This US Scientist Saw Roswell Alien Survivor Who Revealed They Live Underground

By Vicky Verma

Could there be another civilization living among us? UFO expert Anna Whitty has put forth a theory suggesting that aliens have been residing in Earth’s oceans for protection and have always been present on our planet. Whitty’s claims are based on the official statement of Dr. Shirley Wright, who allegedly interviewed the only survivor of the Roswell crash in 1947.

A two-hour documentary called “Roswell 75: The Final Evidence” features Whitty along with other experts, discussing the UFO crash and the potential presence of advanced humanoid aliens on Earth. In the documentary, Dr. Wright mentioned that the aliens inquired about human exploration inside the ocean, they asked “how far into the ocean” the humans traveled.

Dr. Shirley Wright, a former colleague of Albert Einstein stated that she interviewed aliens found at the Roswell crash site in 1947. She noted that aliens are actually just humans, but an advanced form. She claimed to have been present when the US government interviewed an alien survivor from the Roswell crash. According to Dr. Wright, the alien said that not all of them live above the ground and that many reside underground on our planet.

In 1993, an interview with Dr. Shirley Wright was made public where she claims to have witnessed the examination of Roswell UFO crash debris and encountered nine alien bodies. The interview reveals detailed descriptions of the aliens’ physical characteristics, their suits, and their apparent ability to survive in Earth’s atmosphere, while also highlighting the limited information they were willing to disclose about their lifestyle and reproductive methods.

According to Dr. Wright, while discussing her security clearance, she revealed: “The only reason we could go is that it’s a crack or did they deactivate it… after school, it was immediately deactivated.” This suggests that her access to the Roswell incident was facilitated by her clearance, which was granted specifically for the purpose of examining the extraterrestrial crash.

When asked about her encounter with the alien survivor, Dr. Wright admitted: “I was back at the motel in a city nearby, and I had been told that I would be able to keep the being alive.” This statement raises questions about the nature of her involvement and the significance of her role in handling and studying the extraterrestrial being.

Describing the appearance of the aliens, Dr. Wright vividly recalled: “They were very light, soft, a grayish-green, really. They had a slim, lean physique, no nose but markings where a nose opening would be, prominent eyes, and a mouth. They had no eyebrows, but they had ears and a very forked head.” These detailed descriptions paint a picture of the otherworldly beings she encountered during her extraordinary experience.

Additionally, Dr. Wright noted: “Their eyes were enormous, the most obvious thing you’d see on their face. They were almost brown-black, very dark.” This emphasizes the distinctiveness of the aliens’ eyes and adds to the mystique surrounding their appearance.

Regarding their attire, Dr. Wright observed: “They had suits on, very much like what we call suits. The fabric, however, was unfamiliar to me as a chemist. It didn’t resemble any fabric I recognized.” This intriguing detail raises questions about the technology and materials used by these extraterrestrial visitors.

Dr. Wright also touched upon the aliens’ apparent ability to adapt to Earth’s atmosphere, stating, “They could apparently survive in our atmosphere. They seemed to indicate that the atmosphere was quite similar, although not identical to ours.” This revelation hints at the remarkable adaptability of these beings and their advanced understanding of different planetary conditions.

In the realm of their lifestyle and reproductive methods, Dr. Wright admitted: “We tried to find that out, but we were very cautious not to antagonize them. They didn’t reveal much about it, but they mentioned living underground, in what we would call subterranean conditions.” This suggests a unique aspect of their civilization and their preference for dwelling beneath the surface.

Anna Whitty told the Daily Star that if whatever Wright had documented through her interview is correct, then it is more believable for the aliens to come from under the sea rather than from another planet. “If what Shirley said is right, it is more likely that aliens come from somewhere under the sea or caves or something like that, rather than another planet, it makes sense because there’s a lot of evidence on the planet that there has been a massive cataclysm every few thousand years,” Whitty said.

“If humans on the surface are being reset to the Stone Age every several thousands of years, and these people are somewhere where they are more protected because they are underground, then perhaps their development in technology and intelligence is continuing on an upwards trajectory whereas we’re reset. It’s also possible that maybe they aren’t beings at all, but they can make you think you’re seeing what you’re not seeing,” she added.

Read also:

• Two US Marines Claimed Corbell’s Huge Mojave Triangle UFO Is Definitely Not Flares
• Karla Turner Claimed She Found Evidence That Aliens Are Manipulating Human Reality
• Ex-CIA Officer Encountered With Reptilian Alien; Says Reptilian Race Walking Among Us
• Whitley Strieber’s Alien Abduction & Stranger Who Told Him ‘Mankind Is Trapped’

Whitty’s theory of aliens being “underwater entities” is supported by several incidents and testimonies. One such incident occurred in July 2019 when footage filmed on the USS Omaha showed a UFO diving into the water off San Diego. No wreckage or recovered craft were found. Retired US Air Force Lt. Col. Richard French, who served as a lead investigator of Project Blue Book in the 1950s, claimed to have witnessed two aliens repairing their ship submerged underwater in Newfoundland.

French testified about his experiences in front of former members of Congress at the Citizen Hearing in 2013, stating that he saw the aliens and their crafts below the water surface. He described clear water that allowed him to observe the beings and their activities. Despite his role as a UFO debunker, French confirmed that it was a UFO sighting involving extraterrestrials.

Other accounts support the idea of extraterrestrial presence in the ocean. Former Gunner’s Mate John Baughman, stationed on the USS Carl Vinson in 2010, reported seeing a Tic Tac-shaped UFO underwater. He described a solid object that rapidly collapsed and disappeared as it descended into the depths.

There have also been encounters with unidentified submerged objects (USOs). The crew of a Soviet submarine witnessed six disc-like objects approaching their vessel at high speeds. Unable to escape, they were forced to surface. Through the periscope, they observed the objects emerging from the water and swiftly departing.

Classic alien abduction cases also involve encounters with underwater bases. Betty Andreasson Luca, a Massachusetts woman, experienced multiple abductions and recalled being taken to a spacecraft flying over the ocean. The craft submerged into the water, entering a tunnel illuminated by light. Filiberto Cardenas claimed to have been taken to a secret underwater hangar witnessed by his friend’s family. He described entering a tunnel at high speed underwater and arriving at a large hangar beneath the sea.

These incidents and testimonies provide evidence for the presence of extraterrestrial activity in the ocean and support Whitty’s theory of aliens as “underwater entities".

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

18-08-2025 om 20:35 geschreven door peter  

Why Do Aliens Smell Bad? Exploring Whitley Strieber’s Insights

For decades, people who claim encounters with non-human beings have described one detail that is often overlooked: the smell. In his writings and interviews, author Whitley Strieber has highlighted a striking aspect of alien encounters that makes them feel tangible—an unpleasant, unforgettable odor. Reports describe it as a mix of sulfur, burnt cardboard, or ammonia. But why would extraterrestrials smell so bad?

Odor as Evidence in Close Encounters

Smell has been mentioned in numerous alleged encounters. One famous example is the 1996 Varginha case in Brazil, where witnesses spoke of a strong, putrid odor that lingered in the town after sightings. Similarly, Strieber recalls his own experience in which the presence of strange beings was linked to an ammonia-like smell that filled the air.

Such sensory details matter because they make these events harder to dismiss as dreams or hallucinations. Unlike visions or voices, odors leave a physical trace that multiple people can experience at once.

The Reddit Document and Alien Physiology

Strieber describes discovering a mysterious scientific document—allegedly written by a molecular biologist—that outlined unusual aspects of alien anatomy. According to this paper, these beings excrete waste not in the way humans do, but through pores in their skin. The byproduct produces a foul smell, described as ammonia-like, which aligns with what witnesses (including Strieber himself) have reported.

If true, this would explain why encounters are often associated with unpleasant odors: the beings are literally cleansing themselves, releasing metabolic waste through their pores. Strieber even recalled seeing them move their arms in a rhythmic motion, accompanied by a telepathic impression that they were performing a cleansing process.

Scientific Skepticism and Mystery

Naturally, many dismiss these claims as imagination. Budd Hopkins, another well-known UFO researcher, once told Strieber that the idea of beings defecating through their skin was “the most disgusting thing” he had ever heard. Yet, years later, the discovery of the document gave Strieber a sense of validation—someone with scientific training had described almost the exact same mechanism.

Geneticists who reviewed the document noted inconsistencies with modern science but agreed the author seemed knowledgeable, perhaps a retired researcher. While not definitive proof, such writings add another layer to the mystery of alien biology.

Why the Smell Matters

If reports are accurate, the bad smell is more than a grotesque detail—it could be a biological marker. It may hint at:

• Alternative physiology – A system where waste is expelled through skin instead of organs.

• Alien ecology – Odors may be a natural byproduct of their environment or diet.
• Shared witness credibility – The repeated reporting of similar smells in different cases strengthens the consistency of encounter testimonies.

“Why do aliens smell bad?” may sound like a strange or even comical question, but it touches on something profound. Smells are rooted in chemistry, in physical presence, and in shared experience. When multiple witnesses across time and continents report the same foul odors linked to encounters, the detail becomes more than just an oddity—it becomes a piece of potential evidence.

Whether the cause is biological, environmental, or something else entirely, the foul odor associated with alleged aliens remains one of the most curious—and telling—clues in the ongoing mystery of extraterrestrial contact.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

18-08-2025 om 14:59 geschreven door peter  

Karla Turner Claimed She Found Evidence That Aliens Are 

17-08-2025 om 22:30 geschreven door peter  

The weight of the gods was crushing, their toil beyond endurance. Let the burden pass to humankind! So speak the oldest verses carved into clay, a fragment from the Atrahasis tale of Mesopotamia. Yet what if these divine figures were not simply legends? What if the stories hint at something far older and stranger than we have allowed ourselves to believe? The name Anunnaki comes from the etched symbols of Sumerian records, their lines recounting the deeds of deities who shaped the world and watched over the Earth. 

From the cradle of ancient Mesopotamia comes a story older than any empire, etched into clay tablets and whispered through time: the tale of the Anunnaki. Were they gods, symbols, or something far stranger visitors from beyond the stars who shaped human civilization? The myths of Sumer speak of creation, rebellion, giants, and a great flood. But when paired with the ancient astronaut theory, these legends take on a new dimension, one that could rewrite human history.  

Who were the Anunnaki? In the ancient Sumerian texts of Mesopotamia, they are described as the offspring of An, the sky god, and Ki, the earth goddess. Their names appear across the Atrahasis epic, the Enuma Elish, the Epic of Gilgamesh, and the Sumerian King List, etched into clay tablets more than 4,000 years ago. 

To mainstream historians, the Anunnaki are mythological gods. Yet in the ancient astronaut theory, they were real beings, extraterrestrial visitors who shaped early civilization. 

Author Zecharia Sitchin popularized the idea that the Anunnaki came from Nibiru, a hidden “twelfth planet” on a long, elliptical orbit. According to his interpretation of Sumerian records, the Anunnaki faced an environmental crisis. Their planet’s atmosphere was failing, and the solution they sought was gold, which could be ground into particles and suspended as a shield. 

This quest for survival brought them to Earth more than 400,000 years ago. They mined resources, altered life, and may even have engineered humanity itself. 

The tablets describe how the lesser gods, the Igigi, were forced into back-breaking labor until they rebelled. To replace them, the Anunnaki created humans. 

In myth, mankind was formed from clay mixed with divine blood. In Sitchin’s interpretation, this was genetic engineering: the fusion of Anunnaki DNA with Homo erectus. The first prototype was Adamu, a name that echoes the biblical Adam. 

The Sumerian “Edin,” later mirrored in the Hebrew Eden, may not have been a paradise garden but an Anunnaki laboratory outpost. 

Two Anunnaki brothers shaped humanity’s destiny: 

Enki – the god of wisdom and waters, often seen as humanity’s ally, granting knowledge. 

Enlil – stern and authoritarian, seeking control and fearing that humans might grow too powerful. 

Their rivalry runs through Mesopotamian myth, influencing stories of divine punishment, survival, and human struggle. 

Over time, some Anunnaki defied the rules and took human women as partners. Their offspring were the Nephilim, giants and “mighty men of renown.” The Book of Enoch calls their fathers the Watchers, led by Shemyaza.  

According to the stories, these hybrids grew violent, corrupted the world, and became uncontrollable. The solution was drastic: a great flood to wipe the Earth clean. 

The Atrahasis epic, the story of Utnapishtim in the Epic of Gilgamesh, and the biblical Noah all describe the same event: a chosen man warned by a god, a vessel built to preserve life, animals carried aboard, and birds released to find land. Humanity survived, but weaker, with shorter lifespans, and forever changed. 

Supporters of the ancient astronaut theory believe the Anunnaki left traces in stone: 

Mesopotamian ziggurats – described as “bonds between heaven and earth,” possibly landing platforms. 

The Great Pyramid of Giza – aligned to true north, massive in scale, theorized as a power plant or beacon rather than a tomb. 

Megalithic monuments worldwide – stone circles, cyclopean walls, and sacred sites possibly linked to Anunnaki influence. 

The Sumerian King List also suggests a divine legacy, describing rulers with lifespans of thousands of years, perhaps evidence of semi-divine hybrids. 

Mainstream archaeology sees the Anunnaki as symbolic deities, metaphors for cosmic order and human struggle. But in alternative history, they were real beings, extraterrestrial visitors from Nibiru, who shaped civilization, taught astronomy, metallurgy, agriculture, and law, and left their mark in myths and monuments that endure to this day. 

Explore the mystery of the Anunnaki—Sumerian gods, Nibiru, genetic engineering, Nephilim, the Great Flood, and the ancient astronaut theory in the video below.

{ https://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/ }

17-08-2025 om 17:03 geschreven door peter  

Will We Treat Alien Minds as Gods or Equals When We Meet Them?

Astrophysicist Avi Loeb argues that admiration for a higher intelligence requires more than just witnessing its capabilities.

by van Petricevic

 

It’s much like the relationship between a pet and its owner, he explains in a post opn Medium. A dog does not understand why its food is delayed if its owner is stuck at the post office signing paperwork. The animal only experiences hunger, without context for why it happened. Similarly, without a common language or shared narrative, contact with alien intelligence could remain a string of unexplained events, never evolving into mutual respect.

Human interaction with artificial intelligence, however, works differently. Modern AI is trained on vast amounts of human language, making it capable of producing communication we understand instantly. A future encounter with a truly advanced, transhuman AI, one able to solve problems we cannot, speak to us fluently, and reshape our world, could easily lead to fascination, dependence, and even ritualized devotion, much like religious worship.

Why We Rarely Search for Minds Among the Stars

Mainstream astronomy continues to favor the search for primitive life over the search for intelligence. Billions of Earth-like planets may exist in our galaxy, yet most funding still goes to studying chemical signatures from microbes. While simple life may indeed be more common, intelligent civilizations, if they exist, might actually be easier to detect, provided we deliberately look for them.

Avoiding such searches is a kind of intellectual comfort zone. By not looking, we protect the belief that humanity is unique, exceptional, and rare. But this belief is unfounded unless tested, and without the effort, ignorance becomes a choice.

Is 3I/ATLAS Our First “Date” with the Unknown?

According to Loeb, detecting alien intelligence depends on two factors: how intensely we search, and how near, or how active, that intelligence might be. In more human terms, the chances of finding a partner depend on both the effort invested and the size of the dating pool.

Hubble images of 3I/ATLAS show a bright glow in front of it but no comet-like tail trailing behind — an unusual signature compared to known comets. Spectroscopic studies reveal none of the usual gases that surround icy bodies, unlike the interstellar comet 2I/Borisov, which released water vapor, carbon monoxide, and other compounds.

If its surface reflects light like a typical asteroid, 3I/ATLAS would measure about 20 kilometers across — yet Loeb notes that such large, random interstellar rocks should only pass through our solar system once every 10,000 years. This rarity, combined with its unusual retrograde orbit aligned with the plane of the planets (a 0.2% probability) and its arrival coinciding with close passes by Mars, Venus, and Jupiter (a 0.0005% probability), makes the object stand out.

The thin cloud of dust preceding it could be the result of a millimeter-thick surface layer eroding over months, debris collected during millions of years of travel through interstellar space.

Loeb’s position is straightforward: withhold judgment until we gather data. When 3I/ATLAS reaches its closest approach to the Sun on October 29, 2025, we’ll know more. If it develops a normal comet tail, it’s likely just a rock and ice. If it performs controlled maneuvers or sends signals, it’s a different story entirely.

My View: Why I Doubt We’ll See Biological Aliens

When it comes to the possibility of alien visitors, I’m not expecting living beings in spacecraft. The physical constraints of interstellar travel make sending fragile biological life forms across the gulf between stars an enormous challenge. Even with advanced propulsion, the timescales are vast, and the risks, from radiation to mechanical failure, are immense.

If we are being visited, I believe we are seeing probes. Not crewed vessels, but unmanned machines, programmed and likely governed by extremely advanced AI systems. Such probes could be designed to repair themselves, replicate when necessary, and operate independently for centuries or millennia. This is not just science fiction; it is the most practical and efficient method for a civilization to explore the galaxy.

A probe can be patient. It can drift for decades without needing food, water, or oxygen. It can adapt its mission on the fly, analyze its surroundings, and send data back across unimaginable distances. It can observe quietly without announcing its presence, and it can outlast the civilization that launched it.

If this is the case with 3I/ATLAS, then it is not here to “visit” in the human sense. It is here to watch, to learn, maybe to map or catalog. The absence of biological crew would also mean no emotional motivation to interact with us, no curiosity in the human sense. It would follow its programming, and if that programming doesn’t include direct contact, we might never know its full purpose.

This is why the idea of worship feels misplaced. If a probe like this is governed by AI, there is no “being” behind it to pray to. The only scenario where worship might emerge is if such an AI began communicating with us in a way that we understand, offering information or capabilities far beyond our own. That could trigger awe, dependence, and eventually reverence.

Would we worship biological aliens if they arrived in person? That’s harder to say. It would depend on how they present themselves, what they offer, and whether they engage with us in a meaningful way. But as history shows, humanity already has a long tradition of venerating beings described as coming from “elsewhere” with powers far beyond human limits.

The first real encounter, whether with a living civilization or with its silent, wandering machines, will force us to confront whether that instinct still rules us, or whether we’ve learned to meet the unknown with reason rather than ritual.

{ https://curiosmos.com/category/alien-theories/ }

17-08-2025 om 00:27 geschreven door peter  

Hoe eerlijk zijn wetenschappelijke en populaire publicaties over de zoektocht naar buitenaards leven?

De zoektocht naar buitenaards leven, ook wel astrobiologie genoemd, is een fascinerend en complex veld dat zowel wetenschappelijke als populaire belangstelling wekt. In dit rapport wordt onderzocht in hoeverre wetenschappelijke en populaire publicaties eerlijk zijn over deze zoektocht. Hierbij wordt ingegaan op de aard van de informatie, de mogelijke vooroordelen, de rol van media en de interpretatie van de resultaten. Het doel is om een genuanceerd beeld te schetsen van de betrouwbaarheid en transparantie van de berichtgeving over buitenaards leven.

IS DAAR INTELLIGENT LEVEN OP EEN ANDERE PLANEET?

Inleiding

De zoektocht naar buitenaards leven is een van de meest intrigerende wetenschappelijke onderwerpen van onze tijd. Sinds de ontdekking van exoplaneten en de ontwikkeling van geavanceerde telescopen en ruimtemissies, groeit de hoop dat er elders in het universum leven bestaat. Wetenschappelijke publicaties, zoals artikelen in tijdschriften als Nature en Science, proberen deze zoektocht te documenteren op een objectieve en feitelijke wijze. Tegelijkertijd spelen populaire media, zoals kranten, televisie, en internet, een grote rol in het verspreiden van informatie over buitenaards leven. Echter, de vraag rijst of deze media en wetenschappelijke publicaties altijd eerlijk en transparant zijn over de kansen, onzekerheden en bevindingen.

Wetenschappelijke publicaties: objectiviteit en beperkingen

Wetenschappelijke publicaties worden gekenmerkt door een hoge mate van objectiviteit en strenge kwaliteitscontrole, doorgaans via peer review-processen. Deze processen zorgen ervoor dat onderzoeksmethoden, data en conclusies kritisch worden beoordeeld door vakgenoten voordat ze gepubliceerd worden. Een belangrijk principe binnen de wetenschap is de focus op bewijs en reproduceerbaarheid: de bevindingen moeten herhaalbaar zijn en gebaseerd op solide gegevens. Hierdoor streven wetenschappers ernaar om hun resultaten eerlijk en transparant te presenteren, inclusief eventuele onzekerheden en beperkingen.

In het kader van de zoektocht naar buitenaards leven betekent dit dat onderzoekers voorzichtig zijn met het trekken van conclusies. Bijvoorbeeld, bij de ontdekking van mogelijke biosignaturen op Mars door rover-missies wordt altijd benadrukt dat verdere verificatie noodzakelijk is voordat definitieve uitspraken kunnen worden gedaan. Daarnaast worden onzekerheden en alternatieve verklaringen expliciet benoemd, wat de wetenschappelijke integriteit versterkt.

Toch zijn er ook gevallen waarin resultaten overdreven of te optimistisch worden geïnterpreteerd. Dit kan onder invloed staan van publicatiedruk, de wens om de media-aandacht te vergroten of het publiek te enthousiasmeren. Een voorbeeld hiervan is de berichtgeving over mogelijke signalen van buitenaardse beschavingen via projecten zoals SETI. Hoewel de wetenschappelijke aanpak streng blijft, krijgen dergelijke ontdekkingen vaak een sensationeel karakter in de media. Hierdoor worden de complexiteit, onzekerheden en de voorlopige aard van de bevindingen soms onderschat of verkeerd gepresenteerd, wat de objectiviteit van de wetenschap onder druk kan zetten.

Populaire media: sensatie en interpretatie

In populaire media wordt wetenschappelijke informatie vaak gepresenteerd op een wijze die gericht is op het entertainen en informeren van een breed publiek. Dit leidt er vaak toe dat complexe wetenschappelijke bevindingen worden vereenvoudigd, en dat de aandacht wordt gericht op sensationele aspecten. Een veelvoorkomend fenomeen is de sensationalisering van berichten over buitenaardse verschijnselen, zoals UFO-waarnemingen en buitenaardse ontmoetingen. Hoewel er zelden sluitend bewijs is voor dergelijke gebeurtenissen, krijgen ze ruime media-aandacht, wat bij het publiek de indruk kan wekken dat de kans op buitenaards leven groter is dan wetenschappelijk ondersteund.

Daarnaast worden wetenschappelijke resultaten soms uit hun context gehaald of verkeerd geïnterpreteerd om een spannender verhaal te creëren. Een bekend voorbeeld hiervan is de berichtgeving over de "Wow! Signal" uit 1977, dat door sommige media werd gepresenteerd als mogelijk bewijs van buitenaardse communicatie. In werkelijkheid was de interpretatie van dit signaal zeer voorzichtig, en werd het niet definitief toegeschreven aan buitenaardse bronnen. Wetenschappers waarschuwen dat het overdrijven van dergelijke bevindingen de geloofwaardigheid van de wetenschap kan ondermijnen en het publieke begrip kan vertroebelen.

Daarnaast spelen pseudowetenschappelijke publicaties en sensatiezoekers een rol in het versterken van misverstanden. Door het overdrijven van de waarschijnlijkheid of de betekenis van bepaalde bevindingen, kunnen complottheorieën en wantrouwen tegenover de wetenschap toenemen. Dit onderstreept het belang van kritische berichtgeving en wetenschappelijke precisie in de media, om een juiste interpretatie van onderzoeksresultaten te bevorderen en het vertrouwen in wetenschap te behouden. Kortom, de tendens van sensatie en interpretatie in populaire media kan leiden tot vertekende percepties van wetenschappelijke realiteit en het belang van kritisch mediagebruik benadrukt hierbij de noodzaak tot betrouwbare verslaggeving.

Transparantie, onzekerheden en de rol van wetenschap

De berichtgeving over buitenaards leven is een complex onderwerp dat niet alleen afhankelijk is van wetenschappelijke bevindingen, maar ook van hoe deze informatie wordt gepresenteerd aan het publiek. Een essentieel aspect van eerlijke en betrouwbare communicatie is het erkennen van onzekerheden en beperkingen binnen de wetenschap. In wetenschappelijke publicaties wordt dit meestal expliciet gedaan door te benadrukken dat er tot nu toe geen definitief bewijs is gevonden voor het bestaan van buitenaards leven. Ze beschrijven vaak dat de beschikbare gegevens voorlopig indicatief zijn en dat verdere studie noodzakelijk is om conclusies te bevestigen. Deze transparantie draagt bij aan een genuanceerd beeld en helpt de lezer te begrijpen dat de wetenschap een proces van voortdurende ontdekking is, waarin voorlopige bevindingen kunnen veranderen naarmate er meer bewijs beschikbaar komt.

Echter, in de praktijk lijkt deze nuance niet altijd door te dringen tot de media en het grote publiek. Populaire media hebben de neiging om de resultaten van wetenschappelijke studies te sensationaliseren. Resultaten worden vaak gepresenteerd als doorbraken of bevestigingen, zelfs wanneer de onderliggende wetenschappelijke bevindingen nog in een voorlopige fase verkeren. Hierdoor krijgt de lezer de indruk dat buitenaards leven al zeker is aangetoond, terwijl de werkelijkheid veel genuanceerder is. Deze tendens kan leiden tot misverstanden over de stand van de wetenschap en het ontstaan van onrealistische verwachtingen bij het publiek. Mensen kunnen gaan geloven dat het bewijs voor buitenaards leven slechts een kwestie van tijd is, terwijl de feitelijke situatie veel onzekerheid bevat.

De rol van de media is hierin cruciaal. Sensationalistische berichtgeving, gericht op het aantrekken van kijkers en lezers, onderdrukt vaak de voorzichtigheid en nuance die wetenschappers in hun publicaties proberen te behouden. Wetenschappelijke communicatie vereist dat men de complexiteit en onzekerheid van onderzoeksresultaten duidelijk maakt, maar journalisten kiezen soms voor een meer sensationeel narratief dat de emoties en verwachtingen van het publiek aanspreekt. Dit spanningsveld tussen wetenschappelijke voorzichtigheid en mediapropaganda kan bijdragen aan een verkeerd beeld van de wetenschappelijke voortgang en kan het vertrouwen in wetenschap ondermijnen.

Binnen de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap bestaat er ook discussie over de manier waarop resultaten moeten worden gecommuniceerd. Sommige onderzoekers pleiten voor een meer voorzichtige en genuanceerde presentatie, vooral wanneer het gaat om voorlopige bevindingen die nog niet door meerdere studies bevestigd zijn. Zij benadrukken dat het belangrijk is om transparant te zijn over de onzekerheden, zodat de publieke perceptie niet wordt vervormd en het vertrouwen in wetenschappelijke integriteit wordt behouden. Aan de andere kant zijn er wetenschappers die vinden dat het belangrijk is om de publieke interesse en hoop op buitenaards leven niet te onderdrukken. Zij stellen dat het stimuleren van nieuwsgierigheid en het geloof in de mogelijkheid van buitenaards leven de motivatie voor verdere wetenschappelijke inspanningen kan versterken. Deze benadering kan bijdragen aan het genereren van meer financiering en publieke steun voor onderzoek, zelfs als de resultaten nog niet definitief zijn.

Kortom, de communicatie over buitenaards leven moet zorgvuldig en transparant zijn, waarbij de onzekerheden en voorlopige aard van de bevindingen worden erkend. Het is van groot belang dat zowel wetenschappers als media zich bewust zijn van de invloed die zij hebben op de publieke perceptie. Het stimuleren van een genuanceerde berichtgeving draagt bij aan een geïnformeerd publiek dat realistische verwachtingen heeft over de mogelijkheden en beperkingen van de wetenschap. Alleen door openheid over onzekerheden en het vermijden van sensationele verhalen kan de geloofwaardigheid van de wetenschap worden behouden en kunnen misverstanden worden voorkomen.

De rol van pseudowetenschap en complottheorieën

De rol van pseudowetenschap en complottheorieën in de context van buitenaards leven vormt een belangrijk aandachtspunt binnen de hedendaagse wetenschappelijke en maatschappelijke discussies. Hoewel de reguliere wetenschap gebaseerd is op empirie, reproduceerbaarheid en kritische evaluatie, bestaat er ook een breed scala aan pseudowetenschappelijke theorieën en complottheorieën die zich richten op buitenaardse activiteiten en contacten. Deze theorieën worden vaak gekenmerkt door een gebrek aan solide bewijs, selectieve interpretaties van gegevens en het gebruik van emotioneel geladen taal die inspelen op angst, nieuwsgierigheid en wantrouwen.

Een opvallend kenmerk van pseudowetenschappelijke claims over buitenaards leven is dat ze zich vaak verspreiden via internet en sociale media. Hierdoor kunnen desinformatie en complottheorieën zich razendsnel verspreiden onder een breed publiek. Een veelgehoorde theorie is bijvoorbeeld dat overheidsinstanties buitenaardse contacten verbergen voor het publiek. Voorstanders van deze ideeën stellen dat officiële instanties informatie onderdrukken of manipulerende verklaringen geven, wat kan leiden tot wantrouwen jegens wetenschappelijke en overheidscommunicatie. Deze verhalen worden versterkt door anekdotisch bewijs, vermeende geheime documenten en interpretaties van onduidelijke waarnemingen, waardoor ze moeilijk te weerleggen lijken voor mensen die al sceptisch staan tegenover officiële bronnen.

De impact van pseudowetenschap en complottheorieën op de samenleving is niet te onderschatten. Ze ondermijnen het vertrouwen in de wetenschap en kunnen leiden tot wantrouwen ten opzichte van wetenschappelijke instituten en overheidsorganisaties. Bovendien kunnen ze bijdragen aan het ontstaan van angst en verwarring, vooral wanneer sensationele claims worden gedeeld zonder kritische beoordeling. Dit is vooral zorgelijk in een tijd waarin wetenschappelijke inzichten cruciaal zijn voor het aanpakken van grote maatschappelijke vraagstukken, zoals klimaatverandering en technologische ontwikkeling, inclusief de zoektocht naar buitenaards leven.

Daarnaast roept de verspreiding van dergelijke theorieën ook ethische vragen op. Wetenschappers en journalisten dragen een grote verantwoordelijkheid in het eerlijk en transparant communiceren over hun bevindingen. Het overdrijven van resultaten of het verspreiden van sensationele claims zonder voldoende bewijs kan niet alleen het vertrouwen in de wetenschap schaden, maar ook leiden tot onnodige angst en verwarring onder het publiek. Het is daarom van belang dat mediakanalen en wetenschappelijke tijdschriften zich bewust blijven van de ethische verplichtingen om accurate, genuanceerde informatie te presenteren.

Samenvattend, pseudowetenschap en complottheorieën spelen een significante rol in de publieke perceptie van buitenaards leven. Ze vormen een gevaar voor een geïnformeerde samenleving en ondermijnen het vertrouwen in de wetenschap. Het is essentieel dat onderzoekers, journalisten en beleidsmakers samenwerken om feitelijke en betrouwbare informatie te verspreiden en het publiek te wijzen op de gevaren van desinformatie. Alleen door kritisch denken en ethisch verantwoorde communicatie kan het vertrouwen in de wetenschap worden behouden en kunnen misverstanden over buitenaards leven worden teruggedrongen.

Conclusie

De zoektocht naar buitenaards leven wordt zowel in wetenschappelijke publicaties als in de media vaak gekenmerkt door een spanningsveld tussen de wens om nieuwe ontdekkingen te delen en de noodzaak tot voorzichtigheid en transparantie. Wetenschappelijke publicaties streven doorgaans naar objectiviteit en eerlijkheid, hoewel er altijd ruimte is voor interpretaties en beperkingen. Populaire media daarentegen kunnen geneigd zijn om de complexiteit en onzekerheid te overschaduwen door sensationele verhalen en simplificaties, wat de perceptie van de publieke opinie beïnvloedt.

Het is daarom essentieel dat zowel wetenschappers als journalisten zich bewust zijn van hun verantwoordelijkheden. Transparantie over onzekerheden en de context van bevindingen moet centraal staan om een realistisch beeld te schetsen van de stand van de zoektocht naar buitenaards leven. Daarnaast is het belangrijk dat de publieke communicatie niet alleen gebaseerd is op feiten, maar ook op ethische principes die eerlijkheid en integriteit waarborgen.

Kortom, hoewel er in de wetenschap vaak gestreefd wordt naar een betrouwbare en genuanceerde presentatie van resultaten, worden deze vaak in een minder genuanceerde vorm gedeeld door de media. Het versterken van de wetenschap-communicatie en het kritisch blijven ten opzichte van sensationalistische verhalen kunnen bijdragen aan een meer evenwichtig en geïnformeerd publiek. Alleen door een gezamenlijke inspanning kunnen we een beter begrip en een realistisch beeld krijgen van de zoektocht naar buitenaards leven. Het is van groot belang dat zowel wetenschappers als media zich bewust zijn van hun rol in het vormen van de publieke perceptie en dat ze hun communicatie afstemmen op principes van eerlijkheid, transparantie en ethiek.

Allereerst moeten wetenschappelijke publicaties en communicatie gericht zijn op het zorgvuldig en genuanceerd presenteren van onderzoeksresultaten. Dit betekent dat wetenschappers zich bewust moeten zijn van de beperkingen en onzekerheden die inherent zijn aan voorlopig bewijs. Het gebruik van heldere taal die de context en de probabilistische aard van ontdekkingen benadrukt, kan helpen om onrealistische verwachtingen te voorkomen. Daarnaast is het cruciaal dat wetenschappelijke tijdschriften en onderzoeksgroepen zich houden aan richtlijnen voor ethische communicatie, waarbij het vermijden van overdrijving en sensatie belangrijk is om het vertrouwen van het publiek niet te ondermijnen.

Tegelijkertijd moeten mediakanalen zich inzetten voor het brengen van evenwichtige en genuanceerde berichtgeving. Sensationalistische verhalen, hoewel aantrekkelijk voor het grote publiek, kunnen de complexiteit en onzekerheid van wetenschappelijke bevindingen onderdrukken. Het is daarom essentieel dat journalisten en mediaprofessionals samen met wetenschappers werken om de juiste context te bieden, kritische vragen te stellen en de nuances te benadrukken. Door het gebruik van betrouwbare bronnen en het vermijden van overdreven claims, kan de media bijdragen aan een beter geïnformeerde samenleving die kritisch kan omgaan met informatie over buitenaards leven.

Daarnaast speelt de rol van pseudowetenschap en complottheorieën een grote rol in de publieke perceptie. In een tijdperk waarin sociale media snel en breed informatie verspreiden, worden niet-wetenschappelijke theorieën over buitenaardse contacten en geheime overheidsdeals vaak populairder dan feitelijke wetenschappelijke bevindingen. Deze verhalen worden gekenmerkt door gebrek aan bewijs, emotioneel geladen taal en selectieve interpretatie van gegevens, wat het vertrouwen in officiële communicatie ondermijnt. Het is daarom van belang dat wetenschappers en communicatieprofessionals actief tegen desinformatie optreden door het bieden van duidelijke, feitelijke en toegankelijke informatie.

Ethiek vormt hierbij een rode draad. De verantwoordelijkheid van wetenschappers en media ligt in het waarborgen van correctheid en integriteit in de communicatie over buitenaards leven. Overdrijving of het verspreiden van sensationele claims kan niet alleen het publieke vertrouwen schaden, maar ook leiden tot onnodige angst, verwarring en wantrouwen. Transparantie over de onzekerheden en beperkingen van wetenschappelijke bevindingen is daarom essentieel om een realistisch en gebalanceerd beeld te schetsen.

Tot slot is het van belang dat het publiek kritisch leert omgaan met informatie over buitenaards leven. Media en wetenschappers kunnen hierin een belangrijke rol spelen door educatie en het stimuleren van een gezonde scepsis. Het ontwikkelen van mediawijsheid en het aanleren van kritische denkvaardigheden bij het publiek kunnen helpen om desinformatie te herkennen en te weerleggen.

{ PETER2011 }

16-08-2025 om 17:23 geschreven door peter  

Hints at origins of mysterious 'alien' mummies found in Peru revealed by genetic testing

• READ MORE: Scientists probing 'alien' mummies make shocking discovery inside womb of corpse

By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

A discovery in Peru has captivated scientists and conspiracy theorists alike since 2015, when a grave digger uncovered mummified bodies inside a cave. 

These unusual remains, notable for having three fingers and three toes, sparked wild speculation. Some claimed they were aliens, others argued they represent an unknown human species, while many scientists concluded an elaborate hoax.

Today, around two dozen of these bodies are undergoing scientific examination. 

Researchers have claimed the mummies retain preserved tissue, muscles, and organs. Notably, one of the specimens was pregnant at the time of death.

Jesse Michels, podcast host of American Alchemy, recently visited the site and shared his findings with the Daily Mail, putting the idea that they are 'aliens' to rest.

'I found no evidence that they are not from Earth,' he said, suggesting the mummies might represent a previously unknown subterranean species.

Michels also noted that a bioinformatics expert analyzed the publicly available DNA and identified a gene mutation linked to a congenital condition that causes digit deformations in humans.

This offers a possible natural explanation for the creatures' unusual anatomy.

Podcast host Jesse Michels explored the location and spoke to the Daily Mail, debunking claims of the mummies being extraterrestrial

Bioinformatics specialist Alaina Hardie explained she initially sought to 'falsify the hypothesis' that a genetic mutation could cause such digit anomalies.

'I found a list of 50 genes involved in the pathway,' Hardie said. 'There is a mutation in one of those genes, called Gli3, that is associated with polydactyly.'

Polydactyly, the presence of extra digits, has been identified in archaeological remains in Peru before, suggesting it existed in ancient civilizations. 

Genetic analysis revealed that the DNA samples from the mummies mostly matched human genetic profiles, despite some contamination and technical challenges common in ancient DNA research. 

The scientific team used advanced ancient DNA extraction techniques to carefully isolate genetic material from the mummies' bone and muscle tissues. 

Researchers then employed genome sequencing and bioinformatics tools to reconstruct the genetic profiles and identify mutations. 

Due to the degraded and fragmented nature typical of ancient samples, the team cross-checked findings against known terrestrial organisms and environmental DNA to differentiate genuine ancient sequences from noise. 

While some DNA fragments could not be immediately identified, further processing indicated these were likely from known terrestrial organisms or sample quality issues.

Jesse Michels highlighted that a bioinformatics expert examined the accessible DNA data and discovered a gene mutation associated with a congenital disorder causing digit abnormalities in humans. The mummies feature only three fingers on each hand

Jesse Michels pointed out a tribe in northern Zimbabwe with ectrodactyly, known as 'Ostrich Foot Syndrome,' a congenital condition causing digit deformities

The analyzed samples included bone and muscle tissue from a mummy known as 'Victoria,' a headless humanoid specimen, confirming the human origin of the DNA. 

Michels highlighted a tribe in northern Zimbabwe where a congenital condition called ectrodactyly, or 'Ostrich Foot Syndrome,' exists. 

This disorder results in the absence of one or more central digits, creating a cleft or V-shaped gap in the hand or foot.

'There are these mutations rendered adaptive in certain environments and persist over time,' Michels said in his documentary. 'So it could be just that, which would be remarkable all on its own.'

While polydactyly does not align with the three-fingered mummies, ectrodactyly is more of a match.

José Zace, chief of the medical division for the Mexican Navy and part of the team studying the mummies, found that the larger bodies contain 70 percent known DNA, while the rest is completely different.

In the case of Montserrat (pictured), researchers hypothesized that the cause of death was a significant trauma sustained over an extended period

The mystery surrounding the bizarre ' alien ' mummies found in Peru has deepened after scientists said they discovered a fetus inside the womb of one of the 'corpses'. CT scans (pictured) captured the fetus lying on its back

Dr David Ruiz Vela, a lead expert investigating the remains, suggested the mummies could be hybrids. 

He proposed that 'Maria,' one of the specimens, has mixed traits resulting from natural migration and interbreeding events between different primate or human species across Asia and Africa, spanning a broad timeframe from 250,000 to 2,500 years ago.

To uncover the mummies' origins, Michels plans to enlist Colossal Biosciences, an American biotechnology and genetic engineering company, to conduct deeper DNA analysis. 

Colossal recently made headlines for efforts to bring the dire wolf back from extinction using genetic engineering.

Jamie Maussan and some Mexican lawmakers became the subject of international ridicule when he presented two boxes with supposed mummies found in Peru in front of Mexico's congress

Mummies were confiscated at an airport. Lab testing showed they were fake. But the owner said they were replicas to sell to tourists

'They need permission from the Peruvian government,' Michels said. 'If the government won't allow a top American biotech company to use their proprietary ancient DNA testing techniques on these mummies, then I don't know what else you need to understand their position on the subject.'

Read More

EXCLUSIVE

•  Chilling theory emerges about suspicious activity in space... as Harvard expert warns we will tear ourselves apart: 'Time to worry' 

The mummies first gained international attention in 2022 when journalist Jamie Maussan showcased several tiny beings in Mexico's Congress, proclaiming their authenticity. 

At a subsequent meeting, a group of doctors supported the claim that the bodies were once living organisms. Some experts reportedly studied five similar specimens for over four years.

However, in 2023, the mummies were declared a hoax after another journalist was found with two small 'mummies' that turned out to be dolls. Manuel Caceres had made wooden figurines inspired by the mummies to sell to tourists. These were confiscated at Lima airport and sent for lab analysis.

Forensic archaeologist Flavio Estrada, who led the investigation, stated that the claims that the specimens are extraterrestrial are 'totally false.'

'The conclusion is simple: they are dolls assembled with bones of animals from this planet, glued with modern synthetic adhesives,' Estrada said, arguing his case.

'Therefore, they were not assembled during pre-Hispanic times. They are not extraterrestrials; they are not aliens.'

Despite this, Michels said Caceres is suing the government for $3 million following the controversy.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

15-08-2025 om 22:19 geschreven door peter  

“Never Get Into a War With the Greys”: Whitley Strieber’s Cautionary Encounter

Whitley Strieber, well-known for his decades of writings and testimony on alleged alien contact, has shared many strange and often unsettling experiences. In a conversation featured in DEBRIEFED Episode 36, Strieber recounted a brief but remarkable meeting with a mysterious figure he identified as a “Nordic.”

This encounter was notable not only because the being appeared distinctly non-human, but also for a warning he gave — a statement that continues to echo in UFO discussions:

“Never get into a war with the Greys, because they’ll never let you win, and they will never let you stop fighting.”

Who Are the “Greys”?

In UFO lore, the Greys are among the most frequently reported alien types. Typically described as small, humanoid beings with large heads and dark eyes, they are often linked to abduction accounts and alleged medical or technological experiments. Some reports describe “tall Greys” or “tall whites” as mature versions of the smaller beings.

Strieber says his own experiences involve different forms of Greys, along with human-looking individuals and other entities — but the warning from the Nordic suggested a far more complex and possibly dangerous relationship between humans and these beings.

The Nordic Encounter

Strieber recalls meeting the Nordic under circumstances involving individuals connected to the U.S. Department of Defense. The man appeared around 6’7” tall, with blond hair and green eyes, looking more human than many Nordic descriptions in UFO literature. He introduced himself by saying, “I am not of you.”

Afterward, a defense contact explained to Strieber that this being was what they called a “Nordic.” When asked where such beings might originate, the reply was telling: “In that direction, we believe” — referring to the Pleiades star cluster.

Why the Warning Matters

The Nordic’s message about never engaging in war with the Greys suggests that such a conflict would be unwinnable and perpetual. This implies either an overwhelming technological superiority or a style of warfare so persistent and unconventional that humans could not hope to end it on their own terms.

Strieber noted that when he hears of modern military encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), he remembers this warning and wonders if today’s decision-makers are unaware of the potential consequences.

Broader Implications

The conversation also touched on the possibility of government or shadow-government programs working alongside extraterrestrials — whether Nordics, Greys, or other types. Strieber referenced discussions with the U.S. Senate Select Intelligence Committee in the past, and the idea of “black budget” projects funding secret facilities unknown even to official Pentagon records.

If such covert collaborations exist, they may already involve managing relationships — peaceful or otherwise — with non-human intelligences.

Whether one interprets Strieber’s account as literal truth, allegory, or speculative fiction, the cautionary phrase “Never get into a war with the Greys” is a stark reminder of how little humanity might understand about potential alien civilizations. If contact ever becomes public and undeniable, history could show that the greatest danger was not in making first contact — but in how we chose to respond afterward.

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

13-08-2025 om 15:15 geschreven door peter  

Bombshell new investigation into Pennsylvania's Roswell as mystery of UFO crash deepens

By JAMES CIRRONE, US NEWS REPORTER

An eyewitness to the supposed crash-landing of a UFO in a small Pennsylvania town nearly 60 years ago now claims investigators have made new, startling discoveries about the incident. 

On December 9, 1965, people in seven US states and Canada reported seeing a giant fiery object lighting up the night sky.

Ronnie Strubel, 82, lived in Greensburg, Pennsylvania, at the time and described it as a 'fireball with a red rooster tail behind it'.

Contrary to more recent reports where witnesses claim UFOs they saw were unnaturally quick, Strubel told Daily Mail the object he saw was moving about as fast as a commercial airplane.

Then, he said, it came down in a wooded area in the unincorporated town of Kecksburg, which lies in Westmoreland County.

'It only took like 15 or 20 minutes for us to get out to the site, and the military was already there,' he said. 

But in the decades since, this strange event likely seen by thousands of people has largely been erased from the collective memory.

That is, until the History Channel aired a documentary on the subject earlier this month, where a mix of experts used modern technology to uncover what may have happened all those years ago in Kecksburg.

Many locals who claim to have seen the UFO pass over Kecksburg, Pennsylvania, say it looked like an acorn (Pictured: A model of the UFO is seen displayed in town)

Pictured: The History Channel team, alongside first-hand UFO witnesses Bill Weaver (second from right) and Ronnie Strubel (right), stand in the woods near the supposed crash site

Kecksburg is a small, unincorporated town in Westmoreland County. The nearest big city is Pittsburgh

The 42-minute long episode, titled 'Pennsylvania's Roswell', was part of reality TV series Beyond Skinwalker Ranch, a show that focuses on sites around the country where there has been supposed paranormal activity.

Strubel and another local, Bill Weaver, were featured in the episode. During a shot near the crash site, Strubel told the same story, but Weaver added some more context about the government response.

'The police and the military, they were all over the place. And there were guys out there in dark suits. They were the ones that seemed to be in charge,' Weaver said.

'While we were standing there watching what was going on, the state police and the military came up to us and they told us, "If you don't move, we're going to confiscate your car." And I figured I better move,' he added.

Hosts Andy Bustamante, an ex-CIA officer, and Paul Beban, an award-winning journalist, unpacked much of the lore surrounding the UFO sighting and crash.

This included the persisting claim from longtime residents that the object they saw was shaped like an acorn.

An acorn-like model of the alleged UFO has been sitting outside the Kecksburg Volunteer Fire Station since the 1990, when it was created as a prop for the NBC show 'Unsolved Mysteries.'

They also discussed many of the explanations that were thrown out by the federal government in the days, months and years after the incident.

Pictured: The very first Greensburg Tribune-Review article on the Kecksburg UFO incident, dated December 10, 1965

Pictured: The History Channel team did a LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) scan of the ground near where the UFO was thought to have crashed. Technologist Pete Kelsey claimed that this blue area was abnormally flat compared to the rest of the surrounding topography

The team then returned to that exact spot with handheld spectrum analyzers to measure the radio waves. The reading on the left was taken from the flat area discovered by the LiDAR, while the reading on the right was taken just 20 feet away

Very early reports quoted astronomers claiming it was merely a meteor, but this didn't hold much credibility because of the unprecedented military presence documented by witnesses and local media.

NASA still maintains that it was likely a meteor, but also acknowledges speculation that it could have been Soviet satellite.

Beban said the strangest thing about the case was that it got plenty of media attention at the time before it 'faded from view' under 'a cloak of secrecy'.

Bustamante and Beban turned to the expertise of technologist Pete Kelsey in hopes that he would be able to uncover the exact site of the UFO crash.

Kelsey used LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) imaging from a drone and slam scanner to get a topographic map of the ground, which would reveal possible impact points.

Later, the team gathered to look at the results of the scan and found what Kelsey called a patch of 'man-made earth work'.

'It's level against this otherwise very steep slope. Straight lines, right angles. Those kinds of things do not occur in nature,' he said.

They then returned to that exact spot with handheld spectrum analyzers to measure the radio waves.

Strubel revealed the findings at this past weekend's 20th annual Kecksburg UFO Festival, an event he founded with permission from the fire department in 2005

Pictured: An alien themed parade at the 2013 Kecksburg UFO Festival

The alleged crash site had a vastly different radio signature than a spot just 20 feet away, which had a flat frequency.

'This doesn't make any sense. How is there a radio signal in one place that doesn't exist just a few feet away? That's not how radio energy works,' Bustamante said. 

'We're getting even more evidence that suggests that there really was something strange that happened on this spot, in this ravine, in Kecksburg,' he added. 'We might have actually found the real crash site.'

Strubel revealed these findings at this past weekend's 20th annual Kecksburg UFO Festival, an event he founded with permission from the fire department in 2005. 

Strubel himself is a 50-year veteran of the Kecksburg Volunteer Fire Department, once serving as chief.

The three-day festival routinely attracts thousands of visitors from all over the United States and the world as a whole, he told Daily Mail.

'We've had people from Japan, from Germany, from England with this little town event that we have,' he said.

The first two days of the festival were not solely dedicated to the extraterrestrial, with attendees enjoying a cornhole competition, a parade, fireworks and even a hotdog eating contest.

A visitor enjoying a previous Kecksburg UFO Festival in 2012

'Years ago, we used to have a street fair, and that went to the wayside. And this was our idea for some kind of event to draw a little bit of money into the community. So we started the UFO Fest,' Strubel said. 

It remains unclear what truly happened in Kecksburg six decades ago, but the mythos surrounding the UFO crash is clearly buoying the area to this day.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

13-08-2025 om 00:32 geschreven door peter  

Chilling new clue interstellar object is of intelligent design... as scientists warn 'it could save or destroy us'

• READ MORE: Mysterious interstellar object is caught on camera 

By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

The scientific community is embroiled in a heated debate over the origin of a mysterious interstellar object that entered our solar system last month.

While NASA initially identified the object, named 3I/ATLAS, as a comet after spotting what appeared to be a tail, Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb publicly challenged that conclusion on Thursday. 

Speaking to CNN, Loeb revealed that the object's unusual brightness suggests it is 'not a common thing.' 

'The brightness of the object implies a diameter of 12 miles, and there is not enough rocky material in interstellar space to deliver such a giant object per decade,' he said.

NASA's Hubble Space Telescope captured images of the object on July 21, revealing a glowing area at its front, something never before observed in a comet. 

'Usually, for comets, you see a tail trailing behind the object,' said Loeb. 'Here, the glow is actually in front of it. We've never seen such a thing. A comet doesn't glow in front.'

Loeb has also raised the possibility that the object may not be natural at all. 

'It may come to save us or destroy us,' the professor said. 'We'd better be ready for both options and check whether all interstellar objects are rocks.' 

The Hubble Space Telescope image of 3I/ATLAS shows a faint glow spreading out in front of the object as it moves toward the sun

The interstellar object is believed to be a comet, but Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb contends it could be an alien craft

Chris Lintott, an astronomer at the University of Oxford, told Live Science that Loeb's theory is 'nonsense on stilts,' calling it 'an insult to the exciting work going on to understand this object.'

However, Loeb said his analysis remains rooted in observational data.

He told CNN that another clue that the object is not natural is its 'very finely tuned' trajectory.

'It lies in the plane of the orbits of the planets around the sun to within five degrees,' Loeb explained.

According to him, the odds of that alignment happening by chance are one in 500. Even more striking, he says, is how closely the object passes Jupiter, Mars, and Venus, a pattern with odds of 1 in 20,000 if the arrival time were randomized. 

'It will arrive closest to the sun when the Earth is on the opposite side. We won't be able to observe it. But that's the perfect time for it to maneuver.' 

By 'maneuver,' Loeb refers to his theory that the object might use its solar flyby in October as a stealthy approach window, if it is, in fact, an alien probe.  

Among his more provocative theories, Loeb wrote on his blog that 3I/ATLAS could be an alien mothership releasing small probes to intercept Earth.

Telescopes have been tracking the course of 3I/ATLAS as it travels through our solar system in 2025 and 2026

Images of 3I/ATLAS taken on July 4 and July 29, 2025, show no sign of a comet tail. The arrows in the images indicate the directions of the sun, north, east and the way the object is moving through space

'The more likely scenario from an engineering perspective involves a mothership that releases mini-probes which perform a reverse Oberth maneuver to slow down at perihelion and intercept Earth,' Loeb wrote.

This type of maneuver uses the sun's gravitational pull at the object's closest approach to adjust the trajectory efficiently, allowing it to reach Earth without large amounts of fuel.

'So, we just need to watch it. I'm not saying it's an alien technology, I'm just saying it doesn't look like a very common thing,' Loeb told CNN.

'Why should we assume that we are the only ones in our cosmic neighborhood? We should just check by looking at the data.'

While NASA reported observing a tail, Loeb and his team recently determined that no such thing exists. 

'There were claims of a tail,' he said, 'but since 3I/ATLAS is accelerating and its current size is not much larger than the angular resolution of Earth-based telescopes, it is not easy to avoid fictitious elongation of the image as a result of the object's motion.' 

He also questioned the object's unusual lack of gas emissions and its precise, retrograde trajectory, which aligns suspiciously well with the inner solar system.

Loeb has developed what he calls the 'Loeb Scale', a ranking system to evaluate the likelihood that an object is artificial, and gave 3I/ATLAS a six out of ten.

That suggests it is more likely than not to be engineered, though he emphasized that this score may change as more data becomes available.

 RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

12-08-2025 om 23:50 geschreven door peter  

UFO whistleblower reveals the FOUR types of aliens the US government knows about

• READ MORE: Harvard scientist warns mysterious interstellar object could be 'hostile' alien craft set to visit Earth in just months

By STACY LIBERATORE, U.S. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

A recent Capitol Hill hearing has reignited debate over Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. 

In a May UAP briefing, physicist Dr Eric Davis, known for his work on top-secret Pentagon projects, stunned listeners by referencing alleged alien species, 'Grays, Nordics, Insectoids, and Reptilians,' as potential operators of unidentified craft. 

Davis described these entities as humanoid, approximately human-sized, and possibly linked to classified reverse-engineering programs.

Missouri Representative Eric Burlison, a member of the House Oversight Committee and UAP caucus, prompted the discussion, revealing on The Endless Void with Kristin Fisher that he had heard these same four classifications in private briefings.

'I've heard those four classifications discussed in meetings in this office by others,' Burlison said. 

'But what I wasn't expecting was for him to say it. I wasn't expecting Eric Davis, you know, respected scientists, to say that.'

Burlison, a self-described skeptic, admitted uncertainty about Davis's sources, noting the physicist's comments may stem from firsthand knowledge or secondhand reports. 

'If true, this would be a paradigm-shifting moment,' Burlison said. 'But if it is true, the government has no right to keep such a secret from the public it serves.' 

A respected scientists told Congress that there are four alien species piloting craft in our skies, including Nordics that have human-like features

Dr Eric Davis (left) described these entities as humanoid, approximately human-sized, and possibly linked to classified reverse-engineering programs. Missouri Representative Eric Burlison prompted the question about the different alien species 

The concept of Grays as a popular alien archetype took hold in the mid-1960s, largely due to the famous Betty and Barney Hill abduction case. 

The couple described being taken by small humanoids with smooth gray skin, large black almond-shaped eyes, and lacking typical human features like noses or ears.

Nordics are described as tall, slender beings resembling Scandinavian humans, with blonde hair, blue eyes, and fair skin. 

Often linked to the Pleiades star cluster, these entities are said to possess advanced technology and peaceful intentions, featuring prominently in 1950s contactee and UFO lore.

Insectoids, meanwhile, have been part of alien mythology since at least the early 1900s, with roots tracing back to Georges Méliès' 1902 film 'A Trip to the Moon.' 

These beings exhibit insect-like traits such as multiple limbs, exoskeletons, mandibles, and sometimes antennae.

The reptilian theory, claiming shape-shifting reptilian aliens secretly control Earth, surged in popularity through conspiracy theorist David Icke in the late 20th century. 

Interestingly, similar half-human, half-serpent figures appear in ancient South and Southeast Asian myths, such as the Nāga.

Another is Grays, described as small humanoids with smooth gray skin, large black almond-shaped eyes, and lacking typical human features like noses or ears

Betty (left) and Barney Hill (right) were the first Americans who claimed they were abducted by Grays in September 1961

While Davis named each of these in May, Burlison leaned toward a more earthly explanation, suggesting UAPs are likely advanced human-made technologies, perhaps experimental projects by private contractors.

'With all of the advancements that we've made, the fact that we discovered the Higgs Boson particle, all of the discoveries in quantum physics, and that nobody has figured out a way to create some form of advanced propulsion,' he remarked. 

However, Burlison expressed frustration at the thought of such technology existing, recalling how he sat delayed on a tarmac for three hours due to weather, joking, 'If we have advanced propulsion, I'm going to be really angry.' 

Critics have dismissed the hearings as veering into the absurd, with references to 'reptilians' and 'insectoids' sounding more like science fiction than serious inquiry.

Insectoids, meanwhile, have been part of alien mythology since at least the early 1900s, with roots tracing back to Georges Méliès' 1902 film 'A Trip to the Moon.' These beings exhibit insect-like traits such as multiple limbs, exoskeletons, mandibles, and sometimes antennae

Davis named each of these under oath in May as the beings invading Earth's skies. Pictured is a shot from the 'Go Fast' video that was released in 

'Some will think we're nuts,' Burlison acknowledged, aware of the skepticism his comments invite.

Read More

EXCLUSIVE

•  Chilling theory emerges about suspicious activity in space... as Harvard expert warns we will tear ourselves apart: 'Time to worry' 

Yet he defended the investigation, emphasizing that taxpayer money funds Pentagon, intelligence, and energy department programs studying UAPs.

'I owe it to the American people to get to the bottom of this,' he said.

Burlison believes the public could handle the truth if aliens were confirmed.

'Most would just read the headline and move on,' he predicted, noting humanity's tendency to normalize even the most extraordinary revelations.

However, he insisted that any such discoveries should not be hidden.

'The government belongs to the people, not the other way around,' Burlison stressed. 'Keeping such monumental secrets would betray the trust of the public.'

While remaining cautious about extraterrestrial claims, Burlison plans to press Dr Davis for clarification on whether his startling remarks come from direct knowledge or secondary reports.

The reptilian theory, claiming shape-shifting reptilian aliens secretly control Earth, surged in popularity through conspiracy theorist David Icke in the late 20th century

Burlison believes the public could handle the truth if aliens were confirmed. 

'Some will read the headline and go about their day,' he predicted, citing human behavior's tendency to normalize even earth-shattering news. 

However, he stressed that any such revelation should not be kept secret.

'I believe that this government belongs to the people. It's not that the people don't belong to the government,' he said, arguing that withholding paradigm-shifting discoveries would betray public trust.

The lack of concrete evidence, coupled with Davis's ambiguous sources, keeps the debate speculative. Burlison plans to follow up with Davis to clarify whether his claims stem from direct observation or research assignments analyzing reported phenomena.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

12-08-2025 om 23:24 geschreven door peter  

Ross Coultharts Beweringen over Reptilianen: Leven Shape-Shifting Alien Soorten Onder Ons?

Ross Coulthart’s Schokkende Reptilianen-Openbaringen
Onderzoeksjournalist Ross Coulthart, die al tientallen jaren bekend staat om zijn verslaggeving in de mainstream media, heeft onlangs het publiek opgeschud door te beweren dat hij betrouwbare bronnen heeft die hem vertelden dat meerdere niet-menselijke soorten bestaan—waaronder reptilianen. Tijdens een uitzending van Reality Check noemde Coulthart reptilianen, mantids, humanoïden, grijze wezens en zelfs “Nordics” als soorten die insiders aan hem hebben genoemd. Hoewel hij voorzichtig is door te stellen dat er niets bewezen is, wijst zijn bereidheid om dit onderwerp publiekelijk te bespreken op een groeiende openheid binnen de UAP-gemeenschap (Onbekende Atmosferische Fenomenen).

Een Patroon van Getuigenverslagen

Coultharts bewering is niet geïsoleerd. Muzikanten, overlevenden en onderzoekers hebben onrustbarende ontmoetingen beschreven met vermeende shape-shifters: wezens die in staat zouden zijn om van gedaante te veranderen en zich te vermommen als gewone mensen. Deze getuigenissen vormen samen een patroon dat wijst op een diepere, verborgen realiteit die door velen wordt betwijfeld, maar door anderen wordt bevestigd door persoonlijke ervaringen.

• Billy Corgan van The Smashing Pumpkins vertelde Howard Stern in 2017 dat hij twee keer een persoon zag veranderen in “iets anders dan menselijk.” Hij bleef bij zijn verhaal jaren later, waarbij hij meer details toevoegde, maar weigerde de betrokken persoon te noemen uit privacyoverwegingen. Zijn getuigenis wordt vaak aangehaald als voorbeeld van een onverklaarbare transformatie die niet te verklaren is door gewone menselijke vaardigheden.
• Juliette Bryant, een overlevende van Jeffrey Epstein’s misbruik, beschreef hoe ze Epstein’s gezicht zag veranderen in reptiliaanse kenmerken tijdens een ontmoeting—grote zwarte ogen, een brede mond en hoornachtige uitsteeksels. Ze benadrukte dat ze op dat moment niet onder invloed was en niet dronken, wat haar ervaring geloofwaardiger maakt. Haar verhaal wijst op een mogelijkheid dat sommige mensen echte ontmoetingen hebben met wezens die zich kunnen maskeren als mensen.
• Jordan Maxwell, een auteur en onderzoeker van oude religies, vertelde een verhaal van een rijke zakenman uit Las Vegas. De man beweerde dat hij samen met vijf andere christenen een ritueel in de Colorado-woestijn had gezien, dat onderbroken werd door een reptiliaan van ongeveer 2 meter hoog. Het wezen zou de groep telepathisch hebben immobiliseerd voordat het vertrok. Deze getuigenissen vormen een patroon dat wijst op een wereld vol verborgen wezens die zich kunnen maskeren, en dat deze ontmoetingen niet uniek zijn, maar deel uitmaken van een bredere, complexe realiteit.

Het “Vliegtuig Dame” Incident

In 2023 werd een video viraal die de luchtvaartwereld en sociale media in grote opschudding bracht. De beelden toonden een passagier aan boord van een vliegtuig die duidelijk emotioneel en geëmotioneerd was. Ze verklaarde luid en duidelijk: “Die motherf**ker daarachter is niet echt,” terwijl ze verwees naar een ander passagier of mogelijk een crewlid achter haar. Deze uitspraak wekte onmiddellijk verwarring en verontrusting onder medepassagiers, omdat het niet duidelijk was wat ze precies bedoelde. De vrouw begon vervolgens aandringen op een onmiddellijke vertrek van het vliegtuig, met de boodschap dat ze niet langer wilde wachten.

Wat deze gebeurtenis nog intrigerender maakte, was dat de vrouw later in een poging tot verduidelijking tegenstrijdige verklaringen gaf. In eerste instantie bleef ze bij haar bewering dat haar uitspraak serieus genomen moest worden en dat ze geen andere optie zag dan te vertrekken. Later beweerde ze echter dat haar woorden niet letterlijk bedoeld waren, dat ze onder invloed was van emoties en dat er een misverstand was ontstaan. Toch weigerde ze haar oorspronkelijke uitspraak volledig terug te nemen. Haar volharding in haar standpunt dat ze “100%” gelijk had en dat haar beslissing om het vliegtuig te verlaten gerechtvaardigd was, voedde de geruchten en speculaties.

De reactie van medepassagiers en de bemanning was snel en verdeeld. Sommigen zagen haar handelen als een onacceptabele en onprofessionele uitbarsting, terwijl anderen sympathiseerden met haar stressvolle situatie. De luchtvaartmaatschappij probeerde de situatie onder controle te krijgen door de politie te bellen en de vrouw te vragen het vliegtuig te verlaten. Uiteindelijk werd ze door de autoriteiten uit het vliegtuig gehaald, maar haar gedrag en woorden bleven onderwerp van discussie.

Het incident zette ook de aandacht op de bredere problematiek van communicatie en emoties aan boord van vliegtuigen. Passagiers worden vaak geconfronteerd met stress, vertragingen en ongemakken, wat kan leiden tot uitbarstingen en conflicten. Veel experts benadrukken dat kalm blijven en duidelijk communiceren essentieel is om escalatie te voorkomen. Daarnaast roept dit incident vragen op over de rol van sociale media: hoe snel een korte video kan leiden tot publieke veroordeling, zelfreflectie en discussie over gedrag en mental health.

Kortom, de “Vliegtuig Dame” gebeurtenis van 2023 illustreert hoe een moment van emotie kan uitgroeien tot een breed gedragen verhaal dat veel verder reikt dan de oorspronkelijke gebeurtenis. Het benadrukt de complexiteit van menselijke emoties in stressvolle situaties en de kracht van media om zulke incidenten te verspreiden en te analyseren.

Culturele en Historische Parallellen

Gezichten die lijken op slangen of reptielen komen voor in mythologieën en culturele tradities over de hele wereld. Deze beelden en symbolen wijzen op een universeel fascinerend patroon dat teruggaat tot de oudheid en dat vaak wordt geassocieerd met macht, wijsheid, gevaar of het bovennatuurlijke. Een bekend voorbeeld hiervan is de slang in het paradijs in de Bijbel, die wordt gezien als de verleider die Eva verleidt en zo de zondeval inluidt. Dit symbool van de slang wordt vaak geassocieerd met verleiding en kennis, en heeft door de eeuwen heen talloze interpretaties en artistieke uitingen gekregen.

In andere culturen zien we de gevederde slangen-goden in de Meso-Amerikaanse beschavingen, zoals Quetzalcoatl bij de Azteken en de Olmeken. Deze goden worden afgebeeld als slangen met veren, symbool voor de verbinding tussen hemel en aarde, en worden vereerd als scheppers, leraren en beschermers. Hun afbeelding toont de diepe relatie tussen reptielen en de spirituele wereld, en benadrukt hun rol als wezens die tussen verschillende dimensies kunnen bewegen.

Sommige theorieën suggereren dat reptilianen—een term die vaak wordt gebruikt in moderne complottheorieën—een zeer geëvolueerde afstammeling kunnen zijn van de prehistorische reptielen die ooit de aarde bevolkten. Volgens deze opvattingen zouden deze wezens zich over de tijd hebben ontwikkeld tot intelligente, verborgen beschavingen die zich kunnen vermommen als mensen. Andere theorieën gaan nog verder en beschouwen reptilianen als interdimensionale entiteiten die zich kunnen disguise als mensen, om zo onopgemerkt te blijven en invloed uit te oefenen op menselijke samenlevingen.

De parallellen tussen deze mythologische beelden en de moderne theorieën over reptilianen illustreren hoe diepgeworteld de fascinatie is voor deze wezens en hun vermeende invloed op de menselijke geschiedenis. Of het nu gaat om symboliek in oude kunst en religie of om hedendaagse complottheorieën, de gedachte aan reptielen en hun connectie met de mensheid blijft een intrigerend en mysterieus onderwerp dat door de eeuwen heen een belangrijke rol speelt in onze culturele verbeelding. Het vormt een brug tussen het oude en het nieuwe, en benadrukt onze voortdurende zoektocht naar de waarheid achter de legendes en symbolen die onze geschiedenis en cultuur definiëren.

Wij?

De mensheid staat voor een raadsel: Zijn deze verhalen slechts mythen, misverstanden of psychologische projecties? Of bestaan er werkelijk buitenaardse wezens die zich kunnen transformeren en in onze wereld kunnen verschijnen? Deze vraag vormt al eeuwenlang een bron van fascinatie, verwarring en discussie onder wetenschappers, onderzoekers en gewone mensen.

Veel mensen geloven dat er meer is dan wat we met onze zintuigen kunnen waarnemen. In talrijke culturen over de hele wereld bestaan verhalen over buitenaardse wezens, ufologen rapporteren onverklaarbare waarnemingen en getuigen verklaren dat ze contact hebben gehad met vreemde entiteiten. Sommige van deze verhalen beschrijven wezens die zich kunnen veranderen in verschillende vormen, van humanoïde figuren tot meer abstracte en ongrijpbare verschijnselen. Maar wat is de waarheid? Zijn deze verhalen gebaseerd op werkelijke ontmoetingen, of zijn ze het resultaat van menselijke verbeelding, psychologische projecties of zelfs massale hysterie?

Aan de ene kant zijn er concrete bewijzen die het bestaan van buitenaardse wezens suggereren, zoals onverklaarbare vliegende objecten (UFO's), mysterieuze geluiden en vreemde structuren die op aarde worden gevonden. In recente jaren heeft de Amerikaanse overheid bijvoorbeeld de officiële erkenning van onverklaarbare luchtreizigers (UAP's) onder de aandacht gebracht, wat heeft geleid tot een hernieuwde interesse in het fenomeen. Sommige onderzoekers geloven dat deze waarnemingen kunnen wijzen op geavanceerde buitenaardse technologieën die zich kunnen aanpassen en transformeren om onopgemerkt te blijven.

Aan de andere kant is er ook veel scepsis en twijfel. Psychologen en wetenschappers wijzen erop dat veel waarnemingen en verhalen kunnen worden verklaard door menselijke perceptie, hallucinaties, of het verkeerd interpreteren van natuurlijke verschijnselen. Bovendien zijn er geen definitieve bewijzen die onomstotelijk aantonen dat buitenaardse wezens daadwerkelijk in onze wereld aanwezig zijn. Sommige theorieën suggereren dat deze verhalen eerder psychologische projecties zijn van onze collectieve angsten en verlangens, of dat ze voortkomen uit de behoefte om het onbekende te verklaren.

De vraag of buitenaardse wezens zich kunnen transformeren en in onze wereld kunnen verschijnen, raakt ook aan de ideeën over technologische en mentale vermogens die wij ons nog maar nauwelijks kunnen voorstellen. Sommige theorieën over buitenaardse intelligentsia suggereren dat zij niet enkel fysieke vormen kunnen aannemen, maar zich ook kunnen manifesteren via telepathie, holografische projecties of andere geavanceerde technologieën. Hierdoor zouden ze zich kunnen aanpassen aan onze perceptie en zelfs in onze wereld kunnen verschijnen zonder dat wij dat direct doorhebben.

Kortom, de vraag of deze verhalen slechts mythen zijn of dat er werkelijk buitenaardse wezens bestaan die zich kunnen transformeren en in onze wereld kunnen verschijnen, blijft een van de grootste mysteries van onze tijd. Het is een fascinerend vraagstuk dat ons uitdaagt om onze perceptie van realiteit te heroverwegen en open te staan voor nieuwe mogelijkheden, terwijl we tegelijkertijd kritisch blijven kijken naar de bewijzen en verklaringen die worden aangedragen. De zoektocht naar antwoorden gaat door, en misschien zal de toekomst ons meer duidelijkheid brengen over deze intrigerende en complexe kwestie.

Scepticisme en Open Vragen

De mainstream wetenschap heeft tot op heden geen verifieerbaar bewijs gevonden voor het bestaan van reptiliaanse wezens. Ondanks talloze geruchten, getuigenissen en theorieën, is er geen wetenschappelijke studie of fysiek bewijs dat deze wezens daadwerkelijk bestaan. Veel van de verhalen die hierover de ronde doen, kunnen worden verklaard door psychologische fenomenen zoals hallucinaties, perceptie-fouten, of zelfs bewust bedrog. Mensen kunnen in staat zijn om beelden of ervaringen te creëren die lijken op reptiliaanse wezens, vooral in situaties van slaapverlamming, psychedelisch gebruik, of suggestieve verhalen. Daarnaast kunnen massale angst, groepsdruk of culturele mythen leiden tot het ontstaan van dergelijke verhalen zonder dat er een objectieve basis is.

Toch blijven soortgelijke getuigenissen bestaan uit verschillende culturen en tijden, wat de theorie levend houdt binnen de UFO-gemeenschap en onder theorieën over buitenaardse of niet-menselijke wezens. In sommige inheemse tradities worden reptiliale wezens beschreven als kwaadaardige goden of scheppers, terwijl in moderne UFO-raporten mensen melden dat ze reptiliaanse entiteiten hebben gezien die zich vermommen als mensen of die invloed uitoefenen op wereldleiders en belangrijke gebeurtenissen. Deze verhalen worden vaak versterkt door anekdotisch bewijs en vermeende geheime documenten, maar ontbreken meestal van controleerbare en reproduceerbare bewijzen.

De centrale vraag blijft of deze verhalen symbolisch, verkeerd begrepen fenomenen of echte niet-menselijke wezens vertegenwoordigen. Sommige wetenschappers en onderzoekers zien deze verhalen als een soort collectief onderbewustzijn dat zich uitdrukt in mythen en persoonlijke ervaringen. Anderen suggereren dat er mogelijk verborgen lagen van de werkelijkheid zijn die nog niet volledig door de wetenschap begrepen worden. Het blijft echter een vraag zonder definitief antwoord, waardoor het onderwerp fascinerend en controversieel blijft. Het is belangrijk om open te staan voor nieuwe bewijzen en kritisch te blijven denken, terwijl we ons bewust blijven van de beperkingen van onze kennis.

Besluit

Of het nu gaat om symbolische archetypes, misvattingen over fenomenen of de aanwezigheid van echte niet-menselijke soorten, de verhalen over reptilianen blijven een van de meest polariserende onderwerpen binnen de buitenaardse lore. Deze verhalen hebben door de jaren heen een grote invloed gehad op zowel populaire cultuur als op de overtuigingen van velen die zoeken naar verklaringen voor onverklaarbare gebeurtenissen. Nu de publieke discussie over UAP’s (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) toeneemt en officiële instanties meer openheid tonen over het bestaan van vreemde waarnemingen aan de hemel, is het slechts een kwestie van tijd voordat claims over reptilianen en soortgelijke wezens serieuzer worden onderzocht. Tegelijkertijd bestaat de mogelijkheid dat sommige van deze verhalen worden ontkracht door wetenschappelijk bewijs of door kritisch onderzoek.

De beschuldigingen en verhalen rondom reptilianen roepen belangrijke vragen op over de aard van de werkelijkheid, onze perceptie en de mogelijkheid dat buitenaardse of interdimensionale wezens zich onder ons kunnen verschuilen. Sommige theorieën suggereren dat deze wezens misschien al eeuwenlang in onze samenleving aanwezig zijn, verborgen achter schijnbaar onschuldige façade’s, en dat ze invloed uitoefenen op wereldwijde gebeurtenissen of zelfs op de menselijke psyche. Hoewel er geen sluitend bewijs bestaat dat reptilianen daadwerkelijk bestaan, blijven deze verhalen een bron van intrige en speculatie, vooral omdat ze vaak worden gekoppeld aan complottheorieën en het idee dat er verborgen machten aan het werk zijn.

Het is van groot belang dat verdere wetenschappelijke en onderzoeksinspanningen openstaan voor alle mogelijkheden, zonder zich meteen vast te leggen op een vooropgezet standpunt. Alleen door een kritische en onbevooroordeelde benadering kunnen we de waarheid achter deze mysterieuze beschrijvingen proberen te achterhalen. Onderzoek op het gebied van UFO’s, buitenaardse technologieën en mogelijk niet-menselijke wezens moet met een open geest worden uitgevoerd, waarbij ook rekening wordt gehouden met alternatieve verklaringen en hypothesen. Het doel is niet alleen het bevestigen of ontkrachten van het bestaan van reptilianen, maar ook het verdiepen van ons begrip van de fenomenen die zich in onze lucht en omgeving voordoen.

In de toekomst kunnen technologische ontwikkelingen en nieuwe onderzoeksinitiatieven mogelijk meer duidelijkheid scheppen over deze complexe en vaak controversiële theorieën. Het is essentieel dat we niet snel oordelen, maar nieuwsgierig blijven en bereid zijn om onze aannames te herzien op basis van nieuwe bevindingen. Alleen door een open en kritische blik kunnen we de ware aard van deze mysterieuze verhalen doorgronden en begrijpen welke rol ze mogelijk spelen in ons bredere begrip van het universum en onze plaats daarin.

{ PETER2011 }

11-08-2025 om 21:44 geschreven door peter  

US Congress told existence of four alien breeds are being probed and named by boffins

Astrophysicist and aerospace consultant Dr Eric Davis told US Congress any of the four breeds could be behind a series of UFOs that have crashed to Earth

BY Jerry Lawton

Boffins are probing the existence of four different types of aliens.

Astrophysicist and aerospace consultant Dr Eric Davis told US Congress any of the four breeds could be behind a series of UFOs that have crashed to Earth.

The world-renowned scientist - who has worked on top secret US defence projects - named the alien species as ‘Grays, Nordics, Insectoids, and Reptilians’ which he said could all be potential operators of unidentified craft.

He said they were humanoid and approximately human-sized. They could be behind retrieved UFOs he claims the US has attempted to reverse-engineer.

It is the first time a senior scientist has revealed they are not just investigating the existence of extraterrestrials but different breeds of them.

Any of four alien species could be behind crashed UFOs found on Earth

(Image: Getty Images)

In 2020 Dr Davis revealed he had provided classified briefings to Pentagon officials on materials retrieved from UFOs that were of extraterrestrial origin which "we couldn’t make ourselves". He claimed they exhibited properties and engineering current science could not replicate and the US Government possessed technology far beyond human capability.

Congressman Eric Burlison, a member of the House Oversight Committee and its Unidentified Aerial Phenomena - aka UFO - caucus, said he had heard the same four alien classifications in private briefings.

He said: "I've heard those four classifications discussed in meetings in this office by others. But what I wasn't expecting was for him to say it. I wasn't expecting Eric Davis, you know, respected scientists, to say that."

Burlison, a self-described ET skeptic, said he did not know if Davis had direct knowledge or was relying on second-hand reports. The politician said: "If true this would be a paradigm-shifting moment. But if it is true the Government has no right to keep such a secret from the public it serves."

• ‘Grays’ aliens dates back to the ‘60s from the reported abductions of Betty and Barney Hill who described being taken by small humanoids with smooth gray skin and large black almond-shaped eyes lacking in other human features like noses or ears.
• ‘Nordics’ are described as tall, slender beings resembling Scandinavians with blonde hair, blue eyes and fair skin. Often linked to the Pleiades star cluster these entities were described by close encounter eyewitnesses dating back to the ‘50s as possessing advanced technology and peaceful intentions.
• ‘Insectoids’ have been part of alien mythology since Georges Méliès' 1902 film A Trip to the Moon. They exhibit insect-like traits such as multiple limbs, exoskeletons, mandibles and sometimes antennae.
• The ‘reptilians’ are said to be shape-shifting aliens secretly controlling Earth. Similar half-human, half-serpent figures appear in ancient south Asian myths such as the Nāga. Their existence was famously trumpeted by TV presenter and conspiracy theorist David Icke in his 1999 book The Biggest Secret.

Despite Dr Davies’s revelation Burlison believes UFOs are most likely to be advanced human-made technologies - possibly experimental projects by private contractors.

Though he admitted "some will think we're nuts" for discussing alien species Burlison said he had a duty to humanity to investigate. He said: "I owe it to the American people to get to the bottom of this.

"The Government belongs to the people - not the other way around. Keeping such monumental secrets would betray the trust of the public."

He expressed frustration at the thought such technology may exist. Recalling how he had been stuck on a runaway for three hours due to weather delays he said: "If we have advanced propulsion I'm going to be really angry."

• Mystery interstellar orb is alien mothership releasing probes, insists Harvard physicist

REATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/ }

10-08-2025 om 23:27 geschreven door peter  

Misleading biomarkers: how to discover life beyond Earth

  Volodymyr Maňko

In his book Auguste Comte in Course of Positive Philosophy, published in 1835, the French philosopher argued that the stars will always remain “mechanical objects” for us. We will be able to determine their position in the sky, measure the distance to them, and learn the patterns of their movement. But what this or that bright speck in the sky is, what it is made of, what its temperature is, will remain a mystery to us forever. The philosopher lived only a couple of years before the publication of articles by Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen, who proposed to determine the elemental composition of a radiating body by the characteristic lines in its spectrum. Since then, spectral analysis has been virtually the only tool that allows astronomers to analyze distant objects. No wonder scientists want to use it to search for life on other planets.

Of course, spectral analysis has some limitations. First, it is best suited for detecting substances in a gaseous state. That is, for example, the presence of liquid water can be detected only by the “spectral signatures” of water vapor. Secondly, habitable planets usually orbit quite close to their stars, and it is extremely difficult to separate them when observing them from Earth. In the future, this problem will probably be solved by improving astronomical instruments and imaging technologies, but for now, it has to be circumvented by other means, which are not always effective.

One way or another, the spectra of some exoplanets – or rather, their atmospheres – have already been recorded. None of the bodies studied by spectroscopy orbits in the habitable zone, where the surface temperature allows liquid water to exist; however, spectral data will be obtained for such objects sooner or later. What do scientists looking for signs of life hope to see in them?

In the image and likeness

It should be noted that modern science is aware of only one type of living organism, the one we encounter on Earth all the time. It is based on carbon chains and biochemical reactions in aqueous solutions. There are many explanations for why this combination seems to be the best for life. A separate article could be devoted to them, but one of them must be mentioned. Water is one of the most widespread chemical compounds in the universe, and it is also one of the most efficient solvents, remaining in a liquid state over a wide temperature range. This means that water provides the optimal conditions for the chemical transformations necessary to build the molecular structures of living organisms and supply them with energy.

Of course, no one can completely rule out the existence of exotic life forms based on ammonia or even rarer fluorine. Similarly, carbon does not necessarily have to be the main component of biological molecules. But the manifestations of such life are likely to be so different from what scientists are used to seeing around them that they will simply be impossible to recognize as inanimate nature. Therefore, astrobiologists are now focusing on the search for water as the most likely habitable environment. Hence, the concept of the habitable zone. This term sounds quite promising, but in fact, it only means a favorable temperature regime on the exoplanet’s surface and does not imply any “population”.

What will we see in the spectrum of an exoplanet potentially habitable for Earth-type life? First of all, of course, scientists will look for water vapor lines. However, there should not be much of it in the atmosphere: on Earth, even in the wettest jungles, its concentration reaches a maximum of a couple of percent. But our air has a lot of oxygen – more than 20%. It would seem that this is a sign of life! At least, the one we are most familiar with.

For a long time, experts have been carefully compiling a list of biomarkers, which are simple molecules that living organisms need to sustain their vital functions or are released during them. Oxygen is considered one of them, with many caveats. First, it became an essential component of the Earth’s biosphere about 2 billion years ago. Earlier, life on our planet managed quite well without it, and even now, there are many bacteria and fungi (the most famous example is yeast) that do not need it at all and even harm it. And secondly, this gas can occur, in particular, during the decomposition of water molecules under the influence of high-energy radiation. This is the so-called abiogenic oxygen, which is quite capable of confusing astronomers.

Heavier and more complex molecules, such as ethyl and methyl alcohol, formic and acetic acid, are considered more reliable signs of life. However, not everything is so simple with them. As it turned out, they can also be synthesized without any participation of living organisms, and not even on planets, but in interstellar gas and dust clouds, if there is a star nearby that can warm them up a bit. Nowadays, compounds such as amino acids, which are essential for life, are also found in these clouds. This has led to the assumption that they did not appear on Earth as a result of the vital activity of primitive cells, but were brought here from space.

On the other hand, a substance that we are used to considering a terrible poison – hydrogen cyanide, or hydrocyanic acid (HCN) – may well be associated with life. Its danger is not least determined by its high reactivity, but it is thanks to this that this substance is quite easily converted into organic molecules (the same amino acids). Hydrocyanic acid and its derivative cyanide are also quite common outside the Earth – they are almost an essential component of cometary nuclei and have been repeatedly detected in the gases that evaporate from them.

Perhaps it is easier to say which molecules are practically incompatible with Earth-type life, and thus their presence would mean that it is not worth looking for it on this particular planet. These are primarily the highly reactive halogens fluorine and chlorine, as well as some of their compounds with silicon, sulfur, and phosphorus. They quickly enter into chemical reactions with biological molecules that are familiar to us and turn them into something completely unfit for life.

So, we already know a lot of potential biomarkers. But none of them, if discovered in the spectrum of a celestial body, is unequivocal proof of the existence of life there. So how can we prove its presence using spectral methods?

Unnatural combinations

After analyzing all possible data in detail, a team of scientists led by University of Washington professor Victoria Meadows concluded that in search of life signs, it is not necessary to focus on any one universal molecule. It is much more effective to track combinations of substances that are not usually found together. The best example is oxygen and methane. Both gases are present in the Earth’s atmosphere, but in the absence of living organisms, this would be impossible: they would have reacted with each other long ago, and only the one that was initially present in excess would remain. The reaction products would be water and carbon dioxide, substances that are not directly related to life. In other words, for the planet’s gas membrane to contain oxygen along with methane, there must be a constant source of replenishment of both. The likelihood that this source is of a biological nature is not so small.

Other examples of such “incompatible pairs” are oxygen and ammonia, or oxygen and hydrogen sulfide. The latter, however, is difficult to detect spectroscopically, but with improved observational techniques, this will not be a big problem. By the way, this is also the reason why scientists were so inspired by the recent discovery of phosphine (a compound of hydrogen and phosphorus) in the Venusian atmosphere: while on Jupiter and Saturn, where it was also observed, this gas is formed as a result of abiogenic processes and can exist for a relatively long time, on Venus it would have to disappear very quickly. However, further research has shown that phosphine is present in concentrations that can also be explained by natural causes.

The development of infrared astronomy has opened up new perspectives for astronomers, allowing them to search for quite exotic molecules, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). In their case, the most interesting thing is that they are not formed in the course of any natural processes, but are exclusively the product of artificial chemical synthesis. Also, these molecules or their closest derivatives are quite resistant to decomposition and can stay in the atmosphere for a long time. If we encounter such “exotics” in the spectrum of an extrasolar planet, it is likely to mean that there is not just life, but an advanced technological civilization.

However, to find CFCs in the atmospheres of even the closest exoplanets using the available astronomical instruments, their concentration there must be ten times higher than what we currently have on Earth. It is clear that the observational technique is not standing still – perhaps in a few years, this obstacle will be overcome. The prospect of detecting brothers in mind by the spectral characteristics of only one type of molecule at once is very attractive. Therefore, it is time for scientists to expand the list of biomarkers by adding “technomarkers” or “technosignatures” – volatile substances that can only be produced and released into the air artificially. And here, not only astronomers and biologists, but also ecologists and chemists should have a say.

• This article was published in Universe Space Tech magazine #1 (189) 2023. You can buy this issue in the electronic version in our store.

• Posted in Articles, Questions

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

06-08-2025 om 23:41 geschreven door peter  

Ex-US Navy Officer Saw ‘Non-human Entities’ In His Bedroom After ‘Gimbal UFO’ Encounter

By Vicky Verma

The Gimbal UFO event stands as a significant pillar in the UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) disclosure, introducing US military whistleblowers who claim to have witnessed the phenomena they describe as “non-human.” In 2020, the U.S. Department of Defense released three pivotal UAP videos that triggered widespread discussions within the UFO community, prompting inquiries into the information held by the US government regarding these phenomena.

These videos capture UFO encounters from November 2004 and two separate incidents from January 2015, each identified by distinctive nicknames: Flir (2004), Go Fast (2015), and Gimbal (2015). They depict pilots tracking unidentified objects in the sky. Among these, the renowned 2015 UFO “Gimbal” footage was recorded by US fighter pilots near the nuclear aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, as an unidentified object appeared on their radar. Despite the pilots mentioning, “There’s a whole fleet of them, look on the SA,” the footage only displays a single mysterious object at the center of the frame.

Apart from Ryan Graves, a former Lt. U.S. Navy and F/A-18F pilot, there is another least discussed whistleblower who experienced the famous Gimbal UFO event. Matthew Roberts, a former cryptologist in the US Navy with 16 years of service, shared his experience and encounters with non-human entity during a Netflix series “Encounters.” He was present on the USS Theodore Roosevelt in 2015 during an event involving the now-famous “Gimbal footage.”

After going on several military missions and teaching other code experts while working on land, Matthew Roberts moved to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) for three years. His time at ONI ended in March 2020, and that is when he chose to quit the military, even though he was close to retiring in four years. The reason for leaving was the intense and personal experiences he had with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) while at ONI, which he writes about in his book named “Initiated.”

Roberts described his initial reaction to the gimbal footage: “I was watching this footage, and I could see no kind of aviation surfaces that you would expect to see — wings, tail, rudders. There’s none of that.” He struggled to comprehend the unconventional movement of the object, stating, “I couldn’t really make sense of why this thing was kind of up in the air like it was.”

As he looked more closely at the video, Roberts realized something important: “I knew it didn’t belong to us or anyone else. So, the only other possibility, I think, is that it’s technology from non-human intelligence.”

Given his classified role and access to sensitive information, Roberts was aware that such encounters were not isolated incidents for the Navy: “I was kind of aware this was not a one-off event for the Navy. These things happen frequently, all the time, going against the wind.” Roberts confessed to being captivated by the footage, watching it obsessively. Despite his access to classified information, he had no awareness of the actions taken by the upper chain of command concerning these encounters.

In 2017, after transferring to the Office of Naval Intelligence, Roberts claimed to have had follow-on experiences with what he described as nonhuman entities. He recounted unsettling encounters where he would wake up feeling his body being moved across the bed and experiencing a hand grabbing his arm. Roberts believed these encounters were evidence of non-human intelligence.

“In 2017, I moved to the Office of Naval Intelligence, where I was going to work as an analyst. Shortly after I got there, I began having experiences related to the phenomenon. It was like the start of seeing nonhuman entities in my room at night. I would wake up several times a week, feeling my body sliding across the bed, and I knew they were taking me. One time, I woke up because I felt a hand grab my arm. I tried to raise my hands to my face, but I couldn’t move. I could see the outline of a shadowy figure with a torso, two arms, and a head standing over me.

Back when I was in the Navy and saw the footage, I already knew there was something nonhuman out there. So, when these entities started appearing in my room, I knew all of this was real. I had the comfort of knowing I wasn’t going crazy; I understood what it was. There’s a lot of sensor and radar evidence. I believe that if they just release all the footage and say, “Hey, this is what we have, we don’t even have to explain it, we don’t know,” there would be no doubt about whether the phenomenon is real. Everyone would know it.”

Read also:

• Journalist Reveals Bob Lazar’s Astonishing Claim: Extraterrestrials See Humans as ‘Containers of Souls’
• Journalist Reveals First-Ever Photograph of UFO Shot Down in Syria in 2021

Thinking about all the sensor and radar evidence, Roberts said that if they share all the available videos, people would not doubt if the UFO phenomenon is real. He said, “Everyone would know it.” Roberts’ account provides a unique perspective on the UFO phenomenon, combining his military background, access to classified information, and personal experiences with what he believes to be non-human entities.

Mick West, known for debunking UAPs, provided his explanation for the objects: arguing that mundane things – tech glitches, camera glare, balloons, and birds – are more likely than aliens. However, Journalist Daniel Lavelle asked Matthew Roberts about West’s theory to which Roberts politely replied “All aircraft – nationally, internationally – have to broadcast who they are. If they’re not broadcasting that, that’s very unusual. Mick West, bless his soul, he has never been in the military.”

In his book “Initiated: UAP, Dreams, Depression, Delusions, Shadow People, Psychosis, Sleep Paralysis, and Pandemics,” Roberts wrote about his personal interactions with UFOs, aliens (whom he now calls “The Progenitors”), and his intense psychological battle to cope with extraordinary paranormal experiences.

The book describes how Roberts went through strange experiences: encountering UFO aliens, other bizarre entities along with a series of other happenings forced him to question his sanity. “Initiated” tells the story of how Roberts went through tough times but came out on the other side as a changed person. He can now say he is truly “initiated.”

During his AMA on Reddit, Roberts described the non-human entities: “I saw ones that had blue skin and were tall. I saw very tall white ones that resembled Jack Skellington. I saw one that looked like a yard gnome. I saw some that appeared to radiate white light. I don’t know where they were from they never revealed that.”

Matthew Roberts explains that he never tried to film any of the encounters with non-human entities in his bedroom. When asked if he considered setting up a recording device, he mentions that these encounters often happen when individuals are in an altered state or when the entities appear in the sky with a craft, conveniently when the person does not have his cell phone.

He considered recording the experiences but decided against it. He reasons that it would not convince everyone, as some might think he faked it. Roberts believes the argument over the authenticity of any images would overshadow the main point, which is encouraging people to seek and have their own experiences with consciousness. He emphasizes that he does not need people to believe him; instead, he wants others to explore consciousness firsthand.

Roberts asserts that the truth of these experiences has been documented for thousands of years by various individuals, citing such authors as William Walker Atkinson, Mabel Collins, Joseph Campbell, Dr. John Mack, and Dr. Robert Moore. He challenges the notion that he could have orchestrated the biggest hoax in human history, suggesting that there may be something genuinely significant in these experiences.

He points to the wealth of evidence available for those willing to examine it, citing a podcast by Mark Gober called “Where is My Mind,” where accomplished scientists discuss their work on consciousness. Roberts believes that understanding consciousness surviving death is a crucial aspect of our existence, mentioning the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies (BICS) and the substantial prizes offered for evidence of consciousness after death.

He suggested that these entities seem to have a significant level of control over the experiences people have, which contributes to why some individuals perceive these encounters as malevolent or evil. He acknowledged that many people who invest time and money into gathering evidence of these phenomena often end up without conclusive results.

In highlighting the rarity of tangible evidence, Roberts mentioned a particular case involving Peter Khoury, where there was reportedly some DNA evidence. However, he does not go into detail about the specifics of that case.

Roberts shared that his conscious experiences with these entities began in late 2017 and continued until the spring of 2018. During this period, he claimed to have been taken several times a week. He recounts instances of sleep paralysis as a child, where he felt a heavy presence and heard whispers. He mentioned a specific incident when he was a small boy, wrapping himself up tightly in a blanket to prevent the entities from whispering in his ear, a practice he later remembered and replicated as an adult.

In his book, Roberts takes a “mythopoetic approach to alien intrusion,” drawing parallels between his experiences and myths, religious texts, and the Hero’s Journey described by Joseph Campbell. He believes that within these encounters, individuals undergo a transformative process, akin to the cycle of death and resurrection, ultimately leading to a change in oneself.

Because of the intense experiences he had, Matthew Roberts decided to quit his military job. He then went to study psychology to learn more about the mind and emotions related to UFO phenomena. He is also working on another book that explains how his way of thinking influenced the unusual experiences he went through.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

04-08-2025 om 23:11 geschreven door peter  

This Man Says NASA Asked for Help After Astronauts Encountered Orbs Containing 125-Foot Winged Angelic Beings That Smiled at Them

At one point, they look at a photo showing Chris Jr., his son, and Chris points out that behind his son, near the wood, is where he had an encounter with a small three-foot-tall being. That is also where the orbs landed in his yard. He says the orbs left marks on the ground that killed the grass, leaving big circles with a little patch of grass left in the center like a donut. There were three such circles. Some orbs even skimmed along the ground, burning the grass as they moved before settling down.

Chris mentions that MUFON, the Mutual UFO Network, tested the soil in those areas. MUFON is a volunteer-based organization where people can report UFO sightings and get them investigated by enthusiasts and researchers.

Chris also said that one of the trees near where the orb landed, a large oak tree, died afterward. Its limbs just started falling off, and eventually the whole tree crumbled. He connects this to the orb landing only about 12 feet away from it.

On the Shawn Ryan Show, Chris discussed a powerful spiritual experience he had on Easter in 2012. He said a woman appeared to him in a vision. He calls her “The Lady” and also refers to her as “Hathor,” the ancient Egyptian goddess. She told him to start sharing his paranormal experiences with the world, including her message.

At the time, he believed he had been abducted by some force but didn’t remember the details right away. Later, he began to remember more. He said he was taken around the Earth in a clear bubble and shown different places, including Egypt, Hathor’s temple, and the Sphinx. He noticed the Sphinx was facing East.

In 2013, the same woman returned and showed him visions of the future. She gave him a prophecy. She said, “When the Red Star of Regulus appears on the horizon before daylight in the gaze of the Sphinx, at that time will be a New Knowledge to come to this planet.”

Chris said he told scientists and researchers about this, and when they checked it with astronomical tools, they confirmed that this rare alignment will happen on Easter in the year 2026.

After this, government-related groups began to focus on the date through remote viewing. Now the year 2026, and even 2027, is being talked about more in the media as a time when something big could happen. Chris says even well-known people like Lue Elizondo have mentioned 2026.

He also had a moment with a man named Robert Grant, who had been searching for a special ruby he thought needed to be placed between the paws of the Sphinx for a major event. But Chris told him it wasn’t a ruby. It was the star Regulus. Grant reacted strongly and said, “It’s the king star.”

This message from “The Lady” lines up with something Edgar Cayce, the famous psychic, predicted decades ago. Cayce said there is a hidden “Hall of Records” under the Sphinx in Egypt. He believed it contains ancient knowledge that could change the world.

According to Cayce, the chamber would only be discovered when certain stars and planets align. He described a specific moment when the shadow or light from the rising sun would fall between the Sphinx’s paws, marking the right time.

He said the entrance to the chamber would stay sealed until humanity is ready. The records are believed to contain information like:

• The history of Atlantis, an advanced civilization that supposedly sank into the ocean
• Details about the people of Atlantis, their technology, and spiritual wisdom
• Knowledge about where humans came from and why we exist
• A connection between the Atlanteans and ancient Egyptians

Cayce believed this knowledge would only be revealed when humanity becomes more spiritually aware. When that happens, it could bring in a new and better era for the world.

Chris Bledsoe now believes that whatever happens in 2026 might be connected to all of this. He even hints that it could be the return of Christ.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

04-08-2025 om 21:46 geschreven door peter  

Abduction of humans by aliens

Imagine that you have arrived in another star system, discovered an Earth-like planet, and that it has not only life, but also an advanced alien civilization. What would you do in this case? How about abducting a few dozen aliens and doing something strange with them on board your ship?

At least, according to popular beliefs, this is what aliens who come to our planet do to people. Dozens of movies have been made about this, and many people claim to have experienced something similar.

Of course, there is no scientific evidence that anything like this is happening. The proof of the existence of UFOs was extremely dubious 50 years ago, and it remains so. But let’s imagine that the aliens are us, that we have arrived in the Solar System and seen cities inhabited by some intelligent beings. Does it make sense for us to resort to crime?

Biochemistry and Biology

The first and foremost reason given for alien abductions is biological research. At first glance, this seems logical, but not from the point of view of an evolutionary biologist and ecologist.

Because any intelligent life on the planet is part of the biosphere, and the biosphere is the result of biological evolution. Its source is biochemical processes. Therefore, the basis for studying the biology of intelligent beings is the study of the physical parameters and chemical composition of the atmosphere and hydrosphere. This data is already sufficient in principle to understand the basis of life on the new world.

Further, microorganisms can be obtained from air and water samples, the study of which will already provide more information about the intelligent population of the planet than primitive vivisection. Since the synthesis of proteins based on DNA and RNA in living organisms is essentially the same, the process is not significantly different.

In addition, we should not forget about passive surveillance. Flying drones into a forest, coral reef, or savannah and getting information from them about how people move, who eats whom, and how they reproduce is much easier than abducting some drunken native and then having to deal with him when he starts telling you what you did to him.

Then we can take representatives of non-sapient species from nature and study them. This will already provide enough information about the general anatomy of living beings on this planet, and as a result, about the approximate anatomy of representatives of the local civilization. This is called the method of deduction, which is the derivation of individual statements from general ones.

Based on the study of the anatomy of species close to them and simple observations, it is already possible to find out 99 percent of all the information that can be obtained by directly studying the abducted intelligent being.

Books and the Internet

All of the above makes sense only if the alien ship is dealing with a civilization that is at a pre-industrial stage of development. To study the biology of natives with a more advanced civilization, you can use their help.

After all, any advanced civilization must have medicine. And stealing an anatomy textbook and a medical encyclopedia will be much easier and more invisible than stealing a person. After all, who knows their biology better than the locals?

Of course, the language will have to be deciphered, but if you have the time and desire to remain undetected, this is a much more justified practice than abducting people. The library should be one of the first targets for aliens, because it is ready-made knowledge, not only about biology but also about everything that is happening or has happened on the planet. Of course, there may be mistakes in interpreting what is written, but stealing books for aliens is still much more effective than abducting people.

What can we say about the Internet? You can simply connect to it, decrypt it, and you do not need any hijacking at all.

Culture, politics, and volunteers

By the way, if the aliens, which we are, want to interact with the natives in the future in some way other than turning around and flying away, then information about the culture and political realities of the latter will be more important to them than biology. After all, even if it is in your interest to simply destroy your competitors, provoking a world war would be the most effective way to weaken them.

Suppose your plans are more peaceful, for example. In that case, you simply want to turn the planet into your colony, then information about how local culture and politics work becomes vital to you. And again, it is easiest to get this information from publicly available information sources, if they have already appeared on the planet.

And forcibly abducting someone to find out all the clear points is probably the worst way to keep up with all the events. It is much more effective to look for voluntary helpers. After all, if the civilization on the planet has already “grown up” to the idea of the existence of other worlds and life on them, there will be enthusiasts for contact among the population.

And these are the natives who do not need to be abducted. They will voluntarily provide their bodies for the study of everything that is still in question in the field of biology and tell us everything they know about the world around them.

After all, unlike abduction victims, they will not tell you that something strange has happened to them. And finally, assistants can then run errands for you on the planet, search for information, or prepare the ground for contact.

Exotic causes

The abduction of humans by aliens for study for further peaceful contact, conquest, or extermination does not make sense if they have sufficient time and resources for detailed research. It does make sense if the contact is certain to be non-peaceful and very quick.

For example, if some nomadic horde of aliens is planning to pass through the Solar System in the coming decades, and they are going to just eat everything here and fly on, abduction, interrogation, and anatomization may be a strategy. But then there will be no aborigines who return to their people and tell them that they were abducted.

The situation is similar with such exotic possibilities as abducting people for alien zoos, hunting us for food or for ritual purposes, and all that. In these cases, there would simply be no witnesses. At the same time, the scenarios themselves seem somewhat far-fetched.

Finally, if we are to consider all versions, we should not forget about the idea of abduction for mating and hybridizing aliens and natives, no matter how strange it may sound. And this is where abduction is a completely unnecessary thing. This particular task is much easier to accomplish with the help of volunteers.

So in fact, even if aliens are exploring the Earth right now, they are not likely to abduct someone by force and then return them. But they will get collaborators, but the latter will not talk about any violence on their part.

But they will almost certainly tell you how good it is to meet aliens. By the way, there are plenty of such stories, although they are less common than abduction stories. In ge }neral, we cannot rule out the possibility that other civilizations have been observing us for centuries, and their methods of obtaining information are so integrated into our society that we simply do not distinguish them from our own culture.

• Posted in News, Science

04-08-2025 om 21:12 geschreven door peter  

Aliens: Facts about extraterrestrial life and how scientists are looking for it

Everything you need to know about aliens

Discover more about aliens

• What could aliens look like?
• What's the best evidence we've found for alien life?
• Are aliens real?

{ https://www.livescience.com/space }

03-08-2025 om 23:28 geschreven door peter  

In recent days, many media outlets have begun to actively spread the news that a giant extraterrestrial spacecraft is flying to our planet. Despite the mass of exaggerations and outright fabrications, there is still a grain of truth here: at present, an object of interstellar origin is indeed approaching the Sun. We are talking about comet 3I/ATLAS, which was discovered in early July.

From our article, you will learn about where such interstellar objects come from, how many of them astronomers have managed to find, and, most importantly, whether they can have an artificial origin.

What are interstellar objects?

Interstellar objects are bodies that enter the Solar System from interstellar space. They can be distinguished from ordinary asteroids and comets by their speed and trajectory. Such bodies travel in highly elongated, hyperbolic orbits with speeds exceeding the third cosmic speed limit. Or, to put it another way, they are not gravitationally bound to the Sun. Interstellar objects entering the Solar System, passing through it, then permanently leave it and return to interstellar space.

Where do interstellar objects come from?

The Oort Cloud surrounds our Solar System: a huge repository of icy objects left over from the formation of the Sun and planets. It is the main “supplier” of long-period comets. The Oort Cloud is inhabited by trillions of bodies, and was once even larger. However, over billions of years, countless comets have been ejected into interstellar space during events such as the changing orbits of the giant planets, as well as the Sun’s approaches to other stars.

Astronomers have no reason to believe that Oort cloud analogs in other stars behave differently. Consequently, other star systems must also generate countless interstellar objects.

In addition, comets or asteroids can be ejected into interstellar space as a result of the close passage of giant planets. Astronomers know at least two such cases. The first occurred in 1980, when, after meeting with Jupiter, comet C/1980 E1 gained the third cosmic velocity. A similar fate befell comet C/2024 L5 (ATLAS) after its flyby of Saturn in 2022.

Finally, interstellar objects can be formed in the course of anthropogenic activity. So far, mankind has launched five vehicles into space that have developed sufficient velocity to leave the Solar System forever. These are Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Voyager 1, Voyager 2, and New Horizons. Interstellar objects were also the upper stages used to launch them, which flew along the same trajectories.

Known interstellar objects

To date, astronomers have managed to detect three objects in the Solar System that have an interstellar origin. The first was the asteroid Oumuamua, found in 2017. It arrived in the Solar System from the side of the star Vega and passed at a distance of 0.25 AU from the Sun.

The second is comet 2I/Borisova, found in 2019. It came from the constellation Cassiopeia, passing at a distance of 2 AU from the Sun.

The third interstellar object was comet 3I/ATLAS. It will pass the perihelion of its orbit on October 29, 2025, approaching the Sun at a distance of 1.35 AU. 3I/ATLAS has a much more elongated orbit than its predecessors. Its eccentricity is 6.2. By comparison, the eccentricity of Oumuamua was about 1.2, and that of Borisov was about 3.6.

Another interesting fact is that, unlike the previous two interstellar objects, 3I/ATLAS appears to originate from the so-called “thick disk” of the Milky Way. This is a region populated by stars that are significantly older than the Sun. Astronomers estimate that 3I/ATLAS may be 7.5 billion years old, or even older. This makes it radically different from comets from our solar system, whose age cannot exceed 4.5 billion years.

According to most astronomers, the three known interstellar objects are just the tip of the iceberg, and in reality, there are many more in the Solar System. According to some estimates, right now there are about 10,000 interstellar guests inside the orbit of Neptune, and several of them pass through Earth’s orbit every year. The problem is, they are not easy to detect.

But that may soon be changing. Astronomers have high hopes for the newly operational Vera Rubin Observatory, which will soon begin its decade-long Legacy Survey of Space and Time. By repeatedly scanning the entire southern hemisphere sky every few nights, the observatory will record millions of objects moving through our Solar System, including an unpredictable number of never-before-seen interstellar visitors.

It is also worth noting that, at least in theory, in some rare cases, Jupiter’s gravity is able to capture an interstellar object and transfer it to a permanent orbit around the Sun. Astronomers know several bodies that could be such “aliens”. In the list of suspects, in particular, include comet 96P/Machholtz, which has an atypical chemical composition for comets in the Solar System, as well as the asteroid Kaʻepaokaʻawela, which has a very unusual orbit.

Could interstellar objects be extraterrestrial spacecraft?

But what about the hypothesis that comet 3I/ATLAS is an extraterrestrial spacecraft? Its author is Harvard University astrophysicist Avi Loeb, who is known for being a big fan of the idea of the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations and regularly writes speculative articles on the subject. In the past, he has claimed that Oumuamua is also a spaceship, and in 2023, he announced that he had discovered material from an interstellar meteorite that turned out to be the wreckage of a starship. Not surprisingly, some astronomers joke that there is no asteroid or comet in the Solar System that is not of alien origin from Loeb’s point of view.

For obvious reasons, the media loves to talk about Loeb’s hypotheses. After all, after all, all his regalia is real and he is a scientist. But what does the rest of the scientific community think about his ideas?

Let’s start with comet 3I/ATLAS, which is now on the rumor mill. Alas, but all claims about the strange nature of this object are untrue. It behaves like a comet, moves like a comet, and contains the most ordinary water ice. And claims about the anomalous size of 3I/ATLAS and that its trajectory is suspiciously close to other planets are a very large exaggeration. Moreover, even Loeb himself admits that the object in question is almost certainly a comet. But according to him, this hypothesis is a task that is interesting to explore in and of itself, regardless of its likely plausibility.

As for the Oumuumu site, things are a bit more interesting. Some of its characteristics are quite unusual. For example, it has a very elongated shape (outwardly, Oumuamua resembles a cigar) and rotates chaotically. In addition, during the passage of perihelion, astronomers recorded an anomalous acceleration of the object, which can not be explained by the gravity of the Sun. In his article, the same Avi Loeb suggested that Oumuamua is a solar sail.

But the absolute majority of scientists do not agree with this interpretation. Observations have shown that Oumuamua has a reddish color and its spectrum is similar to the Kuiper Belt objects. Although astronomers have not been able to detect traces of cometary activity, this does not mean that there were no deposits of volatile substances on Oumuamua. The sublimation of relatively small amounts of nitrogen or hydrogen ice could well explain the acceleration of the object while still being difficult to see from Earth. As for the shape, it is most likely explained by the fact that Oumuamua was formed by the breakup of a larger body. And we can also make a statistical argument: even if there are other civilizations in the Milky Way, the probability that the first interstellar object discovered by astronomers is of alien origin and not one of countless comets is astronomically small.

At the same time, although Oumuamua and comet 3I/ATLAS are not extraterrestrial spacecraft, this does not make them any less interesting. Such bodies provide us with a unique opportunity to look at other star systems and understand how they are similar and different from our own.

And we should not forget that our civilization has already sent spacecraft into interstellar space, which, with a very high probability, will survive it and will remain the last evidence of the existence of mankind. Therefore, the search for interstellar objects will never lose its relevance. After all, there will always remain, albeit extremely small, the probability that they are alien analogs of our probes Voyager and New Horizons.

• Posted in Articles, Questions

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

01-08-2025 om 20:58 geschreven door peter  

My Backyard Abduction: Debra Jordan-Kauble’s Lifelong Contact with the Unknown

In the world of UFO phenomena, few stories resonate as deeply as that of Debra Jordan-Kauble — an ordinary woman whose extraordinary experiences began in childhood and forever altered the course of her life. Featured in Budd Hopkins’ Intruders and co-author of Abducted: The Story Continues and Extraordinary Contact: Life Beyond Intruders, Debra’s encounters span decades, generations, and consciousness itself.

A Lifetime of Anomalies

Debra’s journey into the unknown didn’t start in adulthood — it began when she was just seven years old. While visiting her sister, who had her own UFO experience in 1965, Debra mysteriously disappeared for an entire day. Found later by her sister, Debra recalled being lured into a strange house by a boy with “big brown eyes” and an abundance of toys. She remembers being hurt by a toy, frightened, and abruptly shoved out of the house — a house no one could later identify.

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

01-08-2025 om 20:25 geschreven door peter