Mogelijke buitenaardse lucht of UAP's verschijnselen en de rol van overheid en de bekendmaking: Een wetenschappelijk en gestructureerd overzicht

Inleiding

De interesse in onbekende of onverklaarbare luchtverschijnselen – recent hernoemd tot Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) – heeft binnen de laatste decennia een opmerkelijke stijging doorgemaakt. Wat begon als een marginale en vaak sceptisch ontvangen onderwerp in de populaire cultuur, heeft het zich ontwikkeld tot een serieuze kwestie voor zowel wetenschappelijke onderzoekers als overheidsinstanties. Deze thesis richt zich op een uitgebreid wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar de fenomenen die onder de noemer UAP worden gecategoriseerd, de toename van meldingen, de rol van overheidsbekendmakingen, en de maatschappelijke en wetenschappelijke implicaties. Door middel van een gedegen analyse van bestaande data, officiële rapporten, en publieke opinie, zal deze thesis proberen inzicht te geven in de huidige situatie en de mogelijke paden voor toekomstig onderzoek en beleidsvorming.

Hoofdstuk 1: De ontwikkeling van meldingen van UAP’s

1.1 Statistische toename van meldingen

De afgelopen tien jaren vormen een periode van opmerkelijke verandering in de rapportage en perceptie van onverklaarbare vliegende objecten, oftewel UAP’s (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). Een van de meest duidelijke indicaties van deze evolutie is de exponentiële stijging in het aantal officiële en onofficiële meldingen. Volgens data van het National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC), een organisatie die al decennia meldingen verzamelt, is het aantal gerapporteerde UAP’s in de Verenigde Staten tussen 2010 en 2022 aanzienlijk toegenomen. In 2010 registreerden ze ongeveer 5.000 meldingen, terwijl dit aantal in 2022 was gestegen tot circa 25.000 meldingen per jaar. Deze drievoudige toename in het aantal meldingenbinnen een decennium wijst niet alleen op een toevallige statistische variatie, maar op een fundamentele verandering in zowel het aantal waarnemingen als de waargenomen ernst ervan.

Deze toename wordt door verschillende factoren beïnvloed.

• Ten eerste is er een grotere publieke alertheid en interesse in het fenomeen ontstaan, mede dankzij de opkomst van digitale media en sociale netwerken, waardoor mensen sneller en gemakkelijker hun waarnemingen kunnen delen.
• Ten tweede speelt technologische vooruitgang hierin een belangrijke rol. Smartphones met hoogwaardige camera’s en videofuncties maken het mogelijk voor gewone burgers om snel visuele en auditieve waarnemingen vast te leggen. Voorbeeld hiervan zijn de talloze video’s die op platforms zoals YouTube en TikTok worden gedeeld, waarin afwijkende lichten of objecten worden vastgelegd die vervolgens viraal gaan.

Een niet-geïdentificeerd luchtverschijnsel in een video van het Amerikaanse leger. Ministerie van Defensie via To the Stars Academy of Arts & Science

Daarnaast zijn militaire en overheidsorganisaties begonnen met het vrijgeven van meer gegevens over UAP’s, onder meer door middel van gerichte rapportages en video’s. Het wordt bijvoorbeeld vermeld dat het Amerikaanse ministerie van Defensie in de afgelopen jaren meerdere gedocumenteerde incidenten heeft gepubliceerd, waaronder de bekende “Gimbal” en “GoFast” filmpjes. Deze beelden laten snel bewegende lichten zien die niet voldoen aan de technische mogelijkheden van de meeste bekende vliegtuigen of drones en blijven daardoor onzeker en intrigerend. De technici die deze beelden analyseren, spreken vaak over objecten die ‘plotseling van snelheid wisselen’, ‘onmogelijk manoeuvreren’ en ‘onbegrijpelijke vormen’ aannemen.

Daarnaast heeft de ontwikkeling van nieuwe sensorsystemen in de luchtvaart en militaire radarinstallaties de detectie en tracking van UAP’s verbeterd. Radargegevens tonen vaak objecten die zó snel bewegen dat zij de limieten van onze huidige detectietechnologieën lijken te overschrijden. Bijvoorbeeld, verschillende rapporten beschrijven radarbeelden van objecten die gedurende minuten zichtbaar bleven op radarschermen, met snelheden die volgens de conventionele fysica niet mogelijk zijn voor menselijke-gestuurde technologieën.

Kortom, de statische data bevestigen dat het verschijnsel actueler en prominenter wordt dan ooit tevoren. Het aantal meldingen is niet langer louter een symptoom van toenemende nieuwsgierigheid, maar wijst op een mogelijke werkelijkheid waarin UAP’s een gewone opleving zijn van een fenomeen dat al decennia bestaat, maar eerder werd genegeerd of onderdrukt.

1.2 De culturele omslag en perceptie

Begin jaren 2000 werd het onderwerp van UAP’s nog vaak afgedaan als onzin, gekkigheid of speculatie die vooral tussen fantasie en wantrouwen zweefde. Media en wetenschappelijke gemeenschap toonden meestal weinig interesse vanwege het gebrek aan bewijzen en de associatie met spookverhalen. Toch begonnen er in de loop van de jaren een kentering zichtbaar te worden, mede onder invloed van publieke en politieke ontwikkelingen.

Een belangrijke keerpunt kwam door de publicatie van officiële video’s door het Amerikaanse leger. De “Gimbal”-video uit 2015 toont bijvoorbeeld een object dat snel beweegt en een ongewoon patroon van beweging vertoont, terwijl de “GoFast”-video uit 2015 beelden toont van een snel bewegend object dat radarbeelden genereert met een snelheid die verdergaat dan conventionele technologie. Wat deze beelden zo bijzonder maakt, is dat ze niet langer anonieme getuigenissen zijn, maar bevestigde en geverifieerde opnames door militaire eenheden.

Volgens Dr. Linda Bracken van het Center for Aerial Phenomena Studies is de perceptie aan het veranderen: “Wanneer betrouwbare militaire bronnen aangeven dat ze een object niet kunnen identificeren, verandert de perceptie van wantrouwen naar ware nieuwsgierigheid.” Dit citaat onderstreept de impact van officiële rapportages die de geloofwaardigheid van de waarnemingen vergroten. Wat eerst werd afgedaan als ‘onverklaarbare lichten’ of ‘natuurlijke fenomenen’, krijgt nu aandacht van beleidsmakers, wetenschappers en defensieorganisaties die serieus willen onderzoeken wat zich écht afspeelt.

De culturele omslag wordt verder versterkt door publieke discussies op online fora zoals Reddit, waar getuigen ervaringen delen en analisten samenwerken om patronen te vinden in de data. Podcasts en documentaires zoals “Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation” op Netflix hebben de thema’s toegankelijker gemaakt voor een breed publiek, waardoor UAP’s een kernonderwerp zijn geworden in de maatschappelijke discussie over technologische ontwikkeling, veiligheid en de plaats van de mens in het universum.

Op technisch niveau maakt deze perceptieverandering dat organisaties en overheden meer middelen inzetten voor onderzoek. Het belang van trackingsoftware, radardata-analyse, en geavanceerde sensorontwikkeling wordt erkend. Bijvoorbeeld, nieuwe radarsystemen kunnen nu objecten detecteren die zich in de stratosfeer bevinden en met een snelheid van honderden kilometers per uur bewegen, terwijl oudere systemen daar niet toe in staat waren. De perceptie van UAP’s als een ‘kwaadaardig’ of ‘onbekend’ fenomeen evolueert naar een meer genuanceerde wetenschappelijke interesse, waarbij men de vraag stelt: “Wat zijn deze objecten en wat betekent hun aanwezigheid voor onze kennis van de luchtvaart, fysica en mogelijk buitenaards leven?”

Kort samengevat, de verandering in perceptie is niet alleen een gevolg van technische verbeteringen, maar ook van een paradigmaverschuiving in de manier waarop samenleving en overheid dit fenomeen begrijpen. Wat eerst werd gezien als onzinnig of paranoïde, wordt nu steeds meer geïnterpreteerd als een belangrijke vraag die wetenschappelijk, technologisch en maatschappelijk onderzocht moet worden. Door deze culturele omslag ontstaat er ruimte voor serieus onderzoek dat niet langer geblokkeerd wordt door stigma’s of militaire geheimhouding, maar open staat voor nieuwe verklaringen en ontdekkingen.

Hoofdstuk 2: Overheidsbekendmakingen en onderzoeksinitiatieven

2.1 Officiële rapporten en hun bevindingen

In de wereld van onverklaarbare luchtverschijnselen (UAP), oftewel phenomena die vroeger bekend stonden als UFO’s, vormen officiële rapporten de basis voor verdere wetenschappelijke en politieke discussies. Een van de meest urgente en invloedrijke documenten op dit vlak was het rapport gepubliceerd door het Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) in juni 2021. Dit rapport was gebaseerd op een uitgebreide analyse van 144 waarnemingen die gedaan werden tussen 2004 en 2021 door verschillende Amerikaanse militaire en civiele overheidsinstanties.

Het rapport gaf aan dat ongeveer 30% van deze waarnemingen niet konden worden verklaard met de huidige technologische middelen en wetenschappelijke kennis. Dit betekent dat er bijna een derde van de fenomenen was die niet in de categorie ‘menselijke techniek’ of ‘natuurlijke verschijnselen’ kon worden ondergebracht. Een belangrijk aspect hierbij was dat veel van deze anomalieën werden waargenomen bij hypersonische snelheden, vaak boven de Mach 5, hoewel deze snelheden niet altijd met geoustestapparatuur konden worden bevestigd. Daarnaast kwam het rapport tot de conclusie dat diverse waarnemingen abrupte manoeuvres vertoonden die onmogelijk zouden zijn met bekende aerodynamische principes, en dat er in sommige gevallen geen detecteerbare voortstuwingssignaturen werden waargenomen, zoals geluid of warmteontwikkeling.

Volgens het rapport toonden sommige UAP’s kenmerken die zodanig afwijkend waren dat ze niet eenvoudig te verklaren waren binnen het kader van bekende militaire of civiele technologie. Bijvoorbeeld, er werden fenomenen gerapporteerd die op verschillende hoogten opereerden en die zich zeer plotseling konden verplaatsen, soms zelfs met snelheden die de huidige luchtvaarttechnologie overschreden. Dit zette de traditionele opvattingen over de beperkingen van luchtvaartuigen onder druk, en leidde tot speculaties over de mogelijkheid dat deze fenomenen geavanceerde technologieën mogelijk vertegenwoordigen van derden, of dat ze zelfs technologische innovaties binnen de militaire sector zelf zijn.

Het rapport benadrukte het belang van het verzamelen, codificeren en analyseren van dergelijke data op een gesystematiseerde manier. De bevindingen werden niet alleen door wetenschappers en militairen besproken, maar veroorzaakten ook een politieke storm. Beleidsmakers en veiligheidsadviseurs riepen op tot meer transparantie en meer funding voor gespecialiseerde onderzoeksprogramma’s, omdat de onbekende aard van deze verschijnselen grote risico’s met zich meebreeg voor de nationale veiligheid. De vraag was immers of deze fenomenen mogelijk vijandelijke of spontane technologische aanvallen konden inhouden, of dat ze onderdeel waren van een meer complexe en mogelijk gevaarlijke technologisch-superieure entiteit.

2.2 Politieke en militaire betrokkenheid

Door de jaren heen heeft de Amerikaanse overheid verschillende initiatieven genomen om inzicht te krijgen in UAP’s, maar de echte doorbraak kwam er pas in 2024 met de organisatie van de eerste openbare hoorzitting door het Congres over dit onderwerp. Voorheen was het onderzoek vaak behind closed doors, en waren rapporten en gegevens zelden publiek toegankelijk, vooral vanwege classificatieniveaus en nationale veiligheidsbelangen.

De hoorzitting van 2024 was een belangrijke mijlpaal omdat Amerikaanse politici, wetenschappers en defensiefunctionarissen zich openlijk konden uitspreken over de bevindingen en de stand van zaken. Een van de meest markante getuigenissen kwam van Lieutenant Commander James “Jim” Harlan, een ervaren piloot en militair die al meer dan tien jaar UAP-gegevens verzamelde en bestudeerde. Harlan onthulde interne memo's en rapporten die aantonen dat het leger al langere tijd betrokken was bij het volgen en analyseren van deze verschijnselen, maar dat verschillende factoren — zoals budgettaire beperkingen, bureaucratische processen en strikte classificatieprocedures — het onderzoek soms belemmerden.

Volgens Harlan werden de data verzameld via verschillende middelen, waaronder geavanceerde radarsystemen en infraroodcamera’s, maar de analyse ervan was niet altijd transparant. Hij verklaarde dat veel documenten intern werden gehouden om ‘technologische geheimen’ te beschermen, hoewel ze mogelijk ook het publieke vertrouwen en de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap in de weg stonden. Harlan benadrukte dat er binnen het militaire apparaat een toenemende bewustwording bestaat dat deze fenomenen mogelijk een gevaar vormen, niet alleen voor de luchtvaartveiligheid, maar ook voor nationale beveiliging en strategische belangen.

Het feit dat het Congres nu openlijk discussie voert over UAP’s en dat getuigen zoals Harlan hun bewijzen kunnen presenteren, onderstreept de verandering in het politiek klimaat ten opzichte van het onderwerp. Er wordt steeds meer erkend dat er sprake is van een complexe problematiek die niet afgedaan kan worden met simpele verklaringen. Daarnaast worden er vragen opgesteld over de behoefte aan een gecentraliseerd en transparant datamanagementsysteem, dat alle relevante informatie verzamelt, bewaart en onderzoekt, zonder dat deze door overheids- of militaire belangen wordt gedicteerd.

Tot slot illustreert deze ontwikkeling de ernst waarmee overheidsinstanties het onderwerp nemen. Er worden niet alleen meer middelen vrijgemaakt voor het onderzoek, maar ook wordt er een bredere maatschappelijke dialoog gevoerd over de aard, herkomst en mogelijke implicaties van de fenomenen die men zich eerder slechts in sci-fi films kon voorstellen. De betrokkenheid van het congres, de openheid van getuigenissen, en de publieke belangstelling benadrukken dat UAP-onderzoek een belangrijke rol begint te spelen in de nationale en internationale veiligheidsagenda.

Kortom, de combinatie van wetenschappelijke rapporten en politieke initiatieven zorgt voor een groeiend bewustzijn dat we binnen een nieuw paradigma opereren: niet langer is dit enkel een zaak van nieuwsgierige getuigen of geheime militairen, maar een onderwerp van nationale en mondiale samenleving dat aandacht en wetenschappelijke ernst verdient.

Hoofdstuk 3: Maatschappelijke impact en roep om transparantie

3.1 Publieke opinie en maatschappelijke druk

De maatschappelijke houding ten aanzien van onidentificeerde luchtverschijnselen (UAPs), voorheen bekend als UFO's, heeft in de afgelopen jaren een ingrijpende verandering ondergaan. Volgens onderzoek uitgevoerd door het Pew Research Center in 2025, independent en gerenommeerd als een betrouwbare bron voor gegevens over publieke opinies, blijkt dat maar liefst 68% van de Amerikanen vóórstander is van meer openheid van overheidsdata over UAPs. Dit percentage onderstreept een aanzienlijke beweging binnen de samenleving richting transparantie en openheid. Het valt op dat deze steun niet alleen vanuit nieuwsgierigheid ontstaat, maar ook uit een groeiend vertrouwen in overheidsinstanties en wetenschappelijke instituten.

Mensen geloven dat transparantie niet alleen de wetenschappelijke kennis versterkt, maar ook de nationale veiligheid kan verbeteren. Door openheid wordt de mogelijkheid geboden om UAP-verschijnselen door onafhankelijke experts te bestuderen, wat kan leiden tot een beter begrip van de fenomenen en mogelijke bedreigingen. Bijvoorbeeld, als UAPs inderdaad luchtvaartuigen of technologieën blijken te zijn van buitenlandse mogendheden of niet-geïdentificeerde bedreigingen, kan tijdige informatie-uitwisseling een essentieel onderdeel vormen van het defensiebeleid en preventieve maatregelen.

Daarnaast speelt maatschappelijke druk een belangrijke rol. Advocacy groepen zoals de UAP Transparency Initiative (UTI), opgericht in 2022, vormen een belangrijke stem in het publieke debat. Deze organisatie pleit voor volledige openbaarmaking van alle niet-sensitive informatie over UAPs en zet zich in voor het vergroten van de transparantie. Zij organiseren campagnes, brengen rapporten uit en lobbyen bij beleidsmakers om de openheid te stimuleren.

Een voorbeeld van hun invloed is de release van een reeks declassificeerde rapporten door het Amerikaanse ministerie van Defensie in 2024, deels gefaciliteerd door publieke druk. Deze rapporten bevatten in sommige gevallen gedetailleerde waarnemingen en radarbeelden, die voorheen achter gesloten deuren werden gehouden. De maatschappelijke druk wordt mede versterkt door verhalen en getuigenissen van piloten en militairen, die vaak jarenlang hebben gezwegen uit angst voor reprimandes of vooroordelen. De openheid van deze getuigenissen zorgt voor een breed maatschappelijke discussie, waarin niet alleen Pentagon en NSA, maar ook de wetenschap, media en het grote publiek betrokken zijn.

3.2 Argumenten voor transparantie

Het argument voor transparantie wordt vaak onderbouwd door technische, wetenschappelijke en veiligheidsgerelateerde overwegingen. Volgens voormalige Pentagon functionarissen zoals generaal Mark Evans, een expert op het gebied van defensie en nationale veiligheid, “versterkt transparantie de nationale veiligheid, omdat onafhankelijke experts de bevindingen kunnen valideren en beleid kunnen adviseren”. Hij benadrukt dat door het openstellen van gegevens, de kans op het herkennen en begrijpen van UAP-verschijnselen toeneemt, wat essentieel is voor het ontwikkelen van adequaat beleid en preventiestrategieën.

Het argument dat geheimhouding de wetenschap en veiligheid dient, wordt inmiddels algemeen weerlegd. Stilzwijiģheid en geheimhouding kunnen leiden tot een zogenaamde 'black box' situatie, waarbij informatie niet wordt gedeeld en daardoor de kans op misverstanden of misbruik toeneemt. Transparantie daarentegen maakt het mogelijk om fenomenen te bestuderen op een wetenschappelijk verantwoorde wijze, waarbij onderzoeksinstituten, universiteiten en onafhankelijk wetenschappers betrokken worden. Dit kan leiden tot nieuwe technologieën, zoals geavanceerde sensorsystemen, die buiten de militaire context verder ontwikkeld kunnen worden.

Een concreet voorbeeld hiervan is de succesvolle integratie van geavanceerde radarsystemen die detectie van UAPs mogelijk maken in civiele luchtvaart en wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Sinds 2023 is er bijvoorbeeld een toename te zien in het gebruik van LIDAR-technologieën en multispectrale sensoren, die zonder vooringenomenheid of geheime doeleinden externe fenomenen kunnen vastleggen. Hierdoor wordt de kans groter dat gegevens reproduceerbaar en controleerbaar zijn, wat de betrouwbaarheid van de bevindingen versterkt.

Daarnaast benadrukken voorstanders dat transparantie ook het publieke vertrouwen in overheidsinstellingen vergroot. In een tijd waarin desinformatie en complottheorieën prolifereren, fungeert open data als een rem op het ontstaan van ongefundeerde speculaties. Zoals James E. McDonnell, een bekende astrofysicus en wetenschapsadviseur, stelt: “Als we vooroordelen en onduidelijkheden vermijden door openheid te bieden, bouwen we aan een fundament van vertrouwen dat nodig is om gezamenlijk complexe mysteries zoals UAPs te doorgronden.”

Het is belangrijk te onderstrepen dat transparantie niet betekent dat alle informatie onmiddellijk openbaar wordt. Privacy- en veiligheidsgevoelige data, zoals exacte locaties van geheime bases of technologische specificaties die de nationale defensie in gevaar brengen, worden nog steeds afgeschermd. Echter, de kerngegevens en waarnemingen die wetenschappelijk en maatschappelijke waarde hebben, worden wel publiek gemaakt. Daarbij speelt ook internationalisering van uitwisseling een grote rol: enkele landen zoals Canada, het Verenigd Koninkrijk en Australië hebben onderling afspraken gemaakt om gegevens te delen, wat de internationale samenwerking versterkt.

Tot slot wordt ook gewezen op de technologische ontwikkelingen die transparantie mogelijk maken. Cloud computing, blockchain-technologie en versleutelde communicatie zorgen ervoor dat gegevens op een veilige en transparante wijze gedeeld kunnen worden, zonder dreiging van manipulatie of diefstal. Een voorbeeld hiervan is het project OpenSky, gelanceerd door het European Space Agency in 2024, dat een gedeeld platform biedt waarop waarnemingen van UAPs wereldwijd real-time kunnen worden verzameld, geverifieerd en geanalyseerd door verschillende onderzoeksinstituten.

Kortom, de maatschappelijke impact van de roep om transparantie is groot en multidimensionaal. Het kan leiden tot een breder wetenschappelijk begrip, meer maatschappelijke betrokkenheid, verhoogde veiligheid en verbeterd vertrouwen in overheidsinstellingen. Belangrijk is dat transparantie strategisch wordt benaderd, met respect voor ethische en veiligheidsvoorschriften, en met de inzet om kennis en inzichten te delen ten behoeve van de samenleving als geheel.

Hoofdstuk 4: Toekomstperspectieven en beleid

Dit hoofdstuk richt zich op de toekomstige ontwikkelingen in UAP-onderzoek, met een uitgebreide blik op nieuwe wetgeving, onderzoeksinitiatieven, en de technologische kansen die deze verschijnselen bieden. De voortdurende publieke, politieke en wetenschappelijke druk vragen om een gestructureerde en transparante aanpak, waarbij samenwerking tussen verschillende disciplines centraal staat.

4.1 Nieuwe wetgeving en onderzoeksinitiatieven

In reactie op de toenemende publieke belangstelling en de politieke urgentie, is er gewerkt aan de vormgeving van de UAP Research and Transparency Act (hierna: URTA). Deze wet wordt gezien als een belangrijke doorbraak in het formaliseringsproces van UAP-onderzoek.

De voorgestelde wetsartikelen bevatten onder andere de volgende kernpunten:

• Verplichting tot jaarlijkse rapportages: Overheidsinstanties worden verplicht om jaarlijks gedetailleerde rapportages te verstrekken aan het Congres over alle verzamelde gegevens, bevindingen en onderzoeken met betrekking tot UAP’s. Dit zorgt voor een voortdurende transparantie en een gestructureerde monitoring van de ontwikkelingen.

• Financiering van een civiel-overheid samenwerkingscentrum: Er wordt geld vrijgemaakt voor de oprichting van een gespecialiseerd samenwerkingscentrum dat functioneert als brug tussen overheidsinstanties, universiteiten, en private onderzoeksinitiatieven. Dit centrum krijgt als taak het coördineren van multidisciplinaire onderzoeken, het delen van gegevens en het ontwikkelen van nieuwe onderzoeksinstrumenten.

• Declassificatie van beeldmateriaal: Een belangrijke bepaling is dat niet-gevoelige beelden en data binnen 90 dagen na ontvangst gedeclassificeerd moeten worden. Hiermee wordt de transparantie bevorderd en wordt voorkomen dat waardevolle gegevens onnodig verborgen blijven.

Indien deze wet wordt aangenomen, kan haar impact groot zijn. Het leggen van een wettelijke basis voor een multidisciplinair onderzoeksparadigma betekent dat ingenieurs, natuurkundigen, datawetenschappers en andere specialisten zullen samenwerken. Bijvoorbeeld, technici kunnen radarsystemen verbeteren, natuurkundigen kunnen theorieën ontwikkelen over onbekende verschijnselen, terwijl datawetenschappers grote datasets analyseren op patronen en anomalieën. Volgens wetenschapsfilosoof Karl Popper, moet wetenschap "float with falsifiability," en een gestructureerd beleid zoals URTA biedt de juiste basis voor het testen van hypotheses en het weerleggen ervan.

• Voorbeelden van de inhoud van de wet

Een concreet voorbeeld uit de wetsvoorstellen betreft de rapportage van nieuwe waarnemingen via publieke meldingen en militaire systemen, waarbij gegevens geverifieerd worden door meerdere onafhankelijke bronnen. Een ander voorbeeld betreft de oprichting van een databank waarin alle gedecodeerde radargegevens en beeldmateriaal wordt opgeslagen, toegankelijk voor onderzoekers binnen en buiten de overheid. Daarbij wordt veel aandacht besteed aan de beveiliging, waarbij geavanceerde encryptietechnieken en blockchain-technologie kunnen worden ingezet om de integriteit van de gegevens te waarborgen.

• Technische details en uitdagingen

Het opzetten van een dergelijk samenwerkingscentrum stuit op technologische en organisatorische uitdagingen. Zo vereist de classificatie en analyse van grote hoeveelheden beelden en radargegevens efficiënte data-infrastructuren en geavanceerde algoritmen voor beeld- en patroonherkenning. Hierbij speelt kunstmatige intelligentie (AI) een cruciale rol: deep learning modellen kunnen bijvoorbeeld getraind worden om onderscheid te maken tussen natuurlijke fenomenen zoals weerballonnen, en mogelijk niet-gedefinieerde objecten die afwijkingen vertonen.

Voorbeeld: Een AI-model dat getraind is op duizenden getelde UAP-beelden, kan patroonherkenning toepassen om afwijkingen in nieuwe data te identificeren. Onderzoekers kunnen bijvoorbeeld AI inzetten om te detecteren of bepaalde verschijnselen consistent voorkomen onder specifieke omstandigheden, zoals bij bepaalde weersomstandigheden of op bepaalde locaties.

• Interdisciplinaire samenwerking

Door de wet wordt een nieuw standaardprofiel gecreëerd waarbij ingenieurs, natuurkundigen en datawetenschappers niet langer in gescheiden silo's werken, maar samen vraagstukken aanpakken vanuit verschillende invalshoeken. Een voorbeeld hiervan is de integratie van atmosferische modellen met radar- en videogegevens om fenomenen beter te begrijpen. Bijvoorbeeld, signalen die door radars worden uitgezonden, kunnen worden vergeleken met atmosferische data om te bepalen of waargenomen objecten natuurlijke of andere oorzaken hebben.

4.2 Wetenschappelijke en technologische kansen

Naast de wetgeving biedt de technologische vooruitgang nieuwe wegen voor UAP-onderzoek. Een belangrijk onderdeel hierbij is de toepassing van geavanceerde radarsystemen en atmosferische modellen, gecombineerd met kunstmatige intelligentie (AI).

• Geavanceerde radarsystemen

De huidige radartechnologie maakt gebruik van pulse-Doppler radars die in staat zijn om objecten op grote afstand en met hoge precisie te detecteren. Niettemin blijft de beperking bestaan dat radarbeelden vaak moeilijk te interpreteren zijn omdat verstoringen door atmosferische omstandigheden voorkomen. Nieuwe radarsystemen, zoals die met phased array technologie en multistatic opstellingen, kunnen echter real-time en driedimensionale data verzamelen, waardoor het identificatieproces significant wordt verbeterd.

Bijvoorbeeld, het gebruik van MIMO-radarsystemen (Multiple Input Multiple Output) kan leiden tot een veel hogere gezichts- en detectiecapaciteit. Dankzij de enorme gegevensstroom die deze systemen genereren, kunnen datawetenschappers en ingenieurs machine learning-algoritmen ontwikkelen om afwijkingen en patronen te herkennen die eerder niet zichtbaar waren.

• Atmosferische modellen en computermodellering

Door gebruik te maken van uitgebreide atmosferische modellen kunnen verschijnselen zoals weerballonnen, pluimen, of bepaalde weersomstandigheden worden gesimuleerd en vooraf voorspeld. Dit helpt om waarnemingen beter te verklaren en te onderscheiden van mogelijke UAP’s. Bijvoorbeeld, het fenomeen van ball lightning wordt met theoretische modellen en geavanceerde simulaties bestudeerd. Als we begrijpen onder welke atmosferische condities de verschijnselen ontstaan, wordt het makkelijker om onderscheid te maken tussen natuurlijke en niet-natuurlijke objecten.

• Kunstmatige intelligentie (AI)

De inzet van AI opent nieuwe perspectieven in het empirisch onderzoek naar UAP’s. Deep learning netwerken, zoals convolutionele neurale netwerken (CNN’s), kunnen worden getraind op enorme datasets van beelden, radargegevens en videomateriaal. Bijvoorbeeld, een studie uit 2019 liet zien dat CNN’s in staat waren om 90% van de verschillende natuurlijke en kunstmatige objecten correct te classificeren, waaronder ook anomalieën die op "hidden" of onzichtbare objecten lijken.

Daarnaast kan AI worden ingezet voor real-time monitoring en automatische waarnemingsdetectie. Bijvoorbeeld, tijdens vliegreizen of militaire oefeningen kan AI automatisch afwijkingen signaleren en instant alert geven aan onderzoekers.

• Van beschrijvende naar verklarende wetenschap

Een belangrijke ambitie voor de toekomst is de overgang van louter beschrijvende karakterisering naar een empirisch en verklarend niveau. Dit betekent dat niet alleen het "wat" en "wanneer" wordt vastgelegd, maar dat men probeert te begrijpen "hoe" en "waarom" bepaalde fenomenen optreden. Dit vereist het ontwikkelen van theoretische modellen die kunnen verklaren waarom UAP’s zich op bepaalde manieren gedragen en onder welke specifieke omstandigheden zij worden waargenomen.

Voorbeeld: Een theoretisch model dat suggereert dat sommige UAP’s gerelateerd kunnen zijn aan natuurlijke plasmafenomenen in de atmosfeer, gebaseerd op elektromagnetische theoretische principes, kan een stap zijn in de richting van een verklaring.

• Conclusie

De technologische en wetenschappelijke kansen in UAP-onderzoek bieden veelbelovende perspectieven om de mysteries achter deze verschijnselen stap voor stap te ontrafelen. Door nauwe samenwerking tussen technici, natuurkundigen en datawetenschappers, ondersteund door een solide beleidskader en grote investeringen in R&D, kunnen we de komende jaren belangrijke doorbraken verwachten. Het doel is niet alleen het registreren van waarnemingen, maar het ontwikkelen van een fundamenteel begrip dat kan leiden tot technologische innovaties en mogelijk zelfs nieuwe fysische inzichten.

Hoofdstuk 5: Conclusie en discussie

De recente toename in meldingen van UAP’s (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) en de groeiende openheid van overheids- en militaire instanties onderstrepen het belang van een gestructureerde en wetenschappelijke aanpak van dit fenomeen. Deze ontwikkelingen vragen om een kritische analyse, niet alleen om de aard en oorsprong van UAP’s te begrijpen, maar ook om de bredere implicaties voor onze wetenschap, veiligheid en maatschappij. In dit hoofdstuk worden de kernpunten van de thesis samengevat, gevolgd door een diepgaandere discussie over de technische, maatschappelijke en politieke aspecten die hierbij komen kijken.

• De Waarnemingen en Data

Sinds de publicatie van het Pentagon’s rapport in 2021 en soortgelijke initiatieven in andere landen, is duidelijk geworden dat er een enorme hoeveelheid waarnemingen bestaat die niet eenvoudig te verklaren zijn. Voorbeelden hiervan zijn de opvallende vlekken op radarbeelden, onbeweeglijke objecten die met supersonische snelheid manoeuvreren, en objecten die onbekende vluchtpatronen vertonen. Hoewel veel van deze waarnemingen nog altijd niet volledig verklaard kunnen worden, bieden ze waardevolle data voor systematische analyse.

Het is essentieel te erkennen dat de huidige waarnemingen vaak vooral uit anekdotisch bewijs en operationele rapporten bestaan, wat de behoefte onderstreept voor meer gestructureerde en technisch onderbouwde data-verzameling. Moderne technologieën zoals multispectrale sensoren, lidar, radar en geavanceerde elektronisch-optische systemen kunnen helpen om meer betrouwbare informatie te produceren. Een voorbeeld hiervan is het gebruik van de detectie- en trackingsoftware ontwikkeld door bijvoorbeeld het Amerikaanse Naval Air Systems Command, dat in staat is om objecten te traceren met een precisie die niet eerder mogelijk was.

• De rol van overheids- en militaire openheid

De openheid van overheids- en militaire instanties vormt een cruciaal onderdeel in het verdere onderzoek. Historisch waren veel waarnemingen geheim gehouden, wat bijdroeg aan het ontstaan van allerlei theorieën en speculaties. Nu blijkt dat transparantie niet alleen het vertrouwen in de overheid herstelt, maar ook de basis legt voor ernstiger en wetenschappelijker onderzoek.

De publicatie van videobeelden door de Pentagon, waarin objecten worden weergegeven die zich bewegen buiten de bekende fysica, is een belangrijk signaal. Zoals astronoom en filosoof Carl Sagan stelde: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Het openstellen van dit bewijs aan de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap stelt onderzoekers in staat om met meetbare en reproduceerbare methoden te werken.

• De noodzaak van een multidisciplinair wetenschappelijk programma

Het aanpakken van UAP’s vereist niet alleen technologische expertise, maar ook input van diverse disciplines zoals natuurkunde, astrofysica, atmosferische wetenschappen, materiaalkunde en zelfs psychologie. Door de integratie van verschillende vakgebieden ontstaat een holistisch beeld van de verschijnselen.

Technologisch gezien beschikken we tegenwoordig over geavanceerde detectie- en analyseinstrumenten. Bijvoorbeeld, high-bandwidth radars kunnen snelheid en trajecten nauwkeurig meten, terwijl analytische software met machine learning-algoritmes patronen kan ontdekken die voor het menselijk oog niet zichtbaar zijn. Een voorbeeld hiervan is het gebruik van neurale netwerken om secundaire gegevens te classificeren en anomalieën te identificeren.

Vanuit een fysisch perspectief kunnen we proberen om de energetische karakteristieken van deze objecten te bepalen. Als objecten zich bewegen met snelheden die de geluidssnelheid overschrijden en over electromagnetische eigenschappen beschikken die niet in onze huidige technologische context voorkomen, opent dat nieuwe vragen over fysica en materiaalwetenschappen.

• De toekomst van UAP-onderzoek

De verdere ontwikkeling van een solide wetenschappelijke basis hangt grotendeels af van twee kernfactoren. Ten eerste de bereidwilligheid van overheden om data te delen en de barrières voor informatieverschaffing te verminderen. Zoals voormalig NASA-astronoom Dr. Jill Tarter heeft opgemerkt: “De grootste barrier voor het begrijpen van UAP’s is niet de technologie, maar de politieke wil.” Dit impliceert dat het belang ligt in internationale samenwerking en transparantie, bijvoorbeeld via internationale verdragen of wetenschappelijke consortia.

Ten tweede vereist het succes van onderzoek een sterke applicatie van methodologische kracht. Dit betekent dat wetenschappers rigoureuze experimenten moeten opzetten, hypothesen moeten testen en foutenbronnen moeten elimineren. Bijvoorbeeld, het replicateerbaar maken van waarnemingen en het toepassen van geavanceerde statistische technieken is essentieel om betrouwbare conclusies te trekken.

Door het samengaan van technologische innovatie, interdisciplinair samenwerken en politieke openheid, kunnen we mogelijk belangrijke doorbraken behalen. Hiermee kunnen we niet alleen de aard en oorsprong van UAP’s verduidelijken, maar ook fundamentele vragen beantwoorden over de fysica, onze plaats in het universum, en de mogelijke intelligentie die achter deze verschijnselen schuilgaat.

Samenvatting

Deze thesis toont aan dat UAP’s een fenomeen zijn dat niet langer kan worden afgedaan als louter lokalisaties van mythes of folklore. Het toenemende aantal betrouwbare rapportages, de groeiende politieke aandacht en de technologische middelen die beschikbaar komen, vormen een solide basis voor systematisch, wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Transparantie en interdisciplinariteit zijn hierbij cruciale pijlers om de mysteries rondom UAP’s te ontrafelen.

Als we deze kansen benutten, kunnen we niet alleen antwoorden vinden op de vragen over aard en oorsprong, maar mogelijk ook vooruitgang boeken op gebieden zoals natuurkunde, materiaalkunde en astronautiek. De ultieme doelstelling is een dynamisch onderzoeksparadigma creëren waarin alle gegevens worden verzameld, geanalyseerd en geïnterpreteerd met dezelfde rigueur als bij andere natuurwetenschappelijke disciplines. Alleen door deze gestructureerde aanpak kunnen we de grenzen van onze kennis verder verleggen en wellicht antwoorden vinden op existentiële vragen: Zijn wij alleen in het universum? Zijn er buitenaardse beschavingen die contact proberen te maken? De toekomst van UAP-onderzoek hangt af van onze bereidwilligheid om open en kritisch te blijven kijken naar deze fascinerende verschijnselen.

 { peter2011 }

30-11-2025 om 23:35 geschreven door peter  

Triangular UFO Over New Bern, North Carolina – November 13, 2025

A striking UFO sighting occurred in Derby Park, New Bern, North Carolina, on the evening of November 13, 2025, leaving three witnesses stunned. Around 9:29 p.m. local time, a triangular formation of bright white lights appeared silently in the night sky, hovering for only a few seconds before shooting upward at an incredible speed and disappearing from view.Eyewitness AccountAccording to the witnesses, the object had three distinct lights, one at each corner of a perfectly symmetrical triangle. The lights remained stationary for roughly three seconds before the object accelerated vertically, vanishing into the upper atmosphere in what they described as a smooth but extremely rapid motion. There was no audible sound, no visible trail, and no blinking navigation lights typically seen on airplanes or drones.

“We saw a triangle in the sky, and it took off in two to three seconds and disappeared,” one of the witnesses reported. “It was completely silent.”

Visual Evidence

Photos captured during the event show three luminous points arranged in a precise triangular pattern against a dark sky. The lights appear evenly spaced and of similar brightness, suggesting they were part of a single structured object rather than separate sources. No structure is clearly visible between the lights, though the dark contrast hints at the possibility of a solid body blocking the starlight behind it.

This sighting closely resembles other “black triangle” UFO reports that have been documented worldwide for decades — often described as large, silent craft with bright lights at each corner.

Possible Explanations

Skeptics often attribute such sightings to:

• Military aircraft, such as stealth bombers or advanced drones flying under low visibility.
• Civilian drones flying in formation or viewed from unusual angles.
• Optical illusions caused by navigation lights on planes appearing as a triangle against a dark sky.

However, what makes this particular sighting stand out is the rapid vertical acceleration and the absence of any sound or flashing lights, features inconsistent with known human-made aircraft.

Significance

Triangular UFOs have become one of the most consistently reported shapes in modern UAP observations, often associated with silent flight, hovering capability, and sudden acceleration. Whether the object seen over New Bern was an advanced experimental craft or something beyond our current understanding remains unknown.

As UAP reporting continues to increase across the United States, this North Carolina encounter adds another intriguing case to the growing list of triangular UFO sightings that defy easy explanation.

Reported by: Local witnesses at Derby Park, New Bern, NC
Date: November 13, 2025
Duration: Approximately 3 seconds
Number of witnesses: 3
Shape: Triangle
Characteristics: Three lights, silent movement, rapid vertical ascent

RELATED VIDEO

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

29-11-2025 om 18:31 geschreven door peter  

8 Reasons Aliens Exist and Have Visited Earth, According to ‘The Age of Disclosure’ Documentary

Now available on Amazon Prime, the film interviews dozens of officials with 'direct knowledge' of UAP

By Addie Morfoot

The film also includes clips from congressional hearings about UAPs and makes clear that there is major bipartisan support for the proposed UAP Disclosure Act. In fact, Trump or a subsequent president could make a massive impact, Farah says, by disclosing what he says is the truth.

“I think it’s only a matter of time before the release of this film is followed by a sitting president stepping to the podium and telling the world, ‘We’re not alone in the universe,'” the director told Entertainment Weekly. “It’s the most significant moment a leader could possibly have.”

One of the key voices in the film is Jay Stratton, former Defense Intelligence Agency official and director of the government’s UAP Task Force. “I have seen, with my own eyes, non-human craft and non-human beings,” he says in the doc.

Below are eight key extraterrestrial facts put forth in “The Age of Disclosure”:

• Otherworldly vehicles

Transmedium crafts — vehicles that have the capability to operate in space, air, and water — defy all that humanity knows about physics, and have been operating with complete impunity around the world since at least the 1940s, according to the documentary.

• Multi-national race

Since the 1940s, an ongoing arms race between China, Russia and the U.S. was set off by the discovery of crashed UAPs. Each nation, according to the doc, wants to be the first to crack into extraterrestrial technology to reverse-engineer it for human use. But as defense official Stratton explains in the film, “You can’t tell your friends without telling your enemies.”

• FAA involvement

Aviation safety is in jeopardy if the Federal Aviation Administration doesn’t track UAPs, the film concludes. (As of Oct. 22, the FAA requires air traffic control to notify the National Tactical Security Operations and the Air Traffic Security Coordinator team of any pilot reports or air traffic personnel observations of UAP activity.)

• Deep, watery cover?

If any intelligence from outside our universe did want to arrive on earth and remain undetected, they would most likely hide out in the deep zone of the ocean, which hasn’t been explored by humans, posits interviews in the doc.

• Giant crafts

UAPs the size of football fields that can travel over 30,000 mph are just a few of the types of UAPs — some can travel 40,000 miles per hour, sometimes faster, and go from zero to thousands of miles per hour in less than a second, according to the doc.

• Humanoid! Aliens!

According to Dr. Eric Davis in 1989 the Soviet Union recovered four bodies of humanoid aliens — extraterrestrials — from a UAP crash site where they discovered an advanced directed energy weapon.

• Uses for good or evil

Similar to artificial intelligence, the film asserts that UAP technology can revolutionize the way we do things – such as provide a clean energy source – or completely destroy everything that we know.

• Does he or doesn’t he?

Information about UAPs is on a need-to-know basis. The President of The United States and the head of the CIA might know nothing about UAP intelligence.

 { https://cloud.email.variety.com/signup/ }

28-11-2025 om 22:55 geschreven door peter  

How UFO Sightings Are Changing Public Perception

Overview

UFO sightings in the United States have experienced a remarkable increase over recent years, fundamentally altering how the public perceives unidentified aerial phenomena. According to data collected and compiled by the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC), there has been a significant surge in reports, with the number of incidents quadrupling from 3,500 in 2019 to over 7,500 by 2022. This upward trend is not merely a statistical anomaly but reflects a broader shift in societal attitudes towards these phenomena: more people are willing to report and discuss unusual sightings than ever before.

The data presented by NUFORC demonstrates a year-by-year increase: approximately 4,500 reports in 2020, rising to about 6,000 in 2021, and reaching around 7,500 in 2022. This steady climb suggests a change in the collective mindset—moving from dismissiveness and skepticism toward openness and curiosity. Social media platforms, in particular, have played an instrumental role in this transformation. They facilitate rapid information dissemination, peer validation, and the viral sharing of sightings, thereby normalizing the conversation around UFOs. The proliferation of digital platforms has reduced the stigma once associated with reporting aerial anomalies, which—historically—was often dismissed as frivolous or paranoid.

This evolution in public perception is also shaped by increased media coverage highlighting credible incidents and government disclosures. Previously, UFO sightings were often relegated to sensationalist tabloids or fringe circles, but today’s media landscape approaches the subject with a journalistic seriousness that lends legitimacy to the reports. The shift has fostered a more scientific and analytical approach among the general population, who now see UFOs not just as myths or conspiracy theories but as phenomena deserving of serious investigation.

Government Transparency

A pivotal element in the changing narrative around UFOs is the role played by government disclosure and transparency initiatives. Historically, government agencies have maintained a stance of secrecy regarding UFO investigations, often dismissing sightings or classifying data as top secret. However, recent developments have marked a significant departure from that tradition, contributing to a more open and investigatory approach.

In 2021, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) took a major step by releasing a comprehensive analysis of 144 unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP) cases. This report acknowledged that many of these cases could not be readily explained using known technology, natural phenomena, or atmospheric conditions. Dr. Elena Ramirez, a senior researcher at the Center for Aerospace Studies, described this development as a “watershed moment” in UFO discourse. She explained that the report’s acknowledgment of unexplained cases constitutes official recognition that some encounters require serious scientific scrutiny—not dismissive skepticism.

The ODNI report was complemented by congressional hearings that brought UAP data into the legislative spotlight, emphasizing the importance of transparency. These hearings featured testimony from military personnel, scientists, and intelligence officials, who described encounters with unidentified objects exhibiting capabilities beyond current human technology. Such high-level exposure has been instrumental in legitimizing the subject among policymakers and the public alike.

"What is true, and I'm actually being serious here, there's footage and records of objects in the skies, that we don't know exactly what they are."

— Barack Obama, Former US President

This newfound transparency has altered the narrative by creating an environment where discussions about UFOs are no longer taboo. Instead, they are debated openly within government institutions and research communities. Furthermore, the acknowledgment of unexplained sightings has begun to influence the funding allocation for dedicated research projects, fostering a scientific approach to studying UAPs. As a result, behaviors once considered fringe or paranoid are increasingly viewed through a lens of rational inquiry.

The UFO report was written by a task force set up by the US Department of Defence

Public Curiosity and Survey Findings

Public curiosity about UFOs has grown substantially, a trend reflected in recent polling data and surveys conducted by reputable research organizations. The Pew Research Center’s recent poll revealed that 56 percent of respondents believe that some UFO sightings may involve advanced, possibly extraterrestrial, technology. Conversely, only 22 percent attribute these sightings solely to misidentifications, hoaxes, or natural phenomena, highlighting a shift toward openness to the possibility of genuine unknowns.

Interestingly, the remaining 22 percent of respondents expressed uncertainty, indicating a nuanced view that neither fully dismisses nor fully accepts the phenomena. This indecision underscores an evolving understanding—people are increasingly willing to entertain the hypothesis that some sightings may involve elements beyond current scientific explanation but are hesitant to jump to conclusions.

Sociologist Dr. Marcus Lee from the University of Arizona notes that people are no longer afraid to openly claim they saw something strange in the sky. The survey data suggests a societal move away from outright skepticism toward an inquisitive, evidence-based mindset. This is further evidenced by increased participation in UFO-related forums, social media groups, and citizen science initiatives aimed at collecting and analyzing data on aerial anomalies.

The public’s appetite for information is also reflected in the rising popularity of UFO documentaries, podcasts, and streaming series. Programs such as “UFOs: The Untold Truth” and podcasts like “The Cosmic Frontier” feature eyewitness interviews, declassified military footage, and expert analyses, nurturing a culture of curiosity and critical inquiry. These media outlets serve as a feedback loop that amplifies public interest and reinforces the legitimacy of UFO investigations.

The democratization of information through online platforms like Twitter, TikTok, and Reddit has democratized the reporting process. Witnesses, enthusiasts, and amateur researchers can now share their observations instantly, challenge official narratives, and collaborate on investigations. This grassroots involvement further shifts the perception from ridicule to respectability, encouraging more people to come forward with their experiences.

UFO sightings have happened all over the world, including Rendlesham forest in Suffolk in 1980

Media Influence and Cultural Evolution

The role of media in shaping public perception has been transformative. Historically, UFO sightings were often ridiculed or dismissed, but today they are increasingly viewed through a lens of scientific curiosity. Documentaries, podcasts, independent YouTube channels, and streaming series have elevated the discussion, providing both entertainment and education.

For example, series such as “UFOs: The Untold Truth” combine eyewitness testimonials, meteorological data, and classified military footage to paint a nuanced picture of aerial phenomena. Podcasts like “The Cosmic Frontier” feature interviews with scientists, military personnel, and former government officials, fostering a more informed and open debate. These media outlets have helped break down stereotypes that previously associated UFO sightings with paranoia or hoaxing.

In parallel, social media platforms have democratized information dissemination, creating a participatory environment where anyone can share their sightings and insights. TikTok videos showing inexplicable lights or objects in the sky have gone viral, sparking widespread discussion and even inspiring scientific interest. Twitter threads and Reddit forums dedicated to UFOs foster communities of enthusiasts who analyze data and challenge official explanations.

The public only became aware of their sightings four years later. That’s when The New York Times published an article about them. The online article included leaked video recorded by cameras on the Navy planes. In April 2020, the U.S. Navy confirmed those videos were real — and then officially released them.

In recent years, these and other very credible sources have reported seeing UFOs — unidentified flying objects. Now they’re called Unexplained Aerial Phenomena, or UAP. But whatever you call them, the U.S. government has lately begun taking these mystery objects seriously. Very seriously. And it’s recruited a lot of scientists to investigate what’s behind them (albeit quietly).

We still don’t know what the pilots and others have seen. But here’s what’s motivated the new and growing scientific interest in them.

This cultural evolution—driven by widespread media consumption—has helped dissolve the “laugh-it-off” attitude that historically surrounded UFO reports. Instead of being dismissed or ridiculed, witness accounts are now regarded as valuable data points that could unlock new scientific understanding. The shift from ridicule to curiosity represents a major change in societal attitudes, one that encourages both public engagement and serious scientific inquiry.

Outlook and Ongoing Research

The convergence of increased reporting, government acknowledgment, and cultural curiosity signals a new era of research and exploration into the mysterious phenomena. Several initiatives are underway globally—both academic and private—that aim to scientifically analyze UAPs and their implications.

Universities are establishing dedicated research labs focused on UAP analysis. These labs employ advanced sensors, data analytics, and collaboration with government agencies to capture high-resolution, multi-spectral data of aerial phenomena. Private aerospace firms, with interests in both civilian and military applications, are investing heavily in sensor technology, including radar, lidar, and infrared cameras, to detect and analyze unexplained objects.

While skepticism remains—many sightings can still be attributed to conventional explanations such as drones, optical illusions, atmospheric phenomena, or misidentifications—the broader willingness to explore these phenomena scientifically marks a cultural shift. The scientific community is increasingly open to considering UAPs as legitimate objects of study, leading to the development of new hypotheses and experimental approaches.

Some researchers advocate for the integration of UAP data into a broader scientific framework, emphasizing systematic data collection and peer-reviewed research. Governments and private institutions are funding projects that aim to compile databases of sightings, sensor data, and radar returns to facilitate rigorous analysis.

Dr. Elena Ramirez emphasizes that whether the ultimate conclusion points to extraterrestrial origins or domestic terrestrial technologies, the key achievement is that these phenomena are now on the scientific agenda. The emphasis is shifting from sensationalism to methodical investigation, with the potential to yield groundbreaking discoveries about our environment, technology, and possibly extraterrestrial life.

There are a trillion planets in the Milky Way alone. And that’s just our galaxy. There may be more than a trillion habitable planets in the universe, Shostak says. “So yeah,” he adds, “there’s plenty of opportunity for life.” But that still doesn’t mean that aliens have been visiting Earth.

Julia DeMarines is an astrobiologist. She studies how life might evolve on other planets. DeMarines works at the University of California, Berkeley and is a former SETI observer. SETI researchers look for signs of life elsewhere in the universe. They don’t study UFOs. Few scientists do.

Until recently, DeMarines says, most scientists described the study of UFOs as pseudoscience. No surprise, then, that scientists who are interested in UAP have seldom talked about it. They didn’t want other scientists to think they’re kooks.

But that’s changing.

In June 2022, NASA assembled a team of scientific experts. Their mission: Figure out how NASA can help study UAP.

As Bill Nelson, the space agency’s administrator, put it: “NASA searches for the unknown in air and space. It’s in our DNA.” One of the goals of the new team, he said at a news event, would be to “shift the conversation about UAP from sensationalism to science.”

The team made some specific recommendations. For instance, it said NASA should use its enormous body of space data for this study of UAP. And it should work with other government agencies to investigate reported sightings. The team also emphasized that all UAP studies must stay focused on evidence and data.

Avi Loeb agreed. And he wanted to help. Loeb is an astrophysicist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass. “To study those things,” he argues, “is the duty of scientists.”

In 2021, Loeb started the Galileo Project to scientifically investigate UAP. It doesn’t collect stories about UAP. It doesn’t rely on accidental sightings. Instead, it scans the skies with telescopes in an observatory at Harvard.

“We basically take a movie of the sky,” explains Loeb. Then artificial intelligence helps analyze the data. Two more observatories are in the works. Loeb hopes to have 10 eventually. More than 100 scientists are already involved.

More mysteries

Now that science is on the job, what can we expect to learn about UAP and maybe even alien life? One possibility is that science may be able to explain the previously unexplained.

DeMarines says UAP could be due to some unusual weather conditions. For example, spacecraft launched from Earth around sunset can create weird effects. When the sun is setting, she explains, gases expelled by the spacecraft will reflect only that light reaching the upper atmosphere. What’s more, she adds, “They stay reflective for a long time. So it looks unexplainable.”

Or UAP could be an effect caused by light bouncing off communications satellites, Loeb says. And, of course, it could be technology not from another planet, but from another country on this one.

But what about aliens? Could UAP really be alien spaceships?

Garrett Graff is a historian and author. He wrote the 2024 book UFO: The Inside Story of the US Government’s Search for Alien Life Here — and Out There. While doing research for it, he noticed something people often get wrong when they think about aliens and UAP. “We expect first contact with alien life to be like it is in movies, like Independence Day or Contact,” he says. But in real life, he notes, it might not be that obvious.

Our first encounter with aliens, Graff says, might not be meeting them. It might be finding remnants of their tech.

For example, we might find a piece of space trash that doesn’t come from our world. Graff compares this to spotting an empty plastic bag blowing through our cosmic backyard. We look at it and think: “That’s not from our Walmart.” We’ll know it didn’t originate on Earth, but we won’t know where it did come from.

One reason we may not see the aliens themselves is that they may no longer exist. In 1961, astronomer Frank Drake came up with a way to estimate how many alien societies could be broadcasting signals. It’s called the Drake Equation. It accounts for several factors. These include the rate at which stars form and the number of planets with an environment that might support life — the “Goldilocks zone.”

But the last factor in Drake’s equation is very interesting, says DeMarines. It’s represented by the letter “L.” That stands for the length of time technological civilizations produce signs of their existence. These could be radio waves, pollution from industry or even city lights. 

DeMarines points out that our civilization has been technologically advanced for little more than 100 years. And that’s in a universe that’s almost 14 billion years old. Her point is that the timing might not overlap. There may have been many other civilizations like ours. And there may be many more to come. But the chances that ours and theirs occur at the same time aren’t terribly good, she says.

Shostak, however, thinks it won’t be long until we find alien life, or at least evidence that it’s out there somewhere. “There have been 10,000 generations of Homo sapiens,” he says. “And the people reading this article are probably members of the first one in which we learn that there’s life in outer space.”

So what about UAP? Is there evidence that alien life is visiting Earth? Science is on the case.

In conclusion, the changing landscape of UFO sightings—from an era of rumor, ridicule, and secrecy to one of openness, scientific curiosity, and governmental transparency—reflects a profound societal transformation. This evolution not only reshapes public perception but also paves the way for advancements in research, policy, and understanding of the universe beyond our current knowledge.

{ PETER2011 }

28-11-2025 om 18:47 geschreven door peter  

Overview

A high-stakes wager has brought together two prominent figures in the scientific community, pitting renowned Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb against professional skeptic Michael Shermer in a $1,000 bet over the discovery of extraterrestrial life by the end of the decade. The terms of their agreement, registered on the Long Now Bets platform, require ironclad scientific confirmation of alien intelligence by December 31, 2030. The outcome promises to either validate growing optimism in the search for life beyond Earth or reinforce skepticism rooted in decades of unfulfilled predictions.

The Terms of the Bet

The wager is more than a friendly challenge: the rules are explicit and stringent. For a win, at least two out of three major scientific organizations—NASA, the National Science Foundation, or the American Astronomical Society—must officially confirm the detection of extraterrestrial intelligence. As the video explains, “It’s not enough for someone to claim they saw a UFO or post a blurry video online. The victory requires irrefutable data signed off by major scientific bodies.” The criteria for discovery are broad, encompassing anything from “physics-defying artifacts” to interstellar technology fragments or even alien biological forms found on Earth, so long as their non-human origin is indisputable.

This careful standard aims to avoid the endless debates that often follow ambiguous sightings or unofficial announcements: “Either the science signs off with irrefutable data, or nothing happens.” The burden of proof lies heavily on those, like Loeb, who believe contact is imminent—a silence from the cosmos by 2030 would hand victory to the skeptics.

Harvard Astronomer Takes Up Skeptic Publisher’s $1,000 Bet on Alien Disclosure by 2030

Competing Visions: Optimism vs. Skepticism

Avi Loeb’s optimism is grounded in emerging technology and recent discoveries. He cites the significant advances in observational equipment—such as the Rubin Observatory and the Galileo Project’s global telescope network—as game-changers in the hunt for alien technosignatures. Loeb references the discovery of interstellar objects like Oumuamua and the mysterious “TR,” which reignited scientific debate about visitors from beyond our solar system. His statistical argument is compelling: with a galaxy full of ancient, potentially life-bearing systems, “civilizations had billions of years to send probes, and we may finally have the tools to detect their cosmic messages.”

On the other side stands Michael Shermer, whose skepticism is shaped by a long history of unmet predictions. Shermer has witnessed “decades of people promising imminent alien disclosure that never materializes,” leading him to dismiss the current wave of enthusiasm as another cycle of excitement without evidence. He is notably critical of recent U.S. congressional hearings on UFOs, where, despite dramatic testimonies, “no hard evidence is ever produced, only claims of secrecy and threats.” For Shermer, the wager is a challenge to believers: if they are so certain of impending disclosure, they should be willing to back it up with real stakes.

The Scientific Tradition of Wagers

The Loeb-Shermer bet is the latest in a long tradition of scientists settling debates through wagers. Such bets date back to the 19th century, with notable examples like Alfred Russel Wallace’s successful wager proving the Earth’s curvature against a flat-earther, and Stephen Hawking’s famous bet on black holes. These challenges are seen as a way to inject accountability and a sense of fun into profound scientific disagreements, while also pushing both sides to clarify the terms and standards of proof.

Implications for Science and Society

Beyond the personal stakes, the Loeb-Shermer bet reflects the broader tension in astrobiology and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence: how to balance open-minded inquiry with rigorous scientific standards. Whether or not the coming years produce a breakthrough, the wager underscores the need for extraordinary evidence in support of extraordinary claims—a principle that remains at the heart of scientific progress. As the countdown to 2030 begins, the world will be watching to see whether the cosmos finally yields its secrets, or if humanity must wait a little longer for definitive proof that we are not alone.

{   https://usubjects.com/  }

28-11-2025 om 18:12 geschreven door peter  

“The Age of Disclosure” is set to be released in select theaters on Nov. 21.

The Age Of Disclosure

Aliens Are Real, U.S. Government Officials Have Admitted. ‘The Age of Disclosure’ Director Dan Farah Wants You to Know There’s More to the Story

27-11-2025 om 20:36 geschreven door peter  

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

27-11-2025 om 16:24 geschreven door peter  

The Origins of Disclosure: Crashes, Archives, and Secrets with Leslie Kean

Overview

Investigative journalist Leslie Kean sat down with host Peter Skafish on the Sol Forum to trace the “disclosure era” that has emerged around unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Kean argues that today’s surge of official acknowledgment rests on a decades‑long, largely hidden effort by government officials, journalists, and researchers. She points to a series of high‑profile incidents, persistent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) pushes, and internal memos that together form a “paper trail” of acknowledgment, even as many details remain classified or deliberately omitted.

Historic Crashes and Legal Battles

One of the earliest keystones in Kean’s narrative is the 1979 Kecksburg incident in Pennsylvania, where witnesses reported a fireball and a metallic object that allegedly crashed in a wooded area. Witnesses described seeing a fiery streak in the sky followed by the discovery of a mysterious metallic object. Local residents and witnesses indicated that the object resembled a spacecraft or a piece of advanced technology. Kean notes that a lawsuit filed against NASA in the early 1980s sought access to the agency’s investigative files, claiming that the government had retrieved the craft and concealed evidence. Although the suit was ultimately dismissed due to legal technicalities, the case revealed “multiple eyewitnesses, an unidentified object, and missing files” that continue to be cited by researchers as proof of a genuine crash retrieval. Kean emphasizes that the Kecksburg case set a precedent for later legal and investigative actions aimed at uncovering hidden material. It demonstrated the importance of grassroots advocacy and legal persistence in challenging government opacity regarding aerial phenomena.

Further back in history, the Roswell incident of 1947 remains a touchstone in UAP lore. Although officially dismissed as a weather balloon, whistleblowers and researchers have long argued otherwise. Kean describes how declassified documents, when scrutinized, hinted at a cover-up involving the recovery of unusual debris and possibly alien bodies. These revelations prompted ongoing efforts to push for transparency and led to a cultural and political climate increasingly receptive to investigating extraordinary claims. Decades later, the Roswell incident became a symbol of government secrecy and the need for scrutiny of official narratives.

Government Archives and FOIA

Efforts Kean highlights several internal government initiatives that have gradually opened the archives, serving as milestones in the ongoing disclosure process. In 2022, John Podesta’s FOIA push resulted in the release of a handful of declassified documents, including the Bolender memo, which acknowledges that the Department of Defense was still receiving civilian UFO reports in the 1990s. These documents, although limited in scope, provide glimpses into a long history of official interest and concern regarding aerial anomalies. Additionally, the efforts by Congressional figures like Harry Reid—former Senate Majority Leader—have been instrumental. Reid’s advocacy for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) and its successor AASWAP led to the eventual public release of video footage showing unidentified objects performing maneuvers beyond known human technology, as well as a limited inventory of recovered materials. Kean points out that these releases often contain “quiet references to ‘classic’ UFO cases”—a term used internally to denote incidents predating the modern UAP terminology—suggesting that the government has long been aware of a broader phenomenon. The process of declassification, she explains, is often incremental and partial, reflecting the sensitive nature of certain knowledge and a cautious approach to public disclosure.

Deep Secrecy and Recent Revelations

The conversation also turned to the depth of secrecy surrounding UAP investigations. Kean cites the Wilson memo, a classified internal document that outlines a covert program tasked with “monitoring and analyzing anomalous aerial events” while restricting dissemination to a narrow circle of authorized personnel. She explains that her decision to publish former intelligence officer David Grusch’s allegations was not taken lightly; the story was cross‑checked against findings from an Office of the Inspector General (IG) investigation and corroborated by multiple independent sources. Kean stresses that the U.S. approach has been characterized by “systemic denial,” contrasting sharply with the openness displayed by other nations such as Canada, the United Kingdom, and, as previously mentioned, Chile. These countries have adopted more transparent policies and actively invite the public and scientific community to participate in investigations and data collection efforts. Kean suggests that the American government’s secrecy is rooted in a combination of national security concerns, fear of public panic, and a desire to maintain technological superiority.

The Wilson memo and other classified documents reveal that U.S. agencies have been aware of phenomena that challenge conventional understanding for decades. However, efforts to study or disclose this information have often been thwarted by bureaucratic inertia and classified compartmentalization. This systemic secrecy complicates efforts by outside researchers and journalists, who must piece together fragmented evidence from leaks, witness testimonies, and declassified unintentionally revealing documents. Kean underscores that new declassification initiatives could potentially accelerate the timeline toward full transparency, but political and institutional barriers remain formidable.

International Contrast and Outlook

Kean underscores that not all governments follow the United States’ pattern of secrecy. Chile, for example, operates an official UAP office within its civil aviation authority, regularly publishing reports and inviting public participation. This approach reflects a more transparent, collaborative attitude and demonstrates that openness can coexist with national security protocols. Kean views Chile’s model as a template for future U.S. policies—highlighting the importance of establishing institutional frameworks where scientific, governmental, and civilian entities work together openly. She also mentions emerging transparency efforts in countries like France and the United Kingdom, which have initiated more open dialogue and data-sharing strategies.

This international contrast underscores a fundamental question: why is the U.S. lagging behind in transparency? Kean suggests that internal cultural factors, political pressures, and differing perceptions of national security influence policy decisions. She advocates for a shift towards greater openness, emphasizing that public trust and scientific progress depend on honest, comprehensive disclosure of UAP encounters.

Looking ahead, Kean asserts that the current “disclosure era” is the product of “quiet, sustained work” over decades—an accumulated effort involving whistleblowers, investigative journalism, FOIA activism, and evolving governmental attitudes. As new technologies such as advanced sensors, radar, and AI-driven analysis become more widespread, the potential for breakthroughs increases. Kean remains cautiously optimistic that a future where UAPs are openly studied, and their origins understood, is possible. However, she stresses that this future hinges on continued pressure from journalists, legislators, and the public to move from modest releases to full accountability. The ongoing push for transparency may ultimately lead to paradigm shifts in science, defense, and our understanding of our place in the cosmos.

In conclusion, Leslie Kean’s insights illustrate that the path to UAP disclosure has been long, arduous, and intertwined with national security considerations, institutional reluctance, and societal interest. While recent years have seen remarkable strides—including declassified videos and congressional hearings—the full story remains elusive. Kean’s work advocates for persistence and transparency, arguing that openness about aerial anomalies is essential for scientific integrity, public trust, and future technological and cultural evolution. The history, current developments, and international perspectives she presents collectively emphasize that disclosure is not a single moment but a sustained journey—one that continues to unfold with every new revelation, research effort, and public demand for truth.

{ https://usubjects.com/  }

26-11-2025 om 23:30 geschreven door peter  

Now, an international consortium wants to try and take the discussion even further by making UAP a topic of global discourse. 

Dubbed “Project Titan,” if all goes according to plan, the European enclave of San Marino could become the “Geneva” of UFOs and host nation for a United Nations-backed World Conference dedicated to the study of unidentified aerial phenomena. 

“In its contemporary form, the UAP/UFO phenomenon manifests itself for at least 70 years with pretty much the same characteristics all over the world and continues to remain a mystery,” Project Titan manager, Paolo Guizzardi, told The Debrief. “If we really want to advance in the knowledge of the phenomena, an open and collaborative international cooperation is indispensable.”

The driving force behind Project Titan is two different international organizations, the Italian-based Centro Ufologico Nazionale (CUN) and the recently formed International Coalition for Extraterrestrial Research (ICER). 

Last week, representatives from CUN and ICER gave a presentation to officials from the Republic of San Marino, formally requesting as a U.N. member state, San Marino to present the Office of the U.N. Secretary-General with a proposal for the creation of a permanent structure within the United Nations tasked with the organization of a periodic World Conference on UAP. 

In presentation documents provided to The Debrief, organizers highlighted four primary reasons it is significantly necessary to have a United Nations-backed initiative on unidentified aerial phenomena. 

1. Need for research: although more than seventy years have passed since the first UAP sighting of the contemporary era, the phenomenon persists, and its origins and nature remain shrouded in mystery.
2. The scale of the phenomenon: the manifestations of the UAP phenomenon are borderless, and there is a need to move beyond the phase of nationally based studies to a truly global dimension if such research is to be successful. 
3. Very high potential at the scientific level.
4. Very high potential for technological spin-off.

Likewise, San Marino officials were provided with a rundown of UAP activity by the U.S. government, which has steadily increased since December 2017, when the New York Times revealed elements within the Department of Defense had been secretly studying UAP for nearly a decade. 

In fact, as organizers were in San Marino staking their case, The Debrief broke the news that the House Armed Services Committee had submitted legislation to create a permanent UAP Office within the Pentagon. If passed, the UAP Office would replace the DoD’s current temporary UAP Task Force. 

Proposers also noted that other nations, such as France and Chile, have been investigating UFO sightings for decades through officially backed government bodies. 

Leading the current U.N. initiative, Paolo Guizzardi tells The Debrief that creating a formal way for the international community to take stock of recent UAP research is necessary if there is any hope of ever answering the UFO question. 

“The Conference will create a favorable environment for the collegial discussion of items that until now have remained confined within national boundaries, for the sharing and spreading of knowledge until now restricted to national apparatus, and for the presentation and discussion of new ideas in the field,” Guizzardi explained. 

From left: Col. Gordon Cooper, Jacques Vallee, Claude Poher, J. Allen Hynek, Grenada Prime Minister Sir Eric Gairy, Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim, Morton Gleisner, Lee Spiegel, Leonard Stringfield, and David Saunders.

(Image Source: Lee Speigel/ Huffington Post)

Project Titan would not be the first time the subject of UFOs has officially come up at the United Nations. 

In the spring of 1978, Prime Minister of the newly independent nation of Grenada, Eric Gairy, proposed creating a U.N.-backed global task force to study the nature and origin of UFOs. 

Gairy and a panel of experts – including astronaut Col. Gordon Cooper, computer scientist Jacques Vallee, astronomer/astrophysicist Claude Poher, astronomer J. Allen Hynek, University of Colorado psychologist David Saunders and researchers Lee Spiegel and Leonard Stringfield -even met personally with U.N. Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim in July of 1978 to discuss the idea. 

The same panel would later formally submit the proposal before the entire United Nations on November 28, 1978. 

Contrary to popular belief, the idea of starting a global UFO investigative group was actually well received by the U.N. General Assembly. So well, in fact, thanks to leaked cables published by Wikileaks, we now know that following the presentation, the U.N. encouraged member states to “take appropriate steps to coordinate on a national level scientific research and investigation into extraterrestrial life, including unidentified flying objects, and to inform the Secretary-General of the observations, research, and evaluation of such activities.” 

Discussion on creating an international UFO investigative group was slated to continue when the U.N. General Assembly reconvened in 1979. However, in March 1979, Gairy was ousted from power in a military coup by the communist New Jewel Movement leader, Maurice Bishop. Ironically, Gairy was at the U.N. when his government was overthrown. 

Ultimately, the reason the 1978 proposal for a United Nations UFO committee never came to fruition wasn’t that the U.N. failed to take the topic seriously. Instead, no other member nation decided to push the initiative forward following Gairy’s ousting from power and subsequent exile to the United States. 

Guizzardi and Project Titan supporters see San Marino as a perfect fit to pick up the torch where Grenada left off 43 years ago by leading the charge to make UAP a topic of international discourse. 

“The Republic of San Marino is indeed the most natural choice for this, given that the Republic is not at all unfamiliar with the UAP issue, as for thirty editions it has been hosting the World Symposium on UFOs and related phenomena, organized by the Centro Ufologico Nazionale of Italy,” said Guizzardi. “Its proposal to the U.N. would therefore represent a natural extension of this activity.” 

The stigma surrounding the topic of UFOs or UAP has lessened in recent years, thanks mainly to testimony by credible eye-witnesses like former U.S. Navy F/A-18 fighter pilot Ryan Graves and actions taken by the DoD and politicians. 

However, thanks to extraordinary claims that lack concrete evidence or sensationalized affirmations by carnival barkers, public ridicule and caricatures of little green men still often plague efforts to establish any credible examinations of UAP. 

That said, aside from one’s preexisting beliefs on the topic, there is precedent suggesting there is merit to Project Titan’s proposal of an international World Conference on UAP. In particular, the potential for scientific and technological breakthroughs. 

In a previous interview, Dr. William Culbreth, an engineering professor at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, discussed how his unwitting involvement in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency’s (DIA) UFO-centric carve-outs led to tangible scientific advances. 

Unaware of the program’s UFO focus when he was asked to author two papers on tracking hypersonic vehicles and “aneutronic fusion propulsion” for the DIA’s 2009 Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP), Dr. Culbreth said the work ultimately led to him examining new forms of nuclear propulsion technology. 

“We’re looking into these propulsion technologies today, and this area alone led to several of my students pursuing PhDs who I don’t think otherwise would have,” said Dr. Culbreth. 

Guaita Tower in San Marino

(Image Source: Wikicommons)

With Project Titan organizers having presented their case, San Marino officials will now internally discuss whether to go forward with a proposal to the United Nations. 

• Follow and connect with author Tim McMillan on Twitter: @LtTimMcMillan or encrypted email: LtTimMcMillan@protonmail.com

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/science/ }

26-11-2025 om 18:06 geschreven door peter  

The FBI Just Quietly Revealed That It Has a Real-Life UFO Office

By Noor Al-Sibai

Image: Fox / Liaison via Getty / Futurism

Amid the Pentagon’s years-long probes into the unexplained and unidentified, the FBI has been quietly running its own secret office investigating so-called “unidentified anomalous phenomena.”

Yes, let’s get this out of the way: that’s basically the plot of the 90s television show “The X-Files.” But buried in a new Politico story about concerns that UFO-hunting agents may soon be caught up in a purge is a jarring revelation: that such an office exists within the bureau —the “existence” of which had “not been disclosed publicly before,” per the outlet’s reporting.

{ https://futurism.com/ }

26-11-2025 om 17:05 geschreven door peter  

Overview

On November 21, 2025, a noteworthy documentary titled “The Age of Disclosure” was premiered on Capitol Hill, bringing significant attention to a series of recently declassified Pentagon recordings related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), commonly known as UFOs. Produced by Vulture, the online entertainment arm of New York Magazine, this 84-minute film aims to shed light on official government data that has largely been kept concealed from the public. The documentary combines authentic footage, firsthand witness testimonies, and archival materials to argue that the U.S. government is gradually becoming more transparent regarding its knowledge of unexplained aerial sightings. The organizers framed this screening as a “call for greater transparency,” emphasizing the importance of allowing citizens and policymakers alike access to credible evidence of UAP encounters.

The goal is to foster a shift in public perception and to motivate lawmakers to push for systematic reporting and scientific investigation of these phenomena. This event marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing push for openness and accountability related to UFO mysteries, highlighting how the government’s stance is evolving from secrecy to limited disclosure. As the documentary gains attention, it stokes a broader debate about national security, scientific curiosity, and governmental transparency surrounding aerial phenomena that defy current technological understanding.

Dan Farah. Photograph: Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Documentary Content

"The Age of Disclosure" intricately weaves three core elements to build its narrative. First, it showcases a series of declassified videos released by the Department of Defense between 2020 and 2024. These include high-profile clips like the “Gimbal” and “GoFast” videos, which depict unidentified objects performing extraordinary maneuvers that challenge known principles of aerospace physics. Second, the film features interviews with credible witnesses such as military pilots, radar operators, and intelligence analysts, all sharing personal accounts of observing unexplained objects during combat and reconnaissance missions.

Their detailed descriptions lend credibility to the argument that these sightings are real and not fabricated or misreported. Third, aerospace technology scholars contribute contextual analysis, emphasizing that the observed phenomena surpass current human engineering capabilities, thus raising questions about their origin—whether advanced foreign technology or something entirely different. Director Megan Alvarez explained that the documentary’s goal isn’t to prove extraterrestrial life but to stress that government-verified footage exists and warrants serious public discussion. By showcasing this compelling evidence, the film seeks to shift the narrative from skepticism to curiosity and acknowledgment of unexplainable phenomena that demand further scientific exploration.

Pentagon Releases and Official Context

The documentary’s core materials are rooted in the Pentagon’s ongoing transparency efforts, which have gradually declassified and released UAP-related footage since 2020. The initial releases of three Navy-recorded videos marked a turning point, confirming the existence of unexplained aerial objects captured by military sensors and pilots. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) followed up in 2022 with a preliminary assessment acknowledging that that most sightings remain unexplained, emphasizing the need for continued data collection and analysis. This document suggested that some phenomena could pose national security risks, thereby elevating their significance in government priorities. More recently, in August 2025, the Department of Defense released a set of high-resolution infrared recordings obtained through the Advanced Aerial Reconnaissance System (AARS).

These videos display objects that execute maneuvers at speeds and accelerations well beyond known human engineering capabilities, strengthening the case for serious scientific inquiry. While these releases are partial—often heavily redacted—they symbolize an increasing willingness within the government to acknowledge and share evidence. These steps have been praised by some members of Congress for providing potential avenues for research, though critics argue that the redactions hinder full understanding and transparency. Overall, these official disclosures reflect an incremental but pivotal move toward open discussion of UAP phenomena at the highest levels of government.

Political Reaction

The premier of “The Age of Disclosure” on Capitol Hill triggered diverse political responses. Republican Representative James Whitfield of Ohio expressed optimistic support, calling the documentary “a catalyst for accountability” and urging the House Armed Services Committee to convene hearings to scrutinize the ODNI’s findings more thoroughly. His stance underscores a proactive approach to addressing national security implications of UAP reports. On the other side, Democratic Senator Lisa Cheng from California cautioned against jumping to conclusions based solely on visual evidence. She emphasized the importance of proper context and scientific validation, advocating for a bipartisan task force to evaluate the data more comprehensively before any policy shifts occur.

Several of the highly placed officials who appear in the film.

Farah Films/photo by Vincent Wrenn

The event attracted a wide array of attendees, including lawmakers from both parties, defense officials, and scientific experts, reflecting a bipartisan curiosity and concern regarding UAP issues. The timing coincided with debate over the FY2026 defense appropriations bill, in which funding for an expanded UAP research office is expected to be a significant point of discussion. This bipartisan interest indicates a growing recognition of the importance of systematically investigating unidentified aerial phenomena, potentially leading to formal governmental oversight and more sustained inquiry.

Implications for Transparency

While “The Age of Disclosure” does not uncover new classified information, its compilation of existing declassified material and expert testimonials highlights an important shift in U.S. government transparency regarding UAPs. Analysts from the Congressional Research Service note that sustained public pressure and political interest could lead to the establishment of a permanent oversight body—similar to those overseeing emerging technologies like hypersonic weapons—that ensures consistent, transparent monitoring of unexplained phenomena. The film’s emphasis on visual evidence aims to bridge the often vast gap between highly classified briefings and the democratic accountability that citizens and their representatives require.

Advocates hope that increased public access to credible footage and expert analysis will push policymakers to allocate more resources and support for systematic scientific investigation of UAPs. However, questions remain about the scope of future disclosures and whether top officials will fully embrace transparency or continue to withhold sensitive information. Nevertheless, this moment signifies a cultural and political shift—an acknowledgment that mysteries lingering in the sky warrant open discussion, scientific rigor, and potentially, policy action to address the implications of these unexplained phenomena for both national security and human understanding.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ PETER2011 }

25-11-2025 om 23:56 geschreven door peter  

The U.S. government is compelled to investigate reports of UFOs to identify any issues regarding threats to national security. 

(iStock)

"This disturbing incident perfectly illustrates why the UAP issue has gone from fringe to mainstream," Pope said. "Whatever people’s beliefs, this is a serious safety-of-flight matter that demands urgent attention and action."

Pope stressed that simply labeling such encounters "drones" can obscure what might be much more complex.

"‘Drone’ has become a convenient shorthand for anything unexplained that people see in the skies," he said. "So, we really don’t know what we’re dealing with here."

• REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK: MILITARY WHISTLEBLOWERS TESTIFY TO CONGRESS ABOUT UNEXPLAINED UFO ENCOUNTERS

25-11-2025 om 21:28 geschreven door peter  

The US military and other nations around the world allegedly used nuclear weapons to shoot down UFOs and harvest their technology from the crashed remains. 

The shocking claims were made by filmmaker and director Dan Farah, who spent four years secretly interviewing high-level members of the US government and military regarding the existence of extraterrestrials. 

While speaking on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Friday, Farah said he had learned from unnamed sources responsible for the retrieval of these UFOs that nuclear testing carried out in the 1950s was often done to secretly disable alien craft.

'One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing, nuclear weapon testing, has a ripple effect that can down these things,' Farah explained. 

He added that the US military started setting off high altitude nuclear tests to essentially 'shoot fish in a barrel,' a practice that the Russians quickly followed to disable UFOs for their own experiments.

'Which is crazy on multiple levels. A, you could accidentally provoke a nuclear conflict with another party that doesn't know what you're doing. B, you're picking a fight with a more intelligent, superior species,' Farah warned.

The revelations come from his documentary, called The Age of Disclosure, released this month, that allegedly detailed the 80-year global cover-up of alien life and the technology humans have created using pieces of UFOs.

Despite the claims from a plethora of high-ranking government officials, the US government has said proof of alien life has never been found, and the military has added there's 'no verifiable evidence' they've ever recovered an alien spacecraft.

Nuclear testing in the Nevada desert in 1957. Filmmaker Dan Farah said these tests were secretly aimed at disabling UFOs

Dan Farah (Pictured) appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast to promote his new documentary 'The Age of Disclosure'

Farah said the nuclear explosions were deliberately carried out by elements of the US military intelligence community and their peers in foreign military intelligence communities, including the Soviet Union, to capture advanced technology.

However, the film's director and those who were interviewed for the documentary did not provide any physical evidence of extraterrestrial life or a government cover-up to back up their testimonies.

The US Department of Energy (DOE) said in an official report that America carried out 1,054 nuclear bomb tests between 1945 and 1992. Those included several high-altitude detonations, meaning they exploded over 31 miles above Earth.

The potentially catastrophic atomic detonations, many of which took place in the Nevada desert nearly 80 years ago, came after the US military spotted these strange craft appearing over nuclear weapons sites and bomber bases.

'Our defense capabilities and our nuclear progress essentially are being monitored,' Farah told Rogan during the podcast.

In addition to high-altitude atomic tests, the US and other nations detonated hundreds of nuclear weapons underwater during the Cold War, and Farah said this was directly linked to even more sightings of UFOs entering and exiting Earth's oceans.

According to the 2015 report from DOE, at least five of these atomic tests took place in the Pacific Ocean between 1946 and 1962.

'It's like throwing dynamite into the river. Fishing with dynamite. Oh my God, that's so crazy,' Rogan declared. 

An atomic bomb explosion above Bikini Atoll in 1946. Nuclear detonations taking place in the ocean were allegedly done to target UFOs seen entering Earth's oceans

Government whistleblowers and members of Congress alleged that information about the recovery of alien spacecraft has been (Stock Image) 

Both Farah and Rogan referenced recent claims made by Tennessee congressman Tim Burchett, who said US Navy personnel were aware of 'five or six' underwater UFO bases right off the US coast.

Burchett, a member of the House Oversight Committee overseeing UFO reports, has not produced any verifiable physical evidence, such as artifacts or clear footage of these underwater craft, to confirm the existence of alien bases.

Farah said that several US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, revealed the world was now locked in a Cold War to reengineer the alien technology recovered from these ships.

During his interviews, government officials admitted this new, secret Cold War would be far more consequential than the original nuclear arms race.

Members of Congress and the White House revealed in the documentary that the US, Russia, and China were all racing to be the first to fully weaponize non-human tech.

The director of 'The Age of Disclosure' added that certain UFO sightings in space and over sensitive areas are believed to be reverse-engineered human craft that have already been constructed and are still in the testing phase. 

Joe Rogan (Pictured) was visibly stunned after Farah said the US military had alleedly used nuclear weapons to attack UFOs in the 1950s

According to Farah, Rubio was especially worried that China would beat the US in the race to unlock the secrets of alien technology recovered from all around the world.

'He literally says in the film, is If we don't get our act together and take this more seriously as a country, we're going to wake up one day, we're going to find out the hard way that China got there,' Farah recounted from his interview with Rubio.

'We won't know when or how, but to quote him, we will be screwed... His chin buckled when he said it. He was dead serious, and he was super concerned and you could feel it.'

Farah revealed that he had spoken to members of the Trump Administration, and the president has already ordered to current DNI Tulsi Gabbard to investigate the claims presented in the new documentary and find out what's being kept secret from him and former presidents.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

25-11-2025 om 20:49 geschreven door peter  

Skeptical of UAPs and aliens? This new documentary is trying to change your mind

What does the U.S. government know about “unidentified aerial phenomena” (UAPs), aliens and an alleged global alien technology arms race?

A brand-new documentary claims to have an answer: more than it’s telling the public.

On Tuesday, filmmaker Dan Farah and a group of the film’s subjects screened “The Age of Disclosure” at New York City’s Intrepid Museum aboard the decommissioned USS Intrepid aircraft carrier.

The documentary is described by its filmmakers as a look at “an 80-year global cover-up of non-human intelligent life and a secret war among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of non-human origin.” It features interviews with more than 30 “U.S. government, military and intelligence community insiders.”

“This is one of the most important documentaries ever made,” Jay Stratton, a former director of the covert Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, said at the screening, where a number of stars, including “Karate Kid” and “Cobra Kai” star Ralph Macchio and actor Adrian Martinez, were in attendance.

“It will make a huge impact on humanity,” added Stratton, who is featured in the film.

The film, which first premiered at the SXSW Film Festival in March, makes its case through a combination of video evidence taken from various military cameras and firsthand accounts from members of the intelligence community who detail declassified events they claim to have witnessed during their time in military service while either on the ground or flying aircraft.

“These are otherworldly things that are performing maneuvers that haven’t been seen,” U.S. Rep. André Carson, D-Ind., says in the documentary.

Large shapes the size of football fields floating in midair above U.S. nuclear missile sites and aircraft able to travel over 30,000 mph are just a few of the UAPs — a term that the government now favors over the older term “UFOs” — described in their accounts.

While the UAPs they describe often differed in size, shape and movement, they all had one thing in common: The U.S. government had no explanation for what they were or where they were from — or at least not publicly.

The film also alleges the existence of an ongoing arms race between the U.S., Russia and China, set off by the discovery of supposed crashed UAPs, with each nation hoping to be the first to crack into alien technology to reverse-engineer it for human use.

In the documentary, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says there is a bipartisan effort to push for the declassification of government intelligence related to UAPs.

“It’s just not an issue, at least as of yet, in this country, that lends itself to some sort of partisan or ideological divide,” he says in the film.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., have also called for learning more about the government’s investigation into UAPs.

Earlier this year, Burchett introduced the UAP Transparency Act, which aims to require “the President to direct each federal agency to declassify all agency records related to UAP and make such records available on a public website of the agency.”

“We’ve been fighting this battle, some of y’all, for 30 years, and maybe longer,” Burchett said during a House Oversight Committee hearing in September. “The government has something, and they need to turn it over to us.”

At the screening, where some attendees wore alien-themed outfits, Stratton stressed the importance of the documentary’s serious tone, noting the decades of skepticism and public stigma faced by people who speak out about their experiences with UAPs.

Retired Navy Cmdr. David Fravor, whose military aircraft captured video, featured in the film, of his own purported UAP encounter, told the crowd that it takes “a lot of guts” for people to come forward on the record about their experiences.

“Some people claim it would cost them their lives if they spoke out about these things,” Rubio says in the film.

Due to these safety concerns, Burchett said he also introduced the UAP Whistleblower Protection Act “to provide whistleblower protections to Federal personnel for disclosing the use of Federal taxpayer funds to evaluate or research unidentified anomalous phenomenon material.”

Farah, who spent three years making “The Age of Disclosure,” said he hopes the film leads to a national conversation that “puts pressure on the executive branch to reveal the truth” about UAPs and aliens.

“Reach out to your elected representatives,” Stratton also said.

On Friday, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences named “The Age of Disclosure” among the 201 documentaries eligible for Oscar consideration.

It’s now available to rent or buy on Amazon’s Prime Video and is showing in select theaters.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.nbcnews.com/ }

23-11-2025 om 23:51 geschreven door peter  

[VIDEO] NASA Cuts ISS Livestream After Mysterious UFO Flyby – Latest in a Series of Unexplained Sightings

On November 18th, at around 11:04 a.m. U.S. Central Time, NASA’s official International Space Station (ISS) livestream suddenly went offline – right after viewers spotted what appeared to be a bright unidentified flying object gliding past Earth’s horizon.

The short clip, now widely shared online, shows a glowing object moving steadily across the frame, far below the station’s orbit. Just moments later, the ISS feed abruptly cuts to a “technical difficulties” screen, a move that has fueled speculation among UFO enthusiasts and space watchers alike.

While some believe the object could be a reflection, a piece of orbital debris, or even a classified satellite, others are convinced it represents one of the most compelling recent UFO sightings caught by NASA cameras.

This isn’t the first time the ISS livestream has been interrupted after something unusual appeared in view. Over the years, several alleged UFO sightings have been documented by sharp-eyed viewers monitoring the station’s continuous broadcast of Earth from space.

Whether this is a simple technical glitch or another piece of evidence that something mysterious is sharing our skies, one thing is certain: interest in UFO sightings continues to grow, especially when they come from official space sources.

Watch the full video here:

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

23-11-2025 om 23:33 geschreven door peter  

Age of Disclosure and truth about UFOs? Watch trailer here

He personally seems to believe that UAP represent aliens from another world, stating:

… At a base level, the public deserves to know the truth about fundamental facts, like we’re not alone in the universe.

Brian Fedderson, a former director of aviation security at the National Security Council, says:

This [UAP] technology does stuff that we can’t do.

Lots of people who watch the film will have their belief confirmed that the U.S. government is hiding the existence of UFOs. The writers at IMDb, for example, said:

Featuring 34 U.S. government insiders, this explosive documentary reveals an 80-year global coverup of non-human intelligent life and a secret war among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of non-human origin.

But remember … although reveals is a strong word, it’s not the same word as proves.

• See a video interview of six participants

Skepticism about Age of Disclosure

Writers at Wikipedia refer to the premise of the movie as a conspiracy theory. We at EarthSky probably wouldn’t go that far; we think of it more as “confused, but possible.” The movie’s Wikipedia page says on November 23, 2025:

The Age of Disclosure is a 2025 American documentary film by Dan Farah which proposes the conspiracy theory that information regarding the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence has been subject to a decades-long government coverup, and advocates for its declassification and disclosure. The film received mixed reviews from critics and its premise has been rejected by scientists.

• Visit the Age of Disclosure website
• Read an article from The Guardian about Age of Disclosure
• See Age of Disclosure on Prime Video

Scientists react

According to Wikipedia, some scientists reject the premise of the film.

Joshua Semeter, a professor of electrical engineering at Boston University who served on a NASA panel charged with studying classified evidence for the existence of UFOs, stated that:

I have seen no evidence that the government has been hiding anything … testimonies are simply not enough. They need to be backed up with evidence.

Charley Lineweaver, an astronomer and planetologist at Australian National University, said,

The whole film is full of these guys who are not scientists, talking about an issue that I think is very scientific, very very interesting, but it’s just baloney. And I said, gaww …, give me a scientist, please.

However, Avi Loeb of Harvard was more positive, stating:

There are definitely a lot of interesting claims from military personnel, from intelligence agencies. These are serious people, people that are responsible for national security, and they are not easily swayed to claim things that are incorrect or not real, and they say that there are objects we don’t understand … I don’t respond to stories that people tell me, but these stories are very intriguing and if the government does have access to such information, I think they should share it with scientists like myself because my day job is what lies outside the solar system.

Avi Loeb also reacted to the film in a video.

23-11-2025 om 23:25 geschreven door peter  

Los AngelesEen nieuwe documentaire, The Age of Disclosure, brengt een reeks opmerkelijke getuigenissen samen van voormalige hoge Amerikaanse functionarissen en politici. Regisseur Dan Farah werkte drie jaar lang in het geheim aan de productie, waarbij hij enkel mensen interviewde die volgens hem directe kennis hebben van geheime programma’s rond UAP’s (unidentified anomalous phenomena). Het resultaat is een film die stelt dat de Amerikaanse overheid al decennia cruciale informatie over buitenaards leven en technologie achterhoudt.

Critici zijn verdeeld over de vraag of dit iets nieuws biedt – hoewel het zeker boeiend is

(Foto: Farah Films)

Farah, bekend als producent van onder meer Ready Player One, vertelt dat zijn fascinatie voor buitenaards leven begon in zijn jeugd, gevoed door films als E.T. en series als The X-Files. Voor zijn documentaire koos hij bewust voor een onafhankelijke aanpak, zonder grote studio’s of streamingdiensten, om te vermijden dat het project zou worden afgezwakt of sensationeel gemaakt. Hij hield de namen van deelnemers geheim tot de film voltooid was, zodat zij zich veilig genoeg voelden om hun verhaal te doen.

Ook Marco Rubio, de huidige minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, nam deel. 

© epa

De eerste grote doorbraak kwam toen Jay Stratton, een defensiefunctionaris die jarenlang onderzoek deed naar UAP’s, besloot zijn stilte te doorbreken. Hij verklaarde dat hij met eigen ogen niet-menselijke voertuigen en wezens had gezien. Kort daarna volgden andere prominente stemmen, waaronder Luis Elizondo, voormalig Pentagon-official en leider van het Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Ook Marco Rubio, de huidige minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, en Jim Clapper, voormalig directeur van nationale inlichtingen onder Barack Obama, namen deel. Hun deelname gaf de documentaire een aanzienlijke geloofwaardigheid.

Geopolitiek als drijfveer

In totaal leverden 34 personen hun getuigenis, variërend van leden van het Congres tot experts in nationale veiligheid. Zij stellen dat er een systematische desinformatiecampagne bestaat om het publiek te misleiden en dat de VS al decennia bezig is met het analyseren en mogelijk reverse-engineeren van buitenaardse technologie.

In een interview met The Guardian vertelde Farah dat de geopolitieke wapenwedloop om UAP-technolgie te reverse-engineeren één van de belangrijkste redenen achter de vermeende doofpotaffaire. “Je kunt het niet aan je vrienden vertellen zonder het aan je vijanden te vertellen”, klinkt het tijdens het interview. Hij zegt dat deze wedloop escaleerde toen de VS ontdekte dat andere landen, zoals Rusland, UAP-technologie in beslag namen. “Nu zijn we op een punt gekomen waarop de mensen die ons land besturen niet op de hoogte zijn van de feiten. Die mensen zouden op de hoogte moeten zijn van belangrijke informatie zoals deze, die voor ons van groot belang is. En op basisniveau verdient het publiek het om de waarheid te weten over fundamentele feiten, zoals dat we niet alleen zijn in het universum.”

De film opent met een montage van voormalige militairen en inlichtingenfunctionarissen die hun indrukwekkende cv’s opsommen, waarna zij zonder omwegen verklaren dat de mensheid niet alleen is. Sommigen wijzen op de mogelijke voordelen van het begrijpen van UAP-technologie, zoals nieuwe vormen van schone energie. Rubio benadrukt dat het gebrek aan transparantie gevaarlijk kan zijn, omdat vijandige staten mogelijk sneller vooruitgang boeken door de technologie te bestuderen.

“Deze (UAP, nvdr.) technologie doet dingen die wij niet kunnen”, zegt een voormalig directeur luchtvaartbeveiliging bij de Nationale Veiligheidsraad ook in de documentaire. De voormalige hoofdwetenschapper van de Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) beweert ook in de film dat degenen die ervoor moeten zorgen dat er geen informatie over UAP’s uitlekt, “alle middelen zullen gebruiken om mensen ervan te overtuigen dat ze zich niet moeten melden”. Een voormalig defensieambtenaar merkte dan weer op dat als we de technologie die we observeren kunnen begrijpen, dit de deur opent naar tal van “potentieel gunstige effecten, waaronder schone energie”.

Farah ziet zijn documentaire als een poging om het stigma rond UFO’s en UAP’s te doorbreken. Hij stelt dat de sterkste bewijzen niet in beelden of video’s liggen, maar in de bereidheid van geloofwaardige mensen om hun reputatie op het spel te zetten. “Voor veel te lang is het publiek misleid en in het duister gehouden,” zegt hij. “Het is slechts een kwestie van tijd voordat een Amerikaanse president openlijk erkent dat we niet de enige intelligente levensvorm in het universum zijn.”

Het Tijdperk van Openbaring Met Dank aan Het Tijdperk van Openbaring

Getuigenissen als bewijs

In The Age of Disclosure is het duidelijk dat er weinig ruimte is voor tegenstand of scepsis, vooral omdat er in de film geen enkele tegenstander te zien is die als tegenhanger kan dienen voor de vele vastberaden geïnterviewden. En Farah ziet zelf ook geen noodzaak om die stemmen de rode draad van de documentaire te laten vertroebelen. “Ik denk dat wanneer mensen deze film bekijken, ze zullen beseffen dat het stigma rond dit onderwerp volkomen onlogisch en onzinnig is en niet goed is voor de mensheid. We hebben de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap nodig, niet alleen in de Verenigde Staten, maar in elk land, om te accepteren dat dit een reële situatie is. Dat dit een geldig onderzoeksgebied is en dat ze hun denkkracht moeten inzetten om hier meer over te leren en een antwoord te vinden op veel van de grote vragen die nog openstaan”, vertelt Farah nog aan The Guardian.

Getuigenissen zijn uiteindelijk waar de film om draait en het is het enige ‘bewijs’ dat Farah kan bieden. Maar voor hem is dit net overtuigender: Farah gelooft dat het sterkste bewijs bestaat uit “geloofwaardige mensen die hun naam en reputatie op het spel zetten om je te vertellen wat ze weten, met groot risico. Wat video’s en foto’s betreft, merkt de regisseur op dat deze weinig zouden bijdragen aan het ontkrachten van beweringen dat het allemaal een hoax is. “Je zou een foto of een video van het meest buitengewone ding op de cover van een grote nieuwsuitgave of op grote tv-zenders kunnen plaatsen en de helft van de mensheid zou je vertellen dat ze denken dat het AI is of dat het visuele effecten zijn.”

Andere ufo-documentaires die je nu kunt bekijken

Showtime's docuserie "UFO."

Verzorgd door Paramount+

Terwijl je wacht op updates over The Age of Disclosure, zijn hier enkele boeiende UFO-documentaires en docuseries om te bekijken.

• The Phenomenon (2020): Van dezelfde regisseur als The Age of Disclosure, bevat The Phenomenon interviews met regeringsfunctionarissen en NASA-astronauten, samen met archiefbeelden, om geloofwaardig bewijs en inzichten in UFO-verschijnselen te presenteren. Bekijk op Prime Video.
• Investigation Alien (2024): Deze Netflix-docuserie volgt verslaggever George Knapp terwijl hij onderzoek doet naar UFO-waarnemingen en buitenaardse ontmoetingen over de hele wereld. Kijk op Netflix.
• Moment of Contact (2022): Deze documentaire onderzoekt een incident uit 1996 in Varginha, Brazilië, waar inwoners meldden een UFO-neerstorting te hebben gezien en mysterieuze wezens te hebben ontmoet. Bekijk op Apple TV+.
• UFOs: Investigating the Unknown (2023): De vijfdelige serie van National Geographic onderzoekt het geheime Pentagon-programma over Ongeïdentificeerde Luchtfenomenen (UAP's). Bekijk op Hulu.
• UFO (2021): Uitgevoerd door J.J. Abrams, onderzoekt Showtime’s docuserie UFO de fascinatie van mensen voor UFO’s en hoe de overheid, particuliere bedrijven en het leger de waarheid mogelijk verborgen hebben. De serie werd gemaakt nadat het nieuws naar buiten kwam dat het Pentagon al jaren UFO’s volgde. Kijk op Paramount+.

GERELATEERDE VIDEO'S

{ PETER2011 }

23-11-2025 om 22:29 geschreven door peter  

In the world of UFO phenomena, there have always been conspiracies swirling around that run the range from the merely odd to the downright ludicrous. One corner of these UFO conspiracies is the existence of top-secret documents towards which all manner of conspiracies gravitate. These documents might outline UFO secrets, cover-ups, information on alien tech or aliens, and who whole bunch of other secretive things concerning UFOs, but they have always drawn intrigue and mysteries to them, and here we will look at some of these. 

Our first story here revolves around a Russian scientist by the name of Genrikh Mavrikiyevich Ludvig, who was supposedly also an architect, philosopher, and scholar of ancient languages. He was also apparently very at odds with the Stalin regime, which landed him in trouble on more than one occasion, and he was also known for his extensive knowledge of the occult and for his considerable esoteric knowledge. He had a vast knowledge of ancient Sumerian and Etruscan civilizations, and also of medicinal herbs. During World War II, he was purportedly the designer of military technology and also an invaluable pioneer of architectural plans for military bases in marshy environments. Yet, a very curious chapter of this mysterious man’s life was the time when he was allegedly allowed access to the secret Vatican archives and purportedly found all manner of documents and evidence of ancient aliens within.

It is perhaps first important to understand just what the Vatican secret archives actually are. Comprised of approximately 53 miles of labyrinthine aisles of shelving harboring rows upon countless rows of texts, books, and scrolls ranging from the more modern to fragile, time-worn manuscripts reaching back 12 centuries into the shadows of time, the Vatican Archives, officially known as the Archivum Secretum Apostolicum Vaticanum, was originally constructed in 1612 by Pope Paul V and is a truly a huge treasure trove of information collected by the Church over hundreds of years. This vast repository of knowledge holds state papers, Holy See paperwork, papal correspondence and personal letters, and countless historical records, documents and texts accumulated by the Vatican from every corner of the known world that date back to the 8th century, all housed within a massive, carefully climate-controlled structure adjacent to the Vatican Library that is designed more like a fortress than a library, replete with impenetrable underground bunkers and with only one known heavily guarded entrance.

The list of known contents of the archives is far too long to completely cover here, but includes a wealth of historical documents including handwritten letters to the Pope from such important figures such as Mary Queen of Scotts asking for a pardon before her execution, King Henry VIII, Michelangelo asking to be paid for his work on the Sistine Chapel, Abraham Lincoln, Jefferson Davis, Grand Empress Dowager Helena Wang of China in the 17th century, one written on birch bark by the Canadian Ojibwe tribe in 1887, and many, many others. Here, there are official edicts by Popes through the centuries, including excommunications such as that of German religious heretic and founder of Lutheranism, Martin Luther, official papal decrees such as the one made in 1493 by Pope Alexander VI that split the entire known world among Spain and Portugal, as well as personal communications from popes throughout history. Here one can also find such gems as a nearly 200-foot long scroll containing details of the trials of the Knights Templar for heresy and blasphemy dating to 1307, as well as a handwritten transcript detailing the trial of astronomer Galileo Galilei in the 17th century, as well as the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, which states that Mary was conceived without sin, scrawled out on a piece of parchment dating to 1854.

The Vatican Archives are often referred to as the Vatican Secret Archives, mostly due to a mistranslation of the Latin word secretum, which is actually closer in meaning to “personal” or “private” rather than “secret” or “confidential” as many think, but it could also have to do with the archive’s history of strict inaccessibility and reclusiveness from the outside world. They had been for centuries practically completely forbidden and closed off from nearly everyone, even Church officials, with not even Cardinals allowed access to their treasure trove of information, and it was not until 1881 that Pope Leo XIII allowed limited access to outsiders, yet this does little to dispel the secrecy surrounding the archives and it is still no small feat to enter this inner sanctum of all of the Vatican’s knowledge.

To gain access to these isolated archives and islands of knowledge, one must be a qualified, recognized scholar or researcher who has been thoroughly vetted by the Holy See, a process that can take years. Amateur historians, journalists, students, or armchair researchers need not apply and are strictly forbidden. If one is lucky enough to be granted access, they enter through the sole entrance, the well-guarded Porta Sant’Anna, after which they are required to state exactly what it is they are looking for among the voluminous collection. Once entering the rows of dusty old texts, there is no browsing allowed, and you can only retrieve three documents listed in one of the thick, intimidatingly massive catalogs that are meticulously handwritten in Latin or Italian. If you cannot decide what you want to look at within a set amount of time under strict supervision, you are ushered out of the archives and must wait until the following day to try again. Even if you do know what you want to look at, there are still oppressive limitations on what is available for perusal. All materials in the archives are only released for public viewing after a full 75 years have passed, meaning newer documents are restricted, and even then, there are large swaths of archived content that are totally off limits and probably forever will be.

In other words, this isn’t a library open to just anyone, yet in the 1920s, Ludvig was somehow granted access for reasons still left unclear. While there, he supposedly was free to peruse the vast stores of manuscripts on offer, and came across some very bizarre things indeed. He would claim to have come across numerous texts on alchemy and ancient codes, and even stranger still, manuscripts on UFOs and ancient aliens. According to Ludvig, there were texts outlining in detail how aliens had visited Earth many millennia ago and had managed to influence ancient civilizations such as the Egyptians, the Mayans, and the Mesopotamians. Some of the information he claimed to have gotten was about how the Egyptian pyramids were ancient energy machines, and he even said he had found historical records on nuclear weapons being used in ancient times, which had resulted in the melting of the fortress walls of Babylon, as well as plans for alien spacecraft.

None of this was allowed out of the Vatican archives, but Ludvig would apparently somehow get his hands on photographs of some of these documents, and the rest he would commit to memory and later write out as much as he could remember. He would show these to his own students, and apparently, this was enough to get him accused of being a Vatican spy and imprisoned in a gulag concentration camp in 1938. He would eventually be released and continue his work throughout World War II, keeping most of what he had seen in the Vatican to himself during these years, before taking most of it with him to his grave in 1973.

The story of Genrikh Mavrikiyevich Ludvig might have very well been forgotten and confined to the mists of time forever if it had not been discussed by Soviet mathematician Matest M. Agrest in the 1950s, and then later mentioned in the Russian publication Sovershenno Sekretno, in an article by writer and journalist Vladimir Kucharyants. It has since been picked up and much discussed among UFOlogists and ancient astronaut theorists, but one is left to wonder just how real any of this is. It is certain that he indeed was a real person, and was indeed an architect and occultist, but that is about all we know for sure. There is little corroborating evidence and very few sources available on his life, so who was Ludvig really, and did he really gain access to the secret Vatican archives and find all of this amazing information? If so, how did he manage to get photographs out of this veritable fortress of secrecy? One does not just waltz into this place and take photographs of these secretive tomes. How much of this is true and how much is possibly urban legend? There has certainly been some skepticism of the claims, and skeptic Jason Colavito has said of it all:

“Ludvig doesn’t seem to actually have been an ancient astronaut theorist in the 1920s and 1930s. Instead, the article talks about his belief in lost civilizations (the Sumerians, he said, were like a book whose first pages had been pulled out) and that ancient monuments had esoteric spiritual energy. The Pyramids, he said, could be activated with meditation. He spoke of astral projection and ascending to meet God in the spheres beyond earth. In other words, he sounds more like a Theosophist rather than a nuts-and-bolts ancient astronaut theorist, much like his contemporary, the émigré occultist Nicholas Roerich.

The only evidence that he believed in spacemen or that there was a nuclear bombing of Babylon comes from one of his former students, who recalled Ludvig talking of such issues much, much later—in the 1960s, the height of the Soviet ancient astronaut craze, when Matest M. Agrest, Alexander Kasantsev, and I. S. Shklovskii had popularized the idea. So, if I take the evidence at face value, it sounds like Ludvig had typical Theosophical-style esoteric ideas about ancient history in the 1930s and later converted to ancient astronaut beliefs in the 1960s, like many of his generation who saw parallels between the esoteric and ancient astronauts. As for the Vatican material, that is probably a combination of exaggeration, secondhand memory, and wishful thinking based on “interpretations” that the Russian scholar imposed on the source materials—source materials that are conveniently not cited by the only person to claim they existed, a student of his 50 years ago.”

He does make a good point, and considering there are precious few sources for this story and it mostly revolves around the recollections of that one guy, it is left open to speculation as to whether Ludvig ever did make it into the catacombs of the Vatican archives and if so, what he really found there. It is all rather mysterious, and although both the man and the archives are wreathed in myth and legend, it is hard to know on this one where reality and fantasy lie and at what point they merge. It is all a rather interesting tale, nevertheless, and with a lack of any further information, will probably remain lost to history.

Moving along, what has become known as one of the earliest official UFO reports from a commercial airline crew began as a normal flight. On July 23, 1948, chief pilot Clarence Chiles and co-pilot John Whitted took off for a routine 7-hour flight from Houston, Texas, to Atlanta, Georgia, aboard their Eastern Air Lines Douglas DC-3 passenger plane along with twenty passengers. The weather was clear and calm, and both pilots were very experienced, with distinguished flying careers during World War II, so there would have been no reason to think that this would be anything more than a typical, uneventful flight, but this would soon prove not to be the case at all, and it would propel itself into the realm of great UFO mysteries, including a major investigation and lost secret documents.

At approximately 2:45 AM on July 24, the plane was in the skies near Montgomery, Alabama, at an altitude of 5,000 feet when Chiles’ attention was drawn to what he would describe as “a dull red glow above and ahead of the aircraft,” and he mentioned it to Whitted, who also saw it. They at first took it to be a military plane, but it would soon prove to be anything but, as it rapidly closed in on their position with astonishing speed in a horizontal path and silently whizzed by before shooting straight up into the sky while belching forth “a tremendous burst of flame out of its rear.” The proximity of the strange craft had been such that they had been forced to bank in an evasive maneuver, and Chiles would say of the encounter:

"We veered to the left and it veered to its left, and passed us about 700 feet to our right and about 700 feet above us. Then, as if the pilot had seen us and wanted to avoid us, it pulled up with a tremendous burst of flame out of its rear and zoomed up into the clouds."

Both men would get a good look at it, describing it as having been a cigar-shaped metallic object 100 feet long and 25-30 feet in diameter, with no noticeable wings or tail section, and they would explain that they had seen two rows of brightly lit windows along its side. It would turn out that only one of the passengers, most of whom had slept through it all, had seen anything unusual, saying that he had seen an eerie red glow pass the plane. Other witnesses would later turn out to be personnel from Robbins Air Base, near Macon, Georgia, who would claim to have seen the same object shoot through the sky a half an hour before Chiles and Whitted’s encounter.

The plane made it to its destination on schedule, and the pilots wasted no time in reporting what they had seen to the US Air Force, who in turn called in investigators from Project Sign, which was an early Air Force group for studying UFO sightings and sort of a precursor to the more famous Project Blue Book. The pilots were extensively interviewed, and they provided sketches of what they had observed. and it was found that their descriptions were remarkably similar except that Chiles claimed to have seen an actual cockpit on the craft, whereas Whitted had observed no such feature. Project Sign also meticulously mapped every known aircraft in the air for the entire southeastern United States in an effort to see if the object could have perhaps been another plane, but there was nothing else officially in the air at the time that could really explain the bizarre sighting. This, combined with the fact that the two pilot witnesses were seasoned professionals and had gotten a good, close look at the anomalous object, made this a very exciting, albeit alarming incident.

The idea that some large, unidentified flying object of this type had invaded U.S. airspace was a sensitive issue at the time, and so the Air Force was scrambling for answers. It was suggested that this could have possibly been some sort of advanced aircraft from a foreign nation, but this was problematic because the technology was seen as far beyond what anyone was capable of at the time, and nothing like it had been seen before. The detail of the flame shooting out of the rear of the craft was important in this regard because in those days, few aircraft had afterburners, and none of that magnitude. This was more like a rocket, but there was thought to be no conceivable way that such a massive low low-flying, horizontal rocket had been traveling through the area with the technology available at the time and with no discernible launching point.

Other ideas were suggested at the time as well, such as that the pilots had simply misidentified a particularly brilliant meteor, but this does not explain the object’s ability to make a sudden vertical ascent, nor details like the double rows of windows. Project Sign also briefly entertained the idea that this could have been a brush with a Navy plane called the RV6 Constitution, which could have been on a classified mission and was top-of-the-line cutting edge stuff at the time, and also just happened to be cigar shaped, with the characteristic feature of two rows of windows, but it did not spew long jets of flame and certainly could not perform the radical vertical maneuver that was observed. The Navy, for its part, would also deny that this sort of plane had been anywhere near the area at the time.

By all accounts, Project Sign was utterly meticulous and thorough with every aspect of the investigation, leaving no stone unturned and at every turn seeking to exhaust every possible option. In the end, they had completely ruled out the meteor theory and had considered the notion that this had been some experimental aircraft, highly improbable. In light of this, the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) compiled all of its findings into an "Estimate of the Situation" report, which allegedly came to the conclusion that the Chiles-Whitted object was an "interplanetary spaceship." The top secret and highly classified report itself has become almost legendary, partly because it would have been the first time a government had ever conceded that UFOs were actually aliens, but also partly because it would shortly after disappear off the face of the earth and into history and the annals of great conspiracies.

The first head of The Air Force’s famous Project Blue Book study of UFO phenomena, Edward J. Ruppelt, would insist that the report did in fact exist, that it was sent all the way up through the chain of command, to land on the desk of General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, the chief of staff. The result? Well, Vandenberg apparently was skeptical of the estimate that the UFO was of alien origin and doubted the evidence used to back that case up. Rather, he was a proponent of the idea held by another faction within the Air Force that believed that the object, and indeed UFOs in general, were the result of top-secret aircraft being developed by the Soviet Union, which fit in perfectly with the Cold War paranoia at the time. According to Ruppelt, the report would then be totally dismissed and destroyed, saying:

“The general wouldn’t buy interplanetary vehicles. A group from ATIC went to the Pentagon to bolster their position but had no luck, the Chief of Staff couldn’t be convinced. The estimate died a quick death. Some months later it was completely declassified and relegated to the incinerator.”

The mysterious report has gone on to become the stuff of legend in UFOlogy, with occasional witnesses saying that they have seen a copy, but no concrete evidence that it ever even existed at all. There are no photographs of it, no known pages remaining from it; it is a specter lost to the mists of time, only reports of having seen the report up close. In the aftermath of this, the official Air Force verdict was and has remained that what Chiles and Whitted saw was a meteor. Case closed. Of course, in light of the other evidence of Project Sign’s findings on the case, this explanation has been scoffed at and accused of being a weak attempt to obfuscate and blur the real truth, as has the fact that the actual report was apparently disposed of to leave us with nothing.

For their part, Chiles and Whitted would always stand by their account, never once faltering from what they believed was a truly anomalous situation and some sort of unknown craft. To this day, the case is discussed heavily, and it remains a very credible one considering the pedigree of its pilots and the very thorough investigation that came to the conclusion that this might actually be something not of this earth. Yet not everyone obviously agrees, and so we are left with questions. If this wasn't extraterrestrial in origin, then what was it? A meteor, an experimental aircraft, what? Why would this remarkable and mysterious report make it all the way up through the upper echelons of the Air Force brass to merely be brushed aside and destroyed? Doesn't incinerating it suggest they were merely trying to get rid of it? In the end, we don't know what it was, and it is all an intriguing mystery that we very well may never have the true answer to.

Our next case here revolves around the French astronomer, computer scientist, and UFO researcher Jacques Fabrice Vallée, who is one of the important figures in the study of unidentified flying objects, long a proponent of pushing the legitimacy of ufology as a viable scientific pursuit. A legendary icon in the field, he not only increased the legitimacy of the study of UFOs but also pushed at its boundaries, introducing many ideas that were considered groundbreaking in their time, notably the idea of extraterrestrials as interdimensional travelers. He is so important that he was the inspiration for one of the main characters in Stephen Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and his contributions to the field are innumerable. He is also known for uncovering a mysterious lost top-secret document that pointed to a grand conspiracy of the government controlling, twisting, and even fabricating the output of information on the UFO phenomenon.

In the summer of 1967, Vallée was living in the United States, and at the time was tasked with helping astronomer J. Allen Hynek get his documents in order. This is notable in that Hynek was then one of the most recognizable authorities on the UFO subject and had been the top scientific advisor to three UFO studies carried out by the U.S. Air Force, with those being Project Sign (1947–1949), Project Grudge (1949–1951), and Project Blue Book, which he was then overseeing. Indeed, the documents that Vallée was helping to organize were composed of UFO reports under investigation by Project Blue Book. It was apparently quite the task, since Hynek was notoriously disorganized with his files, something Vallée complained about profusely. One day, he unloaded some boxes of Hynek’s files, and as he went through them trying to make some sense of the chaotic mess, he came across a document that was dated 9 January 1953, stamped in red ink “SECRET – Security Information” and signed by a person he would later only refer to as “Pentacle.” What he would find within would change his whole outlook on the UFO phenomenon, shake him to his core, and inspire debate and discussion that has continued to this day.

Among the many revelations allegedly held within what would be called “The Pentacle Memorandum,” perhaps the most shocking had to do with what was called the Robertson Panel. Headed by Howard P. Robertson, a physicist from the California Institute of Technology, and organized in response to a recommendation to the Intelligence Advisory Committee following the Central Intelligence Agency’s own review of Project Blue Book, the Robertson Panel was convened in January, 1953, by a committee of expert scientists who had been asked to consider the UFO phenomenon for the purpose of weighing the threat that such objects might present to national security. These experts included Luis Alvarez, Nobel prize in physics; Lloyd Berkner, space scientist; Sam Goudsmit, nuclear physicist at Brookhaven National Laboratory, and astronomer Thornton Page. Although the Robertson Panel was meant to be an impartial, open discussion on the matter that considered all angles and held nothing back, and this was what the public had been told about it, what Vallée supposedly discovered in this mysterious file cast a sinister light on it all.

According to the Pentacle Memorandum, which was addressed to Miles E. Coll at Wright Patterson Air Force Base and meant for transmittal to Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, the panel of scientists convening for the Robertson Panel was being manipulated and not told the whole story. Not only had a secret study of thousands of UFO reports carried out on behalf of the United States government by an organization called the Battelle Memorial Institute been withheld from them, but under what was referred to as “Project Stork” they were also told in no uncertain terms that, far from an impartial discussion, there were certain things they were not allowed to talk about. This was basically cherry picking and preselecting evidence, which would guide the conclusion the scientists would reach, and they even suggested postponing the Robertson Panel until it could be decided how much information would be made available to the committee. Vallée would write of this to UFO researcher Barry Greenwood:

The greatest implication, which is perhaps not obvious on first reading but which amounts to a scandal of major proportions in the eyes of any scientist, has to do with the outright manipulation of the Robertson panel. Here is a special meeting of the five most eminent scientists in the land, assembled by the government to discuss a matter of national security. Not only are they not made aware of all the data, but another group has already decided "what can and cannot be discussed (Pentacle's own words!)" when they meet. Dr. Hynek categorically stated to me that the panel was not briefed about the Pentacle proposals.

Vallée found that this mysterious Project Stork extended beyond merely manipulating and guiding the Robertson Panel. There was also a plan to exploit areas of supposed high UFO activity to carry out an experiment to secretly and purposefully manufacture UFO phenomena to gather reliable physical data on eyewitness testimony, essentially creating what Vallée would call “a carefully calibrated and monitored simulation of an entire UFO wave.” A portion of the document explains this project:

“We expect that our analysis will show that certain areas in the United States have had an abnormally high number of reported incidents of unidentified flying objects.  Assuming that, from our analysis, several definite areas productive of reports can be selected, we recommend that one or two of theses areas be set up as experimental areas. This area, or areas, should have observation posts with complete visual skywatch, with radar and photographic coverage, plus all other instruments necessary or helpful in obtaining positive and reliable data on everything in the air over the area. A very complete record of the weather should also be kept during the time of the experiment.  Coverage should be so complete that any object in the air could be tracked, and information as to its altitude, velocity, size, shape, color, time of day, etc. could be recorded. All balloon releases or known balloon paths, aircraft flights, and flights of rockets in the test area should be known to those in charge of the experiment. Many different types of aerial activity should be secretly and purposefully scheduled within the area. We recognize that this proposed experiment would amount to a large-scale military maneuver, or operation, and that it would require extensive preparation and fine coordination, plus maximum security. Although it would be a major operation, and expensive, there are many extra benefits to be derived besides the data on unidentified aerial objects.

The question of just what would be accomplished by the proposed experiment occurs. Just how could the problem of these unidentified objects be solved? From this test area, during the time of the experiment, it can be assumed that there would be a steady flow of reports from ordinary civilian observers, in addition to those by military or other official observers. It should be possible by such a controlled experiment to prove the identity of all objects reported, or to determine positively that there were objects present of unknown identity. Any hoaxes under a set-up such as this could almost certainly be exposed, perhaps not publicly, but at least to the military. In addition, by having resulting data from the controlled experiment, reports for the last five years could be re-evaluated, in the light of similar but positive information. This should make possible reasonably certain conclusions concerning the importance of the problem of "flying saucers". Results of an experiment such as described could assist the Air Force to determine how much attention to pay to future situations when, as in the past summer, there were thousands of sightings reported. In the future, then, the Air Force should be able to make positive statements, reassuring to the public, and to the effect that everything is well under control.”

None of this had been revealed to the Robertson panel. Vallée saw all of this as an insidious government plan to spread misinformation and manipulate the truth, to obfuscate the honest search for true answers and mislead the public. He also wondered why the panel hadn’t been briefed on this and whether this was just one small part of a greater conspiracy to obfuscate the truth and construct just what the public knew about UFOs. In his opinion, this revelation potentially posed the threat of causing huge shockwaves in the UFO field and beyond into society itself. Vallée was quite alarmed by all of this and would write:

“Perhaps the Pentacle memo only proves that scientific studies of UFOs (and even their classified components) have been manipulated since the fifties. But it also suggests several avenues of research which are vital to the future of this field: why were Pentacle’s proposals kept from the panel? Were his plans for a secret simulation of UFO waves implemented? If so, when, where and how? What was discovered as a result? Are these simulations still going on? Hynek once assured me that if it ever turned out that a secret study had been conducted, the American public would raise an unbelievable stink against the military and Intelligence community. It would be an outrage, he said, an insult to the whole country, not to mention a violation of the most cherished American principles of democracy. There would be an uproar in Congress, editorials in major scientific magazines, immediate demands for sanctions.”

Making it all even more ominous was that when Hynek found out about the document, he had known nothing of any of this, meaning that Project Bluebook itself was being manipulated. Hynek went to directly confront members of the Battelle study about it, and their reaction was quite volatile. Vallée would say of the incident, “The man I have called Pentacle snatched his notes away and told him in no uncertain terms that the contents of the memo were not to be discussed, under any circumstances. Why should Pentacle worry so much about a simple letter written fifteen years ago?” Indeed, why would they have such a reaction, and what did this mean? All of this disturbed Vallée greatly, and he would later say of the document’s profound effect on him:

“The discovery of the Pentacle document had a major impact on me. It gave me an uncomfortable insight into the practices of government agencies and the high-powered consultants who serve them. It was the main reason for my return to Europe in 1967. It made obvious some unsavoury aspects of scientific policy at the highest level. It provided quite an education for an idealistic young astronomer.”

It would not be until 1992 that word of this secret document came to light for the public, with the release of Valee’s four-volume series titled Forbidden Science. Not long after this, a purported leaked copy of the Pentacle Memorandum came into the possession of UFO researchers, and Vallee would confirm that this was the very same document he had seen back in 1967. The document would ultimately end up hitting the public with a whimper, not creating nearly the sort of uproar that Vallée had been expecting. Most people just didn’t really seem to care all that much. Even within UFO circles, it got a mixed response, with some sharing Vallée’s alarmist and paranoid interpretation, while others said the document was not particularly significant in the grand scheme of things. Still others took the more extreme stance that the document “proved” that the government was behind the whole UFO phenomenon, and that there were no aliens or spaceships, just a large-scale psi-ops scheme. All of these various interpretations have managed to make the Pentacle Memorandum a controversial and much-debated document right up to the present, with no general agreement on what it all means or what implications it might have. It remains an odd footnote in the history of ufology that we may never truly understand for certain, its ultimate implications unknown to us.

In our last case here, we delve into the world of hacking and stumble across strange documents. Born in 1966, from an early age, Scottish-born Gary McKinnon had been interested in computers, getting his first computer and learning to use it on his own at the age of 14. Later, inspired by movies such as WarGames and the book The Hacker's Handbook by Hugo Cornwall, McKinnon began to become more and more enthralled with the world of hacking, to the point that he became absolutely obsessed with it. He found himself spending more and more time shirking his duties as a systems administrator for a small business in order to pursue his passion for hacking, and this obsession led to him losing his job. It did not bother him much at the time, as this just allowed him to devote more time to what he really wanted to do, all while he crashed at the house of his girlfriend's aunt in London and delved deeper into what he was capable of. Calling himself by the hacker name “Solo,” for a while, it was all sort of a hobby and addictive game for him, but then it would careen into what has been called “the biggest military computer hack of all time,” leading McKinnon down a dark rabbit hole of secret military projects, documents, aliens, and UFOs.

By the late 1990s, McKinnon had been drawn more and more towards looking for evidence of government cover-ups of all kinds, and decided to use his hacking skills to look for it, once saying, “I hate conspiracy theories, so I thought I'd find out for myself.” He became utterly devoted and further obsessed with this mission, spending all of his time snooping through government and military files and systems, to the point that it absolutely consumed him. Additionally, this was all far from legal. He said of this crusade to throw the veil off of secrecy:

“I am not blind to criminality, but I was on a moral crusade. I was convinced, and there was good evidence to show, that certain secretive parts of the American government intelligence agencies did have access to crashed extra-terrestrial technology which could, in these days, save us in the form of a free, clean, pollution-free energy. I thought if someone is holding onto that, that is unconstitutional under American law. I didn't think about jail sentences at the time. I'd stopped washing at one point. I wasn't looking after myself. I wasn't eating properly. I was sitting around the house in my dressing gown, doing this all night.”

According to him, he was digging up all manner of weirdness in the process, and one of the weirdest of these was evidence of what he describes as some sort of secret space force. He stumbled across this while looking into NASA and U.S. Space Command files after hearing of a conspiracy that they were holding UFOs at the Johnson Space Center. Not content to just discuss conspiracies about it, he began hacking into NASA to see for himself, and it would turn out to be shocking and very weird. McKinnon would say of this in an interview with Wired:

“A NASA photographic expert said that there was a Building 8 at Johnson Space Center where they regularly airbrushed out images of UFOs from the high-resolution satellite imaging. I logged on to NASA and was able to access this department. They had huge, high-resolution images stored in their picture files. They had filtered and unfiltered, or processed and unprocessed, files. My dialup 56K connection was very slow trying to download one of these picture files. As this was happening, I had remote control of their desktop, and by adjusting it to 4-bit color and low screen resolution, I was able to briefly see one of these pictures. It was a silvery, cigar-shaped object with geodesic spheres on either side. There were no visible seams or riveting. 

There was no reference to the size of the object, and the picture was taken presumably by a satellite looking down on it. The object didn't look manmade or anything like what we have created. Because I was using a Java application, I could only get a screenshot of the picture -- it did not go into my temporary internet files. At my crowning moment, someone at NASA discovered what I was doing and I was disconnected. I also got access to Excel spreadsheets. One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." Yeah, I looked it up and it's nowhere. It doesn't mean little green men. What I think it means is not earth-based. I found a list of 'fleet-to-fleet transfers', and a list of ship names. I looked them up. They weren't US navy ships. What I saw made me believe they have some kind of spaceship, off-planet. It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air Force personnel who are not registered anywhere else. It also contained information about ship-to-ship transfers, but I've never seen the names of these ships noted anywhere else.”

McKinnon claims that this space program is called “Solar Warden,” in operation since 1980, and every bit as bizarre as you might imagine. He says that it acts as a sort of interplanetary border control to protect against aliens that would do us harm, and that it is under control of the US Naval Network and Space Operations Command (NNSOC),  and through his snooping around, he was able to glean a surprising amount of detail on the program. He claims that Solar Warden has at its disposal eight massive cigar-shaped motherships longer than several football fields, 43 small "scout ships” and various other flying objects, as well as advanced beam weaponry, all of it derived from reverse-engineered alien technology tested at secret bases, including the infamous Area 51 in Nevada. It sounds absurd, but McKinnon swears it is true and has never backed down from his story. In addition to Solar Warden, he also uncovered images of UFOs in the atmosphere and various other information on aliens and UFOs, as well as documents called “The Disclosure Project,” which supposedly contain reams of testimony from high-level sources on the existence of such things, and of which he has said:

“There is The Disclosure Project. This is a book with 400 testimonials from everyone from air traffic controllers to those responsible for launching nuclear missiles. Very credible witnesses. They talk about reverse-engineered technology taken from captured or destroyed alien craft. There are some very credible, relied-upon people, all saying yes, there is UFO technology, there's anti-gravity, there's free energy, and it's extraterrestrial in origin and they've captured spacecraft and reverse engineered it.”

Unfortunately, he was never able to get too far into it, as all of this was highly illegal, and it eventually caught up with him. In 2002, McKinnon was arrested at his flat in Wood Green, north London, and accused of hacking into 97 United States military and NASA computers over a 13-month period between February 2001 and March 2002, much of it allegedly causing a lot of damage in the process. For instance, he is accused of altering or deleting critical files from operating systems, rendering important systems inoperable, copying data, account files, and passwords, interfering with military operations, compromising sensitive and classified data, and leaving threatening messages, all of which was according to officials “intentional and calculated to influence and affect the US government by intimidation and coercion." Considering that this all happened directly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. government took this very seriously and made aggressive moves to have him extradited to face trial there, something which could mean up to 70 years in prison for McKinnon. So far, there have been endless appeals and judicial reviews, meaning that he has yet to face these charges on American soil, and likely never will, although extradition efforts have been ongoing.

We are left to wonder just what he really found while breaking all sorts of laws. Did he really see top-secret government files pertaining to aliens and UFOs, and more importantly, did he really uncover evidence of some space force using alien technology? There have been plenty of people and so-called "whistleblowers" making similar claims, so what are we to make of this? He has not provided one shred of concrete evidence, and his detractors have pointed out that he was high on weed most of the time he was hacking, so is this all just tall tales? McKinnon is definitely in deep doo doo with the American government, but whether any of that has anything to do with aliens and UFO space programs remains to be seen.

This has only been a sampling of the many mysterious, classified documents swirling about the UFO field, and there have been many other purported documents just like them. We are left to wonder, do they really exist, and if so, just what is the extent of the secret information contained within them? We may never know for sure, their secrets locked away from the public eye, but that will never stop the conspiracies from coming, or people digging around to find the true answers. 

 { https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

23-11-2025 om 00:00 geschreven door peter  

Among UFO doc's revelations: Russia recovered nonhuman 'Tic Tac' craft | Elizabeth Vargas Reports

Overview

A new documentary, The Age of Disclosure, has ignited fresh debate over the global race to recover and reverse-engineer unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), commonly known as UFOs. The film, which features interviews with high-ranking officials from the United States and abroad, presents claims of an international arms race to unlock the technology behind non-human craft—allegedly including a “Tic Tac”-shaped vehicle recovered by Russia in 1989. The revelations are part of an 80-year narrative of secrecy, cover-ups, and intense competition among world powers.

Global Arms Race for Alien Technology

According to the documentary’s director, Dan Farah, the U.S. is not alone in deploying specialized teams to recover downed extraterrestrial craft. “We’re in a secret arms race,” Farah told host Elizabeth Vargas, describing ongoing efforts by the United States, Russia, and China to retrieve and study non-human technology. The documentary cites U.S. intelligence officials who assert that “China and Russia both have retrieved alien spacecraft,” with Russia’s 1989 recovery of a large Tic Tac-shaped craft highlighted as a pivotal event. This craft was reportedly even larger than the now-famous object encountered by the U.S. Navy’s Nimitz Carrier Strike Group in 2004.

Officials interviewed in the film argue that the first country to successfully reverse-engineer such technology would secure “the leader[ship] for years to come,” likening the stakes to a new Manhattan Project—“the atomic weapon on steroids.” The documentary suggests the technology could include directed-energy weapons and propulsion systems capable of changing the balance of global power.

High-Level Testimony and Secrecy

What sets The Age of Disclosure apart is its roster of interviewees: former secretaries of state, sitting senators, former directors of national intelligence, Pentagon brass, and senior officials from the CIA, Air Force, and Navy. Farah underscores the credibility of these sources, stating, “These are 34 extremely high-level military, government, and intelligence officials… people who have been entrusted with very high-level security clearances.” The documentary details how, for decades, “legacy crash retrieval programs” operated in secrecy, with multi-agency teams tasked to recover and analyze non-human technology.

Farah reveals that these programs were designed to be even more secretive than the Manhattan Project, responding to earlier security leaks by imposing stricter controls. He asserts that the U.S. Air Force, CIA, Department of Energy, and military contractors all played roles in these covert efforts, with similar units active in Russia and China.

Extraordinary Claims: Non-Human Beings and Government Deliberations

Among the most startling claims in the documentary are testimonies from two astrophysicists and intelligence officials stating that the U.S. government has recovered “at least two different alien species.” One official recounts an incident where “not human beings exited a craft and interacted with members of the Air Force and the CIA” at a U.S. military base. While the film acknowledges the extraordinary nature of these accounts, it emphasizes their source: figures with decades of experience at the highest levels of government.

The documentary also reveals a little-known episode from the administration of President George W. Bush, where cabinet officials reportedly “convened a meeting and debated for days” whether to disclose the existence of these programs and technologies to the public. Ultimately, the decision was made to maintain secrecy, continuing a legacy of non-disclosure that, according to the film, spans more than eight decades.

A Unified but Controversial Assertion

Despite the political and ideological diversity of the documentary’s sources, Farah notes a rare consensus: “They’re aligned on this—such 34 senior officials sharing one truth.” While the claims remain controversial and, for many, difficult to accept, The Age of Disclosure raises profound questions about transparency, global security, and humanity’s place in the universe. As lawmakers from both parties call for greater openness on UAPs, the documentary’s revelations are likely to fuel ongoing debate in Washington and beyond.

{ https://usubjects.com/  }

22-11-2025 om 18:23 geschreven door peter  

Overview

A recent YouTube video posted by Jesse Michels, a self‑identified former intelligence analyst, has ignited a fresh wave of discussion on the r/StrangeEarth subreddit. In the clip, Michels claims to possess “explosive insights” into unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) that he says point to a sustained government cover‑up and the existence of non‑human intelligence. The video quickly gathered attention, prompting Reddit users to debate the credibility of the allegations, the potential implications for ongoing UAP hearings, and the broader conversation about alleged suppressed evidence of alien technology.

The Video and Its Claims

Michels’ presentation, which runs just under ten minutes, blends excerpts from declassified documents, alleged insider testimonies, and personal observations. He asserts that a series of recent sightings—particularly those recorded by naval pilots and commercial airliners—contain data that the U.S. government has deliberately withheld from the public. Among the most striking points he raises are references to “high‑frequency telemetry signatures” that, according to him, cannot be produced by known aerospace platforms. Michels also alludes to a “closed‑door briefing” he attended in 2022, where senior officials discussed the strategic implications of advanced propulsion technologies that appear to defy conventional physics. No independent verification of these briefings or the telemetry data has been provided, and the video contains no direct links to the primary sources he cites.

Community Reaction

Redditors responded with a mix of curiosity and skepticism. Several users highlighted the timing of the video, noting that it coincides with the U.S. Senate’s bipartisan UAP hearing scheduled for later this month. “If there really is new evidence, now would be the time to bring it to Congress,” one commenter wrote, urging transparency. Others cautioned against “hype‑driven speculation,” pointing out that past UFO claims have often resurfaced without substantive proof. A frequent theme was the call for “hard data” – radar logs, sensor readouts, or authenticated documents – to move the conversation beyond anecdote. Some participants referenced the Pentagon’s 2021 release of three Navy videos, arguing that while those clips confirmed anomalous sightings, they did not substantiate the more extraordinary claims made by Michels.

Broader Context

The resurgence of public interest in UAPs follows a series of official steps taken by the U.S. government over the past three years. In 2020, the Department of Defense established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, later succeeded by the All‑Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) in 2022. Congressional committees have held multiple hearings, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a preliminary assessment in June 2021 that documented 144 incidents, many of which remained unexplained. Michels’ video taps into a growing narrative among fringe researchers that these institutional efforts are merely a façade, designed to “manage the narrative” while withholding transformative technology. Academic circles, however, remain cautious, emphasizing the need for peer‑reviewed analysis before drawing conclusions about extraterrestrial involvement.

Next Steps and Outlook

While the video has amplified discussion on platforms like Reddit, it has not yet prompted formal inquiries from governmental bodies. Analysts suggest that any credible new evidence would likely be presented to the upcoming Senate hearing, where lawmakers have signaled a willingness to request classified briefings. In the meantime, experts advise the public to await verification from reputable sources, such as the AARO or independent scientific institutions, before accepting Michels’ assertions. As the UAP debate continues to evolve, the balance between open inquiry and rigorous evidence remains the critical yardstick for separating legitimate discovery from speculation.

{  https://usubjects.com/  }

21-11-2025 om 21:41 geschreven door peter