushing this material system in more practical ways to solve some very specific medical and engineering problems,” said Pan.
To test some of those potential bio-medical applications, the team used the robot to remove a foreign object from a model of a human stomach and then deliver on-demand drugs to the same stomach.
“Future work should further explore how these robots could be used within a biomedical context,” said Majidi, “but much more study will be required to delve into how this could actually be used for drug delivery or for removing foreign objects.”
To show how it could help screw together parts in hard-to-reach places, the team melted some of the metal into the threaded screw socket and then allowed it to harden in place. They even used the conductive ability of their liquid metal robot to show how it could perform soldering tasks in extremely tight confines by melting into them and then re-hardening to perform its tasks.
Extreme Liquid Phase Allows For Sci-Fi Jailbreak
In the case of the video provided by researchers, the ability to change from a solid state to a liquid metal state allows the robot-shaped metal to escape a tiny prison. This is due to what the researchers describe as an “extremely liquid phase.” Other shape-shifting materials typically have a liquid phase that is much more viscous than the newly created material.
“What we’re showing are just one-off demonstrations, proofs of concept,” said Majidi.
Of course, the robot from the video wasn’t able to travel back in time or track down a tween-aged John Connor. But given its ability to shape-shift from a solid metal state to a liquid one and then back to a solid, it’s pretty much guaranteed that if the robot could talk, it would say, “I’ll be back!”
Christopher Plain is a novelist, comedian, and Head Science Writer at The Debrief. Follow and connect with him on Twitter, learn about his books at plainfiction.com, or email him directly at christopher@thedebrief.org.
Real-Life T-1000? Watch This Liquid Metal Robot Escape Jail! #ai #robotics
The stylish $300,000 Manta M4 offers space for one passenger and takes off from land and sea, but can only land in water.
The Manta M4 travels up to 65 miles per hour and weighs as much as a small jet ski.
The vehicle is steered using a joystick, allowing riders to soar up to 500 feet above the ground — about the height of two Statue of Liberty, or half the height of the Empire State Building.
Riders are protected by a glass hood, which will protect against wind speed and keep users safe from the craft's three propellers.
The craft gets 30 minutes of power with an electric battery or three hours using one of its hydrogen fuel cells.
Revealed at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, founder David Simchon told DailyMail.com how his vehicle would surely be the next pleasure craft of the skies.
Only a model of the vehicle was shown, but the company, called SimTechLabs, says the full product will be unveiled at a boat show in Florida next month when it hits the market for the first time.
Pictured above is a model of the Manta M4, which will debut at a boat show in Florida next month
The device uses three propellers to take off from land or water, and can fly at 65mph for up to 30 minutes using its electric battery
Simchon said that users will not need a license due to the craft’s lightweight design that is at under 300lbs, meaning it is considered ultra-light, a point where the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) does not require users to have a license.
However, owners without a pilot's license will have to follow the FAA's regulations and airspace restrictions.
Manta M4 has a thermal onboard system to detect and warn of birds and other dangers in the air and a system emitting ultrasonic sounds to scare away sharks that may be lurking in the water beneath.
The base features a 360-degree camera, allowing riders to capture breathtaking views of the world below while they fly — or check the water below for any signs of rocks or sharks.
It also features eight ultrasonic sensors, 16 sonar disruptions sensors and four thermal cameras to capture scenes of its surroundings and avoid oncoming obstacles.
In a worst-case scenario of the craft losing power, it has three parachutes that will deploy to ensure a safe landing.
It is the second craft to be launched by SimTech labs after it launched a flying aircraft called the Icarus Project in 2024.
Flying aircraft and taxis — some autonomously operated — are expected to be routinely whizzing around US skies within the next few years, according to the FAA.
And it’s the same in the UK, where the Government says it expects them to be ‘routinely’ in operation by 2028.
Manta M4 has a thermal onboard system to detect and warn of birds and other dangers in the air and a system emitting ultrasonic sounds to scare away sharks that may be lurking in the water beneath
Developer SimTechLabs prices the craft at $300,000 for one. Ten are set to go on sale
The former head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Sergio Cecutta and who resigned in 2023, said at the time that one of his major achievements was fast-tracking progress to get electric airtaxis into the skies.
Another UFO-like craft was also revealed at CES — called the ‘Invo Moon’ — that could carry up to three passengers through US skies.
And Toyota debuted its Joby aircraft which is expected to go on sale later this Year.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
06-01-2025
10 OF THE COOLEST HIGH-TECH FEATURES EVER UTILIZED BY FIGHTER JETS
10 OF THE COOLEST HIGH-TECH FEATURES EVER UTILIZED BY FIGHTER JETS
BY DANIEL FEININGER
Don Farrall/Getty Images
Humans have always looked skyward in envy of birds, bees, and anything else that can take flight. Soaring up above the Earth has long been a task that occupied human minds, from the ancient Greek tale of Icarus launching himself into the winds (and then falling back down) to Leonardo da Vinci's 15th century flying machine designs.
When the Wright brothers managed to lift off the ground over a century ago, they ignited an impassioned sprint toward increasingly substantive innovations and technologies in aerospace. Exponential growth in the realm of aerial flight would eventually transform every aspect of the human experience. From shipping goods and delivering mail to launching a truly global tourism industry, human flight connects the world in ways that people just a few generations ago may have never thought possible.
Flight also changed the landscape of warfare. Observational spy balloons and aerial signaling have been used throughout human history. They formed a core intelligence gathering function in the American Civil War, but would soon be replaced by later airplane propulsion breakthroughs. The first fighter jet to participate in aerial combat was the German Messerschmitt Me 262, which attacked a British reconnaissance plane over Munich in 1944. The aircraft wasn't as impactful as the Germans would have hoped, but the gauntlet was laid down -- jet engines were here to stay and tertiary systems quickly made them even more powerful weapons of war.
The first airplanes to take to the skies features straight wing geometry. The Wright brothers' fliers utilized fixed, rectangular wing designs that straddled the aircraft in a perpendicular fashion, connecting the wing on either side in the center. Wing design has changed a lot in the years since, however.
Many airplanes today feature a sweepback to their wings, from passenger airliners to fighter jets. They are consistently featured in fighters, however, because the design provides solid crossover between speed and maneuverability. A swept design is crucial for reducing aerodynamic drag, allowing an aircraft to travel faster and more efficiently when it crosses speed thresholds like the sound barrier. Its design was the result of decades of wind tunnel testing and at least partially inspired by the way birds and bats tuck back their wings while in flight to increase speed.
Most fighter jets today utilize wing geometry that sees them extend out (and back) at an angle rather than straight to achieve this improved efficiency. However, not all jets deliver this form factor. Some feature forward sweep in their wings, and others offer variable shape. The Mirage G was one of the first fighter jet to allow for adjustments while in flight, just like the creatures of the sky that we were emulating.
The process of in-air refueling has been around for a very long time -- almost as long as manned flight itself, actually. The first instance of in-air refueling took place in 1923, but it has come a long way in the century since its introduction. The first flights to test this method of prolonging time in the air were essentially test runs to explore how this process could work. They utilized a hose to transfer gasoline from one aircraft to another. In August of 1923, two pilots broke a variety of records with an endurance flight lasting 37 hours and 15 minutes, featuring 16 successful refueling operations mid-flight.
Today, the task of refueling while airborne is a commonplace feat of jet propulsion. Dedicated refueling vessels are a staple of the military's aerial fleet, with icons such as the S-3B Viking, originally designed to hunt Soviet submarines, serving for many years in this role. Whether taking off from land or sea-based carriers, extending the range of a fighter jet to expand its capacity to support ground forces or perhaps even engage in multiple dogfights over contested landscapes is a critical capability among modern fighter jets.
The ability to take off from a standstill remains one of the coolest technologies ever imbued in a non-helicopter craft. After all, the Harrier jet is an icon for one reason -- its ability to hover in place and perform Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) operations. Popularized perhaps most vividly in pop culture as a feature of the 1994 Arnold Schwarzenegger film "True Lies," the Harrier is a feat of tremendous engineering.
The wing design of a normal aircraft is carefully crafted to ensure a gliding effect of air traveling above and below its curvature, creating lift in the process. So an airplane that isn't cutting through the air should be one that plummets back down to Earth. This isn't so for the Harrier, however, as it features nozzled engines that can produce vertical lift themselves, rather than relying on air speed to generate it. The result is an aircraft that can perform the same feats of flight that are otherwise reserved for the mighty helicopter.
The aircraft catapult is another tool that has essentially been around since the dawn of human flight. The Wright brothers utilized launch equipment to get their aircraft off the ground and later flight capable vehicles would also rely on this assistance measure to support take off, too. However, the aircraft catapult gained new significance when the world went to war for a second time.
A naval variant of the British Spitfire fighter planes -- known as Seafires -- were outfitted with tailhooks to operate from sea-based positions and engage enemy planes over Malta, Italy, and North Africa. Launching aircraft from aquatic positions wasn't particularly difficult given the existing catapult technology, but landing on them has always proved a greater challenge. The use of tailhooks in coordination with catapult systems delivered much-needed consistency.
Today, this pair of systems has become the primary means of enabling ocean takeoffs that rely on a return to this mobile, sea-based landing strip. The tailhook and aircraft catapult allow fighter jets to operate from virtually anywhere in the world and reduce range requirements down to fractions of what they might be otherwise. This means that fighter jets can stay in the air longer in support of whatever mission they are tasked with because their takeoff and landing site is located within the theater of battle as well.
Understanding the battlefield has been critical for as long as humans have gone to war with one another. Intelligence gathering operations have become increasingly sophisticated through the years, and nowhere is this more apparent than in aerial combat.
Fighter jets engage their enemies in a unique snippet of our three dimensional plane. Height is a critical resource in ground combat, sure, but it gains new meaning when translated onto the skies. Fighter jets require an array of situational awareness tools that help them defend against incoming attacks -– which sometimes originate from beyond their sight horizon or a thousand feet above their heads -– and acquire targets, across land, sea, and air.
The F-4 Phantom II is an excellent example of technically adept flying machine technology. The Phantom, first built in 1958, allowed its pilots to identify and target enemy aircraft from beyond its pilot's line of sight. Radar and missile upgrades helped the aircraft's crew deliver lethal force from a distance that wasn't immediately defensible. The fighter jet was credited with downing over 100 MiG fighters during the Vietnam War, and later variants helped suppress Iraqi opposition during the Gulf War.
The modern F-35 Lightning II operates with some of the most advanced targeting systems ever conceived. It features a helmet mounted display that brings all the information a pilot needs right into their field of vision, no matter where they're looking. The Electro-Optical Targeting System delivers air-to-air threat detection over tremendous range and helps to home in on precise ground targeting needs. The fighter jet also engages in seamless data sharing with other friendlies in the sky, allowing for heightened team cohesion.
Any good fighter jet will need to be outfitted with an array of offensive weapons. From machine gun installations to nuclear-capable payloads, fighter jets have supported all manner of extreme weapons systems through the years.
One of the first fighter planes to lean full force into tremendous offensive load was the P-47 Thunderbolt. Although not a jet aircraft, this early workhorse exhibited immense capability when it came to downing enemy fighters over Europe and the Pacific. The P-47 carried eight .50 caliber machine guns and could also haul along 2,500 pounds of bombing munitions, packing a huge punch in both dogfighting and ground bombardment scenarios.
The trend of stacking as much firepower as possible into the armaments of a fighter jet has continued in the years since World War II concluded. The Thunderbolt's modern equivalent is the F-15EX Eagle II, sometimes called the Air Force's Missile Truck. It may just be the most heavily armed fighter to ever take to the skies. Taking its frame from the F-15, formerly a pure aerial fighter platform, the F-15EX Eagle II now offers 23 total weapon stations, a significant boost over its previous iteration's 17.
7. Speed And The Supercruise Capability
a Blue Angels jet breaks sound barrier right over the water
Fast means lethal, and aircraft have been chasing improvements in speed for as long as humans have been flying. There are numerous hurdles to navigate when seeking to create additional speed in the air, however. For one thing, fighter jets have become capable of moving at speeds that surpass standard human piloting capabilities. A phenomenon known as gravity-induced loss of consciousness takes place at a variety of different thresholds depending on who the operator is.
The average person may experience a blackout when moving at about 5Gs, while trained pilots (augmented with specialized equipment) can extend this range up to about 9Gs, given the right circumstances. Time at extreme speed and particularly the pace of acceleration also play a role in impairment and total blackout. Naturally, a pilot that loses consciousness is one threatened with the loss of their aircraft, and worse. Flight support systems like autopilot tools, onboard oxygen, and other technologies help pilots maintain control of the aircraft even when the physical toll becomes extreme.
The other barrier to intense speed is one that affects even everyday drivers on their local roadways -- fuel economy. Afterburners, in particular, are a tool that can increase speed tremendously, but they burn fuel at a much faster rate as well. Engaging afterburners also ramps up the heat production of a fighter jet, making it more susceptible to enemy detection. However, technology such as Supercruise in the F-22 Raptor allows a pilot to ramp up speed without relying on afterburners, eliminating this detection issue and improving fuel usage.
8. Onboard Countermeasures
three fighter jets releasing flares in a flight display
Countermeasures are perhaps some of the lowest technically demanding features of a fighter jet. Even so, the use of low-tech defensive tools like chaff and flares can create a resoundingly spectacular display. Perhaps one of the most arresting visuals in the prequel "Star Wars" movies is seen during a space battle between Obi-Wan Kenobi and the menacing Jango Fett set in an asteroid field over the brilliant orange of Geonosis. The encounter features prominent usage of countermeasures by Obi Wan as he struggles to defend against the bounty hunter's missile attack.
In real aerial combat, the same discharge of physical countermeasures to scramble missiles and frazzle radar tracking tools can be seen today. Modern countermeasures not only feature a physical shielding options, but also come in the form of infrared defensive weapons and electronic countermeasures that can scramble an aggressor's capability to target or attack a jet. These IR countermeasures target the heat of a missile in flight, and then blast it with an infrared beam to incapacitate its tracking function. This makes the tool reusable and far less reliant on timing, luck, and slick maneuvering.
Flying a fighter jet isn't like piloting a regular aircraft. These aircraft are controlled by immensely sensitive flight tools and have features that simply don't factor into the build of something like a passenger or cargo jet. Thrust vectoring, for instance, isn't required of a larger, transportation-focused jet engine, but make for a tremendously improved fighter jet.
Thrust vectoring allows for nuanced control of the engine exhaust direction, helping a pilot launch themselves into turns and other maneuvers with greater agility. This makes a fighter jet swifter in the turn and can help edge a battle in their favor. Thrust vectoring isn't a feature confined to the military realm, but it's far less common through sheer necessity in civilian aircraft.
Certain variants of the Russian MiG-29 feature thrust vectoring, making them just one of a few aircraft in the world that can perform a full Pugachev's Cobra maneuver, which requires a sudden shift in thrust direction to maintain flight. A Pugachev's Cobra involves violently pulling up on the nose of the aircraft to essentially stall it at a fully vertical orientation, with the angle of attack reaching an astounding 120 degrees. This rapidly halts the jet's forward speed before the pilot sinks the nose back down to its previous positioning.
The result is a capacity to let an enemy fighter completely pass the jet by, placing the MiG in prime attacking position behind its adversary. Thrust vectoring and other maneuverability features of the MiG-29 are responsible for the aircraft's ability to perform this astounding feat.
Stealth technologies are a core component in any fighter jet's ability to perform its duties. Part of the design specifics of a modern fighter involve hiding the vessel as much as possible. This includes shielding its aerial signature from radar systems on the ground, as well as making the aircraft harder to see in the air both visually and by the onboard identification systems of other planes.
Stealth inclusions come in a wide range of variations, but many are focused on unique skins for aircraft, as well as the angular shape of the vessel itself. Modern design language has sought to minimize flat surfaces and rounded edges. These features are easier to hit with sensor equipment, with the resulting ping bouncing more or less straight back to the receiver. Angular faces scatter the radar signal, making it harder to identify an aircraft in the first place, and equally difficult to actually find one that's been noticed.
Want the latest in tech and auto trends? Subscribe to our free newsletter for the latest headlines, expert guides, and how-to tips, one email at a time.
Shaped like a flying saucer, it looks more like a UFO than your next Uber.
But this sci-fi style vehicle is in fact the latest in line of electric aircraft set to take to the skies over the next decade.
The fully autonomous ‘Invo Moon’ offers up to three passengers a 360-degree panorama above and below as it travels at speeds of up to 250mph.
Crucially, it has been designed to be near silent, using a flight system hidden inside its shell rather than relying on noisy exposed propellers like many of its competitors.
The £280,000 aircraft - which is the same size and weight of a small family car - will be able to move in any direction, similar to a handheld drone.
Inventor Leo Kayali, a former Tesla engineer, told the Daily Mail the design was inspired by the drawings of Leonardo Da Vinci over five centuries ago.
The aim is to have it certified by the US aviation authority by 2027 and to launch in ‘all major cities including London’ by the end of the decade.
He said future owners could even have it running as an Uber while they weren’t using it and ‘make money while sitting at home’.
UFO-like electric flying vehicle that could be your next Uber, based on Da Vinci drawings from the 1480s
The fully autonomous ‘Invo Moon’ offers up to three passengers a 360-degree panorama above and below as it travels at speeds of up to 250mph
The government last year announced it expected flying taxis to be ‘routinely’ whizzing around British skies by 2028 - and potentially operating without a pilot by 2030.
Ministers set out ambitious plans to overhaul current regulations and infrastructure, with the technology expected to boost the UK by £45bn by the end of the decade.
The Invo Moon - which is 16ft in diameter and weighs 2,500lb and - can be pre-ordered for £2,000 and will ultimately cost around £280,000 on delivery.
However Mr Kayali believes the vehicles - which he said should be cheap to build when mass produced - could be sold for under £50,000 in the future.
While most electric flying vehicles rely on exposed propellors, the Invo Moon keeps everything within the aluminium frame.
The vehicle uses a complex new aerodynamic design in which a dozen motors, all containing spinning spheres, are positioned in a circle around the side of the vehicle.
Using these motors in groups of four at a time, it can move in any direction 360 degrees, meaning it has no front or back. To land, it extends three retractable legs.
Mr Kayali said this means there is very little vibration, so the machine will emit no more than 45 decibels as it travels - about as noisy as the patter of light rain.
The £280,000 aircraft - which is the same size and weight of a small family car - will be able to move in any direction. Pictured: Cover of the 1956 Sci-Fi movie, Earth vs the Flying Saucers
Inventor Leo Kayali, a former Tesla engineer, told the Daily Mail the design was inspired by the drawings of Leonardo Da Vinci over five centuries ago
Most other eVTOLs run at about 85 decibels, equivalent to the sound of a blender, and also create a lot of unnecessary excess wind, he said.
Inside the cabin, there are three rotating and fully reclinable heated seats which offer views out the top and the bottom through the plexiglass windows.
The “luxury” vehicle will also feature mood lighting, an ice machine, and smart TVs.
It has a range up to 300 miles, and takes no more than 30 minutes to charge from 20 per cent to 80 per cent, Mr Kayali claims.
While the design might seem futuristic, it is in fact based on concepts first invented by Da Vinci in the 1480s.
The exterior is inspired by the Italian artist’s ‘Armoured Car’ drawings, while the internal flying mechanism is a new interpretation of his ‘aerial screw’ design, considered a precursor of the helicopter.
The driving itself is autonomous and has been designed to follow a three-lane system similar to a motorway - but rising vertically.
The speed limit increases as each level goes up - from 100mph to 250mph - and it can only land once it is back in the slowest lane.
UFO? No, it’s an unidentified flying Uber
Max speed: 250mph
Range: 300 miles
Charging time 20-30 mins from 20% to 80%
Passengers: 3
Length: 16ft
Weight: 2,500lb
Noise: 45 decibels (equivalent to the light patter of rain)
Deep inside CERN’s underground labs, the Super Proton Synchrotron has found something incredible. This undercover, four-dimensional force messes with the paths of zooming particles. Hidden in the depths of phase space, this unknown force, called the 4D ghost, throws the delicate dance of particles into chaos.
Scientists at CERN in Switzerland and Goethe University in Germany discovered a mysterious “ghost” that influences how particles move in the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS). This “ghost” is a 3D shape that changes over time, so it’s best understood in 4D. The idea behind it is similar to why coffee spills when you walk or why your friends fly high on a trampoline bounce.
The SPS is a huge circular machine almost four miles wide, built in the 1970s. That might seem old, but it’s still super important at CERN.
In 2019, it got an upgrade called a “beam dump,” which works like a safety ramp for the powerful beams inside the SPS. When scientists spotted a glitch, or “ghost in the machine,” they knew it was crucial to figure out what was happening for future experiments.
A ghost happens because of resonance. This is when energy creates waves, and those waves mix together, forming spots where energy builds up. For example, when you walk with coffee, every step makes waves in the cup.
These waves meet and cause the coffee to spill. On a trampoline, when one person times their jump with another’s, it boosts their jump much higher. In the SPS (a type of particle accelerator), “spilling harmonic coffee” means losing important photons, which leads to beam degradation.
Physicist Giuliano Franchetti from the GSI in Germany explains the challenge: “Particles often don’t follow the path we plan for them. They deviate, get lost, and this leads to what we call beam degradation.”
Physicist Giuliano Franchetti
This degradation complicates scientists’ efforts to maintain the precise conditions required for their experiments. Resonance, the underlying cause, occurs when oscillations synchronize—like how planets influence each other’s orbits through gravity or how a tuning fork vibrates in response to another. By unraveling this “four-dimensional ghost,” scientists aim to better predict and control these deviations, enabling more precise and successful particle physics experiments.
In new research published in the journal Nature Physics, Physicist Giuliano Franchetti along with Frank Schmidt and Hannes Bartosik, explains, “In accelerator physics, an understanding of resonances and nonlinear dynamics is crucial for avoiding the loss of beam particles.”
Beam degradation is a big issue, especially as proton beams become more powerful and energetic. In complex systems, harmonics can interfere with experiments involving particle interactions, like in nuclear fusion research using tokamaks. This interference creates problem areas where energy streams lose critical heat, making it harder to achieve productive nuclear fusion.
n the SPS (Super Proton Synchrotron), particles have only two directions of movement, which seems simple. However, like light traveling in a fiber optic cable, these particles follow a general path but can also “bounce” within it, due to the beam’s slight thickness. While SPS isn’t thick like a donut, it’s still a real-world structure, unlike a perfect geometric circle you’d see in a drawing.
The “bounce” is affected by human and real-world factors, making it less perfect. The SPS, while a top-tier facility, still relies on imperfect technology. The magnets powering it can have small fluctuations in magnetism, which may cause a resonance effect. To understand this, researchers measured data from around the SPS ring and built a mathematical model called a Poincaré section.
A Poincaré section works by focusing on one part of a system (like a “fixed line” mentioned in their study) and tracking how other parts intersect with it over time. This creates a map, almost like an MRI scan but for a changing system. In this case, they also added time as the fourth dimension, making the results resemble a looping, animated shape.
The researchers discovered that these fixed lines can predict where particles might cluster. By studying and modeling this, they hope to help other scientists reduce the effects of these harmonic lines. This could make particle accelerators more efficient, prevent costly errors caused by magnet-related issues, and improve the quality of the data produced.
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger is a Swiss Scientist who claims CERN is working on a secret ‘Nuclear Program’ & there is a Portal underneath CERN from where Beings coming in & out; Physicists who work there told her that there are 17 different dimensions of reality or more.
Dr. Stuckelberger is a scientist and expert in international health. She holds a PhD and teaches at the University of Geneva and Lausanne. With over 20 years of experience, she’s a leading Swiss researcher who has worked with the WHO, UN, and EU on various health programs. That’s what her LinkedIn profile says. She has done numerous interviews which add credibility to her profile. (Click here to read the full article)
Two years ago, Dr. Stuckelberger interviewed Maria Zeee on Zeee Media. This interview was published on Rumble where she discussed many strange things, one of which was about CERN’s terrifying experiments. (Source)
Dr. Stuckelberger claimed that CERN is dealing with “Radio Nuclear research” and there are lots of Physicists, who are doing very strange experimentation. She said Physicists from the CERN who her “There are beings from portals, coming in and out.”
She said, “Yes. And they were saying, I mean, I met them at a dinner and there were two of them. And both said that, yes. They have, you know, secondhand proof that the people who, you know, they’re dealing with the boson of Higgs and the subatomic. So they have apparently in the bottom of the CERN, this portal, this door, where they are dealing with all the subatomic dimensions.”
Dr. Stuckelberger further said,
“They [Physicists] say there are 17 different dimensions of reality. That’s what those physicists and some others say.
There are more dimensions. We know the time-space, the tri-dimensional x, y, and z in a graphic. But then you have more dimensions, and they are playing with that. They’re using that. And they were a group, and they had a being.
They did not tell me more about who came that doesn’t resemble a human. And then they had another one. And they have proof because they left a scarf.
And now when you look at what is going on in the CERN, there is a fight from some of the military agencies, intel. They say that there is a fight on time. They’re trying to change time. I’m just saying that because as a scientist, you can not say something so important, because if you can deal with the little, the smallest energies on earth, you can imagine that you can go through other realms of dimensions.”
RELATED VIDEOS
Scientists Announces New Discovery By The Large Hadron Collider At CERN
Lab 360 | Breaking News: CERN Scientist Claims They have Opened A Portal To Another Dimension!
The British-Canadian computer scientist dubbed the 'Godfather of AI' has shortened the odds of artificial intelligence (AI) wiping out humans over the next 30 years, warning the technology could one day 'take control'.
Professor Geoffrey Hinton said we need to be 'very careful' and 'very thoughtful' about the development of AI which he says is 'potentially very dangerous'.
He had previously said there was a 10 per cent chance of the technology causing the extinction of the human race - but now predicts that figure to be '10 per cent to 20 per cent', because of the rapid pace at which AI is developing.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Professor Hinton said: 'You see, we've never had to deal with things more intelligent than ourselves before.'
He continued: 'And how many examples do you know of a more intelligent thing being controlled by a less intelligent thing? There are very few examples.
'There’s a mother and baby. Evolution put a lot of work into allowing the baby to control the mother, but that’s about the only example I know of.'
Professor Hinton, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics this year, warned AI is changing 'much faster' than he expected and there has not been enough time to complete the research he believes is required.
While his work has laid the foundations for machine learning, technology that allows computers to mimic human intelligence, his recent efforts have centred on advocating for safer AI.
Professor Geoffrey Hinton has shortened the odds of artificial intelligence (AI) wiping out humans over the next 30 years, warning the technology could one day 'take control'
Last year he made headlines after resigning from his job at Google, citing concerns 'bad actors' would use the technology to harm others.
Reflecting on where he thought the development of AI would have reached when he first started this work, he said: 'I didn't think it would be where we would be now. I thought at some point in the future we would get here.
'Because the situation we're in now is that most of the experts in the field think that sometime, within probably the next 20 years, we're going to develop AIs that are smarter than people.
'And that's a very scary thought.'
He added: 'I like to think of it as, imagine yourself and a three-year-old - we'll be the three-year-olds, and they'll be the grown-ups.'
Prof Hinton said he thinks the impact AI could have on the world will be similar to the industrial revolution.
'In the industrial revolution, human strength ceased to be that relevant because machines were just stronger, and if you wanted to dig a ditch, you dug it with a machine.
'What we've got now is something that's replacing human intelligence, and just ordinary human intelligence will not be at the cutting edge anymore. It will be machines,' he said.
Hinton had previously said there was a 10 per cent chance of the technology causing the extinction of the human race - but now predicts that figure to be '10 per cent to 20 per cent'
Asked what he thinks life might be like in 10 or 20 years from now, Prof Hinton said: 'It will depend very much on what our political systems do with this technology.
'So my big worry at present is that we're in a situation now where we need to be very careful and very thoughtful about developing a potentially very dangerous technology.
'It's going to have lots of wonderful effects in healthcare, and in almost every industry it's going to make things more efficient, but we need to be very careful about the development of it.
'We need regulations to stop people using it for bad things, and we don't appear to have those kinds of political systems in place at present.'
Prof Hinton said he fears AI will be bad for society if lots of people lost their jobs and all the benefit goes to rich people.
'If you have a big gap between rich and poor, it's very bad for society,' he said.
'These things are more intelligent than us. So there was never any chance in the industrial revolution that machines would take over from people just because they were stronger. We were still in control because we had the intelligence.
'Now there's the threat that these things can take control. So that's one big difference,' he added.
Hinton is considered one of three leading pioneer 'Godfathers' of AI, alongside Yann LeCun and Yoshua Bengio, after the three won the Turing Award for their work in thge field.
From the steam engine in 1712 to the first ever iPhone in 2007, each year sees the birth of ever more incredible inventions.
And after a year of mind-boggling tech, it's clear that 2024 has been no exception to the rule.
The last 12 months have seen brilliant minds from around the world creating some mind-blowing and potentially world-changing breakthroughs.
With 2024 almost at its end, MailOnline has taken a look back at some of this year's coolest gadgets and most exciting innovations.
From an AI for designing proteins to a real-life pair of Wallace and Gromit's 'techno trousers', these inventions are a glimpse of how we all might be living in the future.
And when it comes to big breakthroughs, this year has been a resounding success for billionaire Elon Musk.
This year, Musk has overseen the debut of Telsa's futuristic Robotaxi and the successful launch and landing of SpaceX's Superheavy rocket.
So, what do you think has been this year's best creation?
With 2024 soon coming to a close, MailOnline has taken a look back at some of the year's coolest gadgets and groundbreaking inventions
Huawei released one of the most impressive phones of the year with its tri-folding smartphone the Mate XT Ultimate Design
Huawei Mate XT Ultimate Design
While Apple's iPhone 16 range might have stolen the spotlight, 2024 has really been the year of the folding phone.
Some of the biggest manufacturers have launched their own folding designs - but no company did it better than Huawei with its triple folding Mate XT Ultimate Design.
The device uses two hinges to extend from a 6.4-inch OLED display to a huge 10.2-inch tablet-like screen.
That means it can go from a phone the size of the Google Pixel 9 to a tablet almost as large as the Apple's 10th generation iPad.
Thanks to the Z-shaped design, the Mate XT can also be used while only partially unfolded with a mid-sized 7.9-inch display – which is just a little smaller than a fully opened Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
Speaking at the launch event, Huawei executive director Richard Yu said: 'We have never stopped innovating, and never given up in the pursuit of making it possible.
'That's how we were able to develop the world's first commercial triple foldable phone.'
The Mate XT Ultimate Design uses two hinges to fold in a Z-shape, allowing it to expand from the size of a smartphone to that of a tablet
When it's turned on, users have the option to either keep the screen see-through, like a window with a movie projected onto it, or turn it opaque so that the room beyond is no longer visible.
That nifty transformation is made possible thanks to a black 'contrast screen' which rises up behind the transparent pane.
And, thanks to LG's wireless transmission box, the TV has no cables to mess around with and can be placed anywhere in the room.
LG's futuristic transparent TV was unveiled earlier this year. When it's turned on users have the option to either keep the screen see-through, like a window with a movie projected onto it, or turn it opaque so that the room beyond is no longer visible.
The transmission box remains plugged in at the wall and beams audio and visual data to the screen via a 60GHz wireless antenna.
Speaking at the TV's launch, LG's Frank Lee said: 'The TV no longer has to dominate the room. This heightens the relationship between the TV and the space it inhabits.'
We don't have an exact release date for the OLED T yet, but LG has said this will be available at some point soon.
LG hasn't set a price point but if the $87,000 (£69,000) price tag on its 65-inch wireless 8K OLED TV is anything to go by, it could easily be over $100,000 (£79,000).
Apple Vision Pro
While some companies have been trying to revolutionise screens, this year, Apple tried to do away with them altogether.
These futuristic goggles allow users to overlay virtual information on the real world or, with a twist of a dial, immerse themselves in an entirely virtual world.
Launched in January, the Apple Vision Pro is currently one of the most advanced virtual reality headsets on the market and boasts extremely impressive body and eye-tracking technology
Billed as the world's first 'spatial computing' device, the Vision Pro was a huge departure from Apple's usual products and its first venture into virtual reality.
Upon release, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that these were 'the most advanced consumer electronics device ever created.'
The headset boasts stunning resolution with 3660x3200 pixels per eye - the equivalent of two 4K TVs.
But what makes the Vision Pro truly special is its unique control system.
While other headsets like the Meta Quest 3 require users to hold onto cumbersome controllers, Apple's offering is controlled through body and eye tracking.
Simply by looking around and reaching out with their hands, users are able to interact seamlessly with a virtual world.
Created by the French health giant Withings, this 'multiscope' can gather data normally only collected in a GP checkup.
The portable device is stacked with censors to check everything from temperature and blood flow to heart and lung health.
By lightly gripping the device, for example, it can measure users' blood oxygen, and heart rate, and carry out an ECG simultaneously.
The smartphone-sized device can also use light waves to interpret blood flow patterns and gather acoustic information from the chest and back.
Withings says that it will alert users of any possible fevers or infections and give them an early warning of any cardiovascular issues like arterial fibrillation.
Founder Eric Carreel said: 'BeamO is a transformative multiscope device. Once, body temperature was the only health scan routinely taken at home.
BeamO is a handheld 'multiscope' which can carry out a full doctor's check-up from home. In under a minute, the handheld device uses a range of sensors to check for everything from temperature and blood flow to lung and heart health
'BeamO will revolutionize the measurement of the core vitals carried out during medical visits from the comfort of one's own home.'
Currently pending regulatory approval, BeamO will launch first in the US for $249.95 (£195) from 2025.
AirXeed
Not every invention needs to come from a massive corporation with millions of pounds of investment.
In fact, one of 2024's most exciting inventions comes from two young students.
All around the world, scientists launch weather balloons containing small devices called radiosondes to measure air pressure, temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction.
These measurements are vital to helping scientists predict weather patterns, but these single-use devices create tonnes of harmful plastic waste.
The AirXeed, this year's winner of the James Dyson Award for sustainability, solves this issue by making radiosondes reusable.
AirXeed was this year's winner of the James Dyson Award for sustainability. These maple leaf-inspired gadgets are reusable instrument arrays for weather balloons which can safely steer themselves to the ground to help scientists reduce their plastic waste
Taking inspiration from maple seeds, inventors Shane Kyi Hla Win and Danial Sufiyan Bin Shaifu from Singapore created a device that can control its drift back to Earth.
By adjusting its stability, AirXeed can steer itself on the wind back towards a collection zone where scientists can collect it and use it again.
This lets researchers make potentially lifesaving predictions about upcoming weather events, without harming the planet.
But if that wasn't impressive enough, this year the company has released the sequel: AlphaFold 3.
While AlphaFold 2 predicted the structure of proteins, AlphaFold 3 is able to predict how they interact.
AlphaFold 3 is a hugely significant invention which can predict the interactions between proteins with 'unprecedented accuracy'. In this image, you can see a comparison between AlphaFold's simulation of an interaction with DNA (colour) and the real scenario (grey)
Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, was awarded a share of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his role in the creation of AlphaFold
In a paper published by Nature in May, DeepMind showed how the algorithm could predict the interaction of all of life's molecules with 'unprecedented' accuracy.
That breakthrough could allow scientists to predict how drugs will interact with the body before they are created, potentially accelerating the discovery of new medicines.
Writing in a blog post, DeepMind said: 'This leap could unlock more transformative science, from developing biorenewable materials and more resilient crops, to accelerating drug design and genomics research.'
Yet what truly sets this apart as one of the year's best inventions is the decision by Google DeepMind to make the software open-source.
This means that researchers all around the world will be able to use a version AlphaFold 3 at no cost; in a move which could lead to an explosion of new discoveries.
MO/GO robotic trousers
All the way back in 1993 Ardman Studios released the Oscar-winning animation Wallace and Gromit: The Wrong Trousers.
In this classic animation, Wallace creates a pair of robotic 'techno-trousers' which can walk for their wearer.
The MO/GO robotic trousers were invented by outdoor clothing company Arc'teryx and Google spinout Skip. They give hikers a mechanical boost while coming uphill and reduce the impact of walking back down
Now, outdoor clothing company Arc'teryx and Google spinout Skip have made the first pair of techno trousers a reality.
The MO/GO robotic trousers are a strength-boosting exoskeleton built into a pair of hiking trousers which can boost a walker's power uphill and take away the impact while coming down.
The trousers feature a lightweight electric motor at the knee, powering a set of carbon struts which clip into braces hidden in each leg.
Skip claims that the trousers can make the wearer feel up to 13 kg (30lbs) lighter and provide a 40 per cent boost to leg muscles in ascents.
In addition to being extremely cool, these modern-day techno trousers could be a game-changer for people who otherwise wouldn't be able to enjoy hiking.
Skip says that the goal is to help people with injuries or disabilities access parts of the outdoors that wouldn't otherwise be accessible.
The trousers even feature an adjustable assistance level so people who need less help can still enjoy the challenge of a good hike.
However, before you get too excited it's worth knowing that the MO/GO 'starter pack' will set you back $5,000 (£3,940) and won't arrive until at least 2026 if you order today.
Fans of Wallace and Gromit might notice a striking similarity to the 'techno trousers' from the 1993 animation, The Wrong Trousers
Arc'teryx says these mechanised trousers could help people with injuries or disabilities stay active and access the outdoors when they might otherwise not be able to
Tesla Robotaxi
Of course, it would be impossible to make a list of the year's best inventions without mentioning something created by Elon Musk.
Launched at the 'We, Robot' event in October, the futuristic vehicle features no steering, wheel, pedals, or rear window and only has enough room inside for two passengers.
While you might mistake it for a prop from the science-fiction blockbuster I, Robot, Musk says that these autonomous cars will soon be a reality.
According to Musk, the all-electric vehicle should cost less than $30,000 (£23,000) to buy and only 20 cents (15p) per mile to drive.
In another sci-fi touch, the Robotaxi won't even feature a charging port for its batteries.
Instead, the car will drive itself over an inductive charging station built into the ground, allowing it to receive power wirelessly without human assistance.
This year Elon Musk unveiled the long-awaited self-driving Robotaxi, which should hit the road sometime in 2027
Tesla's futuristic Robotaxi will have no steering wheel, pedals, or rear window. The two passengers will simply sit back and allow the car to drive itself
According to Musk, these vehicles could fundamentally change the way we think about car ownership.
Instead of simply parking your car when you're not using it, owners would be able to turn the Robotaxi loose to earn money picking up strangers.
In the future, Musk claims that individuals might own entire fleets of Robotaxis and 'take care of them like a shepherd tends to their flock.'
Speaking at the event, Musk said: 'The vast majority of the time, cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used five times more, maybe 10 times more.'
RELATED VIDEOS
65 INCREDIBLE INVENTIONS OF 2024 YOU CAN'T MISS!£
100 Amazing Inventions That Are On Insane Level | Best Of 2024 So Far!
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.