UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN

It seems like the waiting time is over, UFO disclosure is imminent. There is growing skepticism and indifference towards whistleblower David Grusch’s claims that the US federal government has hidden information about recovered extraterrestrial spacecraft from Congress. Republican leaders have dismissed potential witnesses, and NASA officials have reportedly withdrawn from an upcoming hearing on UFOs.

However, two Republican lawmakers leading the investigation still intend to hold a public hearing on July 26. US Representative Anna Paulina Luna confirms the hearing date and mentions that the names of witnesses will be released a week before the event.

Luna and Rep. Tim Burchett are facing pressure from the Pentagon and NASA after announcing their investigation into UFOs (also known as UAPs). NASA has stopped cooperating with the investigation, leading to speculation of a cover-up. Despite the challenges, Luna and Burchett remain determined to hold the hearing and promise an impressive lineup of witnesses. If necessary, Burchett is even willing to hold a field hearing in his own front yard. The hearing is scheduled for the last week of July before Congress goes on recess in August.

Meanwhile, Steve Sprague, a UFO researcher who studied the UAP phenomenon for 30 years, claimed that an aerospace executive would come forward and share the information during the upcoming Congressional Hearing on UAPs. This unidentified insider is described as a C-level executive within the United States-based company which, according to Sprague, is a top firm reverse-engineering alien technology. (Source)

“Let me say this unequivocally, without ambiguity, in no uncertain terms, we are not alone, aliens not only exist but have been here for five millennia, if not considerably longer, they are not friendly and humanity is absolutely in danger,” writes Steve Sprague.

According to the insider, aliens not only exist but have been present on Earth for at least five millennia, if not longer. Startlingly, the individual revealed the existence of at least two civilizations currently residing on our planet: humans and a group known as the “Ganzi,” originating from a distant part of our galaxy, roughly forty light years away. The Ganzi are characterized as technologically advanced beings who possess knowledge far surpassing humanity’s capabilities.

One of the most chilling aspects of the disclosure centered around Ganzi’s technological superiority. The insider explained that the technology recovered and possessed by humans is composed of terrestrial components manipulated in a manner that exceeds human understanding. These materials, created by alien processes, involve elements and physics beyond our comprehension. The Ganzi, however, refuse to share their technology with humanity, fearing the dire consequences of us wielding power beyond our current evolutionary stage.

The insider emphasized the vast technological gap between humans and the Ganzi, stating that they are millions of years ahead of us. They warned that humanity’s very existence could be threatened without the proper knowledge to manipulate these advanced materials. Humans were compared to protozoa on the technological scale, highlighting how far we have yet to evolve.

Read also:

Disturbingly, the insider also shared incidents involving encounters with the Ganzi. One notable event involved the disintegration of an F-15 fighter jet by a particle beam technology wielded by extraterrestrial beings. The astonishing video evidence showcased a green beam hitting the side of the aircraft, which subsequently turned to ash without leaving any debris. Further analysis of the footage revealed the presence of extraterrestrial occupants, commonly referred to as Greys, characterized by their small bodies, large heads, and prominent eyes.

While the Ganzi were not described as inherently malevolent, they view humanity as an annoyance, akin to flies. However, the insider cautioned that provoking or interfering with their mission could lead to dire consequences. Reports of lost pilots and destroyed ships in encounters with the Ganzi underscore the potential dangers of crossing paths with these technologically advanced beings.

These shocking revelations come as anticipation mounts for the upcoming Congressional Hearing on UAPs. The insider has promised to come forward and share their information with the public during the event, which is expected to shed further light on the existence of extraterrestrial life and the presence of UFOs.

Sprague writes that the insider revealed to him that the Ganzi can manipulate matter in ways beyond human comprehension. They have a deep understanding of DNA manipulation, enabling them to increase lifespans indefinitely and cure or prevent diseases. It is even speculated that they have experimented on humans, possibly for reasons such as galactic war or slave labor.

Perhaps one of the most chilling revelations shared by the insider relates to nuclear power. They stated unequivocally that the Ganzi vehemently oppose humanity’s use of nuclear weapons. Any attempt to engage in large-scale nuclear conflict would be met with severe consequences, potentially leading to a complete shutdown of human society. The Ganzi have made it clear that they will not tolerate actions that could jeopardize the Earth or their larger objectives.

Moreover, the insider highlighted Ganzi’s superior abilities in manipulating higher dimensions, allowing them to be present anywhere at any time. They operate within the framework of Multi-Dimensional Theory and Brane Theory, concepts that challenge human understanding. This exceptional capability to navigate dimensions and remain undetected unless desired adds a layer of intrigue to the extraterrestrial presence on Earth.

The insider also touched upon significant presidential briefings that have taken place, shedding light on the United States government’s awareness of these developments. On various occasions, President Biden was reportedly briefed on advanced technologies recovered from the Ganzi. The briefings included demonstrations of lasers capable of remarkable feats, such as extracting elements directly from ore and analyzing biological and geological data.

Videos of these briefings purportedly exist, with one showing Biden interacting with three Ganzi beings through a small device placed in his ear. Notably, one of the individuals accompanying the beings was John Podesta, who later assumed the role of Senior Advisor for Clean Energy Innovation. The insider also linked breakthroughs in fusion energy and laser technology to the company’s efforts in reverse-engineering Ganzi technology.

In response to the question of why he was chosen by the insider, Sprague admitted uncertainty but speculated that a mutual friend with military and intelligence background may have facilitated the connection. He highlighted the importance of trust and the fact that he was seen as an outsider to the intelligence and journalistic spheres. Sprague acknowledged that his role in this situation may be that of a blunt instrument serving a specific goal. (Source)

Sprague mentions that his source is currently not in their home state and may or may not testify in front of cameras during the hearings. The source’s identity and their potential employment with a defense contractor remain undisclosed to protect their livelihood and family from potential fallout. However, Sprague asserts that if the hearings do not take place or the source cannot testify publicly, the information he received will still be released, leaving it out of his hands and independent of his involvement.

Sprague dismisses any connection between his information and a post on 4chan, asserting that he had never visited the platform before and had no intention of doing so in the future. He clarifies differences between the accounts, such as the claim of first-hand dealings with the craft, which he states his source did not mention. Regarding the element discussed by Bob Lazar, Sprague mentions that his source considered it pure trash and explained that the craft operated using a theoretical field similar to an Einstein-Rosen bridge or wormhole.

Sprague mentions his need for at least two more parts to cover additional topics, including the F-15 incident and post-disclosure scenarios. He expresses exhaustion after a busy day and indicates that he will engage with readers on Twitter the following day.

Going to Mars is a major step in space exploration. It’s not a quick jaunt nor will it be easy to accomplish. The trip is already in the planning stages, and there’s a good chance it’ll happen in the next decade or so. That’s why NASA and other agencies have detailed mission scenarios in place, starting with trips to the Moon. Recently, NASA updated its “Moon to Mars Architecture” documents, including a closer look at some key decisions about Mars exploration.

Those decisions cover a wide gamut of challenges to living and working on the Red Planet. NASA planners narrowed them down to these key areas: science priorities, number of crew members on the first trip, how many on each follow-up trip, number of crew members per Mars location, Mars surface power generation technologies, what kinds of missions will be sent (the “target state”), and establishing what they call a “loss of crew risk” posture. That last one involves making the right decisions about missions based on risk to the crew’s health and performance.

NASA Plans for the Moon and Mars

Why create a mission architecture for the Moon and Mars? Essentially, anybody going to these other worlds needs a mutually agreed-upon “roadmap” that plans the explorations and technologies needed. That’s why NASA created its first Moon to Mars objectives in 2022 and has been refining them ever since. The agency’s roadmap includes feedback from a wide swath of society. Members of academia, U.S. industry, international partners, and the NASA workforce all contributed to the project.

“Our new documents reflect the progress we’ve made to define a clear approach to exploration and lay out how we’ll incorporate new elements as technologies and capabilities in the U.S. and abroad mature,” said Catherine Koerner, associate administrator, Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “This process is ensuring that everything we are doing as an agency and together with our partners is focused on achieving our overarching exploration goals for the benefit of all.”

The Key Decisions Regarding Mars Exploration

In a white paper published along with the Moon to Mars Architecture document, NASA explains key areas of concern when it comes specifically to Mars exploration. The first is science. It’s the main reason for going the both the Moon and Mars, and its needs will drive almost all other considerations. It will determine the resources needed, including crew numbers, payloads, technology deliveries, and power and communications infrastructure, and contingencies for possible accidents or other challenges.

An artist’s concept of Mars explorers and their habitat on the Red Planet.

Courtesy NASA.

Once the science is determined, planners can decide on crew needs for the first and subsequent missions. As the white paper states, “…a series of focused science exploration missions to different landing sites would favor one architecture. Establishing a permanent, fixed base from which astronauts could conduct many surface missions supporting diverse and evolving exploration activities would favor a very different architecture.”

From there, planners will figure out the “cadence” of the missions and crew deployments. How often do we send missions and how many people will go? Just as an example, let’s say that the first mission will land in Jezero Crater, near the Perseverance rover. NASA could use its data to determine further science exploration at the site. That will drive the best placement for habitats and other infrastructure, and the type of mission will dictate the number of crew members needed.

Those decisions will then drive the infrastructure and technology needed for each step. Science stations need power to do the science, but also to sustain the habitats for the science teams. If those teams travel across the surface, their rovers will need power, fuel, and possibly replacement parts. Crew members themselves will need to be able to grow food, use local resources to extract fuel and water, and otherwise maintain safe living conditions. And, these are just the first steps in the long-term exploration of Mars, enabled by what people learn about living and working on the Moon.

Why Does NASA Want a Moon to Mars Plan?

While it may seem sexy to send people directly to Mars without any intervening stops at the Moon, NASA and other agencies want a measured approach. The idea to use the Moon as a stepping stone to Mars is not new. The Moon makes a good “training base” of sorts where we can “practice” with the technologies and techniques of living on another world. In addition, it offers a unique environment for astronomy and planetary science exploration. Astronauts learn in an environment close to Earth and if something dire happens to them, rescue is not far away.

Artist’s impression of astronauts on the lunar surface, as part of the Artemis Program.

Credit: NASA

These ideas underlie the planning for the upcoming Artemis missions to the lunar surface. There’s supposed to be a gateway orbiting the Moon, to which astronauts and equipment will fly. Then, from there, materials and people head to the Moon to explore various sites, and begin the complex tasks of exploration and habitat construction. That set of missions will establish the foundation for scientific exploration, and land a diverse set of people on the lunar surface, all in cooperation with international partners. Ultimately, everything they learn on the Moon will prepare people for the leap to Mars.

The Moon to Mars mission architectural plans unite both lunar and Mars exploration in one timeline, identifying technologies and capabilities needed to accomplish each step. They are living documents, updated every year to reflect changes in any aspect of mission planning and technology.