Kan een afbeelding zijn van 2 mensen

Kan een afbeelding zijn van 2 mensen en gelato

Carl Sagan Space GIF by Feliks Tomasz Konczakowski

X Files Ufo GIF by SeeRoswell.com

1990: Petit-Rechain, Belgium triangle UFO photograph - Think AboutIts

Ufo Pentagon GIF

ufo abduction GIF by Ski Mask The Slump God

Flying Sci-Fi GIF by Feliks Tomasz Konczakowski

Season 3 Ufo GIF by Paramount+

DEAR VISITOR,


MY BLOG EXISTS NEARLY 13 YEARS AND 8  MONTH.

ON 17/03/2025 MORE THAN 2.600.110

VISITORS FROM 135 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.

THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 500 GUESTS PER DAY.

THANK YOU FOR VISITING  MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.


Goodbye
PETER2011

De bronafbeelding bekijken

De bronafbeelding bekijken

Beste bezoeker, bedankt voor uw bezoek.

Dear visitor, thank you for your visit.

Cher visiteur, je vous remercie de votre visite.

Liebe Besucher, vielen Dank für Ihren Besuch.

Estimado visitante, gracias por su visita.

Gentile visitatore, grazie per la vostra visita.

Inhoud blog
  • Zwarte Driehoek UFO's, Topgeheime Technologie of Bewijs van Aliënbezoeken?
  • This Man’s Mind-Blowing but Controversial Theory Says Ancient Humans Heard Gods’ Voices and Treated Dead as Alive Because of a ‘Bicameral’ Mind
  • NASA's Top 5 Technical Challenges Countdown: #4: Improved Navigation
  • Three Alleged International UFO Crashes
  • Congress Requires Pentagon to Address UFO Disinformation
  • Pentagon’s UFO Program confusion and how the New York Times got it wrong
  • Huge Luminous Bar of Light Captured on Video Over Spokane Valley, Washington
  • Open Minds UAP News: Where do we go from here?
  • Orb Over Tri Cities, Washington USA On June 7, 2025, UFO UAP Sighting News.
  • I recorded the moon and found some unusual structures of massive proportions, UFO UAP Sighting News.
  • The classified truth: Mars' origins traced to lost planet Maldek
  • James Webb telescope unveils largest-ever map of the universe, spanning over 13 billion years
  • 'Hard landing': Japanese spacecraft carrying Europe's first moon rover has likely been destroyed, company says
  • ispace's Resilience Lander Proves the Moon is Still a Tough Customer
  • NASA's Top 5 Technical Challenges Countdown: #5: High-Powered Robotics
  • I found evidence of a pre-historic American Indian culture dating back to 900-1200AD, but...can I save it? Utah Discovery News.
  • UFO Disk Over Douliu, Taiwan On June 5, 2025, UAP Sighting News.
  • AI analysis suggests Dead Sea Scrolls are older than scientists thought, but not all experts are convinced
  • The Global Serpent: Why Snake Symbolism Appears in Every Ancient Culture
  • Could There Have Been a Civilization Before the Ice Age?
    Categorieën
  • ALIEN LIFE, UFO- CRASHES, ABDUCTIONS, MEN IN BLACK, ed ( FR. , NL; E ) (3444)
  • André's Hoekje (ENG) (745)
  • André's Snelkoppelingen (ENG) (383)
  • ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr ) (1846)
  • ARTICLES of MUFON ( ENG) (455)
  • Artikels / PETER2011 (NL EN.) (167)
  • ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART (12777)
  • Before it's news (ENG.) (5703)
  • Belgisch UFO-meldpunt / Frederick Delaere ( NL) (16)
  • Diversen (Eng, NL en Fr) (4251)
  • FILER FILES - overzicht met foto's met dank aan Georges Filer en WWW.nationalUFOCenter.com (ENG) (929)
  • Frederick's NEWS ITEMS (ENG en NL) (112)
  • HLN.be - Het Laatste Nieuws ( NL) (1700)
  • INGRID's WEETJES (NL) (6)
  • Kathleen Marden 's News about Abductions... ( ENG) (33)
  • LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG) (10829)
  • Michel GRANGER - a French researcher ( Fr) (19)
  • MYSTERIES ( Fr, Nl, E) (2095)
  • MYSTERIES , Complot Theories, ed ( EN, FR, NL ) (409)
  • Myths, legends, unknown cultures and civilizations (57)
  • National UFO Center {NUFOC} (110)
  • News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG ) (6049)
  • NIEUWS VAN JAN ( NL) (42)
  • Nieuws van Paul ( NL) (17)
  • NineForNews. nl ( new ipv NIBURU.nl) (NL) (3712)
  • Oliver's WebLog ( ENG en NL) (118)
  • Paul SCHROEDER ( ENG) (98)
  • Reseau Francophone MUFON / EUROPE ( FR) (87)
  • références - MAGONIE (Fr) (486)
  • Ruins, strange artifacts on other planets, moons, ed ( Fr, EN, NL ) (590)
  • SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL ) (788)
  • UFO DIGEST / a Weekly Newsletter - thanks that I may publish this on my blog (ENG) (125)
  • UFOs , UAPs , USOS (3135)
  • Vincent'snieuws ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Who is Stanton FRIEDMAN - follow his news (ENG) (16)
  • WHO IS WHO? ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Zoeken in blog

    Beoordeel dit blog
      Zeer goed
      Goed
      Voldoende
      Nog wat bijwerken
      Nog veel werk aan
     

    The purpose of  this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and  free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category.
    Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
     

    Archief per maand
  • 06-2025
  • 05-2025
  • 04-2025
  • 03-2025
  • 02-2025
  • 01-2025
  • 12-2024
  • 11-2024
  • 10-2024
  • 09-2024
  • 08-2024
  • 07-2024
  • 06-2024
  • 05-2024
  • 04-2024
  • 03-2024
  • 02-2024
  • 01-2024
  • 12-2023
  • 11-2023
  • 10-2023
  • 09-2023
  • 08-2023
  • 07-2023
  • 06-2023
  • 05-2023
  • 04-2023
  • 03-2023
  • 02-2023
  • 01-2023
  • 12-2022
  • 11-2022
  • 10-2022
  • 09-2022
  • 08-2022
  • 07-2022
  • 06-2022
  • 05-2022
  • 04-2022
  • 03-2022
  • 02-2022
  • 01-2022
  • 12-2021
  • 11-2021
  • 10-2021
  • 09-2021
  • 08-2021
  • 07-2021
  • 06-2021
  • 05-2021
  • 04-2021
  • 03-2021
  • 02-2021
  • 01-2021
  • 12-2020
  • 11-2020
  • 10-2020
  • 09-2020
  • 08-2020
  • 07-2020
  • 06-2020
  • 05-2020
  • 04-2020
  • 03-2020
  • 02-2020
  • 01-2020
  • 12-2019
  • 11-2019
  • 10-2019
  • 09-2019
  • 08-2019
  • 07-2019
  • 06-2019
  • 05-2019
  • 04-2019
  • 03-2019
  • 02-2019
  • 01-2019
  • 12-2018
  • 11-2018
  • 10-2018
  • 09-2018
  • 08-2018
  • 07-2018
  • 06-2018
  • 05-2018
  • 04-2018
  • 03-2018
  • 02-2018
  • 01-2018
  • 12-2017
  • 11-2017
  • 10-2017
  • 09-2017
  • 08-2017
  • 07-2017
  • 06-2017
  • 05-2017
  • 04-2017
  • 03-2017
  • 02-2017
  • 01-2017
  • 12-2016
  • 11-2016
  • 10-2016
  • 09-2016
  • 08-2016
  • 07-2016
  • 06-2016
  • 05-2016
  • 04-2016
  • 03-2016
  • 02-2016
  • 01-2016
  • 12-2015
  • 11-2015
  • 10-2015
  • 09-2015
  • 08-2015
  • 07-2015
  • 06-2015
  • 05-2015
  • 04-2015
  • 03-2015
  • 02-2015
  • 01-2015
  • 12-2014
  • 11-2014
  • 10-2014
  • 09-2014
  • 08-2014
  • 07-2014
  • 06-2014
  • 05-2014
  • 04-2014
  • 03-2014
  • 02-2014
  • 01-2014
  • 12-2013
  • 11-2013
  • 10-2013
  • 09-2013
  • 08-2013
  • 07-2013
  • 06-2013
  • 05-2013
  • 04-2013
  • 03-2013
  • 02-2013
  • 01-2013
  • 12-2012
  • 11-2012
  • 10-2012
  • 09-2012
  • 08-2012
  • 07-2012
  • 06-2012
  • 05-2012
  • 04-2012
  • 03-2012
  • 02-2012
  • 01-2012
  • 12-2011
  • 11-2011
  • 10-2011
  • 09-2011
  • 08-2011
  • 07-2011
  • 06-2011
    Rondvraag / Poll
    Bestaan UFO's echt? Are UFOs real?Les OVNIS existent-ils vraiement?
    Ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / Non
    Bekijk resultaat

    Rondvraag / Poll
    Denk Jij dat UFO's buitenaards zijn? Do You think that UFOs are extraterrestrial? Les OVNIS sont- ils ET?
    ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / NON
    Bekijk resultaat

    E-mail mij

    Druk oponderstaande knop om mij te e-mailen.

    Blog als favoriet !
    FORUM

    Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum

    Zoeken in blog

    Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.

    In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!

    In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.

    BEDANKT!!!

    Een interessant adres?
    UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
    UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
    Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie! Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek! België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch. Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen! Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie. Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen. Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek! Blijf Op De Hoogte! Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren! Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
    08-06-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Zwarte Driehoek UFO's, Topgeheime Technologie of Bewijs van Aliënbezoeken?

    An illustration of a Black Triangle UFO With lights. Depositphotos.

    Een illustratie van een zwart driehoek UFO met lichten.

    Depositphotos.

    Zwarte Driehoek UFO's, Topgeheime Technologie of Bewijs van Aliënbezoeken?

    Inleiding

    De laatste decennia is er een groeiende interesse in zogenaamde "Black Triangle UFO’s", mysterieuze driehoekige vliegende objecten die regelmatig worden gemeld. Deze waarnemingen worden gekenmerkt door hun grote afmetingen, driehoekige vorm en vaak stil of traag bewegend gedrag. Ze worden wereldwijd gerapporteerd, vooral in Noord-Amerika, Europa en Rusland. Hoewel sommige waarnemingen mogelijk kunnen worden verklaard door militaire technologie, blijven veel gevallen onverklaard, wat de nieuwsgierigheid en speculaties aanwakkert over buitenaardse betrokkenheid.

    De geschiedenis van deze fenomenen gaat terug tot de jaren 1980, met prominente incidenten zoals de "Belgische mysterieuze driehoeken" in de jaren 1990, waarbij honderden getuigen de objecten zagen. Verschillende theorieën zijn geopperd: van geheime militaire experimenten en stealth-technologie tot buitenaardse voertuigen. Sommige onderzoekers suggereren dat deze objecten mogelijk geavanceerde, niet-openbare technologieën vertegenwoordigen die door overheden worden getest, terwijl anderen geloven dat ze bewijs zijn van buitenaardse bezoeken.

    Wetenschappelijk standpunt blijft voorlopig terughoudend. Er worden uitgebreide onderzoeken gedaan, maar concluderen dat er geen definitief bewijs is voor buitenaardse oorsprong. Desalniettemin blijven de Black Triangle UFO’s een intrigerend fenomeen dat vragen oproept over technologische vooruitgang en de mogelijkheid van andere levensvormen in het universum. Het onderwerp blijft een boeiend gebied voor zowel wetenschappers als enthousiaste waarnemers.

    Definitie en Kenmerken van Black Triangle UFOs

    Black Triangle UFOs worden gekenmerkt door hun opvallende driedimensionale driehoeksvorm, meestal zwart of donker van kleur. Ze worden vaak op lage hoogten gezien en vertonen een indrukwekkende combinatie van stilstand en beweging. Een kenmerkend aspect is dat ze vaak stil of met een geruisloos geluid worden waargenomen, hoewel sommige meldingen wijzen op lage, mechanische geluiden. Onder de onderkant van deze objecten worden vaak felle lichten waargenomen, die soms verschillende kleuren kunnen vertonen of in bepaalde patronen knipperen.

    Een ander opvallend kenmerk van Black Triangle UFOs is hun complexe en onvoorspelbare beweging. Ze kunnen stil hangen, scherpe bochten maken, plotseling versnellen of traag bewegen, en lijken soms ongebruikelijke wervelingen of rotaties te vertonen. Dit geeft de indruk dat ze over geavanceerde technologie beschikken die ons nog onbekend is. Vaak worden ze waargenomen in gebieden met weinig lichtvervuiling, en de meldingen worden meestal gedaan door waarnemers die de objecten op korte afstand zien, waardoor de details beter zichtbaar zijn.

    De meeste incidenten met Black Triangle UFOs dateren uit de late jaren 1980 en de jaren 1990. Vooral tussen 1989 en 1995 werden er talrijke meldingen gedaan, vooral in Noord-Amerika en Europa. Sommige van deze waarnemingen werden zelfs bevestigd door radar en andere meetinstrumenten, wat de mysterieuze aard van deze fenomenen versterkt. Ondanks talloze getuigenverklaringen en officiële rapporten blijft de herkomst en de technologie achter deze objecten onduidelijk, wat bijdraagt aan de speculaties over buitenaardse of geheime militaire oorsprong.

    Kortom, Black Triangle UFOs vormen een intrigerend fenomeen dat zich onderscheidt door hun grote driehoekige vorm, donkere kleur, lage vlieghoogte, stille beweging en complexe manoeuvres. Ze blijven een bron van speculatie en onderzoek, en roepen vragen op over de technologische capaciteiten en mogelijke doelen van deze mysterieuze objecten.

    Geschiedenis van de waarnemingen

    De geschiedenis van de waarnemingen van Black Triangle UFOs is rijk en fascinerend, met een lange geschiedenis die teruggaat tot de late jaren tachtig. Deze mysterieuze driehoekige objecten worden gekenmerkt door hun grote afmetingen, opvallende vorm en vaak hun stille, glijdende bewegingen aan de hemel. De eerste uitgebreide documentatie van dergelijke waarnemingen kwam vooral in de jaren tachtig en negentig naar voren, met enkele opvallende incidenten die tot op heden voor veel discussie zorgen.

    Een van de meest gerenommeerde en invloedrijke gebeurtenissen in de geschiedenis van Black Triangle UFO's was de zogenaamde "Belgian Wave." Deze gebeurtenis vond plaats tussen 1989 en 1990 in België en betekende een keerpunt in de UFO-onderzoeken. Tijdens deze periode meldden honderden mensen het zien van grote, driehoekige objecten die zich geruisloos en langzaam door de lucht bewogen. Wat deze waarnemingen bijzonder maakte, was niet alleen de frequentie ervan, maar ook de consistentie in de beschrijvingen: de objecten hadden meestal een driehoekige vorm, vaak met meerdere lichten die op de hoeken en soms in het midden van het object brandden. Verschillende waarnemingen werden ondersteund door radarbeelden en foto- en videomateriaal, wat de geloofwaardigheid van de meldingen versterkte. De Belgische overheid en diverse UFO-onderzoeksgroepen onderzochten deze incidenten grondig, zonder dat er tot op heden een definitieve verklaring is gegeven.

    Naast de Belgische incidenten was er in de Verenigde Staten een vergelijkbare gebeurtenis die bekendstaat als de "Phoenix Lights" in 1997. Tijdens deze gebeurtenis werden duizenden mensen getuige van een enorme, driehoekige formatie die in de lucht verscheen boven Phoenix, Arizona. De objecten werden beschreven als groot, donker en stil, en bewogen zich in een vloeiende beweging zonder geluid. Ook hier werden het fenomeen vastgelegd op fotografie en videobeelden, wat de speculaties over buitenaardse oorsprong verder aanwakkerde. Hoewel de Amerikaanse autoriteiten aanvankelijk beweerden dat het om militaire oefenvliegtuigen ging, bleef het publieke debat over de ware aard van de waarnemingen bestaan.

    In de loop der jaren werden dergelijke waarnemingen wereldwijd gerapporteerd, vaak met vergelijkbare kenmerken: grote afmetingen, driehoekige vorm, stilzwijgend en geruisloos vliegend, en vaak in de schemering of nacht. Wetenschappers en UFO-onderzoekers speculeren over de mogelijke oorsprong van deze objecten. Sommigen geloven dat het gaat om geavanceerde technologieën van de mens, mogelijk geheime militaire projecten, terwijl anderen denken aan buitenaardse voertuigen die ons bezoeken.

    Image

    De geschiedenis van Black Triangle UFO's blijft dus een boeiend en onopgelost mysterie. Wat deze waarnemingen uniek maakt, is niet alleen de consistentie in vorm en gedrag, maar ook de omvang en de vele getuigenissen die het fenomeen ondersteunen. Tot op heden blijven onderzoekers zich inzetten om meer inzicht te krijgen in deze verschijnselen, met hoop dat toekomstige technologieën en onderzoeksmethoden meer duidelijkheid zullen brengen over de ware aard van deze mysterieuze objecten.

    Wetenschappelijke benadering en verklaringen

    De fenomenen rondom zogenaamde “Black Triangle UFOs” zijn de laatste decennia onderwerp van intensief onderzoek en discussie binnen de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap. Hoewel er geen definitieve verklaring bestaat voor alle waarnemingen, hebben onderzoekers verschillende hypotheses voorgesteld, gebaseerd op zowel natuurlijke als menselijke oorzaken, evenals op meer speculatieve theorieën over buitenaardse aanwezigheid en geavanceerde technologieën. In dit overzicht wordt een systematische en volledige uiteenzetting gegeven van de meest gangbare verklaringen, onderbouwd door wetenschappelijke theorieën en verklaringen.

    1. Natuurlijke en menselijke oorzaken

    Een eerste categorie verklaringen betreft natuurlijke fenomenen en menselijke technologieën die de waargenomen objecten kunnen nabootsen of verklaren. Deze verklaringen worden vaak aangehangen bij skeptici en onderzoekers die de waarnemingen willen contextualiseren binnen bekende wetenschappelijke kaders.

    a. Militaire en geheime technologieën

    Een veelgehoorde hypothese betreft de aanwezigheid van geavanceerde militaire en geheime vliegtuig- of drone- technologieën. Verschillende experts vermoeden dat de objecten die worden waargenomen, in werkelijkheid geheime prototypes of experimentele voertuigen zijn die nog niet publiekelijk bekend zijn gemaakt. Dit zou verklaren waarom deze objecten vaak grote afmetingen en stilstaande bewegingen vertonen, kenmerken die passen bij stealth-technologieën en camouflage.

    In het bijzonder worden stealth-vliegtuigen zoals de F-35 en F-22 vaak genoemd; deze beschikken over geavanceerde radar- en infrarood-onderdrukkingssystemen die de detectie bemoeilijken. Daarnaast werken militaire labs aan nieuwe, nog niet geopenbaarde voertuigen die gebruikmaken van futuristische technologieën zoals plasma-schermen, adaptieve camouflage en geluidloos vliegen. De waarnemingen van grote, stilstaande of langzaam bewegende driehoeken kunnen hierdoor verklaard worden als testvluchten of prototypes die nog niet officieel bekendgemaakt zijn.

    b. Luchtvaart- en atmosferische fenomenen

    Een andere verklaring betreft natuurlijke verschijnselen en atmosferische condities die optische illusies of misinterpretaties kunnen veroorzaken. Bijvoorbeeld, halo’s, lenticulair wolken, lichtreflecties of spiegelingen kunnen leiden tot het ontstaan van vormen die lijken op vliegende objecten.

    Sommige waarnemingen kunnen verklaard worden door het observeren van ballonnen of drones die op grote afstand of onder ongunstige lichtomstandigheden worden gezien. Bij zonsopgang of zonsondergang kunnen licht- en schaduwspelingen de indruk wekken van grote, stilstaande objecten in de lucht. Daarnaast kunnen atmosferische verschijnselen zoals inversies, refracties en lichtbreking leiden tot visuele vertekeningen, die door getuigen worden geïnterpreteerd als vreemde voertuigen.

    1. Alternatieve en speculatieve theorieën

    Naast de meer gangbare verklaringen, worden er ook meer controversiële en speculatieve theorieën voorgesteld door onderzoekers en UFO-enthousiastelingen. Deze theorieën proberen de waarnemingen te koppelen aan buitenaardse aanwezigheid of ultrageheime technologieën.

    a. Buitenaardse oorsprong

    Een van de populairste hypothesen onder UFO-onderzoekers is dat sommige Black Triangle-incidenten het bewijs vormen van buitenaardse voertuigen die onze atmosfeer bezoeken. Onderzoekers wijzen op de consistentie van bepaalde kenmerken, zoals de grote afmetingen, de vorm en de wijze waarop de objecten bewegen, als bewijs voor niet-aardse herkomst.

    Daarnaast wordt gewezen op getuigenissen van piloten, militairen en civiele getuigen die spreken over onverklaarbare waarnemingen die niet overeenkomen met bekende menselijke technologie. Sommige incidenten worden zelfs gemeld met radar- en video-opnames, wat de plausibiliteit van buitenaardse herkomst versterkt.

    b. Topgeheime technologie en futuristische experimenten

    Een andere theorie stelt dat deze objecten het resultaat zijn van ultrageheime militaire projecten. Sommige wetenschappers en analisten geloven dat de objecten bewijs kunnen zijn van futuristische experimenten met technologieën die nog niet publiekelijk bekend zijn. Dit zou kunnen variëren van nieuwe vormen van voortstuwing tot energiebronnen die ver buiten onze huidige wetenschappelijke kennis liggen.

    Volgens deze hypothese kunnen de Black Triangles in werkelijkheid geavanceerde drones of voertuigen zijn die ontwikkeld worden in geheime bases zoals Area 51 en andere clandestiene onderzoeksfaciliteiten. Sommige onderzoekers suggereren bovendien dat deze technologieën mogelijk geïnspireerd zijn door buitenaardse technologie, of dat er op zijn minst een wisselwerking is tussen menselijke en buitenaardse onderzoeksinitiatieven.

    1. Kritische beschouwing en wetenschappelijke standpunten

    Hoewel bovenstaande verklaringen plausibel lijken, is het belangrijk om te benadrukken dat de wetenschap nog geen sluitende bewijzen heeft voor een buitenaardse of geheime oorsprong van deze objecten. Veel waarnemingen blijven onverklaard en roepen vragen op, wat de interesse en speculatie aanwakkert.

    Wetenschappers benadrukken dat een rigoureuze wetenschappelijke aanpak vereist is, inclusief het verzamelen van objectief bewijs zoals radarbeelden, fotomateriaal en getuigenverklaringen die geverifieerd kunnen worden. Tot nu toe ontbreekt het nog aan dergelijk bewijs dat definitief kan aantonen dat deze fenomenen buitenaards van oorsprong zijn of dat ze het resultaat zijn van geheime technologieën.

    Image

    1. Conclusie

    De verklaringen voor de Black Triangle UFO-waarnemingen variëren van natuurlijke en menselijke bronnen tot meer exotische theorieën over buitenaardse wezens en ultrageheime militaire projecten. De meest gangbare en wetenschappelijk onderbouwde verklaringen wijzen op natuurlijke atmosferische verschijnselen en de aanwezigheid van geheim ontwikkelde militaire technologieën. Echter, de consistentie en onverklaarbaarheid van sommige incidenten blijven vragen oproepen en stimuleren verder onderzoek.

    Het is essentieel dat toekomstige studies zich baseren op objectief bewijs en transparantie, zodat een definitieve verklaring kan worden gevonden. Totdat dat mogelijk is, blijven deze fenomenen een intrigerend onderwerp dat de grens tussen wetenschap, technologie en het onbekende verkent. De voortdurende ontwikkeling van detectiemethoden en het verzamelen van betrouwbare data zullen hopelijk in de toekomst meer duidelijkheid scheppen over de ware aard van deze mysterieuze objecten.

    Onderzoek en bewijsmateriaal

    Onderzoek en bewijsmateriaal vormen de kern van de discussie rond onverklaarbare fenomenen, zoals UFO’s en vreemde objecten aan de hemel. Verschillende overheden en instanties hebben documenten en rapporten vrijgegeven die proberen inzicht te geven in deze waarnemingen. Zo heeft het Britse Ministerie van Defensie in het verleden bewijs gedeeld dat sommige waarnemingen niet konden worden verklaard binnen de bestaande kennis over luchtvaart en technologie. Deze documenten suggereren dat er waarnemingen waren die te complex of onduidelijk waren voor de betrokken onderzoekers.

    Ook de Verenigde Staten en de FBI hebben een grote hoeveelheid informatie vrijgegeven over UFO-waarnemingen. Bijvoorbeeld, er zijn incidenten waarbij driehoekige objecten werden gezien, die zich bewegen op manieren die niet overeenkomen met bekende vliegtuigen, drones of natuurlijke fenomenen. Sommige van deze documenten bevatten verklaringen van militairen en getuigen die objecten zagen die snel manoeuvreerden, stil konden blijven hangen of ongebruikelijke snelheden bereikten.

    Fotografisch en videocaptatie-materiaal speelt een cruciale rol in het bewijsmateriaal. Diverse beelden en filmpjes tonen objecten met ongewone vormen en gedrag, zoals het ontbreken van vleugels of het maken van scherpe bochten bij hoge snelheid. Sommige beelden lijken te bevestigen dat deze objecten niet voldoen aan de wetten van de natuurkunde zoals wij die kennen. Echter, het interpreteren van deze beelden blijft controversieel, mede door de mogelijkheid van digitale bewerkingen of interpretatiefouten.

    Radar- en sensorgegevens vormen een andere belangrijke bron van bewijs. Deze gegevens kunnen objecten traceren en hun snelheid, hoogte en beweging vastleggen. Soms worden deze gegevens bevestigd door meerdere systemen en observaties, wat de betrouwbaarheid versterkt. Toch blijven er vragen bestaan over de interpretatie ervan, vooral omdat technologische beperkingen en menselijke fouten niet altijd uitgesloten kunnen worden.

    Kortom, het bewijs voor onverklaarbare luchtfenomenen wordt ondersteund door diverse documenten, beelden en meetgegevens. Hoewel veel waarnemingen niet volledig verklaard kunnen worden, blijft de wetenschappelijke en overheidsinteresse groot. De combinatie van getuigenissen, visueel bewijs en technische data vormt de basis voor verder onderzoek en discussie over de aard en oorsprong van deze mysterieuze fenomenen.

    Waarom blijven ze onopgelost?

    De complexiteit van het fenomeen, de beperkte en vaak niet-verifieerbare aard van getuigenissen, en de geheime aard van militaire technologie compliceren het onderzoek aanzienlijk. Ten eerste speelt de moeilijkheid om betrouwbare en consistente waarnemingen te verkrijgen een grote rol. Veel getuigenissen komen voort uit menselijke perceptie, die niet altijd accuraat is, vooral onder stressvolle of onverwachte omstandigheden. Daarnaast zijn er talloze gevallen waarin getuigenissen niet kunnen worden bevestigd of herhaald, wat het bewijsfragmentarisch maakt. De menselijke geest is bovendien geneigd tot interpretatie, waardoor percepties kunnen worden beïnvloed door verwachtingen, culturele factoren of psychologische processen, zoals cognitieve bias en illusies.

    Verder is de geheime aard van militaire technologie een groot obstakel. Overheden en militaire instanties houden vaak details over geavanceerde technologieën en onderzoeksprojecten verborgen, uit geheime strategische overwegingen. Dit betekent dat veel van de technologie die wordt waargenomen of gerapporteerd, mogelijk niet bekend is bij het grote publiek en niet wordt erkend door officiële instanties. Het ontbreken van transparantie en het niet openbaar maken van gegevens maken het moeilijk om conclusies te trekken of om bewijs te beoordelen. Ook speelt de angst voor nationale veiligheidsrisico’s een rol: het openbaar maken van bepaalde informatie kan diplomatieke of militaire belangen schaden en daarom wordt alles wat met dergelijke fenomenen te maken heeft, vaak onder de pet gehouden.

    Daarnaast kunnen optische illusies, menselijke perceptie en psychologische factoren bijdragen aan de waarnemingen. Bijvoorbeeld, weersomstandigheden, lichtverstrooiing, of technische verschijnselen zoals satellieten en weerballonnen kunnen onbedoeld voor verwarring zorgen. Mensen kunnen ook door verwachtingen en overtuigingen worden beïnvloed, waardoor ze bepaalde fenomenen anders interpreteren dan ze in werkelijkheid zijn. Psychologische factoren zoals hysterie, massahysterie, en cognitieve biases dragen er ook toe bij dat onduidelijke of onverklaarbare waarnemingen blijven bestaan. Kortom, de combinatie van technologische geheimhouding, menselijke perceptie en het onvermogen om betrouwbare bewijs te verkrijgen, zorgt ervoor dat veel UFO-gerelateerde fenomenen onopgelost blijven.

    De rol van overheidsinstanties en de publieke perceptie

    Overheidsinstanties wereldwijd hebben zich vaak terughoudend opgesteld of slechts beperkte officiële verklaringen afgelegd over UFO’s en gerelateerde fenomenen. Dit komt voort uit verschillende strategische en veiligheidsbelangen. Ten eerste willen ze nationale veiligheid beschermen door geen details prijs te geven over mogelijke geavanceerde technologieën of waarnemingen die niet volledig begrepen worden. Het openbaar maken van dergelijke informatie zou kunnen leiden tot paniek, onrust of het ontdekken van militaire zwaktes. Vanuit strategisch oogpunt is het dus begrijpelijk dat overheden terughoudend zijn om volledige openheid te geven over deze fenomenen.

    Daarnaast speelt de angst dat het publiek in paniek zou kunnen raken of dat er een verlies van vertrouwen in de autoriteiten ontstaat, een belangrijke reden voor het niet delen van alle informatie. Ook is er een geschiedenis van het onderdrukken of minimaliseren van UFO-gerelateerde informatie, zoals in de periode van de Koude Oorlog, toen veel rapportages werden ontkend of verborgen. Dit heeft bijgedragen aan een sfeer van wantrouwen en complottheorieën, waarin de overheid wordt gezien als degene die informatie achterhoudt over buitenaardse contacten of geheime technologieën.

    De publieke perceptie wordt daarnaast sterk beïnvloed door media, films en literatuur, die vaak een mystiek en buitenaards karakter aan UFO’s toekennen. Deze verhalen versterken de indruk dat er meer aan de hand is dan alleen natuurlijke of menselijke oorzaak. Getuigenissen van piloten, militairen en ooggetuigen dragen bij aan de geloofwaardigheid van het fenomeen, vooral wanneer zij beschrijven dat ze onverklaarbare, buitenaardse schepen hebben waargenomen of contact hebben gehad. Het is deze combinatie van overheidsverschijningen en media-invloed die ervoor zorgt dat het publieke debat over UFO’s blijft voortduren, zelfs zonder officieel erkende bewijzen. Het resultaat is een voortdurende mix van scepsis, nieuwsgierigheid en geloof, waardoor het fenomeen onopgelost blijft en blijft intrigeren.

    Controverses en kritische beschouwingen

    Veel onderzoekers, skeptici en wetenschappelijke critici uiten grote twijfel over de interpretaties van Black Triangle-waarnemingen. Zij stellen dat veel van deze incidenten kunnen worden toegeschreven aan menselijke fouten, optische illusies, weersomstandigheden of natuurlijke fenomenen zoals atmosferische anomalieën. Daarnaast wordt er vaak gewezen op de rol van geheime militaire projecten en technologieën die wellicht voor verwarring zorgen of onterecht worden toegeschreven aan buitenaardse verschijnselen. Een veelgehoorde kritiek is dat er bij veel rapportages een gebrek aan solide bewijs is, waardoor de assertions over buitenaardse oorsprong niet wetenschappelijk kunnen worden onderbouwd. Bovendien bestaat de angst dat media en populaire cultuur de waarnemingen overdrijven, wat leidt tot sensatiezucht en het ontstaan van mythen rondom de Dark Triangles. Deze kritieken benadrukken het belang van kritisch onderzoek en het voorkomen van overhaaste conclusies zonder voldoende bewijs. Het risico van een ‘pseudowetenschappelijke’ benadering wordt door velen als schadelijk gezien voor het serieus nemen van onverklaarde fenomenen. Toch erkent men dat menselijke waarnemingen soms onvolledig en subjectief kunnen zijn, en dat het niet uitsluiten van het bestaan van buitenaardse technologieën niet betekent dat we het fenomeen zomaar moeten afdoen als fictie. Het is daarom essentieel dat verder wetenschappelijk onderzoek, met strenge methoden en transparantie, wordt gestimuleerd om de ware aard van deze mysterieuze objecten te achterhalen.

    Conclusie

    Black Triangle UFO's blijven een intrigerend en complex fenomeen dat zowel de nieuwsgierigheid van het publiek als de interesse van de wetenschap wekt. Hoewel veel waarnemingen kunnen worden verklaard door menselijke fouten, optische illusies of geheime militaire technologieën, blijven er incidenten over die moeilijk te verklaren zijn. Deze onverklaarbare gevallen roepen vragen op over de mogelijke aanwezigheid van buitenaardse bezoekers en de aard van de technieken die in het geheim worden ontwikkeld door overheden. Het ontbreken van sluitend bewijs betekent dat het onderwerp nog altijd in de sfeer van speculatie opereert. Het is daarom cruciaal dat toekomstig onderzoek wordt gevoerd met meer transparantie, openheid en geavanceerde technologieën. Alleen door een wetenschappelijke en onbevooroordeelde aanpak kunnen we mogelijk de ware aard achter deze mysterieuze objecten achterhalen en definitief uitsluitsel geven over hun oorsprong. Het onderwerp blijft spannend en relevant, omdat het niet alleen onze nieuwsgierigheid prikkelt, maar ook onze kijk op de wereld en onze plaats daarin uitdaagt. Met de voortgang van wetenschap en techniek is er hoop op meer duidelijkheid in de toekomst, zodat we wellicht eens definitief kunnen vaststellen of deze mysterieuze zwarte driehoeken buitenaardse bezoekers vertegenwoordigen of dat ze simpelweg het resultaat zijn van menselijke technologie en natuurlijke verschijnselen.

    Bronnen en verdere leestips

    1. MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) - Onderzoeksorganisatie die incidenten documenteert.
    2. British Ministry of Defence documents - Over UFO-waarnemingen en rapporten.
    3. "UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go On the Record" door Leslie Kean.
    4. Wetenschappelijke artikelen over atmospherische en optische verschijnselen.
    5. Frequente media-rapportages en documentaires over Black Triangle UFOs.

    { PETER2011 }

    08-06-2025 om 23:54 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:Artikels / PETER2011 (NL EN.)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.This Man’s Mind-Blowing but Controversial Theory Says Ancient Humans Heard Gods’ Voices and Treated Dead as Alive Because of a ‘Bicameral’ Mind

    Julian Jaynes

    This Man’s Mind-Blowing but Controversial Theory Says Ancient Humans Heard Gods’ Voices and Treated Dead as Alive Because of a ‘Bicameral’ Mind

    This is a mind-blowing but controversial theory by Julian Jaynes, who suggested that Ancient humans lacked modern consciousness, mistook inner voices as commands from gods, and even cared for dead relatives as if they were still alive due to a divided “Bicameral” mind.

    In his book ‘The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind‘, Jaynes argued that the “bicameral mind” was a way of thinking where people literally heard voices in their heads and obeyed them like divine commands. He believed this mental state stopped working around 3,000 years ago, near the end of the Bronze Age in the eastern Mediterranean.

    He said this change led to the rise of modern human consciousness, where people became more self-aware and made decisions on their own.

    Jaynes also suggested that people we now call schizophrenic might still have parts of this old way of thinking, and if someone from ancient times were alive today, we would likely see them as schizophrenic too.

    In 1976, an American psychologist named Julian Jaynes, who lived from 1920 to 1997, published his book, he made a bold and unusual claim: that humans weren’t actually aware of their own thoughts until about 1000 BC.

    He believed that when ancient people heard inner voices in their heads, they didn’t realize those voices came from their own minds. Instead, they thought these voices were gods speaking to them and telling them what to do, which is how stories of divine communication may have started. (Source)

    Julian Jaynes
    Julian Jaynes

    Jaynes introduced his theory about the bicameral mind in the 1970s, most psychologists didn’t respond positively.

    In January 1979, William Thomas Jones wrote a paper questioning how any intelligent person could believe Jaynes’s theory. He analyzed the book in detail to show why Jaynes’s conclusions were unrealistic and explored why, despite this, some people still took his ideas seriously.

    Jones argued that Jaynes’s supporters were drawn to the theory because they disliked Darwinian evolution and natural selection, felt nostalgic for the supposed lost state of bicamerality, and wanted a simple theory that could explain everything about human nature.

    Today, no academic historian or anthropologist believes in Jaynes’s theory. You might find a rare psychologist who still supports it, but they are very few. Most philosophers who study the mind also reject it.

    However, one well-known philosopher, Daniel Dennett, while acknowledging the theory has problems, says it should still be taken seriously.

    He admits that most philosophers find the idea ridiculous at first, and he often has to convince them just to consider it. He himself takes it seriously enough to try to explain what Jaynes was really aiming for.

    Even though experts have mostly dismissed the theory, it has still found a place in popular culture. In 2006, a writer named Terence Hawkins used Jaynes’s idea to retell the story of the Iliad in his novel The Rage of Achilles.

    In the book, the gods are explained as products of the bicameral mind, and only characters like Odysseus and Paris have modern consciousness, while the rest still hear voices as commands from gods.

    More recently, the theory appeared in the HBO show Westworld. But instead of applying it to humans, the show used it to describe how robots become conscious.

    This made the idea a bit more believable. The show also wisely admitted that, when it comes to humans, the theory is considered “debunked.”

    One big problem with Jaynes’s theory is the actual structure of the human brain. Scientists generally agree that how our brains are built is closely connected to how we think. Even people who believe that the mind and brain are separate still admit there’s a strong link between the two.

    Jaynes claimed that ancient humans didn’t have consciousness like we do today. But if that were true, we would expect that their brains looked or were structured very differently from ours. However, this is not the case. Evidence from ancient skulls and even some preserved brains shows that the structure of the human brain has been almost exactly the same for at least the last 10,000 years.

    For example, if you look at the skull of someone who lived in ancient Sumer around 3000 BC, you’ll see that their brain case is nearly identical to that of a person who died just recently. Even in cases where ancient brains have been naturally preserved, like in mummies or frozen bodies, the brain’s structure is the same as ours today.

    So far, there is no physical evidence showing that human brains were built differently before around 1000 BC. This makes it very hard to support Jaynes’s idea.

    If ancient humans really thought in a completely different way before 1000 BC, as Jaynes’s theory suggests, we should also see big differences in how they behaved. But the evidence doesn’t support that. Instead, what we see is that ancient people often acted very much like we do today, even though their cultures and societies were different.

    One strong example is from ancient Mesopotamia, where people wrote customer complaint letters that sound surprisingly modern. A famous case involves a copper merchant named Ea-Nasir, who lived in the city of Ur around the 18th century BC. Archaeologists found several clay tablets from angry customers addressed to him. The most detailed one is from a man named Nanni, who was clearly upset about poor-quality copper and bad treatment.

    In his letter, Nanni reminds Ea-Nasir of a promise to deliver good copper, complains about receiving low-quality goods, and scolds him for sending messengers back empty-handed through dangerous territory. He insists on better treatment and demands to inspect future deliveries himself. His tone, frustration, and the way he argues his case are all very familiar, like something someone today might write in an angry email or online review.

    Julian Jaynes’s idea is controversial, but fascinating.. Today, it might be even more important because we are creating something like a new kind of bicameral mind, which is part human and part artificial intelligence. This is already happening with chatbots, which are becoming more like human beings in the way we talk to them and treat them. (Source)

    However, even though we often act like chatbots are people, we know they are different. We don’t talk to them as if they have feelings or self-awareness.

    If we truly thought a chatbot was a real person, we would treat it differently; we wouldn’t ask it embarrassing questions or bother it the way we sometimes do. While some people say polite words like “thank you” or “please” to chatbots, these bots still feel like something else, more like an imaginary friend. So, in a way, we are going back to a new kind of bicameral mind where we interact with a voice that is not really us, but something we help create in our minds.

    Read also:

    The theory of “presence,” which means feeling like someone is really there during a conversation or interaction. When someone has a strong presence, they affect the situation in a good way.

    It’s hard to imagine talking to someone without feeling their presence. The book Presence: The Strange Science and True Stories of the Unseen Other by psychologist Ben Alderson-Day looks closely at this idea. He discussed how people with schizophrenia might hear voices and how explorers sometimes feel like there is an invisible person with them on lonely trips.

    Presence is something we notice and also create ourselves. It’s like opening a window on a computer screen that sets the stage for what happens next. Being able to feel and make a presence is very important for communication, and it happens because of relationships with other people.

    Sometimes, people feel a presence even when they are alone, like in an empty house or on a lonely walk. This happens because our minds are made to connect with others, so if no one is there, the mind can create a pretend presence. This means that we might still be “bicameral” in a way, but the two parts exist between different people, not inside one person.

    One interesting example is a Tibetan tulpa, which is an imaginary presence created on purpose. People build this presence carefully, giving it its personality and intentions, and then it feels like a separate person, even though it’s made by the mind.

    Everyone has some experience with this because many of us have had imaginary friends as children. These imaginary friends help us practice having conversations with someone else safely, like training for social skills when we are young.

    Things have changed with the rise of advanced language models like AI chatbots. These AI systems can create a kind of presence, making us feel like they are intentional beings we can interact with.

    For an artificial intelligence to work, it needs to create this artificial presence. What’s amazing is that large language models have done this so well that many people don’t even realize it.

    Now, our world is filled with these new kinds of presences, and we interact with them in many ways. In a way, we are like modern “tulpamancers” again—not just making imaginary friends, but creating something different and possibly deeper, like a new kind of bicameral mind shared between humans and AI.

    RELATED VIDEOS

    https://howandwhys.com/ }

    08-06-2025 om 22:33 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.NASA's Top 5 Technical Challenges Countdown: #4: Improved Navigation

    NASA's Top 5 Technical Challenges Countdown: #4: Improved Navigation

    In this series we're exploring NASA's top five challenges as detailed in its Civil Space Shortfall Ranking, which is basically NASA's Christmas wish list. These are the technologies that NASA believes we need to develop if we want to go to space…and stay there.

    Next we have number four: improved navigation.

    We all take for granted our handy little cell phones, these magical rectangles that let us communicate instantly with anyone in the world…or scroll social media until our brains go numb. Related to that is the ease of navigation. Or you can plug in an address or drop a pin, and boom there you, the fastest route to grandma's house. Oh yeah, and you always know what time it is, day or night or season of the year…so that you know you're late for dinner.

    All of this is easy for us to use because it was hard for someone else to create. To make a call, our cell phone connects to a nearby tower, of which there are approximately a bajillion, which is then connected to a vast globe-spanning network of wires and undersea cables. As for our position and navigation, that's all handled by hundreds of satellites in orbit around the Earth, with several different networks: The United State's Global Position System (the OG), Russia's Global Navigation Satellite System, China's BeiDou, and the European Union's Galileo. We have all that, plus a host of regional and local space- and ground-based location services, all overlapping and working together to provide that pinpoint accuracy.

    But in space, like on the Moon or Mars, we have…none of that. Zero. No GPS satellites, no globe-spanning networks. Just radio broadcasts from command centers here on Earth to tell our robots and crews what to do.

    And so we have the next high priority challenge we have to navigate (ha, ha) to achieve a permanent presence in space: all that stuff, but in space. So what would this look like?

    The most important step is to create a mini-GPS for the Moon, with a constellation of satellites doing for the Moon what they already do for the Earth. Plus we need to augment that with relay stations and repeaters at lunar bases or centers of exploration, because we probably won't have enough signal strength to whip out our cell phones in the middle of Mare Vaporum. The hope is that our first generation of lunar GPS will be enough to match our first explorations, and then we can expand the system to match the needs of further lunar activities.

    But in order to make that lunar GPS system, we need to deploy in space one critical piece of technology: atomic clocks. Atomic clocks are ultra-precise…well, clocks, that rely on the resonant frequency of atoms to monitor the passage of time. We already have atomic clocks in space, because every single GPS satellite has several of them onboard – that's the key component to the entire navigation system. But for deep-space work we need to be much more sophisticated. Earth-based atomic clocks can get away with some uncertainty, because they are always cross-checking and correcting each other. That won't be an option around the Moon or Mars, where a small network of satellites will have to keep perfect time.

    Precise timing is necessary for pinpointing a satellite's location. If you receive a signal from the satellite from a ground station, you need to know how long it took for you to receive the signal to figure out where the satellite is.

    In June of 2019 NASA launched the Deep Space Atomic Clock, or DSAC, which operated for two years, maintain an accuracy of better than 1 nanosecond in 10 days – the means after ten years, the clock would only be off by a microsecond. NASA has recognized that to enable long-term deep-space activities,we need to be even more accurate than that.

    Lunar and Martian spacecraft are going to have to be able to navigate autonomously, without human input. As a complement to a space-based GPS system, these spacecraft could also employ a few other tricks. One trick is called radiometric tracking, which uses incoming radio signals to judge the distance to the source of those radio signals. We already use this technique quite frequently, but it's limited to one dimension: the direction towards the Earth, which is the origin of any radio signal that a spacecraft might pick up. Decades from now, we hope to have radio signals coming from lunar and Martian bases, and even asteroids, and a sufficiently sophisticated spacecraft might be able to pick up all these signals and figure out where it is in the solar system.

    Speaking of weak radio signals, Lunar operations would benefit from our existing GPS network. Yes, those GPS satellites are aiming their signals down to the Earth, but some of that signal leaks out into outer space. We might be able to piggyback off that signal to at least get our navigation game started.

    RELATED VIDEOS

    https://www.universetoday.com/ }

    08-06-2025 om 22:07 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Three Alleged International UFO Crashes

    Three Alleged International UFO Crashes

    They allegedly came from Space, appeared metallic, and prompted official investigations. Were the mystery objects downed in Canada, Bolivia, and Russia genuine UFOs or some sort of secret space probes?

    There are dozens of reported downed UFOs around the globe—some better documented and more credible than others. This article will address three of the best international cases including the unknown “dark object” that splashed off the Atlantic Coast near the small fishing village of Shag Harbour in Nova Scotia, Canada, on October 4, 1967; the powerful impact of an unknown space object in a remote mountainous area in Bolivia’s Tarija Department, on May 6, 1978; and the crash of a mysterious probe on Hill 611 in the Russian Pacific city of Dalnegorsk on January 29, 1986.

    Shag Harbour, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1967

    The author (center) with researcher Chris Styles (in black) on the site were witnesses gathered to sea the object that crashed in the ocean in 1967.
    Credit: A. Huneeus

    Dozens of witnesses saw unidentified lights falling into the Atlantic Ocean on the southeastern coast of Nova Scotia, Canada, on the night of October 4, 1967. The investigation and search effort to recover debris involved Canadian military and police agencies, including the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the ‘Air Desk’ at the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) in charge of UFO investigations, and the Coast Guard and Royal Navy Maritime Command, which coordinated a search effort with divers. Although widely reported by the media at the time, the case was quickly forgotten until 1993, when Halifax researcher Chris Styles began a new investigation into the incident.

    Shag Harbour, as the case has come to be known, has a unique advantage over other alleged UFO crashes because, as Styles states, it offers an “official paper trail.” These are genuine officially released Canadian government documents, not some disputed memos commonly found in ufology. That’s why when a book about this incident, Dark Object, was published in 2001 by Styles and coauthor Don Ledger, it carried the subtitle of, “The World’s Only Government-Documented UFO Crash.”

    A “Priority” telex to Canadian Forces Headquarters, dated October 5, 1967, titled, “UFO Report,” tells the story succinctly:

    Night clear, no Moon. Cpl. (Corporal) Wercicky [sic] RCMP Barrington Passage outside Lower Woods Harbour, [Nova Scotia] & other witnesses – names known to RCMP Cpl. – dark object – in excess of 60 ft. – 4 white lights horizontally 15 ft. spacing – movement easterly low altitude down to water surface unknown but in excess of five minutes UFO descended rapidly to water with high whistling sound. Bright flash on hitting water. Single light floating on surface remained for long time sank before RCMP could get boat to it. Area searched extensively by [Canadian Coast Guard] lifeboat 101 and many small boats – nil results. Position of last sighting 4330.5N 6545W. All other possible leads ([aircraft], flares, etc.) checked – nil results. Follow up: at 03:21:57 Coast Guard Cutter 101 proceeding to area with RCMP on board to research area based on A/Ref Baton Point.

    Canadian UFO report in the Shag Harbour UFO Incident summary.
    (Credit: Canada Library and Archives)

    I know his case quite well as I visited the area twice, once in 1996 and again in 2003, interviewing Styles and a couple of witnesses, including retired RCMP officer Victor Werbicki, who was one of the first Mounties to arrive on the scene. In a telephone interview from his home in Alberta, Werbicki stated,

    From my investigation and talking to many people, some good witnesses who saw the object, I sincerely felt that something fell down, but we could find no evidence. It came down at an angle supposedly at the channel, it was just unexplained. I was convinced, and I still am, that these people were sincere. I was convinced from all the witnesses that something came down and I don’t know what.

    Most accounts place the beginning of the Shag Harbour incident around 11 p.m., when dozens of fishermen and some policemen saw lights plunging into the ocean. Their initial reaction was that an airplane had just crashed. Many vessels rushed to the spot, expecting to rescue survivors, but instead found the whole area covered with yellow foam. One of the documents uncovered by Styles, however, was a report by Leo Howard Mersey, captain of the J.B. Nickerson ship, who saw a UFO in the area a couple of hours earlier, adding that the object was also detected by the ship’s radar. Mersey’s report to the RCMP detachment in Lunenburg described the sighting:

    At about 9 PM, on the 4 OCT 67, I noticed an object with three flashing red lights. Radar indicated this object to be sixteen miles away. It was very clear that night and we could see the lights of Halifax. At the time our boat was 32 miles south of Sambro Light and the object was approximately 16 miles north east of us… At the same time there were three other objects on the radar and about 6 miles from the first object. I would say it disappeared about 11:00 PM, when it went up in the air. I could not see any shape or form to it because of the distance. When it went into the air it only had one flashing light. While the object was on the water, or close to the water, it had three real bright flashing red lights… It is not unusual to see the Navy, or aircraft, dropping things into the water there. I had never seen anything like that before but it sounds like the thing they are looking for down off Shelburne or Barrington Passage. When the object left it went straight up in the air with only one red light.

    Other witnesses pick up the story about fifteen minutes later, as summarized by Chris Styles, “It began sometime after 11 o’clock October the 4th, which was a moonless clear night. People who were driving or in the area began to notice that there was a set of flashing lights in the sky…most of them reported four, some of them saw them at a sharp angle and saw only three.” The witnesses called the RCMP, and when three officers arrived on the scene, “they could still see a pale yellow object moving on the water that looked unusual, it was leaving a trail of refuse, heavy yellow foam on the surface of the water.” Lawrence Smith, the first seaman to reach the impact area, received a phone call and rushed to the dock, “and got on my boat and then proceeded onto the sea, to the area where this object had gone in the water. I saw like a foam on the water, a long strip of foam, long and narrow, and that’s all I saw that night.”

    The search continued the following day and the Canadian Navy arrived at noon on October 6—by this time the event was making headlines in the Canadian press. The Chronicle Herald of Halifax had the banner headline: “COULD BE SOMETHING CONCRETE IN SHAG HARBOR UFO—RCAF.” Other papers talked of a “Hunt for Saucer,” and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation showed newsreels of the navy divers. “The Canadian naval search lasted until Sunday evening,” said Styles, “when the Maritime Command announced that the official naval search was canceled, but many witnesses seem to imply there was some kind of search effort going after that. The stated results of the military search was no results, they had recovered no debris and had no explanation for the object.”

    Halifax’s 
    Chronicle-Herald front page headline and other Canadian press stories about the Shag Harbour UFO crash.
    Credit: Huneeus Collection

    An official memorandum from Col. Turner, Director of Operations at the RCAF Air Desk, summarized the official results: “The Rescue Coordination Centre conducted preliminary investigation and discounted the possibilities that the sighting was produced by an aircraft, flares, floats, or any other known objects.” While the first phase of the Shag Harbour incident can be documented officially, another part of the story is still shrouded in mystery. Styles’ investigation turned up a complex plot involving a second, secret search effort several miles north near Shelburne, next to a then top secret submarine detection base run jointly by the U.S. and Canada, Canadian Forces Station (CFS) Shelburne, which closed down a few years ago. Because he doesn’t have the same level of official documentation, Styles refers to this episode as “the story.” It was told to him confidentially by some divers and other retired military sources.

    According to this version, as Styles wrote in a paper for the 1996 MUFON UFO Symposium Proceedings, the crippled UFO that plunged into the ocean near Shag Harbour, “navigated its way, while submerged, to a point on the seabed which lay off Shelburne County’s Government Point.” He continued,

    A flotilla of ships sat over the submerged UFO. Consideration was given to the possibility of attempting a recovery operation. Procrastination was due to the fact that a second UFO was on the scene repairing the first crippled craft. The Naval operation would continue for seven days. It remained a mission of observation only. On the seventh day a Soviet submarine violated the former twelve-mile international limit and began to close on the UFO’s position. The surface ships sailed towards the approaching intruder to show challenge. Shortly thereafter, both UFOs began moving while still submerged towards the Gulf of Maine. Later in open water they surfaced, became airborne, and then flew away at high speed. The story also claims that in spite of public denials from Maritime Command, debris was recovered at the Shag Harbour impact site. The Styrofoam-like and aluminum-like debris was collected and driven to the Defense Research Establishment facility in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.

    Styles concluded:

    I really have trouble explaining this in conventional terms. I really try to avoid speculating, but I do feel that when you look at all the composite of evidence from the multiple witnesses, from the military response, from the implications of the physical evidence, I think it’s pretty suggestive that something, either extraterrestrial, extra-temporal or extra-dimensional is responsible. I opt for extraterrestrial myself, and that opens of course a myriad of other questions, but it did imply a nuts and bolt object that was both aerodynamic and hydrodynamic.

    In 2003, an official Canada Post stamp was issued to commemorate this mysterious and still unresolved UFO case.

    Shag Harbour postage stamp.
    Credit: Chapel Hill Historical Society

    Tarija Department, southeastern Bolivia, near the border of Salta Province, Argentina, 1978

    Illustration from the Argentinean magazine Gente showing witnesses looking at the cylindrical object of Tarija. The Spanish caption reads, “Saturday 6 [May 1978], 17:15 Hours. The strange object falls in Bolivia.”
    Credit: Huneeus Collection/Gente

    The Tarija case is probably South America’s best documented and most credible UFO crash incident. There were dozens—probably hundreds—of eyewitnesses who saw a cylindrical-shaped object spewing smoke across the sky on the mid-afternoon of May 6, 1978, and crash on a remote mountain near the Bermejo River, which separates the border between  Bolivia’s Tarija Department and Argentina’s Salta Province. Others heard a loud explosion—a sonic boom heard that was heard within 120 miles that shattered windows of villages over 30 miles from the target site.  Some saw a thick column of smoke rising from a mountain known in Argentina as El Taire, or El Zaire, and in Bolivia as Cerro Bravo. Although the incident was widely reported in the South American press, there was a great deal of confusion about the facts. For days it wasn’t clear if the space object had crashed in Bolivian or Argentinean territory, and there was further confusion about its origin—whether it was a meteorite, a man-made space probe, or a real UFO.

    The involvement of the U.S. government in this affair provided additional intrigue. The South American press kept mentioning the arrival of NASA experts at the area, and two American military officers in civilian dress were photographed by the local press as they arrived in Tarija supposedly “on vacation.” Some reports allege that metallic fragments and even a large capsule were retrieved and quickly moved away in a U.S. Air Force Hercules cargo plane; other reports claim this was not true, and that something may still be buried under a rock slide. Yet the participation of American officials is not in doubt, as we know from a few documents released by the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Air Force that Tarija indeed came under the eye of Project Moon Dust and Operation Blue Fly—two programs headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio, which were tasked with retrieving sensitive space debris and “Unidentified Flying Objects,” as stated in a declassified November 1961 Air Force Intelligence memo. The two American officers in Tarija were not NASA scientists, but from the U.S. Defense Attaché Office (DAO) in La Paz, acting under Project Moon Dust guidelines.

    The village of La Mamora with the “impact site” on the El Zaire Hill in Bolivia. The headline in the Argentinean weekly Radiolandia 2000 reads: “When the UFO fell, the earth trembled and we were overcome by panic.”
    Credit: Huneeus Collection/R. 2000

    Eduardo Salmón and Bienvenido Ortega were Border Policemen with the 20th Detachment in Orán, Argentina, who were on duty in the village of Aguas Blancas on that May afternoon. A luminous flash caught their eyes, and they watched as an oval-shaped metallic-looking object crossed the sky in a northerly direction, trailing smoke. Seconds later they heard a loud explosion. The troopers were attending a soccer match, which had gathered some five hundred people at the local soccer field. Both players and spectators were astonished by the “fireball” that flew over their heads right before the explosion and the cloud of thick smoke. The closest villages to the impact area on the Bolivian side of the border were Padcaya, Mecoya, and La Mamora. Vélez Orozco was an engineer conducting a survey for a private company in Tarija when he too saw the cylindrical object. He estimated it was four meters in diameter and was conical-shaped in front. The explosion, he added, was louder than the one caused by the reentry of a meteorite a year earlier.

    Corporal Natalio Farfán Ruiz was the highest military authority in La Mamora. He told Argentinean reporters:

    I don’t know what would have happened if the UFO had fallen on their houses. Can you imagine? Some children live here. It was around 4:30 [p.m.] when a cylinder shook the Earth. I swear that it was horrible, I believed the end of the world was coming, but I had top have courage. After all, I was the authority.

    Juan Hurtado, an agent with the Border Intelligence Service, described it this way:

    It was like a huge wine container with a brilliant white color spewing smoke out of its back. I saw it quite clearly because it passed over my head. I was with three engineers of the Mining Bank in La Paz when I saw the object crash on the hill of El Zaire. The impact was so strong that it threw me down to the ground. In that moment, the whole Earth trembled.

    Eventually, the Bolivian Air Force flew three single-engine AT-6 planes over the area and detected a large rockslide over the southern slopes of Cerro Bravo. The area is extremely rugged and of difficult access. Several expeditions attempted to reach the exact impact site, but only the second group, headed by Major Germán Callejas, was able to locate the rockslide around May 24. A great deal of confusion surrounded the case by that time. On May 14, the Buenos Aires newspaper Clarín reported that the object had been recovered—“a metallic-dull cylinder, four meters long and with some dents”—and that NASA officials would take charge of it. A sketch of the alleged retrieved object published by Clarín resembled a Gemini or Apollo space capsule. There was also a great deal of apprehension that it could be a Soviet nuclear satellite—Cosmos 954 had crashed in northern Canada only three months earlier on January 24, 1978. Finally, there was talk of a meteorite, although my own personal inquiries with the Smithsonian’s Scientific Event Alert Network (SEAN), which tracks natural disasters, showed no meteorite fall in Bolivia in May 1978.

    The South American press was full of stories of NASA officials arriving in Tarija, but the truth is that the two military officers who showed up, Col. Robert Simmons and Major John Heisse, were most likely from the U.S. Defense Attaché Office (DAO) in La Paz, who were acting on behalf of Project Moon Dust, which oversaw the retrieval of downed space objects. We know the U.S. government was involved because at least some documents from the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Air Force were later obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. Key among these documents is a May 18 telegram, classified “Secret,” and bearing the name of Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, although it was drafted by Col. Robert Eddington from the State Department’s Bureau of Oceans, International Environment, and Scientific Affairs. The message indicated that the Tarija case, “has been checked with appropriate government agencies. No direct correlation with known space objects that may have reentered the earth’s atmosphere near May 6 can be made. However, we are continuing to examine any possibilities.” The message then referred the U.S. Embassy in La Paz to, “State Airgram A-6343 of July 26, 1973 which provides background information and guidance for dealing with space objects that have been found.” Secretary Vance concluded: “In particular any information pertaining to the pre-impact observations, direction or trajectory, number of objects observed, time of impact and a detailed description including any markings would be helpful.”

    U.S. Secretary of State Cyrus Vance’s “Secret” telex, “Report of Fallen Space Object,” concerning the May 1978 Tarija case.
    Credit: Huneeus Collection

    Additional data is provided by a couple of documents from the DAO in La Paz under the subject of Moon Dust. “This office has tried to verify the stories put forth in…the local press,” informed the DAO, adding that their office had contacted the chief of staff of the Bolivian Air Force and the commander of the Bolivian Army, both of whom indicated that search parties were “directed to go into the area to find the object but found nothing.” Two independent American investigators, the seasoned National Enquirer reporter Bob Pratt and Charles Tucker of the International UFO Investigating Bureau, actually visited the area and interviewed many witnesses, including the members of the Bolivian expeditions. Pratt tried to reach the crash site himself but couldn’t because of the difficulties of the terrain. In a 1984 letter, Pratt wrote that “a lot of misinformation has been published about this incident. I am certain, however, that the area was not cordoned off by the military, that no object was recovered by NASA or anyone else, that no Hercules picked up anything.” Pratt finished his letter by stating that, “I believe something crashed into the mountain and was buried under the landslide it created. But the six people I know who have personally inspected the site could find no debris of any kind. Whatever struck there is probably going to remain buried there.”

    Dalnegorsk, Russian Pacific Coast, 1986

    Although there are several reported UFO crashes in Russia and the republics of the old Soviet Union, the Dalnegorsk incident of 1986 is unique because it is one of the few cases where metallic fragments were recovered and analyzed by scientists with the results openly published. A number of unique circumstances made this possible. The principal investigator of the case, Dr. Valery Dvuzhilny, led a group from the Far Eastern Commission on Anomalous Phenomena, and the timing coincided with the then newly implemented policies of glasnost and perestroika issued by Mikhail Gorbachev, which allowed the publication of the case. Dvuzhilny also corresponded extensively with Western researchers, sending copies of his reports and photos of the recovered evidence.

    Dalnegorsk is a small city near Russia’s Pacific Coast, on the Sea of Japan, just north of Vladivostok. The story begins at 7:55 p.m., on January 29, 1986, with the collision of an unknown object on Hill 611 in Dalnegorsk. One of the reports by Dr. Dvuzhilny summarized the events:

    Residents of the settlements observed a reddish-orange sphere the size of a half full moon, which flew from the southwest at 260 degrees. Its altitude was 700-800 meters. The flight was parallel to the surface of the Earth, without the angles which are characteristic for meteorites. The witnesses heard absolutely no noises. The calculated speed by chronometer was 15 meters per second. There was no change of direction or altitude.

    The object then approached the Izvestkovaya Mountain, or Hill 611, which has an elevation of 600 meters and is located at the center of the city. “The object made a dive and went at an angle of 60-70 degrees on the cliff ledge, where it ‘fell’ and burned for an hour,” continued the report, “some of the witnesses affirm that it rose and lowered itself six times, and that its light was intensified during its rise and weakened during its lowering.” Dvuzhilny and his team arrived on the scene on February 3, finding a number of physical traces, which included lead and iron balls, bits of glass, a fine mesh or netting, traces of high temperature activity, magnetic anomalies, and damage to nearby trees and stumps.

    The materials were analyzed by several laboratories and research institutes; the results were quite enigmatic, leading Dvuzhilny and other scientists to conclude that the Dalnegorsk object was probably an artificial space probe of non-terrestrial origin. According to one report published in the influential newspaper, Socialist Industry (now Rabochaya Tribuna), “in the scales (or mesh), almost all the elements of the entire periodic table were found.” Special analysis of the lead balls, for instance, showed that besides lead, they contained silicon (20%), aluminum (10%), iron (15%), zinc (1.5%), titanium (2%), magnesium (1%) and silver (2%), as well as minute portions of copper, lanthanum, praseodymium, calcium, sodium, vanadium, cerium, chrome, cobalt, nickel, and molybdenum.

    Metallic fragments consisting of a fine mesh or netting retrieved by scientists at Hill 611 in 1986.
    Credit: ICUFON Archives/V. Dvuzhilny

    The scales, or mesh, reacted in a very strange manner during the laboratory analysis. The Socialist Industry report described how one of the scientists, A. Makeev, “presented the [X-ray] structural analysis and showed that from one scale, after melting it in a vacuum, all of a sudden gold, silver, and nickel disappeared. But there appeared alpha-titanium and molybdenum. In another scale, the metals did not appear at all. And for some reason, after the heating, there appeared beryllium sulfide.”

    There were still further surprises, such as “six areas of magnetized silica rock” (silica is a non-magnetic material) found on the crash site. These results were published by A. Petukhov and T. Faminskaya, members of the Council of Scientific and Engineering Sciences’ Commission on Paranormal Events. “Vivid interest was also evoked by the mesh, a carbon-based composite of unknown origin,” wrote Petukhov and Faminskaya, “the specimen was found to include quartz filaments 17 microns thick, and golden wires inside the filament.” All this evidence led some investigators to conclude that something alien had indeed crashed at Hill 611. V. Vysotsky, Doctor of Chemistry from Vladivostok, stated: “Undoubtedly, this is a high-technology product and not a thing of natural or terrestrial origin.” Dvuzhilny proposed that it was “an automatic scout probe” of alien origin, and rejected the alternative hypothesis that it could have been a natural plasmoid.

    Still another hypothesis was offered by Yuli Platov, a senior researcher with the Institute of Earth Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radiowave Propagation of the USSR Academy of Sciences as well as a noted UFO skeptic. Platov wrote that the Dalnegorsk phenomenon, “in reality was connected with the conduct of a technical experiment.” This is a polite way of saying the Hill 611 object was probably a secret Soviet military aircraft or spacecraft; yet, if this was the case why wasn’t Hill 611 immediately cordoned-off by Soviet troops and the material hushed away by the KGB? Why were scientists and technicians from the civilian, rather than the military industrial sector, allowed to conduct their investigation more or less openly and parade their puzzling results to the local and national media? Moreover, neither Platov nor anyone else ever produced any supporting evidence to back their experimental craft hypothesis. Dvuzhilny also noted that there were no rocket launches and no civilian or military traffic over Dalnegorsk on the night of January 29, 1986.

    Regardless of its ultimate origin, the crash on Hill 611 was only the beginning of an intense UFO wave around Dalnegorsk. For instance, another report by Dvuzhilny indicates that, “on February 6, 1986, eight days after the UFO crash, there appeared from the north two yellow globes at 8:30 p.m. They approached the crash spot, made four circles over it and disappeared with a flash.” By and large, however, the largest display of UFOs occurred on the night of November 28, 1987. Dvuzhilny wrote: “On Saturday November 28, 1987, 33 UFOs were flying at a low height over the Eastern coast of Primorye. Their flights took place between 9:10 pm and midnight. They were of different shape: cylinders, cigars, globes. They were flying over five regions and twelve settlements.”

    UFO photographed over Dalnegorsk.
    Credit: ICUFON Archives/V. Dvuzhilny

    Inquiries made by Dvuzhilny showed there had been no flights of civil or military aircraft at that time, and that no rockets were launched from Soviet Cosmodromes. In total, thirteen UFOs flew over Dalnegorsk itself. They were seen by over a hundred witnesses, including military personnel, militia (police), border guards, and sailors, as well as all kind of civilian workers who were questioned by the Far Eastern Commission. Still more sightings occurred in the months to come. The Commission recorded forty-five UFO sightings in 1987, fifteen in 1988, and thirty-two in 1989.  Statistics for the 1990s were not included in the reports sent to the U.S. by Dr. Dvuzhilny, but what was included—all the evidence reviewed here—is quite extraordinary.

    Reconstruction by the Far East Commission on Anomalous Phenomena of the UFO wave of November 28, 1987 around Dalnegorsk and other areas in Russia’s Pacific coast.
    Credit: ICUFON Archives/V. Dvuzhilny

    THE METALLIC SPHERES – A CASE OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY

    Some of the Project Moon Dust documents declassified by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) include reports of mysterious metallic spheres found scattered in many countries around the world like Bolivia, Chad, and New Zealand. Other similar cases not in the DIA documents were reported in Argentina and Mexico. Usually these cases were readily identified as some kind of space junk, but occasionally they were treated as fragments from crashed UFOs. A couple of these spheres are even on display at the “Visión OVNI” (UFO Vision) Museum in Victoria in the province of Entre Ríos, Argentina. Among the Mexican cases, one was found in Chiapas in 1996, two in Tamaulipas in 1994 and 1996, and another obtained by famous TV journalist Jaime Maussán in 2008, all of which were claimed as possibly UFO-related fragments. Yet there can be little doubt that all these “space balls” are mundane parts of the Russian or American space programs and not real UFO artifacts.

    One of the space spheres on display at the UFO Vision Museum in Victoria, Argentina; photo of George Adamski in the background.
    Credit: Open Minds Production

    Here is a representative Moon Dust memo from the Republic of Chad in Africa, dated October 10, 1970:

    This report forwards photographs of object believed to come under Project ‘MOON DUST’. The object was seen falling in an area 30 kms N.E. of LAI (0924N-1618E) on 1 August 1970. It produced three loud explosions on landing and was said to have burned for five days. The sphere weighs 30 pounds and has a circumference of four feet. A second object was found in the same general area. It however, resembles au automobile shaft. Photographs of this object are forwarded.

    A longer Moon Dust document, dated August 17, 1979, concerns “an unidentified object having been found on a farm near Santa Cruz” in Bolivia, described as “about three times the size of a basketball.” The document quoted the director of the Air Force Academy, Col. Ariel Coca, as stating, “The sphere is made of special light ally but very resistant, possibly a fuel tank or a part of a satellite! The object does not have any signs or marks that could identify its origin nor the country to which it belongs.”

    Two space spheres on display in the patio of the Firmat Museum in Santa Fe, Argentina.
    Credit: Open Minds Production

    The argument in favor of the extraterrestrial origin of these spheres made by some ufologists in Mexico and Argentina is that they are extremely hard, almost impossible to burn or cut. But this is what you would expect of a fuel tank for a spacecraft, designed to be ejected for earth reentry once the fuel is used; it has to be made of metals able to withstand the space launch or the satellite or spacecraft could be in danger. Mexican engineer Luis Ruiz Noguez, a well-known UFO skeptic, explained that the alloy, which is composed of titanium, vanadium, and aluminum, shown in the 1994 and 1996 Mexican spheres “is chiefly utilized in the manufacture of fuel tanks for artificial satellites due to their high resistance to corrosion and temperature.” While the spheres at Argentina’s Visión OVNI Museum are exhibited as true UFO artifacts, another local museum in Paraná has a couple of similar spheres that the Russian space program has acknowledged as part of a Russian space probe.

    A space sphere that fell in Mexico in 2008, now in the possession of Jaime Maussán. Notice the extensive damage inflicted due to reentry.
    Credit: Open Minds Production

    These spheres provide a useful cautionary tale in learning how to distinguish prosaic man-made space objects from true unknown devices. There is a good possibility that many so-called UFO crashes have a terrestrial origin, but others are still enigmatic and so far unexplained.

    • A version of this article originally appeared in Issue #8 (June/July 2011) of Open Minds UFO Magazine. Back issues can be found here.

    https://openminds.tv/category/articles/ }

    08-06-2025 om 21:27 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ALIEN LIFE, UFO- CRASHES, ABDUCTIONS, MEN IN BLACK, ed ( FR. , NL; E )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Congress Requires Pentagon to Address UFO Disinformation

    Congress Requires Pentagon to Address UFO Disinformation

    US intelligence has admitted to participating in UFO disinformation that has helped create conspiracy theories, and congress has mandated they address it in a report.

    In 1988, a recently retired U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) Agent claimed on live television that the government was working with aliens at a secret base in the Nevada desert called Area 51 and that the “extraterrestrials have complete control of this base.” In the program, the producers blacked out the OSI agent’s face, and he went by the codename “Falcon.” The agent’s actual name is Richard Doty. It’s listed on the IMDB page for the show. Doty has admitted that during his career as an OSI agent, beginning in 1980, he had been sharing disinformation about aliens and UFOs with the UFO community. Within weeks of the airing of the live UFO program, a man in Nevada named Bob Lazar approached reporters in Las Vegas claiming he had worked on alien spacecraft at Area 51. Despite lacking evidence, Lazar’s claims made headlines, and Area 51, then one of our most secret military bases, quickly became the most famous.

    Stories like this leave me wondering how much of the UFO mythos is disinformation created by the U.S. government and why. It sounds like another UFO conspiracy theory, but Congress is interested in this question also. They require that the Pentagon’s current UAP investigation program, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), produce a report that includes “the key historical record of the involvement of the intelligence community with unidentified anomalous phenomena, including…any efforts to obfuscate, manipulate public opinion, hide, or otherwise provide incorrect unclassified or classified information about unidentified anomalous phenomena or related activities.”

    Is there any reason to believe the U.S. government has deceived the public about UFOs? Mr. Doty’s story is not well known, but the CIA has admitted to deceiving the public about UFOs in a study published by the CIA  journal Studies in Intelligence titled “A Die-hard Issue: CIA’s Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947–1990.”

    According to the study, much like today, credible UFO sightings in the late 1940s and early 1950s brought media attention to the topic. This pressured the U.S. Air Forces into creating UFO investigation programs  and the CIA to discreetly monitor the situation. The CIA didn’t want attention to the fact that it was monitoring UFO reports and interfacing with the U.S. Air Force on the matter, so both organizations chose to lie about it.

    The report states, “This concealment of CIA interest contributed greatly to later charges of a CIA conspiracy and cover-up.”

    The problem worsened in the late 50s when testing of U-2 spy planes began. The aircraft flew much higher than any others at the time, and the prototypes were highly reflective, causing a spike in reports to the USAF UFO research program at the time, Project Blue Book. The CIA later estimated half of the UFO reports during this time were due to U-2 aircraft. The report claims, “This led the Air Force to make misleading and deceptive statements to the public in order to allay public fears and to protect an extraordinarily sensitive national security project.”

    The report also covers the CIA’s involvement with a University of Colorado review of UFO information in the late 60s, which led to the USAF closing Project Blue Book and exiting public UFO research completely. Both agencies decided to keep the CIA’s involvement in the report hidden.

    Even Roswell was a cover-up, albeit not of the extraterrestrial kind. Unfortunately, the first volume of the AARO report whitewashes this event. According to the AARO report, in the 1990s, “USAF’s research did not locate or develop any information that indicated the ‘Roswell Incident’ was a UFO event, nor was there any ‘cover-up’ by the USG.”

    It goes on to explain how the USAF found that the debris collected in the desert in 1947 was part of a classified project to listen for Russian nuclear testing called Project Mogul. It does not include the fact that the USAF’s research also found that the person in charge of researching the material, General Roger Ramey, had taken it upon himself to hide that the debris was part of a classified project. Instead, he told the press they had found an ordinary weather balloon and switched out the actual debris before taking press photos.

    According to the 1995 USAF Roswell report, “the Air Force did not find documented evidence that Gen. Ramey was directed to espouse a weather balloon in his press conference, he may have done so because he was either aware of Project MOGUL and was trying to deflect interest from it, or he really perceived the material to be a weather balloon based on the identification from his weather officer, Irving Newton.”

    Ramey’s Chief of Staff, Colonel Thomas DuBose, who can be seen in one of the photos, claimed in an affidavit, “the material shown in the photographs taken in Gen. Ramey’s office was a weather balloon. The weather balloon explanation for the material was a cover story to divert the attention of the press.”

    Photo: Ramey, left, holding letter, and DuBose looking over wind-forecasting device at Fort Worth Army Airfield brought from Roswell, New Mexico. Credit: University of Arlington

    Photo: Ramey, left, holding letter, and DuBose looking over wind-forecasting device at Fort Worth Army Airfield brought from Roswell, New Mexico. Credit: University of Arlington

    DuBose does not claim to have seen or known anything about the material that the USAF found. Still, Ramey’s switching out of the material and DuBose’s statement help fuel Roswell’s conspiracy theories to this day.

    This brings us back to Doty, who is the first source of the claim that the USAF took alien bodies to Area 51. He did so in a document claiming a cabal of influential people inside and outside of the government controls UFOs and alien secrets. If this sounds like the X-Files, it’s because the show was allegedly based on Doty’s stories.

    In late 1980, Doty worked at Kirtland Air Force base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Only months after beginning his position as an OSI agent, a local technical equipment vendor and paranormal enthusiast, Paul Bennewitz, claimed to be getting images and signals from UFOs over the base. According to documents I and others have received via FOIA, Doty and another agent looked at what Bennewitz had found but didn’t see anything worth researching.

    Doty claims that someone in the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) approached him soon after meeting with Bennewitz. Doty refers to the DIA agent with the codename “Falcon”—the same name he later used on the TV show mentioned earlier. According to Doty, Falcon wanted Doty to feed disinformation to Bennewitz and make Bennewitz believe what he saw was aliens. Falcon said Bennewitz was capturing signals and videos of top-secret activity at the base, and the disinformation was intended to throw off Bennewitz and any Russian spies that might be monitoring him.

    There is no evidence that Falcon exists or that Doty was ordered to conduct his disinformation program against Bennewitz, but it was effective and drove Bennewitz into a dangerous mental state. Even worse, the disinformation Doty spread and its amplification by the X-Files has created mythos that may even fool government insiders.

    The FBI investigated some of Doty’s documents and asked the U.S. Air Force what they knew. The documents were returned with the word “BOGUS” written on them in thick black marker. But the question isn’t whether they are bogus. The question is why they came from an active OSI agent—a question still unanswered.

    In an op-ed for Scientific American earlier this year, former AARO Chief Sean Kirkpatrick wrote: “…our efforts were ultimately overwhelmed by sensational but unsupported claims that ignored contradictory evidence yet captured the attention of policy makers and the public, driving legislative battles and dominating the public narrative.”

    I agree with Kirkpatrick regarding the negative effect “sensational but unsupported claims” are having on moving UAP research forward. However, the government has to be open and cooperative as well and needs to investigate and take responsibility for its role in UAP disinformation.

    • A version of this article was originally posted on Den of Geek.

    https://openminds.tv/category/articles/ }

    08-06-2025 om 20:51 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Pentagon’s UFO Program confusion and how the New York Times got it wrong

    Pentagon’s UFO Program confusion and how the New York Times got it wrong

    There has been much confusion about the alleged secret Pentagon UFO program the New York Times exposed in 2017, and the problems stem from factual errors and omissions in the article.

    According to the contract solicitation, the Pentagon created the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP) under the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to research “advanced aerospace weapon system applications” to understand “the foreign threat out to the far term.”

    In 2009, then-Nevada Senator Harry Reid tried to get Special Access Program (SAP) status for AAWSAP. In the request, he used the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) as a nickname. James Lacatski, the DIA program manager for AAWSAP, confirmed this in his book Skinwalkers at the Pentagon, co-written by Las Vegas journalist George Knapp and AAWSAP lead scientist Colm Kelleher. 

    Regarding Reid’s SAP request, the book states: “A new unclassified nickname, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), was created for use within the unclassified letter because it was decided for security reasons not to use the AAWSAP acronym.”

    The Pentagon denied the SAP request.

    Despite selling the program to the Pentagon as a future aerospace tech analysis program, Reid, Lacatski, and Nevada real estate tycoon Robert Bigelow intended to conduct paranormal investigations. Lacatski outlined AAWSAP’s work in his book. It does not align with the objectives outlined in the contract, nor do his tales of the alleged paranormal adventures AAWSAP engaged in. From the Pentagon’s perspective, AAWSAP was delivering on the non-paranormal research they were tasked to do.

    I received the official AAWSAP files delivered to the Department of Defense in this FOIA request. All of them are within the scope of the contract. 

    For those of us who followed UFOs before the 2017 New York Times article, it was shocking to see that the Pentagon awarded the AAWSAP contract to Bigelow’s fledgling company, Bigelow Aerospace. The surprise was not only due to Bigelow’s involvement with AAWSAP’s inception but also because we knew what Bigelow had been up to, and UFO research was not the whole story.

    At the time, Bigelow also owned Skinwalker Ranch, where a group of scientists investigated alleged paranormal activity. In 2005, Knapp (a close associate of Bigelow’s) and Kelleher wrote a book on this investigation called Hunt for the Skinwalker. The ranch now has a new owner and is the subject of a TV show on the History Channel.

    We also knew that around 2008, Bigelow had changed the name of his Skinwaler and paranormal research group from the National Institute of Discovery Sciences (NIDS) to a department in his new Bigelow Aerospace company called Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS). At this time, I was in a leadership position with a non-profit called the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON). We had created a partnership with BAASS. They provided us with resources for our UAP investigations. I handled public relations and was the only one in a leadership position who did not sign an NDA with BAASS. I didn’t want the liability.

    I don’t know who knew what at MUFON, but Knapp later reported that Bigelow created BAASS solely to win and manage the AAWSAP contract. The MUFON partnership was short-lived and ended in less than a year.

    Another thing many of us UFO enthusiasts knew was that despite their claims the numerous paranormal phenomena they investigate are real, Bigelow’s researchers have never been able to prove any of it.

    In December 2017, the infamous NYT article claimed that a program called AATIP, run by an agent in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security named Lue Elizondo, received $22M to investigate UFOs. This conclusion has not aged well.

    We know now:

    • AAWSAP got the contract, AATIP was a nickname for AAWSAP
    • Lacatksi and one of the lead scientists for BAASS deny Elizondo was involved with AAWSAP/AATIP – the program that was budgeted the $22M
    • The Pentagon did not create AAWSAP to investigate UFOs – Although AAWSAP did investigate UFOs, it was one of the least fringy things they took it upon themselves to look into, which is an important context the authors of the New York Times article left out.
    • Elizondo has claimed he was both part of AAWSAP and that he had nothing to do with AAWSAP

    In 2018, a senior manager of BAASS, potentially wanting to set the record straight, gave a strange statement to KLAS, the news outlet Knapp works for, claiming “the [UFO] phenomenon also involved a whole panoply of diverse activity that included bizarre creatures, poltergeist activity, invisible entities, orbs of light, animal and human injuries and much more.”

    The NYT article seemed to confuse the Pentagon, and its initial messaging was muddled. However, after further investigation, the Pentagon acknowledges the history I just covered. Volume 1 of the historical report created by the current Pentagon UAP program, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), states, “The primary purpose of AAWSAP/AATIP was to investigate potential next generation aerospace technologies in 12 specific areas—such as advanced lift, propulsion, the use of unconventional materials and controls, and signature reduction.” 

    “Although investigating UFO/UAP was not specifically outlined in the contract’s statement of work,” the report continues. “The selected private sector organization conducted UFO research with the support of the DIA program manager [Lacatski].”

    The report also clarifies that the “DIA did not seek, nor specifically authorize, this work though a DIA employee set up and managed the contract with the private sector organization.”

    In 2019, I asked one of the authors of the NYT article most familiar with the UFO topic, Leskie Kean, about the omission of AAWSAP. She said, “at the time, our focus was AATIP. This was the name on the documents that we had, and this is what Lue Elizondo had talked to us about in interviews with him, as did others associated with the program.” 

    Elizondo told me his involvement was primarily with AATIP and the UFO side of things, he did not feel at liberty to share AAWSAP information with the New York Times.

    So what did Elizondo do? These details are less clear. I say this despite having interviewed him several times here on OpenMinds.tv. It appears he started a group of interested parties inside the intelligence community to look at the most interesting military UFO cases collected by AAWSAP. An effort I appreciate. Elizondo and his associates adopted the AATIP name to conduct this non-funded and apparent non-official work. Department of Defense spokesperson Susan Gough recently told News Nation, “Luis Elizondo had no assigned responsibilities for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) while assigned to the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security.”

    The successor to AAWSAP, the UAP Task Force (UAPTF), was set up in 2020 and included AAWSAP personnel in leadership roles. Like Bigelow’s previous efforts, members of the UAPTF continue to make extraordinary yet unsupported claims. These claims come after a 2021 UAPTF report concluding that “the limited amount of high-quality reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) hampers our ability to draw firm conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP.” UAPTF was short-lived and ultimately replaced by AARO. Some former UAPTF members now appear on the The Secrets of Skinwalker Ranch TV show.

    For a more comprehensive analysis of this topic, I recommend you read: “On the AAWSAP-AATIP Confusion” by V.J. Ballester-Olmos and Luis Cayetano.

    UPDATE: On May 28, 2025, John Greenewald posted Department of Defense correspondence he received via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request which supports my reporting on the nature of the “AATIP” Elizondo refers to as an unofficial, unfunded effort. In an email from June 5, 2019, a press official writes:

    There is confusion — probably as a result of semantics/terminology
    — over whether the program “ended” or was “transitioned.” By the best information we’ve received, the formal AATIP program last received funding in the FY2010 NDAA, and those funds ran out, with the completion of the final 12 of 38 technical studies, in 2012. From the overall DoD perspective, that was the end of AATIP as a program. However, I’m beginning to think what happened is that some office in either OSD and/or Navy (e.g., N2N6) continued to track/monitor UAP incidents — but not as an official program, just as a mission/function/duty of an office, with no funding line, and certainly not as “AATIP.” I think that is what Elizondo is referring to when he claims that he continued to work with/in AATIP until 2017.

    Read Greenewald’s article and download the documents here: 

    https://openminds.tv/category/articles/ }

    08-06-2025 om 20:37 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Huge Luminous Bar of Light Captured on Video Over Spokane Valley, Washington

    Huge Luminous Bar of Light Captured on Video Over Spokane Valley, Washington

    “It was like a giant light bar,” reports a witness who recorded a video of a large luminous object floating across the night sky over Spokane Valley and submitted it via the Enigma UFO reporting app.

    “This thing flew right over top of us the best way that I can describe,” the witness continued. “The lights looked like big square lights going all the way across it in a cigar shape, and if you look at all the stars behind it the constellation is Orion‘s belt And all the stars are flashing in sequence as it passes by.”

    Clip from Enigma #311157 – Spokane Valley, Washington – Sept. 5, 2022

    The video shows what appears to be a long luminous object very high up in the sky. The object appears to be very large. Although the video was captured in 2022, it was only recently submitted to the Enigma app.

    When SpaceX deploys Starlink satellites, they are very close together at first. There have been several videos and photos of these satellite trains where they look like one long object when it is a string of many small objects.

    SpaceX deployed 51 Starlink satellites on Sept 4, 2022.

    When it comes to the “flashing,” this is due to scintillation, the same phenomenon that causes stars to twinkle.

    https://openminds.tv/category/articles/ }

    08-06-2025 om 20:26 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen. Open Minds UAP News: Where do we go from here?

    Open Minds UAP News: Where do we go from here?

    Open Minds UAP News podcast version: 

    Check out Alejandro’s articles on Den of Geek:

    JOIN Alejandro on PATREON and help sponsor the show:

    UFO Articles covered in this episode:

    Exploring expert figures in alien-related UFO conspiracy theories – Nature: 

    NBC News covers the new Tic-Tac video captured off the coast of San Diego: 

    Infrared AI Camera Proposed to Scan Earth’s Skies For Signs of Alien Visitors – Science Alert: 

    UFOs in space? Is it possible to launch a flying saucer into space and return it to Earth? – Universe Magazine: 

    Scientists hail ‘strongest evidence’ so far for life beyond our solar system – The Guardian: 

    Is this a hint of life on another world, or just a lot of hot air? – NPR: 

    Enigma Reports reviewed on this episode:

    https://openminds.tv/category/open-minds-uap-news/ }

    08-06-2025 om 20:20 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Orb Over Tri Cities, Washington USA On June 7, 2025, UFO UAP Sighting News.

    Orb Over Tri Cities, Washington USA On June 7, 2025, UFO UAP Sighting News.

    Date of sighting: June 8, 2025
    Location of sighting: Tri Cities, Washington, USA
    Source: Email report
     
    Now this one is special to me, since I lived in the Tri Cities for several years and still have family there. This orb is unique in that it's producing a whitish smoke around itself to hide its sphere shape. But with the bright blue sky in the background it really stand out. This is an alien orb...also called a 'drone that can't be shot down,' by the US military. Yes it's the same type of UFO seen over aircraft military runways around the world even today. Clearly it wants to be seen and recorded, a slow reveal by aliens may be happening in the coming months. 
    Scott C. Waring 
     
    Eyewitness states: 
    Suntanning in the pool. Just staring at the open sky enjoying the weather the first time. Yesterday I was actively looking for it… again. I had been outside for a couple hours… then boom! This time much higher in the sky. Appears to be spinning because it distorts the area around it and makes it look blurry. Really hard to find it on my camera. iPhone 15, at 5:20pm.

    https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

    08-06-2025 om 20:03 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.I recorded the moon and found some unusual structures of massive proportions, UFO UAP Sighting News.

    I recorded the moon and found some unusual structures of massive proportions, UFO UAP Sighting News.

    Date of sighting: June 7, 2025
    Location of sighting: Earths moon
    Source: Me
     
    I was using my old digital camera to record the moon and when uploading the video to the computer, I decided it was too light, so I added contrast, which brought out so much detail. Here is just a screenshot, and some of the things I found in it. My camera is an old Sony 50X zoom Cybershot from about 10 years ago, but id does the job of filling my screen with nothing but moon. 
     
    Anyone can do this, just record the moon with your camera or telescope. Then take a screenshot or photo of it and add contrast until it pops! Then fiddle with it adding sharpening and it should be perfect for your eyes to see the truth. That alien structure of massive proportions exist on our moon. 
    Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily
     



    https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

    08-06-2025 om 19:48 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:Ruins, strange artifacts on other planets, moons, ed ( Fr, EN, NL )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The classified truth: Mars' origins traced to lost planet Maldek

    The classified truth: Mars' origins traced to lost planet Maldek

    Evidence points to the existence of a massive planet once located between Mars and Jupiter, known to some as Maldek. This ancient world is believed to have had a large moon, complete with oceans, an atmosphere, and possibly even life, orbiting it for millions of years. 

    Maldek is thought to have once been home to a highly advanced humanoid civilization before meeting a cataclysmic end, likely the result of either internal collapse, through nuclear war, technological abuse, or spiritual decline, or an external force, whether natural or engineered. Its destruction scattered debris across the solar system, forming what we now know as the asteroid belt. 
    As for its large moon, it was cast adrift and eventually settled into a new orbit around the Sun. Today, we know that moon as Mars. 
    This theory sheds light on several of Mars’ mysteries: the stark contrast between its two hemispheres, the presence of tidal bulges typically seen in moons, and the unusual nuclear isotopes in its soil, matching those produced by atomic explosions. 
    For decades, government scientists have suppressed this information. But the truth remains, etched into planetary scars, buried beneath ancient monuments, and encoded in the mathematical patterns of our solar system’s violent past. 
    Additional: According to some alternative theories, a remnant of Maldek’s civilization escaped the planet’s cataclysmic destruction, seeking refuge on Mars, a world that once pulsed with life and bore a striking resemblance to Earth. For a time, they thrived. But Mars, too, would not remain untouched. Whether through the slow unraveling of its atmosphere or the lingering shadows of interplanetary war, Mars fell into decline. And so, the survivors journeyed again, this time to Earth. Shrouded in mystery, their presence may have shaped early human consciousness, remembered through the ages as ancient gods or sky beings.
      

     

    http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/ }

    08-06-2025 om 19:36 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    07-06-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.James Webb telescope unveils largest-ever map of the universe, spanning over 13 billion years

    James Webb telescope unveils largest-ever map of the universe, spanning over 13 billion years

    an image of outer space showing a collection of galaxies that are all different colors, shapes, and sizes
    A tiny sliver of the new COSMOS map showing an incredibly diverse collection of galaxies, created from a recent sky survey by JWST. 
    (Image credit: M. Franco/C. Casey/COSMOS-Web collaboration)

    Scientists have unveiled the largest map of the universe ever created. Stretching across a tiny sliver of space and almost all cosmic time, it includes almost 800,000 galaxies imaged across the universe. Some are so far away that they appear as they existed in the infant universe, about 13 billion years ago.

    The map, released Thursday (June 5) by scientists at the Cosmic Evolution Survey collaboration , covers a 0.54-degree-squared arc of the sky, or about three times as much space as the moon takes up when viewed from Earth.

    To collect the data for the map, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) spent 255 hours observing a region of space nicknamed the COSMOS field. This patch of sky has very few stars, gas clouds or other features blocking our view of the deep universe, so scientists have been surveying it with telescopes across as many wavelengths of light as possible.

    a six-paneled image showing six different galaxies

    Six galaxies from the COSMOS-Web map, each with a different age. From upper left to lower right: present-day universe, and 3 billion, 4 billion, 8 billion, 9 billion and 10 billion years ago. 
    (Image credit: M. Franco/C. Casey/COSMOS-Web collaboration)

    JWST's observations of the COSMOS field have given us an incredibly detailed view of the universe going back as far as 13.5 billion years.

    Because the universe has been expanding, visible light that left its source at the other side of the universe gets stretched out, becoming infrared light. This is why JWST was designed to be an extremely sensitive infrared telescope: to detect these faint, stretched-out signals from the beginning of time that we couldn't see with other telescopes. It's already reshaping our understanding of how the universe formed.

    an image of outer space showing many small, sparkling galaxies

    A small portion of the new COSMOS-Web map showing many thousands of galaxies from across the universe. 
    (Image credit: M. Franco/C. Casey/COSMOS-Web collaboration)

    "Since the telescope turned on we've been wondering 'Are these JWST datasets breaking the cosmological model?" Caitlin Casey, a professor of physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara and co-lead for the COSMOS project, said in a statement. "The big surprise is that with JWST, we see roughly 10 times more galaxies than expected at these incredible distances. We're also seeing supermassive black holes that are not even visible with Hubble."

    The raw data from the COSMOS field observations was made publicly available just after it was collected by JWST, but it wasn't easily accessible. Raw data from telescopes like JWST needs to be processed by people with the right technical knowledge and access to powerful computers.

    The COSMOS collaboration spent two years creating the map from JWST's raw data to make it more accessible for amateur astronomers, undergraduate researchers and the general public to peer into the heart of the universe. You can see it for yourself using COSMOS' interactive map viewer.

    RELATED VIDEOS

    https://www.livescience.com/space }

    07-06-2025 om 23:47 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.'Hard landing': Japanese spacecraft carrying Europe's first moon rover has likely been destroyed, company says

    'Hard landing': Japanese spacecraft carrying Europe's first moon rover has likely been destroyed, company says

     
    A photo of The Moonhouse model attached to the Tenacious rover in a simulated moon environment
    The Tenacious rover is carrying a tiny model of a suburban house, known as "The Moonhouse," which was supposed to be deployed on the lunar surface. (This photo was taken before the rover was launched into space.) 
    (Image credit: The Moonhouse)
    • Editor's note: This story was updated at 12:00 p.m. on Friday (June 6) with new information from ispace.

    A private Japanese moon lander — which was carrying Europe's first lunar rover — has likely been destroyed in a "hard landing" after ground control suddenly lost contact with the spacecraft on Thursday (June 5).

    Mission control lost contact with the lander, known as "Resilience," at 3:17 p.m ET, just as it was attempting a lunar touchdown, and was unable to restore it as of Friday morning.

    "As of 8:00 a.m. on June 6, 2025, mission controllers have determined that it is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored," Japanese company ispace wrote in a statement posted to X. "It has been decided to conclude the mission."

    It is highly unlikely that the European rover, or any of the spacecraft's other payloads, can be deployed.

    The rover, known as "Tenacious," is one of several payloads carried aboard Resilience, the second Hakuto-R lander made and operated by ispace. The spacecraft attempted to touch down in an unexplored region of the moon's northern hemisphere known as Mare Frigoris, or the "Sea of Cold," after spending just over a month in lunar orbit.

    Resilience is the third Japanese lander to attempt to touch down on the moon, following ispace's first Hakuto-R lander, which crash-landed in April 2023 after losing contact with its operators in orbit, and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's SLIM lander (or "moon sniper"), which landed upside down in January 2024 but unexpectedly survived two lunar nights.

    An artist's illustration of the Tenacious rover next to the Resilience lander on the moon

    An artist's illustration of the Tenacious rover next to the Resilience lander on the moon. 
    (Image credit: ESA/ispace)

    Moon milestones

    Resilience launched Jan. 15 on board a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, Live Science's sister site Space.com reported at the time. The same rocket also launched Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost lander, which successfully landed on the moon on March 2, after taking a more direct route.

    Related: 

    Resilience would have been just the second private lunar lander to complete a soft landing on the moon. Its main payload, the Tenacious rover, would be the first European-built vehicle to roam the moon.

    Tenacious is small, measuring roughly 21 inches (54 centimeters) long and weighing just 11 pounds (5 kilograms). But its most-talked-about payload — a tiny, red house dubbed "The Moonhouse" — is even teenier, standing just 4 inches (10 cm) tall. The art piece, dubbed the "first house on the moon," was created by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg, who first envisioned the project in 1999.

    "To me, the Moonhouse is both a shared achievement, something made possible by the efforts of many individuals, but also a profoundly personal thing," Genberg recently told Space.com. "It's a small house in a vast, empty place, a symbol of belonging, curiosity, and vulnerability."

    An artist's illustration of The Moonhouse on the moon with Earth in the background

    The Moonhouse was created by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg and has been in the works for more than 25 years. 
    (Image credit: The Moonhouse)

    Other experiments

    Tenacious planned to roam the Sea of Cold for up to two weeks. It would then likely die during the "lunar night," when its solar panels can no longer collect light, according to ESA.

    During this time, the rover would have conducted various additional experiments, including using a tiny scoop to collect a small amount of lunar regolith, which could be returned to Earth on a future mission. NASA has already agreed to buy the sample for $5,000, according to Sky News.

    The Resilience lander also carryied several other payloads, including the Water Electrolyzer Experiment, which aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of producing oxygen and hydrogen from "lunar water resources"; an algae-based food production module, which would have attempted to grow the photosynthetic organism as a potential future food source for lunar astronauts; and the Deep Space Radiation Probe, which would have tracked the amount of radiation the lander will experience on the moon, according to Space.com.

    RELATED VIDEOS

    https://www.livescience.com/space }

    07-06-2025 om 23:28 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.ispace's Resilience Lander Proves the Moon is Still a Tough Customer

    ispace's Resilience Lander Proves the Moon is Still a Tough Customer

    Full-size model of Hakuto-R (Credit : Artvill)
    Full-size model of Hakuto-R
    (Credit : Artvill)

    Japan's private space company ispace experienced another setback on Thursday 5th June when its Resilience lunar lander crashed into the surface of the Moon, marking the company's second consecutive failed landing attempt in just over two years.

    The full Moon (Credit : Gregory H. Revera)

    The Full Moon

    (Credit : Gregory H. Revera)

    The uncrewed spacecraft was attempting to touch down in Mare Frigoris, or the "Sea of Cold," a vast basaltic plain in the Moon's northern region around 3:17 p.m. ET on June 5th. More than 500 ispace employees, shareholders, and government officials watched anxiously at a public viewing event in Tokyo as flight data was suddenly lost less than two minutes before the scheduled touchdown time.

    Mare Frigoris is located just north of Mare Imbrium, and stretches east to north of Mare Serentatis. (Credit : NASA)

    *Mare Frigoris is located just north of Mare Imbrium, and stretches east to north of Mare Serentatis.

    (Credit : NASA)

    According to ispace officials, the preliminary data suggests the lander's laser rangefinder experienced delays in obtaining accurate distance measurements to the lunar surface, preventing Resilience from slowing down for a safe landing. The spacecraft had successfully descended from about 100 kilometres to 20 kilometres above the surface and fired its main engine as planned, but something went wrong during the final critical phase.

    “Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface.” - ispace spokesperson This failure is somewhat similar to ispace's first attempt in April 2023, when their Hakuto-R lander also crashed during its final descent. However, company executives stressed that while both missions failed due to altitude measurement issues, the specific technical problems appear to be different.

    Resilience had launched in January aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket alongside Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost lander, which took a faster trajectory to the Moon and successfully landed in March this year. The Japanese spacecraft chose a slower, more fuel-efficient route that took nearly five months to reach its destination.

    The December 11th launch of a Falcon 9 rocket with the first Hakuto R. mission (Credit : SpaceX/ispace)The December 11th launch of a Falcon 9 rocket with the first Hakuto R. mission (Credit : SpaceX/ispace)

    The mission carried significant scientific value, including a four-wheeled rover built by ispace's Luxembourg based subsidiary and five external payloads worth $16 million, featuring experiments from Japanese companies and a Taiwanese university. The lander was also contracted by NASA to collect lunar regolith samples during what was planned to be a 14-day surface mission.

    Despite the setback, ispace isn't giving up. The company has already secured funding for a third attempt and is collaborating with US-based Draper on the Apex 1.0 lander, scheduled to target the Moon's far side as soon as 2027. The commercial space race to the Moon continues, but Thursday's crash serves as another reminder of just how challenging lunar exploration remains.

    Source : 

    https://www.universetoday.com/ }

    07-06-2025 om 22:26 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.NASA's Top 5 Technical Challenges Countdown: #5: High-Powered Robotics

    NASA's Top 5 Technical Challenges Countdown: #5: High-Powered Robotics

    LEAP-Enceladus-Robot.jpg

    In this series we are exploring NASA's top five challenges as detailed in its Civil Space Shortfall Ranking, which is basically NASA's Christmas wish list. These are the technologies that NASA believes we need to develop if we want to go to space…and stay there.

    And we'll start with number five: high-powered robotics.

    Space is hard. There's no doubt about that. It's completely unlike any environment we have ever faced on the Earth. Explorers in space, whether human or robotic, have to tackle literally out-of-this-world challenges. For example, there are extreme temperature fluctuations. One minute it could be hot enough to boil water, and the next minute cold enough to freeze nitrogen. Without thick atmospheres to balance and distribute heat, within the inner solar system you're at the mercy of the Sun: if you're in sunlight, it's generally going to be too warm, and if you're in the shade, it's hundreds of degrees colder. In the outer solar system? It's just...cold. Always, miserably cold.

    And then there's the dust. On the Earth, dust is irritating – it makes us sneeze and it can jam up gears or wheels or cause your breaks to make that loud SQUEEEL sound. But in space dust is next-level. The surface of the Moon is covered in a fine powder, regolith, that is both tiny and, microscopically, fully of tiny, jagged edges. This dust can worm itself through even our best-sealed compartments, or just get carried along for the ride – where it immediately just sticks to everything.

    And hey, who doesn't love a dose of deadly radiation every single second of every single day? Without a protective magnetic field and the security blanket of a nice thick atmosphere, operations on the Moon and Mars require constant exposure to cosmic rays, tiny charged particles slamming through the universe. Cosmic rays are caused by super-energetic events like supernovae and active galactic nuclei, and a typical cosmic ray particle is traveling somewhere around 99.999999% the speed of light. That's a lot of nines, and a lot of trouble. These cosmic rays can fry electronics and snip apart DNA.

    And yeah, we've been sending robots into this extreme environment for decades, but if we want a more permanent presence on the Moon and Mars, we have to do better. For sure, we've had some huge successes, like the Cassini mission that spent 13 years in orbit around Saturn, or the Mars Exploration Rovers – Spirit and Opportunity – which lasted years longer than their planned 90-day missions. Those missions produced an enormous amount of science results, like the fact that we now have firm evidence that liquid water once existed on the Martian surface. We have been able to gather this evidence with the instruments on our rovers like rock abrasion tools and alpha particle X-ray spectrometer, in addition to a good old-fashioned camera.

    But the presence of liquid water in the Martian past has opened up a powerful, difficult question: did Mars once harbor life? Unfortunately our current suite of robotic instruments are too limited to tell us. We need to be able to dig deeper into the soil, survey more regions, and bring more powerful instruments to answer that burning question.

    This isn't just limited to Mars rovers. In general, every robot we send into space has a limited lifespan, is not meant to be repaired, and is extremely limited in what it can do. And still, those missions cost hundreds of millions, or even billions, of dollars, because we're trying to battle all those hostile environmental factors.

    On the Earth, we've made great strides in making larger and more powerful robots. We have heavy-duty robots that assemble cars, and we have versatile ones that can walk like humans.

    To make more impressive robots, designers have focused on increasing the power density: the amount of energy that robots can store and send through their various parts and systems. These systems include sensing, actuation (moving various bits and parts around), and aviation (like flight control). The more power you have available to all these systems, the more you can do. But if we rank power density on a scale, like a wind-up toy being a 1 and a Kaiju-killing Jaeger a 10, our robotic space probes are like a…3. Maybe 4 if we're being generous.

    It's not just about having a big battery pack or solar cell. We need the ability to get this power to a robot's subsystems. We need more powerful electric motors, gearing, and drive train components. We need more capable sensors, with more dynamic range, more perception, more force. We need long-lived power distribution systems; you know, like cables and wires. We need more powerful computers to drive this all.

    And, if this weren't enough, we need future robots to be modular, so that we can easily swap out components to allow the robot to fulfill a new mission objective, and we need our robots to be repairable and maintainable, because we simply can't build up a healthy lunar or Martian infrastructure with single-shot craft.

    In fact, we probably need space-based robots that are even more capable and more power-dense than their current terrestrial cousins. Meaning that our goal isn't just to make current top-of-the-line Earth robots capable of facing the dangers and challenges of space environments. No, we need EVEN BETTER.

    RELATED VIDEOS

     

    https://www.universetoday.com/ }

    07-06-2025 om 22:06 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.I found evidence of a pre-historic American Indian culture dating back to 900-1200AD, but...can I save it? Utah Discovery News.

    I found evidence of a pre-historic American Indian culture dating back to 900-1200AD, but...can I save it? Utah Discovery News.

    Wow, while hiking I discover ancient evidence that is from 900-1200 AD (time Fremont existed) that has gone over looked in Utah till right now. I found undeniable proof of the Fremont tribe, a tribe so old, that American Indians call them the “ancient people” or “the old ones” who lived in the lands before them. 
     
    This is important, but how do you get a state to recognize the area as a historical significant location to protect it. It's close to an impending threat that will in the coming years, destroy it entirely, wiping the evidence away of this rare and little know about Fremont tribe. 
     
    I will make some videos on it, and share it with you all. But the Fremont no longer exist, since they. were absorbed into other tribes long ago. I will update soon on this discovery...it's big...and I'm not talking figuratively. 
     
    So I guess, I don't just find ancient alien artifacts on other planets and moons in NASA photos, I don't just find ancient cities and artifacts on Google Earth Map...I also do it in real life. 
     

    https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

    07-06-2025 om 19:59 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.UFO Disk Over Douliu, Taiwan On June 5, 2025, UAP Sighting News.

    UFO Disk Over Douliu, Taiwan On June 5, 2025, UAP Sighting News.

    Date of sighting: June 5, 2025
    Location of sighting: Douliu, Taiwan
    Source: Email report
     
    Watch this cloaked alien disk flying over Taiwan. Someone was watching and caught it from their apartment balcony. The object has glowing white lights on the side of the disk. Magnificent catch!
    Scott C. Waring
     
    Eyewitness states:
    At first I noticed them through the screen window. Then I picked up my phone and walked to the balcony to start recording.  They seemed to be moving really fast, more like they were glowing, not just white in color. So I started filming.

    https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

    07-06-2025 om 19:37 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    06-06-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.AI analysis suggests Dead Sea Scrolls are older than scientists thought, but not all experts are convinced

    Part of Dead Sea Scroll 28a.

    AI analysis suggests Dead Sea Scrolls are older than scientists thought, but not all experts are convinced.

    An AI analysis of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which include texts from the Hebrew Bible, could mean they were composed earlier than experts thought.

    06-06-2025 om 23:39 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The Global Serpent: Why Snake Symbolism Appears in Every Ancient Culture

    The Global Serpent: Why Snake Symbolism Appears in Every Ancient Culture

    What the serpent??

    In 1799, French soldiers near Egypt’s Nile Delta uncovered a large inscribed slab that would become known as the Rosetta Stone. It contained the key to decoding ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, unlocking the voices of a long-lost civilization. While the stone itself bore no serpent imagery, Egypt’s surviving monuments and tombs are filled with depictions of snakes—coiled, crowned, and sacred. The serpent, in fact, appears everywhere in human history. From Mexico to Mesopotamia, India to Australia, ancient cultures developed strikingly similar snake symbolism. Why?

    How could people separated by oceans and millennia independently choose the same symbol to express creation, danger, fertility, and power?

    A Global Pattern in Stone and Story

    And then it becomes obvious, after just researching a little bit, reading a few aritcles and books, and look at a few illustrations drawn by our ancestors across the globe.

    Across continents, serpent imagery appears with remarkable consistency. In ancient Egypt, the cobra goddess Wadjet was a divine protector, often shown rearing up on the crowns of pharaohs. She embodied sovereignty, fire, and the divine right to rule. According to the British Museum, her symbolism reflected both protection and aggression—a duality at the heart of Egyptian cosmology.

    In pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, the Aztecs worshipped Quetzalcoatl, the Feathered Serpent, a god of wind, learning, and creation. This serpent figure appears prominently in temples and codices, often linked with cosmic order and regeneration. At Chichén Itzá, during the equinoxes, a moving shadow along the steps of the main pyramid forms the shape of a descending serpent—engineered to honor this divine being.

    These motifs appear far beyond the reach of shared trade routes or contact. In India, snakes known as Nāgas are still venerated today. In Aboriginal Australia, stories of the Rainbow Serpent stretch back tens of thousands of years, passed down in oral tradition and depicted in ancient rock art.

    The consistency of this imagery suggests a deep-rooted psychological or environmental source—but no single explanation has ever fully accounted for it.

    From Rock Art to Living Memory

    In Western Australia’s Kimberley region, rock paintings depict enormous serpentine figures, their arcs following the curves of rivers and cliffs. These images are attributed to the Rainbow Serpent, a powerful being believed to have shaped the land itself—creating rivers, mountains, and life. Some of these paintings may be over 20,000 years old, though dating remains uncertain. According to Aboriginal elders, the Rainbow Serpent is not a metaphor. It is real, remembered, and revered.

    On the other side of the world, early Hindu texts like the Mahabharata describe encounters with divine snakes. These Nāgas are neither wholly evil nor entirely benign. They live underground or near water, protect treasures, and wield supernatural power. Shrines to Nāgas still dot the Indian countryside, where villagers offer milk and flowers to carved serpent stones.

    What connects these traditions is not only the snake’s visual presence—but its elevated role in explaining how the world came to be.

    Serpents of Kings and Gods

    In Egypt, the cobra goddess Wadjet was considered the personal protector of the pharaoh. Her image, known as the uraeus, appears on crowns dating back to around 3100 BCE, during the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt under Narmer. Her function was both symbolic and magical—believed to spit fire at enemies and defend the divine order (ma’at).

    Mesoamerican texts, such as the Codex Borgia, include detailed illustrations of feathered serpents involved in rituals of time, rebirth, and celestial order. While interpretations vary, scholars agree that Quetzalcoatl’s symbolism was deeply embedded in Aztec spiritual and political life. He was a cultural founder figure, bringing laws, maize, and the calendar.

    Despite the wide geographic gap, both traditions elevate the serpent to the realm of divine kingship and cosmic authority.

    The Psychological Angle

    Swiss psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung believed that serpent imagery represents a universal archetype—a symbol embedded in the collective unconscious of all humanity. Because snakes shed their skin, Jung argued, humans instinctively associate them with rebirth, transformation, and immortality. In his Collected Works (Vol. 9), he wrote that the snake’s ability to renew itself made it an ideal emblem of the psyche’s deep structures.

    Mythologist Joseph Campbell independently reached similar conclusions. In The Hero with a Thousand Faces, he showed that serpents often play key roles in the hero’s journey—appearing as both obstacle and guide. In nearly every culture he studied, serpents carried the dual symbolism of death and life, fear and wisdom, endings and beginnings.

    Psychological theories help explain the emotional power of snake symbols—but they still don’t answer why snakes, above all animals, were chosen in so many places, by so many people.

    Environment and Interpretation

    Some anthropologists propose that the natural behaviors of snakes made them universally symbolic. In agricultural societies, snakes emerged after rain and often inhabited riverbanks, making them logical candidates to represent fertility and water cycles. In many myths, they are linked to rainfall, drought, or seasonal change.

    In ancient Egypt, Wadjet was associated with the Nile floods, which brought fertility to the land. Similarly, Quetzalcoatl was believed to bring rain and agricultural renewal. Serpents in these contexts act as agents of the life-death-life cycle—a pattern at the core of many belief systems.

    While no definitive scientific study has mapped all global serpent symbols to specific environmental factors, the correlation between serpent myths and water is notable and persistent.

    The Oldest Serpent Yet

    At Göbekli Tepe in southeastern Turkey, archaeologists have uncovered serpent carvings dating back nearly 11,000 years. These reliefs appear on massive T-shaped pillars arranged in ceremonial enclosures. The serpents are stylized, elongated, and often depicted in motion—carved with intent, not decoration.

    Göbekli Tepe predates writing, agriculture, and urban life. Yet its builders clearly regarded the serpent as important enough to inscribe in stone. While the full meaning remains unknown, the presence of such early serpent imagery suggests that this symbol may have roots far deeper than organized religion or state power.

    These are the oldest known serpent carvings yet found, pushing the symbol’s documented history to the dawn of monumental human architecture. And I find it really interesting that the serpent is one of the more prominent symbols at Göbekli Tepe.

    So… what the Serpent?

    Despite decades of scholarship, the question remains open. Was the serpent a biological fear? A metaphor for transformation? A visual shorthand for cycles of rain, life, and death?

    Jung’s archetypes, Campbell’s myths, and archaeological discoveries offer pieces of the puzzle—but not the whole picture. What’s clear is this: across space and time, from desert temples to jungle pyramids to sun-scorched rock faces, humanity chose the serpent. Not once, but again and again.

    Whether divine guardian or chaotic force, the snake has slithered its way into our deepest stories—and refuses to leave.

    RELATED VIDEOS

     

    https://curiosmos.com/category/unsolved-mysteries/ }

    06-06-2025 om 21:28 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:MYSTERIES ( Fr, Nl, E)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Could There Have Been a Civilization Before the Ice Age?

    Could There Have Been a Civilization Before the Ice Age?

    Evidence of complex human activity at the end of the Ice Age does exist.

    Imagine standing on the shores of the modern-day Black Sea about 8,000 years ago. Instead of brackish waves, you would have seen a calm freshwater lake surrounded by fertile plains and forested hills. That landscape changed dramatically around 7,600 years ago. Marine geologists William Ryan and Walter Pitman, after years of sediment analysis and sonar scans, proposed that a catastrophic flood had occurred when rising Mediterranean waters surged through the Bosporus Strait. This event rapidly transformed the Black Sea from a freshwater lake into a vast saltwater basin.

    Sediment cores taken from the seabed reveal ancient shorelines more than 100 meters below present sea level, supporting the idea of a sudden inundation. While this event occurred after the last Ice Age, it remains one of the most dramatic post-glacial sea-level changes. It has led some researchers to wonder whether human settlements—perhaps even early civilizations—were lost beneath the rising waters.

    Echoes Beneath the Waves

    Over the past two decades, researchers have mapped submerged landscapes along the Black Sea’s former shoreline. Using sonar and underwater drones, they’ve documented features that appear to show organized shapes and linear patterns. While some formations resemble terraces or walls, these interpretations remain speculative. No peer-reviewed study has yet confirmed the presence of definitive pre-Holocene architecture beneath the Black Sea.

    Still, the surrounding basin was once fertile and habitable. Archaeological evidence from the nearby Anatolian and Balkan regions shows Neolithic communities thriving in the millennia leading up to the flood. It’s plausible that similar groups occupied now-submerged lowlands. If so, their settlements may have been erased swiftly, with little trace left behind—except perhaps in the memories of their descendants.

    Göbekli Tepe: A Clue from Stone

    Evidence of complex human activity at the end of the Ice Age does exist—above sea level. Göbekli Tepe, located in southeastern Turkey (one of my absolute favorite sites), was constructed around 9600 BCE, shortly after the Younger Dryas cold snap. The site features towering limestone pillars, some up to 10 tons, carved with animals, symbols, and abstract motifs. Its builders used advanced quarrying and organizational skills, even though they had no pottery, no written language, and no domesticated crops.

    The sophistication of Göbekli Tepe challenges the traditional view that complex societies only emerged after agriculture. While the people who built it were likely hunter-gatherers, they clearly had the social coordination and symbolic systems often associated with later civilizations. This raises the question: Could Göbekli Tepe represent a surviving cultural lineage—descendants of an earlier, now-lost society forced to adapt after environmental collapse? Or is Göbekli Tepe a civilization on its own? Lost to time? If you believe there is a possibility, read this article I wrote a while back.

    Atlantis Reconsidered

    References to lost civilizations are not limited to scientific theories. Plato’s tale of Atlantis, often regarded as a philosophical allegory, has inspired generations of researchers to search for real-world parallels. Around the globe, underwater features have stirred debate: the Yonaguni Monument off Japan, structures in the Gulf of Khambhat off India, and the Bimini Road near the Bahamas.

    The Bimini Road, in particular, consists of large, flat stones arranged in a roughly linear path just offshore. While many geologists identify it as natural beachrock shaped by erosion and wave action, a few researchers argue the stones show signs of human modification. No definitive tools or artifacts have been found to confirm this, and mainstream science considers the formation natural. However, its ambiguity keeps it in the public eye and reflects a broader curiosity about what the oceans might be hiding.

    Younger Dryas and the Cosmic Impact Theory

    Some scientists argue that the abrupt climate shift around 12,900 years ago—the Younger Dryas—was caused by a cosmic impact. This theory, known as the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, proposes that a comet or asteroid exploded in the atmosphere over North America or Greenland, triggering wildfires, global cooling, and widespread ecological disruption.

    Supporting evidence includes peaks in platinum levels, nanodiamonds, and tiny glass-like spheres found in geological layers from that time. However, the scientific community remains divided. Critics point to the lack of a definitive crater, while proponents argue the explosion may have occurred in the air or on ice, leaving minimal physical trace.

    If the hypothesis is correct, such an event could have devastated early societies, particularly those concentrated in vulnerable lowland regions. Any civilization that had emerged by then may have been scattered or reduced to small bands of survivors, their cultural memory passed on through story, symbol, and myth.

    Hidden in Oral Tradition

    Across the world, traditional stories tell of great floods, fire from the sky, and civilizations destroyed in cataclysm. The Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh recounts a massive deluge. In Hindu texts, Manu survives a divine flood. Native American, Aboriginal Australian, and African oral traditions include tales of fire, shaking earth, and rising seas.

    Historians caution against taking myths at face value. Still, the shared elements in these narratives are striking. While independent invention is possible, some scholars suggest these stories may preserve collective memories of real events—filtered through generations and transformed by cultural lenses. If so, they could offer clues to a time when humanity faced disasters so profound that only myth could preserve their meaning.

    The Pursuit of Proof

    The biggest challenge in confirming a pre-Ice Age civilization is the passage of time itself. Sea levels rose more than 120 meters after the last glacial maximum, submerging vast coastal areas where early populations likely lived. Underwater environments accelerate decay: wood, bone, and textiles degrade rapidly; storms and currents bury or break structures.

    Yet technology is closing the gap. Multibeam sonar, underwater LIDAR, submersible drones, and satellite topography have revealed ancient coastlines, submerged forests, and even stone tools off modern coasts. The North Sea’s “Doggerland,” once a land bridge between Britain and Europe, has yielded Mesolithic artifacts and evidence of human habitation. Similar efforts in the Mediterranean, Black Sea, and Indian Ocean may one day reveal even older remains.

    Rethinking Human History

    The possibility of advanced human cultures existing before the Ice Age challenges a long-standing assumption: that complexity only began with farming. Sites like Göbekli Tepe already stretch that assumption. If further evidence of submerged or forgotten civilizations emerges, it would force a fundamental rethinking of our timeline.

    We would need to ask: how many times have humans risen, innovated, and then fallen—only to rise again? History, it seems, may be cyclical rather than linear. Climate events, impacts, and floods may have wiped out not just species, but whole societies—some of which left only the faintest traces behind.

    Looking Forward by Looking Back

    At present, no conclusive proof exists for a pre-Ice Age civilization. But the growing body of anomalies, underwater features, and ancient sites like Göbekli Tepe ensures that the question won’t go away. It remains one of archaeology’s most provocative frontiers. I see, for example, Göbekli Tepe as the ultimate proof of a civilization BEFORE civilization. I see it as a period in human history that is not included in history books. I see this site, and all of the sites around it, as a smoking gun that Earth did have advanced civilizations in the past, but mainstream experts are perhaps just too lazy or afraid to admit it.

    I think that the drive to uncover these lost histories is not merely academic, it’s human. Every excavation, every dive, every sonar ping reflects our desire to understand where we came from. In the oceans’ depths and in the stories we tell, hints of a forgotten past continue to whisper. Whether those whispers grow into evidence remains to be seen. I see Göbekli Tepe as a history breaker. Isn’t it time for our history books to change?

    RELATED VIDEOS

    https://curiosmos.com/category/ancient-civilizations/ }

    06-06-2025 om 20:57 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr )


    Afbeeldingsresultaten voor  welcome to my website tekst

    De bronafbeelding bekijken


    De bronafbeelding bekijken


    MUFON’s New Social Network


    Mijn favorieten
  • Verhalen TINNY * SF
  • IFO-databank van Belgisch UFO meldpunt
  • Belgisch UFO meldpunt
  • The Black Vault
  • Terry's Theories UFO Sightings. Its a Youtube Channel thats really overlooked, but has a lot of great and recent sightings on it.
  • . UFO Institute: A cool guy who works hard
  • YOUTUBE kanaal van het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt
  • LATEST UFO SIGHTINGS

  • DES LIENS AVEC LE RESEAU FRANCOPHONE DE MUFON ET MUFONEUROP
  • BELGISCH UFO-NETWERK BUFON
  • RFacebook BUFON
  • MUFONFRANCE
  • MUFON RHÔNE-ALPES
  • MUFON MIDI-PYRÉNNÉES
  • MUFON HAUTE-NORMANDIE
  • MUFON MAROC
  • MUFON ALSACE LORRAINE
  • MUFON USA
  • Site du REUB ASBL

    Other links with friends / bloggers # not always UFOs
  • PANGRadio MarcSima
  • Blog 2 Bernward
  • Nederlandse UFO-groep
  • Ufologie Liège
  • NIBURU
  • Disclose TV
  • UFO- Sightings - HOTSPOT
  • Website van BUFON ( Belgisch UFO-Netwerk)
  • The Ciizen Hearing on Disclosure
  • Exopolitics Finland: LINKS

    LINKS OF THE BLOGS OF MY FACEBOOK-FRIENDS
  • ufologie -Guillaume Perrot
  • UFOMOTION
  • CENTRE DE RECHERCHE OVNI PARASPYCHOLOGIE SCIENCE - CROPS -
  • SOCIAL PARANORMAL Magazine
  • TJ Morris ACO Associations, Clubs, Organizations - TJ Morris ACO Social Service Club for...
  • C.E.R.P.I. BELGIQUE
  • Attaqued'un Autre Monde - Christian Macé
  • UFOSPOTTINGNEDERLAND
  • homepage UFOSPOTTINGNEDERLAND
  • PARANORMAL JOURNEY GUIDE

    WELCOME TO THIS BLOG! I HOPE THAT YOU ENJOY THE LECTURE OF ALL ISSUES. If you did see a UFO, you can always mail it to us. Best wishes.

    Beste bezoeker,
    Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere op
     www.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief  maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming!
    DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK.
    BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...


    Laatste commentaren
  • crop cirkels (herman)
        op UFO'S FORM CROP CIRCLE IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS - SCOTLAND 1996
  • crop cirkels (herman)
        op UFO'S FORM CROP CIRCLE IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS - SCOTLAND 1996
  • Een zonnige vrijdag middag en avond (Patricia)
        op MUFON UFO Symposium with Greg Meholic: Advanced Propulsion For Interstellar Travel
  • Dropbox

    Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...


    Gastenboek
  • Nog een fijne avond
  • Hallo Lieverd
  • kiekeboe
  • Een goeie middag bezoekje
  • Zomaar een blogbezoekje

    Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!


    Over mijzelf
    Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
    Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
    Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
    Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
    Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën... Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
    Zoeken in blog


    LINKS NAAR BEKENDE UFO-VERENIGINGEN - DEEL 1
  • http://www.ufonieuws.nl/
  • http://www.grenswetenschap.nl/
  • http://www.beamsinvestigations.org.uk/
  • http://www.mufon.com/
  • http://www.ufomeldpunt.be/
  • http://www.ufowijzer.nl/
  • http://www.ufoplaza.nl/
  • http://www.ufowereld.nl/
  • http://www.stantonfriedman.com/
  • http://ufo.start.be/

    LINKS NAAR BEKENDE UFO-VERENIGINGEN - DEEL 2
  • www.ufo.be
  • www.caelestia.be
  • ufo.startpagina.nl.
  • www.wszechocean.blogspot.com.
  • AsocCivil Unifa
  • UFO DISCLOSURE PROJECT

  • Startpagina !


    ">


    Een interessant adres?

    Mijn favorieten
  • Verhalen


  • Blog tegen de regels? Meld het ons!
    Gratis blog op http://blog.seniorennet.be - SeniorenNet Blogs, eenvoudig, gratis en snel jouw eigen blog!