Overview

Veteran NASA engineer Gentry Lee – a former project manager for the Mars Pathfinder and a key figure in the development of the Mars rovers – told reporters on 24 February 2026 that, while the existence of extraterrestrial life is “almost inevitable,” there is no credible evidence that any such life has ever visited Earth. Lee’s remarks come amid renewed public interest in unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and a series of high‑profile congressional hearings on the topic. He cautioned that “UFO believers have been misled by sensational claims that lack scientific rigor,” and emphasized that NASA’s current focus remains on systematic, data‑driven searches for life beyond our planet.

Lee’s Perspective

In his interview with a media outlet in London, Lee emphasized the significant role that the vastness of the universe plays in supporting the possibility of extraterrestrial life. He explained that the sheer scale of the cosmos makes the likelihood that Earth is the only planet with life incredibly small. With billions of galaxies, each containing billions of stars, the probability that Earth is uniquely suited for life is astronomically low. This concept is rooted in the principle of statistical probability; given the enormity of space, it would be extraordinary if no other planets harbored life forms. However, Lee also underscored a crucial distinction: while the chances of microbial life existing elsewhere are high, the leap from simple organisms to intelligent, technologically advanced civilizations capable of interstellar travel is immense. Currently, there is no concrete evidence to support the existence of such civilizations. Despite numerous claims and sightings, scientists like Lee point out that no signals, artifacts, or physical traces have been definitively linked to extraterrestrial intelligence.

This cautious stance reflects the scientific community’s consensus, which remains skeptical until verifiable proof is presented. Lee’s perspective balances curiosity with scientific rigor, advocating for a measured approach grounded in empirical evidence rather than speculation. He acknowledges the excitement surrounding potential alien encounters but emphasizes that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Until such evidence emerges, the scientific approach remains focused on exploring the universe for signs of life through systematic research rather than sensationalism.

Context Within the UFO Debate

The current UFO debate has evolved significantly over recent years, especially with the United States government taking steps to declassify and study unexplained aerial phenomena. Several videos capturing unidentified flying objects (UFOs), now often referred to as Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), have been released to the public, fueling both curiosity and skepticism. The establishment of the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) signifies a formal effort to investigate these sightings and assess any potential threats to national security. While these initiatives lend credibility to the study of unexplained aerial phenomena, scientists like Lee caution against jumping to conclusions. He warns that the public’s fascination with aliens can sometimes overshadow the importance of scientific rigor, leading to sensationalism. Many UFO reports are often the result of misinterpretations of natural atmospheric phenomena, astronomical events, or human-made objects. Some claims are hoaxes or deliberate fabrications aimed at garnering attention.

Lee advocates for a clear distinction between genuine scientific investigation and myth-making, emphasizing that credible research must be based on solid evidence rather than rumors or sensational stories. He hopes that the focus remains on collecting verifiable data and applying rigorous scientific methods to understand these phenomena, rather than succumbing to hype or unfounded speculation about alien life.

Ongoing Scientific Efforts

The scientific community is actively engaged in multiple projects aimed at discovering signs of extraterrestrial life, aligning with Lee’s call for disciplined inquiry. NASA’s current missions are designed to explore potential habitats beyond Earth systematically. The James Webb Space Telescope, for example, is analyzing the atmospheres of exoplanets, searching for biosignature gases such as oxygen, methane, and phosphine—indicators that could suggest the presence of life or habitable conditions. These gases are considered potential markers because they can be produced by biological processes. Meanwhile, the upcoming Europa Clipper mission, scheduled for launch in 2027, aims to study Jupiter’s icy moon Europa.

This moon is believed to harbor a subsurface ocean beneath its icy crust, and scientists hope to detect chemical signs of habitability or even microbial life within this hidden ocean. Additionally, on Mars, the Perseverance rover and its Ingenuity helicopter continue to collect rock and soil samples, searching for organic molecules and other biological markers. These samples may eventually be returned to Earth for detailed analysis. The overarching goal of these missions is to follow a logical, step-by-step approach: first, identify environments that could support life, then look for biological indicators, and finally, investigate the possibility of technological signatures—technosignatures—that could indicate intelligent life.

These efforts exemplify a cautious yet promising approach, grounded in scientific methodology, to answering one of humanity’s most profound questions: are we alone in the universe?

Implications for the Public and Policy

Lee’s remarks carry significant implications for both policymakers and the general public. His message underscores that the search for extraterrestrial life is a long-term scientific pursuit, rather than a quick fix for sensational headlines or entertainment. The recent declassification of UAP videos by the U.S. government has sparked widespread interest, but Lee stresses the importance of maintaining scientific discipline. Transparent, peer-reviewed research programs are essential to ensure that any claims about alien life are based on reliable and reproducible data. Policymakers are encouraged to support sustained investment in scientific missions and research that adhere to rigorous standards, rather than succumbing to the allure of sensational stories that lack empirical backing.

Lee also highlights the broader philosophical implications of discovering extraterrestrial life. If humanity were to find evidence of an advanced civilization, it would fundamentally alter our understanding of our place in the universe—potentially challenging long-held beliefs and sparking profound societal and scientific shifts. Until such a discovery is made, Lee advocates for patience, rigor, and reliance on data. He concludes that the pursuit of knowledge about extraterrestrial life must be driven by scientific integrity, ensuring that any breakthroughs are meaningful and credible. Ultimately, maintaining a disciplined approach will serve humanity best as we continue to explore the cosmos and seek answers to one of the most compelling questions: are we alone?

{ https://usubjects.com/  }

26-02-2026 om 22:44 geschreven door peter  

In early January, NASA unexpectedly announced it had been forced to delay a scheduled spacewalk involving two crewmates on board the International Space Station, citing a “medical situation” that “involved a single crew member who is stable.”

Two days later, the agency announced the first-ever medical evacuation in the space station’s 25 years of continuous human occupation, a historic moment highlighting the possible severity of the situation.

The affected crew members of the Crew-11 mission — NASA astronauts Mike Fincke and Zena Cardman, Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui, and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov — safely splashed down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of southern California on January 15 and were promptly helicoptered to the nearby Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla near San Diego, leaving us with far more questions than answers.

Now, seven weeks later, Fincke has voluntarily stepped forward, announcing in a NASA statement that it was he who had “experienced a medical event that required immediate attention from my incredible crewmates.”

Fincke is a retired US Air Force colonel and was selected to be an astronaut back in 1996. The Crew-11 mission, which launched in August, was his fourth trip to space. He was also initially selected in 2019 to pilot Boeing’s much-troubled Starliner spacecraft, but — perhaps fortunately — never got the chance.

“Thanks to their quick response and the guidance of our NASA flight surgeons, my status quickly stabilized,” Fincke said. “I am deeply grateful to my fellow Expedition 74 members… as well as the entire NASA team, SpaceX, and the medical professionals at Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla near San Diego.”

But beyond revealing a “carefully coordinated plan to be able to take advantage of advanced medical imaging not available on the space station,” we still don’t know what caused the space station’s first medical evacuation in history, leaving us with the simple question: why come forward without revealing what happened?

In a statement to Futurism, NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens said it was Fincke’s choice to identify himself as the crew member who had the medical incident, not NASA.

“Given medical privacy laws and the overall sensitivity of the situation, this decision was entirely up to the individual involved,” Stevens wrote. “We know now, that in this case, that was Mike Fincke, because he self-identified.”

Stevens also suggested that Fincke may have chosen to protect his fellow crew members from being the subject of speculation and unfounded conspiracy theories.

“I can’t speak to Mike’s motivations in self-identifying, but given the scrutiny and speculation, I would guess he is hopeful that his brave step forward will decrease the conspiracies online that target his crewmates,” Stevens added in her statement to Futurism.

Needless to say, it’s a delicate matter. Fincke could have a litany of personal reasons not to publicize any details regarding his earlier condition that required an evacuation, and he’s entirely within his rights to withhold that information.

But given the extremely public nature of his employment as a NASA astronaut, questions are bound to arise, especially given it’s the first-ever medical evacuation of its kind.

It’s ultimately up to Fincke to tell the likely harrowing tale. But when or if that will happen remains unclear.

More on the situation:

• Astronauts Helicoptered to Hospital After Mystery Evacuation From Space Station

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://futurism.com/category/science-energy }

26-02-2026 om 22:22 geschreven door peter  

K2-18b is a so-called Habitable Zone planet located 124 light-years away from us. In terms of mass, the planet is somewhere between Earth and a small gas giant. Researchers are interested in whether extraterrestrial life could exist on it.

Primary goal for SETI

If you have been following exoplanet research over the past few years, you have probably heard of K2-18b. Located 124 light-years away in the constellation Leo, it has attracted a lot of attention because it is right in the habitable zone of its red dwarf star, and measurements from the James Webb Space Telescope show that its atmosphere is rich in carbon dioxide and methane. It is one of the leading candidates for the title of “hydrogen world” — a world where a dense atmosphere rich in hydrogen covers a global ocean of liquid water.

This is such an interesting target for researchers from the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) project that they have directed two of the world’s most powerful radio telescopes to observe the K2-18b system. A recent article available on the arXiv preprint server shows that, despite millions of potential matches, this planet is unlikely to be sending out artificial narrowband radio signals equivalent to our level of technology.

Listening with radio telescopes

To collect the data needed for processing, both the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) in New Mexico and the MeerKAT radio telescope in South Africa were used. These are the two most powerful radio telescopes on the planet, and their coordination within the observation campaign is an extremely rare occurrence.

But physical equipment was not the only important factor for this work. The “data transfer channel,” as astronomers call the software filters and logic applied after data collection, is no less important, especially in radio astronomy. Signals from Earth are the source of the vast majority of radio signals received by these telescopes, and modern filtering algorithms, such as the Commensal Open-Source Multi-Mode Interferometer Cluster system used by the VLA, and the Breakthrough Listen User Supplied Equipment (BLUSE) system used by MeerKAT, are important elements of any modern radio astronomy program.

Radio signal filtering system

However, the logic behind such filtering remains the responsibility of the people involved in the process, and the article describes five different restrictions they impose on the data for selecting potential alien technosignatures. The first step was to mask radio frequency interference — essentially, they removed all data from signals falling within frequency ranges known to be heavily contaminated by terrestrial interference. If aliens communicated through these channels, we would have to use some other method — such as a radio telescope on the far side of the Moon — to hear them.

Doppler effects, such as the changing sound of an ambulance siren as it approaches or passes you, are even more noticeable when the signal travels between planets. Any signal with virtually no Doppler effect was immediately rejected, as it could only have originated from Earth. Perhaps the most controversial logical filtering choice was to exclude all signals with a signal-to-noise ratio of less than 10 or greater than 100. Although this allowed for the exclusion of extremely weak false positives, as well as strong instrumental data artifacts typically observed in only one antenna, it could also exclude.

Another filtering technique is the use of multi-beam analysis. In this case, the telescopes formed coherent beams across the sky, one of which was directed directly at K2-18b, and the other at a different location. In such cases, the signal coming from the exoplanet would only appear in the beam directed directly at it, while terrestrial interference penetrates several beams simultaneously. The final check, which was not necessary due to the timing of the study, is transit filtering. Any signal coming from K2-18b should disappear when the planet passes in front of its parent star, but since no such “secondary transit” occurred during the observation, filtering was not necessary.

Positive test result in any case

In short, despite millions of potential signals throughout the observation period, none of them passed these filters. No unambiguous technosignatures were detected in the narrowband radio spectrum from K2-18b. Although this may seem disappointing, it is precisely this kind of thing that science needs in order to progress. By carefully scanning the planet and finding nothing, they can establish the “upper limits” of the transmitter’s power from this system — in terms of power, it would be equivalent to the destroyed Arecibo radar in Puerto Rico. If there is civilization there, it certainly does not scream at us from anything greater than this level of radio telescope.

However, perhaps the most important result is the confirmation of the concept of their automated filtering system. Processing millions of signals detected by two telescopes manually would be virtually impossible. So, when even larger radio telescopes such as the Square Kilometer Array appear, these technologies will be ready to help other research projects make sense of the mass of data collected. Although planet K2-18b may be quiet today, we will continue to improve our ability to listen if it ever begins to communicate with us.

• According to phys.org

• Posted in News, Science

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

26-02-2026 om 22:05 geschreven door peter  

On the night of February 24-25, US President Donald Trump made history by giving the longest speech on the state of the nation — it lasted 107 minutes. The main topics were economic successes, criticism of the Democrats, and the fight against illegal immigration. However, amid the political statements, an event worthy of special attention has been overlooked: the country is preparing to send a human into deep space for the first time since the legendary Apollo program. 

The most ironic thing is that the main characters of the upcoming space breakthrough went unnoticed, even though they were sitting in the front row. The astronauts of the Artemis II mission — Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch from NASA, and Jeremy Hansen from the Canadian Space Agency — were guests of honor of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. These four brave souls are about to embark on a journey to the Moon that no human being has undertaken in more than fifty years.

Their 10-day flight will be more than just a symbolic gesture. This will be the farthest human expedition in the history of space exploration, taking the Orion spacecraft into orbit around our natural satellite.

The Trump administration’s vision

The Artemis II mission is intended to lay the foundation for a “golden age of American space leadership” — a phrase that the Trump administration uses quite often. However, the president limited himself to brief references to Apollo’s glorious past and boastful statements about the creation of the US Space Force, proudly calling it “his brainchild.”

However, the significance of Artemis II extends far beyond political ambitions. This is a critically important test phase: for the first time, the super-heavy Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the Orion spacecraft will be tested with a crew on board. The success of the mission should confirm the US’s ability not only to return to the Moon, but also to make long-term plans for expeditions to Mars.

Space race gains momentum

The importance of the program is reinforced by the international context. China is actively developing its own manned lunar program, adding an element of healthy competition and urgency to American efforts. Maintaining NASA’s technological supremacy is not only a matter of prestige, but also of national security and scientific leadership.

However, despite its historical context and geopolitical significance, the mission faces an unexpected enemy — public indifference. Even among space enthusiasts, interest is beginning to wane due to technical problems. It was recently announced that SLS and Orion are returning to the hangar, postponing the likely launch until at least April.

A missed opportunity to unite the nation

The problem of lack of attention is not just a matter of NASA’s “public relations.” Without broad public support, multi-billion-dollar space programs become vulnerable targets for budget cuts. Trump had a unique opportunity to draw the attention of a 300 million-strong audience to the titanic feat that his compatriots are preparing to accomplish for the first time in half a century. He could present the astronauts sitting in the hall and explain the significance of their mission for the future of humanity.

Instead, time was spent on political tirades. By failing to seize this opportunity, the president did more than simply ignore an important event — he dealt a blow to his own space policy, depriving it of potential public support at a time when it needs it most.

Earlier, we reported on whether Trump is hiding something about aliens.

• According to Gizmodo

• Posted in Business, News

{ https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

26-02-2026 om 21:56 geschreven door peter  

Did people report seeing UFOs before the 20th century?

Did earlier civilizations report seeing UFOs? 

(Image credit: Aaron Foster via Getty Images)

The phenomenon of unidentified flying objects, or UFOs, has long fascinated humanity. From ancient times to the modern era, countless individuals across different cultures and eras have reported strange sightings in the sky. While the term "UFO" and the contemporary scientific approach to these phenomena are relatively modern inventions, accounts of mysterious aerial objects and unexplained lights have existed for centuries. This article explores whether people before the 20th century reported seeing UFOs, examining historical records, cultural interpretations, and the evolution of the phenomenon over time.

Ancient and Medieval Accounts of Unexplained Aerial Phenomena

Long before the advent of modern aviation, humans looked up at the sky and interpreted unusual sights through the lens of their cultural, religious, and mythological frameworks. Many ancient texts and artworks contain references that can be interpreted as descriptions of strange aerial phenomena.

Ancient Civilizations and Sky Phenomena

• Mesopotamia:
  The cradle of civilization, Mesopotamian cultures such as the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians, left behind a rich tapestry of mythological texts and cuneiform inscriptions. Some of these writings mention celestial objects and phenomena that appear to be beyond natural explanation. For example, the "Epic of Gilgamesh" references celestial lights and unusual skies, though these are often interpreted symbolically or mythologically rather than as sightings of physical objects.
• Ancient Egypt:
  Egyptian hieroglyphs and texts frequently depict the sky as populated with gods, stars, and otherworldly entities. Some scholars have suggested that certain images of flying chariots or celestial ships could be interpreted as early UFO sightings. For example, depictions of solar barques and celestial boats in tombs and temples may symbolize divine journeys, but some interpret them as possible representations of aerial phenomena.
• Ancient China:
  Chinese historical texts from thousands of years ago record numerous accounts of unusual sky phenomena, such as "guest stars" (novae and supernovae), comets, and mysterious lights. The "Book of Han" (2nd century CE) describes strange objects in the sky, which to ancient observers might have appeared as flying crafts or celestial visitors.
• Ancient Greece and Rome:
  Classical writers such as Pliny the Elder, Cicero, and Lucian of Samosata mention strange lights and flying objects. For example, Pliny’s "Natural History" describes fiery chariots and luminous bodies in the sky. Lucian’s satirical texts mention "chariots of the gods" and "flying shields," which may reflect observations of atmospheric phenomena or mythological allegories.

Medieval and Renaissance Reports

During the Middle Ages, reports of unusual aerial phenomena persisted, often intertwined with religious and superstitious interpretations.

Medieval Europe

• Fireballs and mysterious lights:
  Medieval chronicles often mention "fiery disks" or "balls of fire" seen in the sky, sometimes associated with omens or divine signs. For example, the "Annales of Saint-Bertin" (9th century) record sightings of strange lights during battles or significant events.
• The "Mysterious Flying Shields":
  In 14th-century Europe, some accounts describe "flying shields" or "phantoms" seen in the sky, which contemporary scholars sometimes interpret as atmospheric reflections or natural phenomena, but which could also have been early reports of unidentified aerial objects.

Renaissance and Early Modern Period

The Renaissance brought a renewed interest in astronomy and natural phenomena. However, the period also saw reports of strange lights and craft.

• The Nuremberg Celestial Phenomenon (1561):
  One of the most famous pre-20th-century UFO reports is the "Nuremberg Celestial Phenomenon," documented in a broadsheet newspaper published in 1561. It describes a sky filled with numerous orbs, crosses, and other shapes engaging in a celestial battle. Witnesses reported seeing "many globes" moving across the sky, changing colors, and interacting in strange ways. While some interpret this as a natural atmospheric event or a religious allegory, others see it as an early sighting of unidentified flying objects.
• The Kepler Incident (1594):
  The astronomer Johannes Kepler recorded an unusual sighting involving a "small, bright, and moving star" that appeared in the sky and then disappeared. While likely a meteor or atmospheric phenomenon, such accounts contribute to the long history of strange sky sightings.

The 17th and 18th Centuries

As scientific understanding of the cosmos expanded, so did the recording of unusual sightings, often with more detailed descriptions.

• The Aurora Borealis:
  Northern lights have been observed for centuries and often mistaken for mysterious aerial displays. In many historical accounts, the aurora was seen as a divine or supernatural sign, but to modern observers, it is understood as a natural atmospheric phenomenon.
• Unidentified Lights and Apparitions:
  Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, reports of strange lights persisted. For instance, in 1719, a report from the English coast described "bright, moving lights" in the sky, which could have been early observations of meteors, atmospheric reflections, or unexplained craft.
• Ball Lightning and Other Natural Phenomena:
  Many reports of strange aerial phenomena during this period have been attributed to natural causes like ball lightning, meteors, or atmospheric reflections. However, some reports remained unexplained and could be considered early UFO sightings.

19th Century: The Precursors to Modern UFO Sightings

The 19th century saw a surge in reports of strange aerial phenomena, coinciding with advances in scientific instrumentation, increased observations, and a growing public interest in science and exploration.

Early Ballooning and Aerial Experiments

• Hot Air Balloons:
  The advent of balloon flight in the late 18th and early 19th centuries introduced new aerial phenomena that observers sometimes misinterpreted. Balloons drifting across the sky appeared strange to those unfamiliar with the technology, leading to reports of mysterious "flying ships" or "aircraft."
• Aerial Spectacles and Phenomena:
  In 1804, the "Great Moon Hoax" in New York newspapers captivated the public with stories of life on the moon, but also reflected the fascination with celestial and aerial phenomena. Similarly, the rise of aviation experiments, including early gliders and aircraft, led to more reports of unidentified flying objects.

Notable 19th Century Sightings

• The Vevay, Indiana, Sightings (1800s):
  Multiple reports from the early 1800s describe strange lights and disks seen over Indiana. Such sightings were often dismissed at the time as natural or atmospheric phenomena.
• The Aurora and Unexplained Lights:
  Throughout the 19th century, reports of luminous objects in the sky, including the Aurora Borealis and Aurora Australis, were common. While natural, some reports involved shapes and movements that puzzled observers.
• The Mount Washington UFO (1800s):
  In the late 19th century, there are reports of strange lights and disks over Mount Washington in New Hampshire, which some interpret as early UFOs.

The 20th Century and the Birth of Modern UFO Phenomenon

While the question focuses on whether people reported seeing UFOs before the 20th century, it is impossible to ignore the pivotal role that early 20th-century sightings played in shaping modern perceptions of UFOs. The famous 1947 Kenneth Arnold sighting, which gave rise to the term "flying saucers," was preceded by a long history of similar reports.

• Cultural and Interpretative Variations

Throughout history, interpretations of strange sky phenomena have varied widely depending on cultural context.

• Religious Interpretations:
  Many ancient and medieval reports framed mysterious aerial phenomena as divine signs, celestial battles, or messages from gods. These interpretations reflect the worldview of the time, often seeing such phenomena as supernatural or divine rather than unexplained natural or technological events.
• Mythological and Allegorical Accounts:
  Stories of flying chariots, celestial ships, and divine messengers often served as allegories for spiritual or moral lessons, but they also may encode observations of natural phenomena.

Natural Explanations vs. Unexplained Sightings:
Many historical accounts are now understood as natural phenomena—meteors, atmospheric reflections, planets, or atmospheric optical effects. However, some reports remain unexplained, especially when descriptions are vague or sensational.

Limitations and Challenges in Interpreting Historical Accounts

Interpreting pre-20th-century sky sightings as UFO reports is complicated by several factors:

• Lack of Verification: Many accounts are anecdotal, lacking corroboration or detailed descriptions.
• Cultural Filters: Interpretations are heavily influenced by contemporary beliefs, religious views, and scientific understanding.
• Terminology: The language used in historical texts often differs from modern descriptions, making it challenging to classify sightings accurately.
• Natural Phenomena: Many sightings are likely natural atmospheric or celestial phenomena misinterpreted due to limited scientific knowledge.

Conclusion: Were There Reports of UFOs Before the 20th Century?

Based on historical records, cultural narratives, and scientific analysis, it is clear that humans have reported strange aerial phenomena for millennia. These accounts, spanning from ancient civilizations to the Renaissance, often described lights, craft-like objects, or strange shapes in the sky, which today could be considered early UFO sightings.

While many of these reports can be explained by natural phenomena or mythological symbolism, some remain unexplained or ambiguous, suggesting that the phenomenon of unidentified aerial observations is as old as human civilization itself. The interpretations of these sightings have evolved over time—from divine signs and mythic symbols to potential evidence of extraterrestrial visitation.

In essence, yes, people before the 20th century did report seeing objects or phenomena in the sky that they could not readily explain. Whether these were actual physical objects, atmospheric effects, or cultural expressions, they contribute to the long and complex history of humanity’s fascination with the skies and the mysterious entities that inhabit them.

References & Further Reading:

• Clodd, Edward. The Story of the Heavens. (1913)
• Keel, John. The Mysterious Universe. (1977)
• Ruppelt, Edward. The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects. (1956)
• Hynek, J. Allen. The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry. (1972)
• McNeill, William H. The Shape of the Sky: An Introduction to the History of Astronomy. (1984)
• Historical newspapers and chronicles, including the Nuremberg Celestial Phenomenon (1561)

Final thoughts:
The phenomenon of UFO sightings is deeply rooted in human history. While the context and interpretations have shifted over centuries, the fundamental human curiosity about the unknown in the skies remains unchanged. Recognizing these ancient accounts enriches our understanding of the longstanding human engagement with unexplained aerial phenomena.

{PETER2011 }

26-02-2026 om 21:46 geschreven door peter  

James Webb telescope spots giant auroras rolling through Uranus' atmosphere

JWST observed Uranus rotating for 15 hours in January 2025, showing bright auroral bands (in white) near the planet's magnetic poles. 

(Image credit: ESA/Webb, NASA, CSA, STScI, P. Tiranti, H. Melin, M. Zamani (ESA/Webb))

Scientists using the James Webb Space Telescope just mapped the mysterious upper atmosphere of Uranus for the first time, revealing strange new features of the planet's mysterious magnetic field and glowing auroras.

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observed Uranus rotating for 15 hours (nearly a full Uranian day) to learn more about how ice giants distribute energy in the upper layers of their atmospheres and to investigate how the planet's auroras operate.

Uranus' magnetic field is unique among the big planets of our solar system in that its magnetic pole is tilted by 60 degrees relative to its geographic pole. That tilt produces auroras that extend far beyond the poles of Uranus, unlike auroras on Earth.

To learn more, scientists used JWST to study Uranus' magnetosphere — the region of space around Uranus that's dominated by the planet's magnetic field.

"Uranus's magnetosphere is one of the strangest in the solar system," study lead author Paola Tiranti, a doctoral student at Northumbria University in the U.K., said in a European Space Agency (ESA) statement. "Webb has now shown us how deeply those effects reach into the atmosphere."

Strange lights on Uranus

JWST charted "the most detailed portrait yet" of how particles in Uranus' upper atmosphere are energized (ionized) by interactions with the sun, ESA officials said in the statement. The study, published Feb. 19 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, aimed to measure ion temperature and density as far as 3,100 miles (5,000 kilometers) above the cloud tops of Uranus.

Temperature and density do not peak at the same altitude, JWST showed. Ions were the warmest between roughly 2,500 and 3,100 miles (4,000 and 5,000 km) but the densest at about 600 miles (1,000 km). This is because of the "complex geometry" of the planet's magnetic field, ESA officials said in the statement.

That geometry also produced two bright bands of auroras near Uranus' magnetic poles. In between the aurora belts, however, there is a "depletion" in both ion density and auroral emissions — an effect likely produced by transitions between the planet's magnetic-field lines, the scientists said. Observations at Jupiter's upper atmosphere have shown similar transition regions.

In addition to charting Uranus' upper atmosphere in three dimensions for the first time, JWST confirmed findings from previous studies that suggested the planet's upper atmosphere has been cooling steadily since the early 1990s. The telescope showed the average temperature of Uranus' atmosphere is about 307 degrees Fahrenheit (153 degrees Celsius), which is lower than the temperature measurements from other spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.

"By revealing Uranus's vertical structure in such detail, Webb is helping us understand the energy balance of the ice giants," Tiranti said. "This is a crucial step towards characterizing giant planets beyond our solar system."

{ https://www.livescience.com/space }

26-02-2026 om 21:12 geschreven door peter  

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has finally addressed the president's announcement to release all government files related to UFOs and aliens.

Speaking at an event for the Department of War’s 'Arsenal of Freedom' tour on Monday, Hegseth, 45, said he intends to find out if aliens really exist, and the American people will learn the truth at the same time.

Although he admitted he never envisioned being the person put in charge of potentially revealing alien life to the world, Hegseth declared that the Department of War would fully comply with the president's orders.

'I did not have that on my bingo card at all,' Hegseth said.

'We've got our people working on it right now. I don't want to oversell how much time it will take, right? We're digging in. We're going to be in full compliance with that executive order, eager to provide that for the president.'

Hegseth didn't have an estimate of how long it would take for the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies to release every piece of information on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), which have been widely reported throughout the US since the 1940s.

Asked if he believes aliens exist, Hegseth replied: 'We'll see. I get to do the review and find out along with all of you.'

Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, who was put in charge of the House Oversight Committee's task force on declassifying secret records on UAPs, revealed that all of the incoming documents will be housed on the US National Archives' website.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (Pictured) said the Pentagon plans to be in 'full compliance' with President Trump's order to release all UFO-related files

Trump's February 19 order to disclose any and all information on alien life came hours after he scolded former President Obama for saying in an interview that aliens were real

Until now, the Pentagon has maintained for decades that no physical evidence of extraterrestrial life has ever been found by the US, and videos capturing suspected UFOs have never been confirmed to be of a non-human origin. 

Hegseth's comments came after a whirlwind week of stunning UFO-related claims made by Trump and former President Barack Obama.

On February 14, a podcast interview between Obama and Brian Tyler Cohen sent shockwaves through the US after the 44th president declared aliens were real, but they weren't being kept at Area 51.

Obama tried to walk back the comments a day later, posting on social media that he gave a short and direct answer to Cohen's rapid-fire questions 'to stick with the spirit of the speed round.'

'Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there,' he wrote on February 15.

However, President Trump seized on the comments, declaring that Obama had actually committed a serious violation by speaking on the matter, calling the topic 'classified information.' 

'I don't know if they're real or not,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on February 19 when asked about alien life and his predecessor's comments.

'I can tell you he gave classified information. He made a big mistake,' the president added.

President Trump (Pictured) allegedly has a speech written which discusses the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrial life, a claim later confirmed by his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump

The US government has claimed there is no physical proof extraterrestrial spacecraft or alien life exist and have visited Earth, despite countless videos capturing UFOs

Read More

• Top UFO experts reveal 'whistleblower activity' will finally bring disclosure in 2026 

Just hours later, Trump became the first president in history to issue a broad executive directive ordering government agencies to make any information on unidentified spacecraft and non-human life public information.

The president has also reportedly granted a key US congressman access to the most famous military base - Area 51.

In a recent interview, Representative Eric Burlison of Missouri claimed his request to visit the top-secret Nevada facility and other locations allegedly connected to UFOs was approved by the White House.

Burlison is a member of the congressional oversight committee involved in the ongoing investigation into UAPs, more commonly known as UFOs.

Although the US government has continued to deny that crashed UFOs and alien bodies have been recovered, Congress has heard from multiple whistleblowers claiming secret programs have covered up the truth for 80 years.

Seeking physical evidence of these encounters, Burlison told the ALN Podcast that the Trump Administration has ordered Hegseth and the Department of War (formerly the Department of Defense) to 'make it happen.'

'The extent to which they've been involved is literally just saying to the Department of Defense that "we're backing his request. Do what you can to make it happen,"' Burlison explained during the January 30 interview.

Trump has previously said he didn't believe UFOs or aliens exist, but revealed that military pilots have personally told him about their mid-air encounters with unexplainable craft which defied the laws of gravity.

When asked if he would declassify the files about aliens on the Lex Fridman Podcast in September 2024, then-candidate Trump said: 'Sure, I’ll do that. I would do that. I’d love to do that. I have to do that.'

The president's daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, has claimed he already has a written speech prepared, which discusses the topic of UFOs and alien life visiting Earth.

White House insiders and UFO researchers have claimed this speech is scheduled to be given this year, possibly coinciding with the Roswell UFO incident's 79th anniversary on July 8 or at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index.html }

26-02-2026 om 20:50 geschreven door peter  

Coordinated by AARO and hosted by Associated Universities, Inc. (AUI), the workshop marked a significant step in AARO’s engagement with civilian and independent research groups. The meeting sought to establish a more collaborative and professional process for standardizing the study of UAP within the Department of War (DoW), while potentially increasing transparency compared with previous years.

Topics discussed at the 2025 Workshop

Traditionally, many UAP gatherings involving academics or government officials have focused on presenting findings, historical analysis, or scientific data. The AARO workshop took a different approach, forming breakout groups to address a foundational challenge: how to collect, manage, integrate, and analyze UAP data using rigorous scientific methods—both internally at AARO and in collaboration with civilian datasets.

Areas that the August 2025 workshop focused on included:

• Assessing the current landscape of UAP reporting systems and data repositories;
• Identifying key challenges and gaps in UAP data collection, standardization, and accessibility;
• Exploring methodologies for data analysis and pattern recognition in UAP reports.
• Nurturing trust and collaboration among researchers, government agencies, and civilian organizations; and
• Proposing recommendations for developing a robust UAP data infrastructure.

UAP Report Collection

UAP reports originate from a wide array of sources, including military logs, pilot reports, civilian testimony, archival records, social media posts, and sensor-based systems such as radar and imagery platforms.

In the past, challenges with UAP data collection have ranged from fragmentation and inconsistent formatting to the lack of standardized metadata and limited cross-correlation between datasets. Classification restrictions, language differences, social stigma, and inconsistent retention policies have further complicated access for both government and civilian researchers.

According to the report, participants in the 2025 workshop emphasized that progress in UAP research depends on building a shared data infrastructure between government and civilian researchers. One major recommendation was the development of standardized metadata templates that combine human expertise with AI tools, leverage existing infrastructure, support case triage, and integrate interviews and historical reports, while prioritizing new high-quality data.

These templates would record contextual information such as time, location, morphology, provenance, and environmental conditions.

Clear metadata standards would also make it easier for agencies and independent researchers to share datasets while protecting sensitive information and privacy. The white paper notes AARO seeks a “multi-disciplinary and community-engaged approach to UAP narrative data,” which may influence future sensor deployment strategies.

The white paper identifies artificial intelligence as both a potential solution and a potential hazard. AI could assist with transcription, clustering, and large-scale pattern detection, but also risks introducing bias, amplifying hoaxes, or producing inaccurate results—the classic “garbage in, garbage out” problem. The workshop strongly endorsed a hybrid human-AI model with human oversight.

Privacy First

The AARO whitepaper emphasizes that privacy was a central priority for the workshop. “Participant privacy was an important consideration throughout workshop planning, and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval governed data collection and security for the workshop,” the report states.

Workshop participants were asked to adhere to the “Chatham House Rules,” and not to take photos or attribute statements to individuals without permission. Given these circumstances, civilian participants who attended the workshop and later spoke with The Debrief did so on background.

“Civilian participants were given genuine opportunities to contribute perspectives and technical insights, and there appeared to be a shared commitment—on the part of both AARO personnel and external researchers—to improving the quality and rigor of UAP data collection,” one participant told The Debrief. “The discussions and presentations were conducted in a constructive, solutions-oriented atmosphere that encouraged collaboration on best practices for future observational and analytical efforts.”

The breakout sessions also emphasized balancing quantitative data with qualitative witness narratives and incorporating cultural and experiential perspectives while allowing multiple analytical approaches to coexist.

“I was pleasantly surprised that AARO did a good job of getting a cross-section, not only of the UAP community, right, but also of people from other federal groups or agencies that attended. None of the three-letter agencies, at least none that I knew of, were represented,” said one participant who spoke with The Debrief.

“There was definitely more transparency compared to their public statements and postings,” another participant said. “I think that was attributed to the level of trust they had with their select invitees in a private session. ”

The Importance of Public Reporting 

Improving reporting systems was another major priority discussed at the workshop. Recommendations included open-ended narrative submissions followed by AI-assisted structuring that witnesses could review; improved geolocation tools; standardized time inputs; flexible units; and optional metadata fields. Participants also encouraged the release of de-identified public data to build public trust and reduce stigma.

Following the report’s publication, The Debrief reached out to the Pentagon for comment on how AARO’s mission may incorporate public reports going forward.

“AARO anticipates using public reports to enhance overall UAP trend analysis and, when possible, to enrich open UAP cases from government and law enforcement sources,” said Sue Gough, a Department of War spokesperson, in an email to The Debrief.

According to AARO’s official website, it currently accepts UAP-related information from military and Department of War civilian personnel, although it adds that “AARO will announce when a reporting mechanism is available to the public.”

Asked about the potential timeline for completing this civilian-accessible UAP reporting mechanism, Gough told The Debrief that “We have nothing to announce at this time.”

A Change in Direction

Sean M. Kirkpatrick, a laser and materials physicist and inaugural director of AARO, presided over the office during the initial phase of its development. At that time, engagement with civilian UAP researchers had been limited and often viewed through a more cautious, security-focused lens. That approach appeared to reflect broader government concerns about data reliability, classification, and the challenges of integrating independent research into official investigative frameworks; however, it also left some outside researchers feeling excluded from the process, and at times drew criticism from some in the broader UAP research community.

Under its current director, Dr. Jon T. Kosloski, AARO appears to be moving toward a more collaborative model. The recent workshop brought together representatives from academia, government, and civilian research communities, offering participants an opportunity to contribute perspectives on data collection practices, reporting standards, and analytical methods. For many independent researchers, the possibility of participating in discussions about government UAP data infrastructure and national security implications marks a notable shift from previous engagement.

Overall, the workshop concluded that continuous collaboration and community-building are needed to establish a sustainable “community of practice” across disciplines. 

“AARO recognizes that input from the scientific and academic community is critical to its work and hopes to convene future workshops and collaborative opportunities, as needed, to foster an interdisciplinary community for UAP analysis,” Gough told The Debrief.

“The long-term success of these efforts will be measured by higher-quality UAP reporting, the use of new analytical tools, and improved understanding of UAP sightings, drawing on the expertise of a wide range of stakeholders,” Gough added.

• Chrissy Newton is a PR professional and the founder of VOCAB Communications. She currently appears on The Discovery Channel and Max and hosts the Rebelliously Curious podcast, which can be found on YouTube and on all audio podcast streaming platforms. Follow her on X: @ChrissyNewton, Instagram: @BeingChrissyNewton, and chrissynewton.com. To contact Chrissy with a story, please email chrissy @ thedebrief.org.

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/science/ }

26-02-2026 om 20:30 geschreven door peter  

Artemis II – NASA says it's fixed the fuel leak, putting the Moon mission on course for a March launch

The next mission to the Moon could now be weeks away

BY Iain Todd

A previous Artemis II wet dress rehearsal that concluded on 2 February found a leak in the system that provides liquid hydrogen fuel for propulsion of the Space Launch System (the rocket).

But it seems NASA engineers have completed the second wet dress rehearsal with the problem fixed, and the Artemis II crew are preparing to enter a 14-day quarantine ahead of the first potential launch on 6 March.

Prep for a mission to the Moon

NASA's Artemis II mission will see astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen launch to the Moon and back.

The 10-day mission will take the crew to the Moon, further into space than any human has ever travelled before, then slingshot around the Moon and return to Earth.

Part of preparations for the launch of Artemis II include a wet dress rehearsal, where the ground team run through all the steps to launch, but without the astronauts onboard.

The first wet dress rehearsal for Artemis II concluded on 2 February 2026.

Engineers discovered issues with the system providing fuel to the Space Launch System, but also problems with a valve involved in the pressurisation of the Orion crew module hatch, which is where the astronauts will be situated during their journey around the Moon.

The second dress rehearsal concluded on 19 February 2026.

NASA says the ground team successfully fuelled the Space Launch System rocket and demonstrated the launch countdown for Artemis II during the rehearsal at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Engineers loaded over 700,000 gallons of liquid fuel, practiced closing the Orion capsule's hatches and completed two runs of the final phase of the launch countdown.

The Artemis II crew were present, but observing the wet dress rehearsal from the Launch Control Center at Kennedy Space Center.

Previously-known issues around maintaining communications between ground teams seem to have re-surface, however.

NASA says teams experienced a loss of ground communications in the Launch Control Center.

However, backup communications kicked in so the fuelling could continue before engineers restored main communications and isolated what had caused the issue.

While no launch date has been confirmed, the Artemis II crew are preparing to enter quarantine again, having been released from earlier quarantine after issues with the first wet dress rehearsal became apparent.

Quarantine is a standard practice for the crewed Artemis missions, and sees the astronauts isolated in order to ensure they remain fit and healthy for the mission ahead.

NASA's earliest potential launch date for Artemis II is 6 March 2026.

{ https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/ }

24-02-2026 om 22:38 geschreven door peter  

What came before the Big Bang? These are the best theories we have about the origin of the cosmos

We explore the theories about one of the most mind-boggling questions about the Universe.

Even Isaac Newton believed that God created the Universe, some 6,000 years ago.

Later, many scientists, including young Albert Einstein, assumed the Universe itself to be eternal and everlasting.

The beginning of the Universe

But when cosmic expansion was discovered, Belgian cosmologist (and Jesuit priest) Georges Lemaître realised there must have been a beginning – a scientific version of Genesis, so to speak.

Not that everyone immediately agreed.

Well into the 1960s, Fred Hoyle’s steady-state theory was quite popular among iconoclastic scientists as well as lay people.

Hoyle accepted the expansion of the Universe, but he didn’t believe in the Big Bang.

Instead, he assumed that a slow, continuous creation of new matter could keep the average density and the general properties of the Universe constant over time.

The 1964 discovery of the cosmic microwave background was the major nail in the coffin of the steady-state theory.

Ever since, supporting evidence for the Big Bang origin of our Universe has accumulated to a point where there’s hardly any doubt left.

Still, no one has the final answer to the question "what happened before the Big Bang?".

Could there have been a Universe before the Big Bang?

Most scientists simply ignore the question, as it seems to be too hard a nut to crack.

Beginning of time

When astronomers talk about the Big Bang, they usually do not refer to the very beginning of the Universe (time zero), but to the incredibly hot and compact state of the Universe in the first couple of minutes of its existence.

To some extent, this is because no one has a real clue about the true nature of time, let alone about the beginning of time.

British physicist Julian Barbour, for one, has argued that time doesn’t even exist, except as an illusion in our minds.

According to others (including Stephen Hawking), time came into existence together with the Universe, rendering the whole concept of the word ‘before’ meaningless.

Asking what happened before the Big Bang would be like asking what lies north of the North Pole, or what distance is shorter than zero.

Alternative theories

Then again, we simply don’t know whether or not there was time before the Big Bang.

According to the once-popular idea of the cyclic (or oscillatory) Universe, the current expansion of space could one day revert into a contraction, and the resulting Big Crunch could bounce into a new Big Bang, starting the next cycle of an eternal sequence.

For more on this, read our interview with Katie Mack about the end of the Universe.

It’s just one of many hypotheses in which our Universe is not unique, but part of a possibly infinite multiverse, one way or another.

And if the multiverse is also infinite in time, we’re back to the idea that everything has existed forever, conveniently circumnavigating the nagging question of a beginning.

Finally, South African physicist Neil Turok thinks the Big Bang not only spawned our Universe, but also an anti-Universe, composed of anti­­​­matter and running backward in time.

Again, an intriguing idea, but there’s also no chance of confirmation (or rejection!) via observations.

In the end, we have to admit we’re ignorant about the true beginning of the Universe.

And even if we lean towards an eternal multiverse with no real beginning at all, we don’t know why there is something (or, more to the point, why there is everything) instead of nothing.

{ https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/ }

24-02-2026 om 22:20 geschreven door peter